From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 27 14:32:06 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f7RCV6K44757; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:31:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200108271231.f7RCV6K44757@mail.openpkg.org> From: rse@dev.de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] test 4 (PR#3) Date: Mon Aug 27 14:31:06 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: rse Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) test 4 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 27 14:44:59 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f7RChxJ45620; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:43:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200108271243.f7RChxJ45620@mail.openpkg.org> From: rse@dev.de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] test 5 (PR#4) Date: Mon Aug 27 14:43:59 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: rse Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) test 5 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 27 14:52:44 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f7RCpiC46219; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:51:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200108271251.f7RCpiC46219@master.openpkg.org> From: rse+submitter@dev.de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] test 6 (PR#5) Date: Mon Aug 27 14:51:44 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: rse Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) test 6 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 27 14:58:33 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f7RCvXR46589; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:57:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200108271257.f7RCvXR46589@master.openpkg.org> From: rse@dev.de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] test 7 (PR#6) Date: Mon Aug 27 14:57:33 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: rse Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) test 7 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 27 15:06:44 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f7RD5i847650; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:05:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200108271305.f7RD5i847650@master.openpkg.org> From: rse@dev.de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] test 6 (PR#7) Date: Mon Aug 27 15:05:44 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: RSE Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) ddsaas From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Aug 30 15:19:29 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f7UDJJ351086; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:19:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200108301319.f7UDJJ351086@master.openpkg.org> From: rse@dev.de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] test 8 (PR#8) Date: Thu Aug 30 15:19:19 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: Ralf S. Engelschall Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) test 8 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 4 09:44:16 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f847i6h85898; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:44:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109040744.f847i6h85898@master.openpkg.org> From: klaus.gruber@ecrc.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PRIVATE: PNG Support (PR#9) Date: Tue Sep 4 09:44:06 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: Klaus Gruber Version: newest :-) OS: Solaris 8/Intel Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.73.4) hy folks, please include png & jpeg creating support into the gd library. I can't create images of that format with the php module which is included in the apache pkg. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 4 14:34:03 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f84CXrd42227; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:33:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109041233.f84CXrd42227@master.openpkg.org> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Schau ma mal obs funktioniert (PR#10) Date: Tue Sep 4 14:33:53 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: psm Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Ein kleiner Test From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 4 14:38:34 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f84CcOu42321; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:38:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109041238.f84CcOu42321@master.openpkg.org> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PRIVATE: Schau ma mal private (PR#11) Date: Tue Sep 4 14:38:24 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Gehts auch mit private? From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 4 14:54:25 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f84CrOl44946; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:53:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109041253.f84CrOl44946@master.openpkg.org> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] A Bugreport ohne private (PR#12) Date: Tue Sep 4 14:53:24 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Kommt wahrscheinlich an From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 4 14:55:24 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f84CsOu44963; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:54:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109041254.f84CsOu44963@master.openpkg.org> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PRIVATE: 2. mit private (PR#13) Date: Tue Sep 4 14:54:24 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Nochmal test mit private From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 4 14:55:25 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f84CsPc44969; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109041254.f84CsPc44969@master.openpkg.org> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PRIVATE: A Bugreport mit private (PR#14) Date: Tue Sep 4 14:54:25 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Zum Testen mit private From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Sep 6 14:20:34 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f86CJXS43680; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:19:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109061219.f86CJXS43680@master.openpkg.org> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PRIVATE: Test private messages (PR#15) Date: Thu Sep 6 14:19:33 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) test From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 11 09:45:39 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8B7icP88041; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:44:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109110744.f8B7icP88041@master.openpkg.org> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] OpenSSH upgrade fails (PR#16) Date: Tue Sep 11 09:44:38 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: openssh-2.9p2-6 OS: Debian GNU/Linux on Sparc Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) edge:~# rpm -Uvh /cw/RPM/PKG/openssh-2.9p2-6.sparc-linux2.2-cw.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:openssh ########################################### [100%] sed: -e expression #1, char 22: Extra characters after command error: execution of %preun scriptlet from openssh-2.9p2-5 failed, exit status 1 edge:~# From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Sep 12 09:04:31 2001 Received: by master.openpkg.org (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8C742B08399; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:04:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109120704.f8C742B08399@master.openpkg.org> From: peter.smej@de.cwe.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PRIVATE: Just one for additional tests (PR#17) Date: Wed Sep 12 09:04:02 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) hjhjhjgghj From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 18 11:20:34 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8I9JXh10886; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:19:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109180919.f8I9JXh10886@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] test mit private (PR#18) Date: Tue Sep 18 11:19:33 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) hjkhh From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 18 11:21:33 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8I9KXC10923; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:20:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109180920.f8I9KXC10923@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PRIVATE: test mit private (PR#19) Date: Tue Sep 18 11:20:33 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) jkhlhjhk From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 18 13:45:35 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8IBj5413383; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:45:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109181145.f8IBj5413383@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Admin To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] PNG Support (PR#1) Date: Tue Sep 18 13:45:05 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Problem should be fixed with latest gd-2.0.1 package. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 18 14:45:36 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8ICiZx15371; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:44:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109181244.f8ICiZx15371@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] rpmtool signal not sufficient enough (PR#2) Date: Tue Sep 18 14:44:35 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: Ralf S. Engelschall Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) rpmtool signal seems to be not sufficient enough (found out in conjunction with Sendmail package): 1. problem: childs of childs are not killed correctly 2. problem: if first parent, then childs are killed, childs end up with PPID == 1 (init) if first childs, then parent are killed, child can still spawn new childs in meantime. Solution? 1. parent -STOP 2. recursiv (parent->child->child->...) PIDS rausfinden 3. allen TERM senden 4. sleep 5. allen KILL senden From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 18 14:49:36 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8ICmZg15561; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:48:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109181248.f8ICmZg15561@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Suggestions for run-command system enhancement (PR#3) Date: Tue Sep 18 14:48:35 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: Ralf S. Engelschall Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) The following things would be enhancements: - rename rc.xxxx to just xxxxx? - provide %status in all packages - "rc -v" should output "OpenPKG: apache bind foo" - rc.func additions: signal (via rpmtool signal) rotate (via shtool rotate), checkpid - run-command scripts should support %restart %stop; sleep1; %start From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 18 14:53:36 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8ICqZB15593; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:52:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109181252.f8ICqZB15593@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Perl DSO problems caused by GCC 3.0 requiring Binutils 2.11 on Debian 2.2 (PR#4) Date: Tue Sep 18 14:52:35 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: Ralf S. Engelschall Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) Under Debian 2.2 (has binutils 2.9!), the Perl package has DSO problems caused by the fact that the current GCC package is based on GCC 3.0 and this version requires Binutils 2.11. Possible solutions: 1. provide binutils 2.11 package for Debian and require this => not nice! 2. let gcc package require own binutils package and use this => certainly opens a can of worms! 3. provide a gcc2 package which contains GCC 2.95.3 and require this from perl package => works, but not nice 4. provide in gcc package both GCC 2.95.3 and 3.0.1 and let perl package use "gcc2" or "gcc -V2.95.3" => seems like best solution. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 18 14:54:35 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8ICrZI15606; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:53:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109181253.f8ICrZI15606@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] OpenJade does not build under GCC 3.0 (PR#5) Date: Tue Sep 18 14:53:35 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: Ralf S. Engelschall Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) The openjade package no longer builds now that the gcc package is based on GCC 3.0.1. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 18 14:57:35 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8ICuZt15813; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:56:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109181256.f8ICuZt15813@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] bootstrap (openpkg) requires 150MB of disk space (PR#6) Date: Tue Sep 18 14:56:35 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list User-Agent: OpenPKG Petidomo 4.0b1 Full_Name: Ralf S. Engelschall Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) The bootstrap (openpkg) requires 150MB of temporary disk space. For some small machines this certainly is too much. The build procedure should remove files already while building. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Sep 21 12:36:16 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8LAa7j15071; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:36:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109211036.f8LAa7j15071@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Perl DSO problems caused by GCC 3.0 requiring Binutils 2.11 on Debian 2.2 (PR#4) Date: Fri Sep 21 12:36:07 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Under Debian 2.2 (has binutils 2.9!), the Perl > package has DSO problems caused by the fact that > the current GCC package is based on GCC 3.0 > and this version requires Binutils 2.11. > > Possible solutions: > 1. provide binutils 2.11 package for Debian > and require this => not nice! > 2. let gcc package require own binutils package > and use this => certainly opens a can of worms! > 3. provide a gcc2 package which contains GCC 2.95.3 > and require this from perl package > => works, but not nice > 4. provide in gcc package both GCC 2.95.3 and 3.0.1 > and let perl package use "gcc2" or "gcc -V2.95.3" > => seems like best solution. Putting gcc 2.95.3 into our gcc package in addition to gcc 3.0.1 wasn't easily achievable in a reasonably short time (/cw/bin/gcc -V2.95.3 seem to start the correct compiler, but the preprocessor pass seemed to be missing), so I placed an evil hack into the Perl package which forces Perl to build with the vendor compiler if the Platform is Linux and the binutils are too old. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Sep 21 13:13:14 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8LBCEd15636; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 13:12:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109211112.f8LBCEd15636@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: klaus.gruber@ecrc.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Qpopper -> .PID (PR#7) Date: Fri Sep 21 13:12:14 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Klaus Gruber Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.73.4) Qpopper creates no .PID File for the /cw/etc/rc script From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Sep 24 13:31:55 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8OBUtO96099; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:30:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109241130.f8OBUtO96099@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Checking mail transmission (PR#8) Date: Mon Sep 24 13:30:55 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Just for testing From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Sep 24 14:15:55 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8OCEtL96810; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109241214.f8OCEtL96810@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Mail transmission 2 (PR#9) Date: Mon Sep 24 14:14:55 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: PSM Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Testing From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 25 08:47:06 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8P6k7U15707; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:46:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109250646.f8P6k7U15707@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Qpopper -> .PID (PR#7) Date: Tue Sep 25 08:46:07 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Qpopper creates no .PID File for the /cw/etc/rc script According to the latest QPopper 4.x sources, the program does not write a PID file at all. Additionally in stand-alone mode (where we use it) it always detaches from the terminal itself (makes a daemon out ot it), so we also have no chance to log the PID manually. The only possible solution is to add code to QPopper which writes a PID file or to wait until a new QPopper version is releases which hopefully has PID file support already built-in. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 25 11:58:08 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8P9v7422624; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:57:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109250957.f8P9v7422624@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: maier@de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] SSL does not work with apache-1.3.20-22 (PR#8) Date: Tue Sep 25 11:57:07 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Richard Maier Version: apache-1.3.20-22 OS: sparc-solaris2.6 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.103) errormessages: .... mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed: HTTP spoken on HTTPS port; trying to send HTML error page (OpenSSL library error follows) OpenSSL: error:1407609C:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:http request [Hint: speaking HTTP to HTTPS port!?] child pid 27572 exit signal Segmentation Fault (11) .... #apache -l Compiled-in modules: http_core.c mod_vhost_alias.c mod_env.c mod_define.c mod_log_config.c mod_mime_magic.c mod_mime.c mod_negotiation.c mod_status.c mod_info.c mod_include.c mod_autoindex.c mod_dir.c mod_cgi.c mod_asis.c mod_imap.c mod_actions.c mod_speling.c mod_userdir.c mod_alias.c mod_rewrite.c mod_access.c mod_auth.c mod_auth_anon.c mod_auth_dbm.c mod_digest.c mod_proxy.c mod_cern_meta.c mod_expires.c mod_headers.c mod_usertrack.c mod_unique_id.c mod_so.c mod_setenvif.c mod_ssl.c mod_perl.c mod_php4.c mod_auth_pam.c mod_gzip.c suexec: enabled; valid wrapper /cw/sbin/suexec From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 25 13:19:08 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8PBI8m24129; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:18:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109251118.f8PBI8m24129@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Richard Maier To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] SSL does not work with apache-1.3.20-22 (PR#8) Date: Tue Sep 25 13:18:08 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: It works fine without mod_perl. Richard -- Richard Maier Richard.Maier@cw.com Senior System Administrator +49 89-92699-223 IT Germany/Austria +49 89-92699-302 (fax) Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH, Munich http://www.cw.com/de From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 25 15:08:09 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8PD79H25760; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:07:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109251307.f8PD79H25760@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Richard Maier To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] SSL does not work with apache-1.3.20-22 (PR#8) Date: Tue Sep 25 15:07:09 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Now I get sometimes the following error messages. [Tue Sep 25 14:55:04 2001] [notice] child pid 11512 exit signal Bus Error (10) [Tue Sep 25 14:55:07 2001] [notice] child pid 11513 exit signal Bus Error (10) [Tue Sep 25 14:55:09 2001] [notice] child pid 12109 exit signal Bus Error (10) Richard From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 25 18:04:11 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8PG3Be52832; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:03:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109251603.f8PG3Be52832@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] log file handling broken (PR#9) Date: Tue Sep 25 18:03:11 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: apache-1.3.20-21 OS: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 on sparc Submission from: (NULL) (195.27.130.87) log file handling is broken at least in apache-1.3.20-21 due to missing backslashes in the rc.apache script. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 25 20:38:12 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8PIbCm55010; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109251837.f8PIbCm55010@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] log file handling broken (PR#9) Date: Tue Sep 25 20:37:12 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, Sep 25, 2001, chris@schug.net wrote: > Full_Name: Christoph Schug > Version: apache-1.3.20-21 > OS: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 on sparc > Submission from: (NULL) (195.27.130.87) > > log file handling is broken at least in apache-1.3.20-21 due to missing > backslashes in the rc.apache script. Fixed now with apache-1.3.20-23. Thanks for your feedback. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Sep 28 16:43:51 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8SEgo208970; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:42:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109281442.f8SEgo208970@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: mhoereth@ecrc.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] postfix (PR#10) Date: Fri Sep 28 16:42:50 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.120) aktuelles postfix-package plaettet alle Konfigfiles, die in /cw/var/postfix gelegen hatten. db-files ueberleben. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Sep 28 22:36:54 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f8SKZsR14293; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:35:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109282035.f8SKZsR14293@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] postfix (PR#10) Date: Fri Sep 28 22:35:53 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Sep 28, 2001, Michael.Hoereth@ecrc.de wrote: > aktuelles postfix-package plaettet alle Konfigfiles, die in /cw/var/postfix > gelegen hatten. db-files ueberleben. In /cw/var/postfix are no config files. I guess you mean /cw/etc/postfix. And this should only happen for old OpenPKG postfix versions. From 20010228.5-0 and newer the config files should survive because they are tagged as %config. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Oct 5 10:06:21 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9585LT92809; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 10:05:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110050805.f9585LT92809@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] option CheckMail is deprecated (PR#11) Date: Fri Oct 5 10:05:21 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: openssh-2.9.9p2-9 OS: Debian GNU/Linux sparc Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) The option CheckMail seems not to be supported any longer in current OpenSSH releases thus I would recommend to remove it from %{l_prefix}/etc/openssh/sshd_config. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Oct 5 10:39:21 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f958cLw93384; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 10:38:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110050838.f958cLw93384@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] option CheckMail is deprecated (PR#11) Date: Fri Oct 5 10:38:21 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Oct 05, 2001, chris@schug.net wrote: > Full_Name: Christoph Schug > Version: openssh-2.9.9p2-9 > OS: Debian GNU/Linux sparc > Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) > > The option CheckMail seems not to be supported any longer in current OpenSSH > releases thus I would recommend to remove it from > %{l_prefix}/etc/openssh/sshd_config. Fixed now with openssh 2.9.9p2-10. Thanks. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 8 12:08:45 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f98A7jt04756; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:07:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110081007.f98A7jt04756@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] proftpd: log file handling not yet implemented (PR#12) Date: Mon Oct 8 12:07:45 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: proftpd-1.2.2-5 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) log file handling not yet implemented (daily rotation etc.) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 8 12:12:45 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f98ABjS04786; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110081011.f98ABjS04786@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] mysql: log file handling not yet implemented (PR#13) Date: Mon Oct 8 12:11:45 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: mysql-3.23.43-0 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) log file handling not yet implemented (daily rotation etc.) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 8 12:17:45 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f98AGje04957; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:16:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110081016.f98AGje04957@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] OpenSSH should not log via vendor syslogd (PR#14) Date: Mon Oct 8 12:16:45 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: openssh-2.9.9p2-10 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) OpenSSH should not log via vendor syslogd but use the fakesyslog library also used by the sendmail package. Don't forget daily log file rotation. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 8 12:20:45 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f98AJjT04982; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:19:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110081019.f98AJjT04982@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] zebra: log file handling not yet implemented (PR#15) Date: Mon Oct 8 12:19:45 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: zebra-0.92-2 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) log file handling not yet implemented (daily rotation etc.) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 8 14:22:46 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f98CLkZ07820; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 14:21:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110081221.f98CLkZ07820@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] sudo: wrong file ownership (PR#16) Date: Mon Oct 8 14:21:46 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: sudo-1.6.3p7-4 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) %{l_prefix}/etc/sudo/sudoers should be own by GID 0 (group ownership!, user ownership is ok). From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 8 14:27:46 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f98CQk007849; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 14:26:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110081226.f98CQk007849@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] sudo: log file handling not implemented (PR#17) Date: Mon Oct 8 14:26:46 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: sudo-1.6.3p7-4 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) - log file handling not implemented (daily log file rotation) - what about relocating the log file from %{l_prefix}/var/sudo/log/sudo.log to %{l_prefix}/var/sudo/sudo.log since the extension says it all :-) On the other hand we are more compliant to other packages like sendmail From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 8 15:42:47 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f98Dfl808942; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 15:41:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110081341.f98Dfl808942@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] openssh's scp segfaults on remote side (PR#18) Date: Mon Oct 8 15:41:47 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: openssh-2.9.9p2-10 OS: Solaris 2.6 & 8 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) Trying to copy a file via scp on Solaris box fails with a "lost connection" message. I could verify this with serveral Solaris installations both 2.6 and 8 and the most current openssh-2.9.9p2-10 package installed on them. It seems that the remotly invoked scp seg faults at once # /cw/bin/sshd -dD debug1: Seeding random number generator debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_2.9.9p2 debug1: private host key: #0 type 0 RSA1 debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA debug1: private host key: #1 type 2 DSA debug1: Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0. Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22. Generating 768 bit RSA key. RSA key generation complete. debug1: Server will not fork when running in debugging mode. Connection from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX port 2123 debug1: Client protocol version 1.5; client software version OpenSSH_2.9.9p2 debug1: match: OpenSSH_2.9.9p2 pat ^OpenSSH debug1: Local version string SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_2.9.9p2 debug1: Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port not trusted. debug1: Sent 768 bit server key and 1024 bit host key. debug1: Encryption type: 3des debug1: Received session key; encryption turned on. debug1: Installing crc compensation attack detector. debug1: Starting up PAM with username "XXXXX" Could not reverse map address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX. debug1: PAM setting rhost to "XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX" debug1: Attempting authentication for XXXXX. debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 1000/1000 (e=0) debug1: trying public RSA key file /XXXXX/.ssh/authorized_keys debug1: restore_uid Accepted rsa for cw from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX port 2123 debug1: session_new: init debug1: session_new: session 0 debug1: Enabling compression at level 4. debug1: Exec command 'scp -v -t /tmp' Segmentation Fault # From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 10 12:04:12 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9AA3Bj93852; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 12:03:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110101003.f9AA3Bj93852@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] tar/bison: file conflict (charset.alias) (PR#19) Date: Wed Oct 10 12:03:11 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: tar-1.13.22-2/bison-1.29-0 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) Yet another %{l_prefix}/lib/charset.alias conflict :-) Affected packages are tar-1.13.22-2 and bison-1.29-0. Consider removing that file from both packages. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 10 12:41:12 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9AAeCg94370; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 12:40:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110101040.f9AAeCg94370@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Christoph Schug To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] tar/bison: file conflict (charset.alias) (PR#19) Date: Wed Oct 10 12:40:12 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: fixed -> bison-1.29-1.src.rpm -> tar-1.13.22-3.src.rpm -cs From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 10 17:52:15 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9AFpFh99021; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:51:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110101551.f9AFpFh99021@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] tar/bison: file conflict (charset.alias) (PR#19) Date: Wed Oct 10 17:51:15 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Oct 10, 2001, chris@schug.net wrote: > Full_Name: Christoph Schug > Version: tar-1.13.22-2/bison-1.29-0 > OS: > Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) > > Yet another %{l_prefix}/lib/charset.alias conflict :-) > Affected packages are tar-1.13.22-2 and bison-1.29-0. Consider removing that > file from both packages. Now fixed by submitted ;) Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 15 18:58:38 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9FGvc671270; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 18:57:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110151657.f9FGvc671270@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: maier@de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] bootstrap into a directory which includes a dash (PR#20) Date: Mon Oct 15 18:57:38 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Richard Maier Version: *.36 OS: Sol. 2.6 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) If you try to install the bootstrap packages into directory which includes a dash does not work propperly. The Passwd entry is not set correctely when I also have a user with a dash. pwconv: ERROR: bad entry or blank line at line 16 in /etc/passwd pwconv: Unexpected failure. Conversion not done. chown: unknown user id %{l_fsusr} From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 17 11:42:01 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9H9f0l11535; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:41:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110170941.f9H9f0l11535@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: thomas.lotterer@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] /cw/local owner/group (PR#21) Date: Wed Oct 17 11:41:00 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Thomas Lotterer Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Software has been installed into /cw/local before OpenPKG deployment. When OpenPKG is installed afterwards it changes the owner/group of all files in /cw to cw:cw including those in /cw/local. Some programs don't like this ... It was assumed that /cw/local is left untouched. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 17 12:31:07 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9HAU1912476; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:30:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110171030.f9HAU1912476@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] inn: various log files to be written (PR#22) Date: Wed Oct 17 12:30:01 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: inn-2.3.2-8 OS: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) The fakesyslog lib included in inn packages should honor the various log levels. According to that various log files like news.crit, news.err, news.log and news.notice should be written. Currently only news.log contains messages. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 17 18:06:04 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9HG54x18227; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110171605.f9HG54x18227@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Hussam Bukhari" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] could you plz help me (PR#23) Date: Wed Oct 17 18:05:04 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > sire > could u plz tell me how can i REDIRECT the requist that come for > apache wab server for example A to apache web server B? > because i have only one Global Domain Name that it in my server and i > want this server redirect all my requist to anther local server . > thanx for u'r help > From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 24 18:04:38 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9OG3cL18885; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:03:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110241603.f9OG3cL18885@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: mhoereth@ecrc.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] additional perl mods needed (PR#24) Date: Wed Oct 24 18:03:38 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Version: OS: bsd? Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.120) need Perl modules GD.pm and Chart.pm on ftp.de.cw.net - usual way (via CPAN) failed. chschug told me that a new package is needed ... From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Oct 26 14:12:03 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9QCB3A70156; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:11:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110261211.f9QCB3A70156@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Manuel.Hendel@hendel.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] postfix reloading after logrotating (PR#25) Date: Fri Oct 26 14:11:03 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Manuel Hendel Version: postfix-20010228.5-20011025.0 OS: Debian 2.2 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.25.210) Postfix (or any mailserver) should not be reloaded after logfilerotation. This could lead to a heavy load, because after reload, postfix is trying to manage the whole queue. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Oct 26 14:16:03 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9QCF3470325; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:15:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110261215.f9QCF3470325@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Manuel.Hendel@hendel.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] logging (PR#26) Date: Fri Oct 26 14:15:03 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Manuel Hendel Version: OS: debian 2.2 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.25.210) Every logfile entry is a entry. This couldn't be, that everything is critical. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Oct 26 14:27:06 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9QCQ3e70383; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:26:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200110261226.f9QCQ3e70383@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Manuel.Hendel@hendel.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] confirmation mail to the bugreport (PR#27) Date: Fri Oct 26 14:26:03 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Manuel Hendel Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.25.210) There's something wrong in the confirmation mail you get after reporting a bug. This is the mail you get. #### Thanks for submitting your feedback to our bug database. Your message was recognized and successfully filed under the problem report PR#25. You can monitor it under http://www.openpkg.org/bugdb/guest?findid=25 If you want to submit for information for this particular ^^^ bug report, please include the string "PR#25" in your the mail "Subject" header. ^^^ #### From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 31 15:58:13 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9VEwAS12756; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:58:10 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200110311458.f9VEwAS12756@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] additional perl mods needed (PR#24) Date: Wed Oct 31 15:58:10 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > need Perl modules GD.pm and Chart.pm on ftp.de.cw.net - > usual way (via CPAN) failed. chschug told me that a new > package is needed ... This is now provided with the gd-perl package. It includes not only GD and Chart but also all(!) other GD-based modules available on CPAN. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 31 16:06:13 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9VF5kL16289; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:05:46 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200110311505.f9VF5kL16289@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] sudo: wrong file ownership (PR#16) Date: Wed Oct 31 16:05:46 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > %{l_prefix}/etc/sudo/sudoers should be own by GID 0 (group ownership!, user > ownership is ok). Now fixed with sudo-1.6.3p7-20011031.0 by differently compiling sudo. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 31 16:10:12 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9VF9x516321; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:09:59 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200110311509.f9VF9x516321@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] /cw/local owner/group (PR#21) Date: Wed Oct 31 16:09:59 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Software has been installed into /cw/local before OpenPKG deployment. When > OpenPKG is installed afterwards it changes the owner/group of all files in /cw > to cw:cw including those in /cw/local. Some programs don't like this ... It was > assumed that /cw/local is left untouched. No, the bootstrap creates an initial OpenPKG local hierarchy including sub-directories. So there is no technical solution, because RPM does not support preserving permissions in parent dirs if subdirs exists. Nevertheless this should be pointed out in the OpenPKG handbook. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Oct 31 16:12:39 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id f9VFCCW16345; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:12:12 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200110311512.f9VFCCW16345@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] confirmation mail to the bugreport (PR#27) Date: Wed Oct 31 16:12:12 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > There's something wrong in the confirmation mail you get after reporting a bug. > [...] Now fixed. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Nov 2 15:56:40 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA2Etde85419; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:55:39 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111021455.fA2Etde85419@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: michael.schloh@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Pinfo Package Description is false (PR#28) Date: Fri Nov 2 15:55:39 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Submitted by: admin The package description for pinfo reads: 'Recode converts files between various character sets and surfaces.' It should instead read: Pinfo is a hypertext info file viewer with a user interface similar to lynx. Itis based on curses/ncurses, and can handle info pages as well as man pages. It also features regexp searching and user-defined colors/keys. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Nov 2 16:15:39 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA2FEdg85885; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:14:39 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111021514.fA2FEdg85885@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: michael.schloh@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Package dependencies for autogen do not agree (PR#29) Date: Fri Nov 2 16:14:39 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Submitted by: admin The package dependency graph for autogen does not list texinfo as a dependency. However, the file autogen.spec lists texinfo as a build requirement. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Nov 2 16:20:39 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA2FJdL87907; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:19:39 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111021519.fA2FJdL87907@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: michael.schloh@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Dependencies for orbit do not agree (PR#30) Date: Fri Nov 2 16:19:39 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) Submitted by: admin The dependency graph for orbit does not list bison and flex as dependencies, however they both are listed as build requirements in the file orbit.spec. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Nov 2 18:54:42 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA2HrfW08783; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:53:41 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111021753.fA2HrfW08783@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] mutt: doesn't build due to wrong permissions (PR#31) Date: Fri Nov 2 18:53:40 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: mutt-1.3.23i-20011025.0 OS: FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) mutt doesn't build due to wrong permissions creating muttbug.sh creating imap/Makefile creating Muttrc.head creating doc/instdoc.sh creating config.h creating po/POTFILES creating po/Makefile + /cw/bin/make --no-print-directory cd . && /cw/RPM/TMP/mutt-1.3.23/missing aclocal -I m4 /cw/RPM/TMP/mutt-1.3.23/missing: permission denied make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 126 error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.61802 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.61802 (%build) bash-2.05# ls -l /cw/RPM/TMP/mutt-1.3.23/missing -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8259 Feb 27 2001 /cw/RPM/TMP/mutt-1.3.23/missing bash-2.05# hmm, I guess 'missing' should be 755, shouldn't it? -cs From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Nov 2 20:21:42 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA2JKfv10333; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 20:20:41 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111021920.fA2JKfv10333@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] mutt: doesn't build due to wrong permissions (PR#31) Date: Fri Nov 2 20:20:41 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Nov 02, 2001, chris@schug.net wrote: > Full_Name: Christoph Schug > Version: mutt-1.3.23i-20011025.0 > OS: FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE > Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) > > mutt doesn't build due to wrong permissions > > creating muttbug.sh > creating imap/Makefile > creating Muttrc.head > creating doc/instdoc.sh > creating config.h > creating po/POTFILES > creating po/Makefile > + /cw/bin/make --no-print-directory > cd . && /cw/RPM/TMP/mutt-1.3.23/missing aclocal -I m4 > /cw/RPM/TMP/mutt-1.3.23/missing: permission denied > make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 126 > error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.61802 (%build) > > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.61802 (%build) > bash-2.05# ls -l /cw/RPM/TMP/mutt-1.3.23/missing > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8259 Feb 27 2001 /cw/RPM/TMP/mutt-1.3.23/missing > bash-2.05# > > hmm, I guess 'missing' should be 755, shouldn't it? Try the latest 1.3.23.1i instead of 1.3.23i now. Perhaps this has already fixed the problem... Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Nov 2 20:58:42 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA2JvgU10818; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 20:57:42 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111021957.fA2JvgU10818@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] binary release does not match source release (PR#32) Date: Fri Nov 2 20:57:42 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: With the latest naming scheme, if one builds foo-1.2-20011025.0.src.rpm on 02-Nov-2001 the resulting binary is named foo-1.2-20011102.0.src.rpm instead of the expected foo-1.2-20011025.0.src.rpm. This is caused because of the run-time macro %{l_branch}. Hmmm... Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 5 09:20:16 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA58JGb74615; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:19:16 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111050819.fA58JGb74615@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Pinfo Package Description is false (PR#28) Date: Mon Nov 5 09:19:16 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Fixed on Friday. michael.schloh@de.cw.net wrote: > Full_Name: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz > Version: > OS: > Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) > Submitted by: admin > > > The package description for pinfo reads: > > 'Recode converts files between various character sets and surfaces.' > > It should instead read: > > Pinfo is a hypertext info file viewer with a user interface similar to lynx. > Itis based on curses/ncurses, and can handle info pages as well as man pages. > It also features regexp searching and user-defined colors/keys. > ______________________________________________________________________ > The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org > Bug Database Interface www.openpkg.org/bugdb > Bug Database List openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org > > -- michael.schloh@cw.com Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 5 11:38:17 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA5AbHj76546; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:37:17 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111051037.fA5AbHj76546@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Schug To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] tiff: ar not found (PR#33) Date: Mon Nov 5 11:37:17 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Version: tiff-3.5.6-20011025.0 OS: Debian Linux 2.2/sparc Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) tiff should either depend on binutils (urgh :) or use ar provided by the OS vendor. ... /cw/bin/cc -c -fPIC -g -O -I. -I../libtiff ../libtiff/tif_thunder.c /cw/bin/cc -c -fPIC -g -O -I. -I../libtiff ../libtiff/tif_tile.c /cw/bin/cc -c -fPIC -g -O -I. -I../libtiff ../libtiff/tif_unix.c /cw/bin/cc -c -fPIC -g -O -I. -I../libtiff ../libtiff/tif_version.c /cw/bin/cc -c -fPIC -g -O -I. -I../libtiff ../libtiff/tif_warning.c /cw/bin/cc -c -fPIC -g -O -I. -I../libtiff ../libtiff/tif_write.c /cw/bin/cc -c -fPIC -g -O -I. -I../libtiff ../libtiff/tif_zip.c ~/bin/ar rc libtiff.a tif_aux.o tif_close.o tif_codec.o tif_compress.o tif_dir.o tif_dirinfo.o tif_dirread.o tif_dirwrite.o tif_dumpmode.o tif_error.o tif_fax3.o tif_fax3sm.o tif_getimage.o tif_jpeg.o tif_flush.o tif_luv.o tif_lzw.o tif_next.o tif_open.o tif_packbits.o tif_pixarlog.o tif_predict.o tif_print.o tif_read.o tif_swab.o tif_strip.o tif_thunder.o tif_tile.o tif_unix.o tif_version.o tif_warning.o tif_write.o tif_zip.o make[1]: ~/bin/ar: Command not found make[1]: *** [libtiff.a] Error 127 make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.17882 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.17882 (%build) cw@edge$ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 5 11:44:18 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA5AhHq76581; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:43:17 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111051043.fA5AhHq76581@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] tetex vs. texinfo: file conflicts (PR#34) Date: Mon Nov 5 11:43:17 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0/texinfo-4.0-20011104.0 OS: RedHat Linux 5.2/x86 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) cschug@calenhad:~ $ rpm -Uvh tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0.ix86-linux2.0-hcO.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/bin/install-info from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4 .0-20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/bin/makeinfo from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0-2 0011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/bin/texi2dvi from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0-2 0011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/bin/texindex from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0-2 0011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/info-stnd.info from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinf o-4.0-20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/info.info from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0-2 0011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-1 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-10 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4. 0-20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-11 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4. 0-20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-12 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4. 0-20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-2 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-3 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-4 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-5 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-6 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-7 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-8 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 file /home/cschug/OPENPKG/ix86-linux2.0/info/texinfo-9 from install of tetex-1.0.7-20011104.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.0 -20011104.0 cschug@calenhad:~ $ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 5 12:22:18 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA5BLHS77360; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:21:17 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111051121.fA5BLHS77360@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Pinfo Package Description is false (PR#28) Date: Mon Nov 5 12:21:17 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Erm, ins cvs ist gefixed. Der website verwendet noch die alte Zustand. Naechste make ins openpkg-web Verzeichnis wird wahrscheinlich dasz loesen. Michael Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: > Fixed on Friday. > > michael.schloh@de.cw.net wrote: > > >>Full_Name: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz >>Version: >>OS: >>Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.64.13) >>Submitted by: admin >> >> >>The package description for pinfo reads: >> >>'Recode converts files between various character sets and surfaces.' >> >>It should instead read: >> >>Pinfo is a hypertext info file viewer with a user interface similar to lynx. >>Itis based on curses/ncurses, and can handle info pages as well as man pages. >>It also features regexp searching and user-defined colors/keys. >>______________________________________________________________________ >>The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org >>Bug Database Interface www.openpkg.org/bugdb >>Bug Database List openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Nov 7 17:40:01 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA7Gd0Y64937; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 17:39:00 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111071639.fA7Gd0Y64937@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] openssh: configure complains about skey (PR#35) Date: Wed Nov 7 17:39:00 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: openssh-3.0p1-20011107.0 OS: Solaris 2.6/Sparc Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) $ rpm --rebuild http://www.openpkg.org/pkg/SRC/skey-1.1.5-20011102.0.src.rpm . . . checking utime.h usability... yes checking utime.h presence... yes checking for utime.h... yes checking utmp.h usability... yes checking utmp.h presence... yes checking for utmp.h... yes checking utmpx.h usability... yes checking utmpx.h presence... yes checking for utmpx.h... yes checking for GLOB_ALTDIRFUNC support... no checking for gl_matchc field in glob_t... no checking whether struct dirent allocates space for d_name... no checking for skey_keyinfo... no configure: error: ** Incomplete or missing s/key libraries. error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.6180 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.6180 (%build) $ But nevertheless skey is installed and up-to-date ... hmm $ rpm -q openpkg skey openpkg-0.9-20011107.0 skey-1.1.5-20011107.0 $ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Nov 8 18:16:14 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA8HFEZ96194; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:15:14 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111081715.fA8HFEZ96194@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Christoph Schug To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openssh: configure complains about skey (PR#35) Date: Thu Nov 8 18:15:14 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Problem seems to be bound to Solaris (at least 2.6 and 8). From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Nov 8 18:19:14 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fA8HIEj96211; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:18:14 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111081718.fA8HIEj96211@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: Christoph Schug To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PR#18 Date: Thu Nov 8 18:18:14 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Problem seems to be solved in openssh >= 3 and only occured under Solaris with PAM support enabled and no tty to be used. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Nov 14 14:12:33 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fAEDBxt90860; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:11:59 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111141311.fAEDBxt90860@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] tiff: ar not found (PR#33) Date: Wed Nov 14 14:11:59 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > ~/bin/ar rc libtiff.a tif_aux.o tif_close.o tif_codec.o tif_compress.o tif_dir.o According to the TIFF sources, it actually _USES_ the "ar" in $PATH. So in your case a ~/bin/ar was found in $PATH and perhaps this is not really an "ar". At least on our reference machine running under FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE the /usr/bin/ar is correctly found because it is in $PATH. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Nov 14 14:14:49 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fAEDDua90891; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:13:56 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111141313.fAEDDua90891@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openssh: configure complains about skey (PR#35) Date: Wed Nov 14 14:13:56 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > configure: error: ** Incomplete or missing s/key libraries. > error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.6180 (%build) We were unable to locate the reason of this problem on Solaris, but since OpenSSH 3.0, our package has S/Key disabled. It is now just an option. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Nov 14 15:04:44 2001 Received: by dev0.dev.de.cw.net (Sendmail 8.11.6+) id fAEE4Ok91779; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:04:24 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200111141404.fAEE4Ok91779@dev0.dev.de.cw.net> From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] OpenSSH should not log via vendor syslogd (PR#14) Date: Wed Nov 14 15:04:23 2001 Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > OpenSSH should not log via vendor syslogd but use the fakesyslog library also > used by the sendmail package. > Don't forget daily log file rotation. Fixed with openssh-3.0p1-20011114 Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 19 16:25:14 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 80DB61C1A7E; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 16:25:14 +0100 (CET) From: markus.sander@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] apache: invalid rc script arguments are ignored (PR#36) Date: Mon Nov 19 16:25:14 2001 Message-Id: <20011119152514.80DB61C1A7E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Markus Sander Version: apache-1.3.20-24 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.149) When calling rc.apache with unavailable arguments, it doesn't give negative feedback nor does it list all available arguments e.g. rc.apache graceful|configtest From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Nov 21 09:49:20 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 826BD1C1A7D; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:49:20 +0100 (CET) From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] apache: ivm zmod log file handling not implemented (PR#37) Date: Wed Nov 21 09:49:20 2001 Message-Id: <20011121084920.826BD1C1A7D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: apache-1.3.22-20011114.0 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) subject says it all :-) -cs From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Nov 21 09:52:05 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id A5C261C1A73; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:52:05 +0100 (CET) From: Christoph Schug To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] apache: ivm zmod log file handling not implemented (PR#37) Date: Wed Nov 21 09:52:05 2001 Message-Id: <20011121085205.A5C261C1A73@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ivm should be ivw of course From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Nov 29 10:02:53 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 5C8201C1AFF; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:02:53 +0100 (CET) From: mhe@hendel.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] petidomo upgrade (PR#38) Date: Thu Nov 29 10:02:53 2001 Message-Id: <20011129090253.5C8201C1AFF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Manuel Hendel Version: petidomo-4.0b1-20011129.0 OS: FreeBSD Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.25.210) Petidomo upgrade doesn't work. Here is the error message. root@mail:/cw$ bin/rpm -Uhv RPM/PKG/petidomo-4.0b1-20011129.0.ix86-freebsd4.3-cw.rpm error: failed dependencies: MTA is needed by petidomo-4.0b1-20011129.0 root@mail:/cw$ bin/rpm -Uhv --nodeps RPM/PKG/petidomo-4.0b1-20011129.0.ix86-freebsd4.3-cw.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:petidomo ########################################### [100%] /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.50639: 10: Syntax error: "(" unexpected (expecting "fi") error: execution of %postun scriptlet from petidomo-4.0b1-0 failed, exit status 2 root@mail:/cw$ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Nov 30 23:38:21 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 7B4501C1A83; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:38:21 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] binary release does not match source release (PR#32) Date: Fri Nov 30 23:38:21 2001 Message-Id: <20011130223821.7B4501C1A83@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Now fixed by backing out the %{l_branch} stuff. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Nov 30 23:40:51 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id AF3A11C1A83; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:40:51 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] petidomo upgrade (PR#38) Date: Fri Nov 30 23:40:51 2001 Message-Id: <20011130224051.AF3A11C1A83@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Petidomo upgrade doesn't work. Here is the error message. > > root@mail:/cw$ bin/rpm -Uhv > RPM/PKG/petidomo-4.0b1-20011129.0.ix86-freebsd4.3-cw.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > MTA is needed by petidomo-4.0b1-20011129.0 > root@mail:/cw$ bin/rpm -Uhv --nodeps > RPM/PKG/petidomo-4.0b1-20011129.0.ix86-freebsd4.3-cw.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > 1:petidomo ########################################### [100%] > /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.50639: 10: Syntax error: "(" unexpected (expecting "fi") > error: execution of %postun scriptlet from petidomo-4.0b1-0 failed, exit status > 2 > root@mail:/cw$ This should be now fixed with the latest Petidomo package versions. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Dec 9 13:14:00 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 12B121C1AC5; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 13:14:00 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] bind 8.2.5 dislikes install db 3.3.11 package on building (PR#39) Date: Sun Dec 9 13:14:00 2001 Message-Id: <20011209121400.12B121C1AC5@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Ralf S. Engelschall Version: OS: FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) On building bind 8.2.5-1.0.0 it breaks if the db 3.3.11-1.0.0 package is installed. Removing db before building bind solves the problem. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Dec 17 09:46:57 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DB6191C1803; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:46:56 +0100 (CET) From: michael.schloh@cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Hexer package fails to build from source (PR#40) Date: Mon Dec 17 09:46:56 2001 Message-Id: <20011217084656.DB6191C1803@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz Version: OpenPKG1.0/Hexer0.1.4c OS: FreeBSD Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) bash-2.05# /sw/bin/rpm --rebuild ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.0/SRC/hexer-0.1.4c-1.0.0.src.rpm Installing ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.0/SRC/hexer-0.1.4c-1.0.0.src.rpm Executing(%prep): /sw/lib/openpkg/bash -e /sw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.38922 + umask 022 + cd /sw/RPM/TMP ... ... + cp config.bsd config.h + /sw/bin/make --no-print-directory CC=/sw/bin/cc 'CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe $(DEFINES)' /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o buffer.o buffer.c /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o tio.o tio.c /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o edit.o edit.c /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o main.o main.c /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o hexer.o hexer.c hexer.c:73: conflicting types for `sys_nerr' /usr/include/stdio.h:224: previous declaration of `sys_nerr' make: *** [hexer.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /sw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.38922 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /sw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.38922 (%build) bash-2.05# From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Dec 18 08:51:11 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id A0DB81C1807; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:51:11 +0100 (CET) From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] analog: language file missing (PR#41) Date: Tue Dec 18 08:51:11 2001 Message-Id: <20011218075111.A0DB81C1807@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: analog-5.1 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) The analog package lacks a language file and is thus not usable. Furthermore language files are expected in the wrong directory namely %{l_prefix}/bin/. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 27 14:41:17 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E52821C181E; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:41:16 +0100 (CET) From: maier@de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Derecks openpkg (PR#42) Date: Thu Dec 27 14:41:16 2001 Message-Id: <20011227134116.E52821C181E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Richard Maier Version: webseite OS: egal Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.103) Gruzifix, jetz mus i scho wieder des openpkg zeig upzudaten, ich habs doch erst vor 4 Tag gmacht. Wer verwaltet den die scheiß Seite, die links zu den Paketen stimmen überhaupt nicht ich weiß nicht ob das absicht ist. Desweiteren finde ich die Abhängigkeiten vom openpkg Packet schon ein wenig extrem, immer wenn man ein neues Packet updaten/instalieren möchte muß man erst einmal das openpkg Packet updaten. Gibt es da so viele Bugs? Die Idee finde ich ja ganz gut, aber die Umsetzung ist nicht so ganz gelungen. Richard From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 27 16:51:29 2001 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id ADE001C1826; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:51:29 +0100 (CET) From: maier@de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Drecks openpkg (PR#43) Date: Thu Dec 27 16:51:29 2001 Message-Id: <20011227155129.ADE001C1826@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Richard Maier Version: alle OS: egal Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.103) Greiz-Gruzifix, Jetz werds a no schlimmer. Mitlerweile ist es sogar so weit, das ich openpkg an einem Tag zweimal instalieren muß. Irgendwann wird das auch zuviel des guten. Ich finde das nicht als seht produktiv, wenn man während der installation abhängigkeiten feststellt, wenn man diese dann auflösen möchte, muß man gleich nochmal openpkg updaten. Manchmal hat es den Anschein das passiert nur um die Leute zu ärgen die dieses Zeug verwenden. Schließlich hat jeder nunmal nur endlich Zeit. Richard From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jan 8 14:07:16 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id BDB751C1824; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:07:16 +0100 (CET) From: klaus.gruber@ecrc.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Perl-db Package is not installable (PR#44) Date: Tue Jan 8 14:07:16 2002 Message-Id: <20020108130716.BDB751C1824@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Klaus Gruber Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.73.4) bash-2.05# rpm -Uvh /cw/RPM/PKG/perl-db-20011227-20011227.ix86-solaris2.8-cw.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i86pc-solaris/DB_File.pm from install of perl-db-20011227-20011227 conflicts with file from package perl-5.6.1-20011228 file /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i86pc-solaris/auto/DB_File/DB_File.so from install of perl-db-20011227-20011227 conflicts with file from package perl-5.6.1-20011228 file /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i86pc-solaris/auto/DB_File/autosplit.ix from install of perl-db-20011227-20011227 conflicts with file from package perl-5.6.1-20011228 file /cw/man/man3/DB_File.3 from install of perl-db-20011227-20011227 conflicts with file from package perl-5.6.1-20011228 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 10 13:53:00 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 06FE41C181D; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:53:00 +0100 (CET) From: markus.sander@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] binary pakets install into wrong directory (PR#45) Date: Thu Jan 10 13:52:59 2002 Message-Id: <20020110125300.06FE41C181D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Version: OS: Solaris Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) Binary pakets install into /cw instead into the directory where the openkg instance resides From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jan 14 14:41:26 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 618DA1C1820; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:41:26 +0100 (CET) From: cmm@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] broken link (PR#46) Date: Mon Jan 14 14:41:26 2002 Message-Id: <20020114134126.618DA1C1820@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Version: jdk-sun-1.3.1.02-20011227 OS: Solaris 8/Sparc Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.37) /cw/bin/realpath points nowhere From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jan 14 14:45:30 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B58371C1820; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:45:30 +0100 (CET) From: cmm@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] pdflib.jar is not beeing installed (PR#47) Date: Mon Jan 14 14:45:30 2002 Message-Id: <20020114134530.B58371C1820@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Version: pdflib-4.0.1-20020108 OS: Solaris 8/Sparc Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.37) After building and installing the package pdflib.jar remains in /cw/RPM/TMP/pdflib-4.0.1/bind/java/ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jan 16 15:54:44 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 9FF991C1823; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:54:44 +0100 (CET) From: klaus.gruber@ecrc.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Daily Maintenance (PR#48) Date: Wed Jan 16 15:54:44 2002 Message-Id: <20020116145444.9FF991C1823@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Klaus Gruber Version: 1.0 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.73.4) standard installation of openpkg v1.0 produces the following error: /cw/etc/rc all daily /cw/lib/openpkg/shtool:Error: unknown command `log' /cw/lib/openpkg/shtool:Hint: run `/cw/lib/openpkg/shtool -h' for usage ?? From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jan 16 16:20:35 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E13AB1C1823; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:20:34 +0100 (CET) From: cmm@de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Proftpd (PR#49) Date: Wed Jan 16 16:20:34 2002 Message-Id: <20020116152034.E13AB1C1823@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Version: proftpd-1.2.4-20011222 OS: Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.37) Proftpd shows always "You are number 1 of maximal xx users." no matter how many users are logged in. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 20 12:16:14 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id CA8781C181E; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:16:14 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Daily Maintenance (PR#48) Date: Sun Jan 20 12:16:14 2002 Message-Id: <20020120111614.CA8781C181E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is now fixed in OpenPKG-CURRENT. Two package's %daily scripts were incorrectly calling "shtool log" instead of "shtool rotate". Thanks for your feedback. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 20 12:24:27 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id B50061C181E; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:24:26 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] binary pakets install into wrong directory (PR#45) Date: Sun Jan 20 12:24:26 2002 Message-Id: <20020120112426.B50061C181E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Yes, this is a known "feature" of RPM. A package installs into the location for which is was rolled. That this causes sometimes trouble (especially if multiple OpenPKG instances exists or a vendor RPM) is known and certainly nasty. Unfortunately we still have no solution for this. The only possibility is to patch RPM for OpenPKG to reject those installations. This will be kept on our TODO list for later consideration. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 20 12:26:20 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 55DEA1C181E; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:26:20 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] analog: language file missing (PR#41) Date: Sun Jan 20 12:26:20 2002 Message-Id: <20020120112620.55DEA1C181E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This has been fixed recently. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 20 12:35:02 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 6C8321C180E; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:35:02 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Perl-db Package is not installable (PR#44) Date: Sun Jan 20 12:35:02 2002 Message-Id: <20020120113502.6C8321C180E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This should be now fixed since perl-5.6.1-20020108 because we added -Ui_db to the configure of Perl. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 20 12:51:23 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id D54981C181E; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:51:22 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] broken link (PR#46) Date: Sun Jan 20 12:51:22 2002 Message-Id: <20020120115122.D54981C181E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is now fixed with jdk-sun-1.3.2.02-20010119. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jan 21 14:05:32 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 66E7E1C1813; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:05:32 +0100 (CET) From: robert@weilhammer.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Problems with IMAPD-Package (PR#50) Date: Mon Jan 21 14:05:32 2002 Message-Id: <20020121130532.66E7E1C1813@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Robert Weilhammer Version: imapd-2.0.16-20011201.src.rpm OS: linux-2.4 (Rh 7.2) Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.185) When I try to make the binary-package for IMAP, my compiler doesn't find the file com_err.h - I had the same problems, when I copy the file in the directory. cheers Robert ----------snip----------------------------------- ### Making all in /cw/RPM/TMP/cyrus-imapd-2.0.16/imap /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -I.. -I../sieve -I. -I./../lib -I./../acap -I../acap -I/cw/include -I/usr/local/include -I/cw/include -I/cw/include -I/cw/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -pipe -I/cw/include \ pushstats.c /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -I.. -I../sieve -I. -I./../lib -I./../acap -I../acap -I/cw/include -I/usr/local/include -I/cw/include -I/cw/include -I/cw/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -pipe -I/cw/include \ imapd.c imapd.c:58:21: com_err.h: No such file or directory imapd.c: In function `cmd_select': imapd.c:2316: warning: passing arg 2 of `prot_printf' makes pointer from integer without a cast make[1]: *** [imapd.o] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.54983 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.54983 (%build) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jan 22 16:23:15 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DC9F51C180F; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:23:14 +0100 (CET) From: ky_1064@yahoo.com (raven) To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Make Lots of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ (PR#51) Date: Tue Jan 22 16:23:14 2002 Message-Id: <20020122152314.DC9F51C180F@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --_========_000007057_========_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed A product, and in this case products that are worth $1000 or more! I have taken the idea of a scam chainletter, and turned it into a MARKETING TOOL.....!!!!! Now it is not a scam!!!
Official PayPal Seal

you are receiveing this message because you or someone from your email address has signed up for my mailing list rmoval instructions below




Dear Friend:


NOW BEFORE YOU READ ON, AND THINK THIS IS A CHAIN LETTER....LET ME TELL YOU ONE THING....
****** IT IS !!! *****

BUT... And listen to the BUT... There is a real Product.... A product that some of you sell on the internet, and on ebay... A product that is given away free if you buy something at an internet sight.... A product, and in this case products that are worth $1000 or more! I have taken the idea of a scam chainletter, and turned it into a MARKETING TOOL.....!!!!! Now it is not a scam!!!

In the letter below that I have recieved in my email a while ago, is the same scam letter...and believe me...it was a scam!!!! (although I thought it interesting, so I sent out a few emails myself, before I figured out that there really was no product, and it was illegal..most of you might have gotten a copy of it from me, one of you even wrote me back twice and told me it was a scam in your email.)(it WAS)(but I was convinced like everyone else who fell into it...) So I added to it...Everything I added to make it legal is in COLOR!!!

GET TO THE PRODUCT YOU SAY?

E-BOOKS.... little electronic books that you download, that help you with marketing, how to write emails, how to bid at ebay, and so on...some people buy these for $3.95 and up for each book.... I have quite a few of them...I have sold them on ebay myself...The knowledge that you will get out of these books will more than pay for the auction, or the chainletter that got you to the download sight!!!

FREE BUSINESS CARDS.... Yes... You get 250 Full Color Business Cards to help out with your venture!!! If you run out, just click on the link again at the download sight and order another 250 Free Business Cards!!! Heck, order as many times as you want... Order some for a friend or relative as a gift, or a gag!!!

When you send the five dollars via PayPal, as said in the scam letter below... You will now be emailed the download URL from the person that you paid the $5.00 to. When you send the money with paypal, PayPal will give them a confirmation letter that your email address had paid their email address $5.00. The person you paid the five dollars too will send the web address of the ebooks, to the same address you use with paypal.
(You can set Paypal up to send the URL for you, so you dont have to personally send 1000's of emails)

Now you have seen this letter, and all that you had to pay was five dollars... Unfortunately I have raised it to $6.50...(But for a signifigant reason explained below) Although you will still pay the person on the top of the list $5.00. They will send you the URL for the download sight. This is what makes it cool...The letter below had no insurance that you would not start your own list, and do away with the 3 email addresses that have worked so hard to market the Scam Letter...(which is one reason it was a scam) Now you have to have a product to send the next person, which insures that the names stay intact on the list.

Where does the extra dollar fifty go? It will go to the owner of the download sight, for the upkeep of their server and to insure that this letter does not fall by the wayside....(meaning someone in the line doesnt do their job of upkeeping their own download sight, resulting in angered customers, and the loss of five dollars to a scam artist!)

Of course you will have to go through paypal twice. Once to pay the $5.00 to the person on the top of the list, and once for $1.50 at the download sight...But the results will be 500 times better then the scam letter below, because there is accountability...there is a product..and there is
ONLY ONE download sight....

OK
**********************NOW TO THE SCAM LETTER*************************

RE: PayPal Account

I read an article in the Wall Street Journal on 6/16/2001 about PayPal and x.com.
There have been other articles written about these companies in other well recognized journals. Because I'm a member of PayPal,I knew that this was real and would work.
If you need to make a few thousand dollars REALLY FAST, then please take a moment to read this simple program I'm sharing with you.
THIS IS THE FASTEST, EASIEST PROGRAM YOU WILL EVER DO!!!
Complete it in one hour and you will never forget the day you first received it!!!
Oh! Did I say FAST? "The speed of the internet-type fast." The Newsletter and all payments are made on the Internet by E-Mail. NEED PROOF? Here are just two testimonials from individuals who decided to invest nothing more than a little of their time.
Testimonials from:
(*not really proof, probably just made up But very possible with this Revised Letter*)
******************************************************************
Tony Stevens, Vandenberg AFB, CA:
Hey! I got your e-mail! YOU ROCK! I sent it to all of our frat brothers.....and while I haven't seen my $20 grand yet, I'm up to $8,285. Hook me up when you run this program again.
(Why didnt he run this program himself? He didnt need to wait for his buddy to send it again)

Mary Gathers, Columbia, SC: Hey cuz! This is Mary. I only have one thing to say to you... OH MY GOD! I sent 20 e-mails out like you said and went on vacation. When I got back, my account was up to over $12,000! I owe you!


***********************************************************************************
GETTING STARTED.
The very first thing you need to do is go to PayPal and sign up. It takes two minutes and PayPal will deposit $5.00 in your account. That makes this program only $1.50!
Here's the link:

Pay me securely with your Visa, MasterCard, Discover, or American Express card through PayPal!
BE SURE TO SIGN UP FOR A PREMIER ACCOUNT! OR YOU'LL BE LIMITED TO $100 DOLLARS ONLY!!! YOU WILL MAKE MUCH MORE THAN THIS!!!

Then...... E-Mail the $5.00 from your PayPal account to the FIRST name on the list (#1) along with a little note in the paypal note screen that says...............................................

******************************************************************************
(Please Send me the Url For the $1.50 Ebook Download)

They will send you the URL, and you will download the ebooks..now you can sell them on EbaY (I will also provide an ebay auction template at the download sight, so you can get started right away), or use this letter to market them!!!

These are the products that you will get when you Get your $1.50 URL...

1) eBaY Marketing Secrets
2) Increase Auction Profits
3) 7 Secrets To Unlimited Traffic
4) Internet Cash Machines
5) Wholesale Sources 2001
6) Classified Ads Secrets 2001
7) The Magic Story
8) Magic Letters
9) E-Book Submitter
10) E-Mail Marketing Stratagies
11) Make Your Own E-Book Covers
12) Internet Marketers Secret Guide
13) Building An MLM Empire Using the Net!!!
14) Your E-Book Daily Marketing Plan
15) Scientific Advertising
16) Credit Secrets 2001
17) THE ULTIMATE E-LIBRARY 3000+ EBOOKS.....THIS ONE IS WORTH $39.95.
18) He Hehehehe....I Will Not Forget The Most Useful E_Book (Net Success)

And much much more will come later......
**************************************************************************
........................Now Back To the Scam Letter......................
**************************************************************************
 Read the following and you will agree this is a very exciting opportunity.

ARE YOU IN NEED OF MONEY RIGHT NOW?
HOW DOES $20,000 IN TWO WEEKS SOUND?

Don't laugh! Try this for a change while you wait for the others to start working. One hour of work to get started and no mailing lists! This service is 100% legal (refer to US Postal and Lottery Laws, Title 18, Section 1302 and 1341, or Title 18, Section 3005 in the US code, also in the code of Federal Regulations, Volume 16, Sections 255 and 436, which state a product or service must be exchanged for money received).

Here's How It Works. Unlike many other programs, this THREE LEVEL PROGRAM is more realistic and much, much faster. Because it is so easy, the response rate for this program is VERY HIGH VERY FAST -- Internet
E-Mail FAST -- and you will see results in two weeks or less! JUST IN TIME FOR NEXT MONTHS BILLS!

You only mail out 20 copies (not 200 or more as in other programs). You should also send them to people who send their programs, because they know these programs work and they are already believers in the system! Besides, this program is MUCH, MUCH FASTER and has a HIGHER RESPONSE RATE! Even if you are already in a program, stay with it, but do yourself a favour and DO THIS ONE as well.

START RIGHT NOW! It's simple and takes NO INVESTMENT! It will pay off long before others letters even begin to trickle in!

************************************************************
.........THIS IS THE PART THAT MAKES IT A SCAM.............
************************************************************

Just give ONE person a $5.00 gift (REMEMBER THOUGH, this $5.00 is $5.00 YOU GOT FREE WHEN YOU SIGNED UP FOR THE PayPal account). That's all! If you already have a PayPal account and do not receive their $5.00 gift, feel free out of the goodness of your HEART to donate a $5,00 GIFT to the person in the number 1 spot for him to have your name added to the advertisement list. So anyone’s MAXIMUM INVESTMENT IS $5.00.

****************************************************************************
.....YOU SEE!!! THERE WAS NO PRODUCT OR INFORMATION........
****************************************************************************
........NOW IT IS $6.50........
****************************************************************************

Follow the simple instructions and in two weeks you will have $20,000 in your bank account! Because of the ZERO INVESTMENT, SPEED, and HIGH PROFIT POTENTIAL, this program has a VERY HIGH RESPONSE RATE! FROM just ONE $5.00 bill that you get FREE at PayPal!!!

Follow These Simple Instructions:

E-Mail the $5.00 from your Paypal account to the FIRST name on the list (#1) along with a note saying "add me to your mailing list". Only the first person on the list gets your name and five dollar gift. Edit only the list, removing the FIRST (#1) NAME FROM THE LIST. Move the other two names UP and ADD YOUR NAME to the list in the THIRD (#3) position.

Don't try to add your name in the first place in order to earn money fast! If you do that, you will ONLY reach people you sent e-mail to and then your name will be immediately removed from the first place and you can't reach more people! But if you add your name on the 3rd place, there will be tons of people receiving E-Mails with your name first later!!!

NOTE: Do not forget to replace the PayPal referring URL in the body of the letter with your own PayPal referring URL. Send out 20 copies of this letter.

ALSO NOTE: By sending this letter and the payment via E-MAIL, the response time is much faster...

ELECTRONIC TRANSFER INTERNET FAST!

CONSIDER THIS, MILLIONS of people surf the Internet everyday, all day, all over the world!

Here are the 3 people to start with.

Sign up and send $5.00 to the first person!!!

*****************************************************************
....AND $1.50 WHEN YOU GET TO THE DOWNLOAD SIGHT....
*****************************************************************

*************************************

1. ky_1965@yahoo.com
2.creditvisa@yahoo.com
3. raveen10@home.com

*************************************
Fifty thousand new people get on the Internet every month! An excellent source of names is the people who send you other programs and the names listed on the letter they send you. Your contact source is UNLIMITED! It boggles my mind to think of all the possibilities! Mail, or should I say E-mail, your letter and payment TODAY! It's so easy. One hour of your time, THAT'S IT!

To send your newsletter by e-mail, copy this ENTIRE PAGE and paste it in the message of your E-Mail
TO DO THIS:

1. Go to "edit" and "select all"
2. Go to "edit" and select "copy"
3. Start (compose) a new E-Mail message (make sure it's PLAIN TEXT so everyone can view it!)
4. Fill in your Address and Subject Box
5. Go to "edit" and "paste" (Then you can format it anyway you want!)

Now you can edit the addresses with ease. Delete the top name, adding your name and address to the bottom of the list, then simply changing the numbers. Remember, YOUR NAME goes on the BOTTOM and move the other 2 names up. But DO NOT forget to send $5.00 by PayPal (along with your note) to the TOP E-MAIL address before deleting it!

(*YOU NO LONGER NEED TO SEND A NOTE TO THE TOP EMAIL ADDRESS, PAYPAL WILL DO IT FOR YOU*)
NOTE: Be sure to replace the PayPal referring URL in this e-mail of the letter with your own PayPal referring URL. THERE'S NOTHING MORE TO DO. When your name reaches the first position in a few days, it will be your turn to collect your MONEY! The money will be sent to you by 2,000 to 4,000 people like yourself, who are willing to invest one hour to receive $20,000 in cash! ***********************************************************************

Be willing to send the URL to anybody who buys it from you....THIS IS NOW A BUSINESS....like the letter said, money will be sent(not sent, but paid for a product) to you by 2000 to 4000 people. But, it is five dollars an email...WOW...Did I just say that? $5.00 AN EMAIL???? *NOTE* You might want to use an autoresponder that will automatically send the URL to the download sight..This will save you oogles of time.....You can even set PayPal up to automatically send the URL also. Then you can go on vacation, and let this business run itself

************************Ok, back to the Scam Letter**********************


That's all! There will be a total of $20,000 in $5.00 bills in your mailbox (account)in two weeks. $20,000 for one hour's work! This is real money that you can spend on anything you wish! Just deposit it to your own bank account or spend it directly from your PayPal account!!! It's just that easy!!! I think it's WORTH IT, don't you?

(PayPal even has a debit card now!!!!!)

GO AHEAD--- TRY IT!!! EVEN IF YOU MAKE JUST 3 OR 4 THOUSAND, WOULDN'T THAT BE NICE? IF YOU TRY IT, IT WILL PAY! CAN YOU DO IT AGAIN? OF COURSE YOU CAN---this plan is structured for everyone to send only 20 letters each. However, you are certainly not limited to 20. Mail out as many as you want. Every 20 letters you send has a return of $20,000 or more. If you can E-MAIL forty, sixty, eighty, or whatever, GO FOR IT! THE MORE YOU PUT INTO IT THE MORE YOU GET OUT OF IT!

There will also be information at the download sight to put you on the way to sending 20,000 emails a day!!!

Each time you run this program, just follow steps 1 through 3 and everyone on your gift list benefits! Simple enough? You bet it is! Besides, there are no mailing lists to buy (and wait for), and trips to the printer or copier, and you can do it again and again with your regular groups or gift givers, or start up a new group.

Be SURE and PAY the first person on the list. This is proof that you paid to get put on the list which is the service rendered to make all this legal!!! Why not? It beats working!

******************************************************
The last paragraph is now Null and Void...Although do be SURE and PAY the first person on the list... But now There is a download of a product (A resellable product at that) All you marketers out there know that being put on someones mail list Is NOT a service...It just means you get more junk mail...
************Ok, now back to the Scam Letter***********

Each time you receive an MLM offer, respond with this letter! Your name will climb to the number one position at dizzying rates. Follow the simple instructions, and above all, PLEASE PLAY FAIR. That's the key to this program's success. Your name must run the full gamut on the list to produce the end results. Sneaking your name higher up on the list WILL NOT produce the results you think, and it only cheats the other people who have worked hard and have earned the right to be there. So please, play by the rules and the $$$ will come to you!

$$$ E-MAIL YOUR LETTERS OUT TODAY! Together we will prosper! GOOD LUCK $$$

You are probably skeptical of this, especially with all the different programs out there on the web, but if you don’t try this you will never know. That's the way I felt. I've been watching this type of program for years and this is about as easy and fast as you can get it and it can even be free to try now with PayPal, no stamps, no envelopes, no copies to be made - just a little effort and faith!!! This program really "Kept It Short and Simple"!

OH BY THE WAY....each time someone signs up with your link under your name... you also make $5.00 from PayPal... so they pay to open up the account but they also pay you when someone signs up from being referred by you. AWESOME!

Let's all make some serious money $$$$$$

A product, and in this case products that are worth $1000 or more! I have taken the idea of a scam chainletter, and turned it into a MARKETING TOOL.....!!!!! Now it is not a scam!!! Please just play by the rules, this doesn't cost anything but your time and if everyone plays fair everyone WINS.

GOOD LUCK and THANKS !!!!!

Powered by counter.bloke.com

to be removed from the list please send blank emai with the words remove in the subject line





1 --_========_000007057_========_ Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="gmail1.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gmail1.gif" R0lGODlhWgBRAIcAAQAAAP///zMAM2YAZpkAZswAmf8Amf8AzDMzMzMzZpkzmZkzzMwzzABmZjNm ZmZmZmZm/5lmZsxmzACZmTOZzGaZ/5mZmZmZzDPMzDPM/2bMzGbM/8zMzP/M/wD/zDP//2YAAJkA AMwAAMwAM/8AAP8AMwAzAJkzAMwzMzNmM5lmAJlmM8xmZv9mZjOZADOZMzOZZmaZMzPMADPMMzPM ZmbMM2bMZmbMmZnMmZnMzDP/ADP/MzP/Zmb/Zmb/mWb/zAAAMwAAmQAzzAAz/zMzAGYzM/8zADNm zGZmmcxmM/9mAGaZmZmZM8yZM8yZZv+ZM8zMM8zMZszMmczM///MM//MZpn/M5n/Zsz/Zsz///// Zv//zAAzZgAzmTMzmTMzzDMz/2YzZv8z/wBmzABm/zNm/2ZmAGZmzJlmmZlm/8xm//9m/5mZAMyZ mcyZzMzMAP/MAGYzAP8zM2ZmM/9mM/+ZZgDMmf/MmQD//5n/////MwAAZjMAmTMAzDMA/2YzzGYz /8yZAJnMM5nMZsz/M8z/mf//AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH/C05FVFNDQVBFMi4wAwHo AwAh+QQBCgABACwAAAAAWgBRAAcI/AADCBxIsKDBgwgTKlzIsKHDhxAjSpxIsaKFihgzYuSAQaPH jw09dARJsqRADh48BOhgsqXGlBgsXHSZkYOGjyhTAnhAM2MHkSwzptQ5syfFnyIzXhjqYadRjEMx BJ3ItKmApxU1RJ0KUStTAAhAcvVooepYhkg9fNAJwCPKCyVzMuUAEcOHu3gBtK3YwavUkkjxrqXb EKXgu3qPek058CzflIc9EFbYIcNhxHshdsBQla4FAJM9Qo4MV+GFy3cRZG64uarICHp5krSLN4Pt DB5KH+zw4bZlvAkAODbY2nVTvas/arjr27fughia//7gQPjC4sar6x2+kbl02/vPT37/TQF0QuzG jwNI0JL3+A3wn3eoAP/7h/KhGy9O70F14vbSwSdgfANdMOAG0mEAQFEC9WUcZ0xNgByDJUV324ED wjUfhgj6tqB+/BmgwFd6hUVThxxuUMGKG1xAH30YeniRg/xRYIABBKTUAHJGaZABhysGKSSLHNoG QATLCWacBQccYEAD6lFo0gU/DjjklUIWScF0eKV0gQFDfXlAAcj91xMHB2KpZpAx3nYYBjcOkBKT BxBQJndiYQDfmnwSKWBzXX6JowMeKNBkmbIZtaGKffJ5oG+HaQdAoYfyKFEHmGbaAQccXKCBpxqE uoGeMK4Jwamoqvmom/tdpkRBSoYaMGFEcvFXm21WYonqrqeq+ierd3mwQQFL5XajXuxdmt5hF+Y6 JK/QQnDlgLbdVQFeG9woAJR0mjlRrWoJ1pyAukbLK5Z/SvDjjWtlYMABAHDr5IcUPaAXU8w2S66Q 5kY7LYIMFHCjth5U8C4AE6R0cH4RfQaAA5eN6+yK/UK7ogREZiAmAE3CO0G2BwhAqAfvEjABng0F B0DE414gsAFBRruAvwEfAKO7dXI8r7DvbptSATt7oAHKCjk8gbgXSjDwvBTIvOsCIkIAdZwUqHiw zmSuVTKUhR7LFAYcEI2Qf7dmIMHLHctKMbQLzLzAywg4eSgC7vsePEGTWX9Q8qQe0Jmja39J5DAF eDn5bgEClLn2rgIXELfcBSygs8jZGkBmBoYLoPCYfGOQM98Pil1QiZaNCbReDVDAL6+GE3DA47Lq HK+Ydl7AQMkJNynrUBKCzp+UDDmMwQUJnK4no4ujCnWTqjVpZwVNDtDABc7HTYHrB8j5eYT8edAA 8A51oJcDQMsaHwPIQ3v4w84DYHCd08t9qAOcH71jwt17X+ZOohtk7/rUe5cDYsarvUGgSQJAwPsI QDcFvAteK8uAXo6WPwz4Z3+zmkgHgFYAoLVPSDdC1d6ol70GvO9yGRCA4xBmGdqsxTgTuCAG6YWR G+FtAPuJc1+LbFiAppUMAQuoHsjs1KHqNIBLL2SKA2S4vwSAbyIDQ04DTLjDMflHTGRaIAA2wAD/ 1AdSkRnKDJH1xIpwECxgEZDLkKNAg1nOfS4j4gYe9qtqhVGMTSxjRsrXFg5sUUDlmZ6LKiAoHZbn j6uyo5KS2LtkGYUB8xKI7QqwryFph01FAqOSquLIpygtcRKQHwKqhrwhqQ6T1NJkq1yDFYEoDXsd gxcp9/SvTAKrS0lkSnhocraOFYAAOATALFOUIkBdpnv9w4jSEFemKRLzmdI5ZvdGoijYxMtC+npm HW+Jy/wl8ygyCYB3JEbM8aAml/yZQCsDwIGyjfznnarcZP5SwjCXuLA38NySOVHTALvMcyjf1GC4 3OmbOW4xmuc85MMglL+b9Gig58yAysDCnHMKZkf7GxkyexIYiypof0my6Fo+MCEMahRwAX2IXFCT ASayZzMW5Z1eZtIBe+0Pf52hSVUOo1DkTGYpx0wiRg3CAZuyEaeMaQm4BupSg0AoWOi01G6YiICh 1FMjDP0aBh2TFuOQdD1ooapKAOOaDzAxUQcpllqq0rurHsQCMuykR7Lqgd6Vya0DoetQ/DMRuOoF rxKpylkdslS2mKhecsVIWVJiV+Qkcz941OM6A7DX/aE1fK7pXUqVKjTx3Yki4OLrZBUCtgBDTFSy C3kVHhM7WoIExbEa6epMW7uQ4FxWsYzdDm0Vkpy59sdbu8XKT5AV3NE6DLXFJQlwk4uV3jJXUc+N rnSn+5CAAAAh+QQBCgABACwDAAIAVQBNAAcI/AADCBxIsKDBgwgTDuSgsKHDhxAjJqwhsaLFiw9r UMTIsaNFHDooMvRIsuTBGjpm4MBhsiSOGyZBpgxgoSVJDjpslJyhQ4cMmyVxhhyJUWZPmkA98hyK UWjPGQEeJO1oo2dKohJv6NhhFSjWolt3iP3qEKfYswEQuFRZMixaiTTOnjVhoiMHGzw3ejQrdwfL hzj6iq1L9uFdqzpGFo7IQbDYvw15OCZc8TBiHAzVenT8uOENzikCLD7IASXilCsE1vQYV7BkyAY5 8JAsOPRogqVPW60bgLfHz3JnC8+B8IZw2mdhiG6YW3fP0AJhdzx7nEcP68QNXq+ePIB03PtVnff8 KVBqULHHe6hfD5uDj/XbZ4tV/l10ePE9eZu4LVG2cPg9+CCgD9kFkIOAAB5Hg3cFcaCVbjKc9sJA 9XH033oDZkicexm+p55wC+L2IIQkqBChT1MJdB2GHWbIwQ8tevhhiKIBd9ZpMZBAwgnPLQTUDSy2 CCOMPhDZ4oc90GTjjaepoKMIKUyYonfqCfnDlVhiWeSR6sGAXF8qoHCikySIQJBmSQWYYZZsZrll hx/K11eOO/ZEJgi4TcXhgG326WaG68kpl5MihOCCDmROiduaRfrZ55sIxieYCwKZgKiOA6FZFgec curdDS/dIKqoVjrqKJeCnjXDC/sv9IRCmRRmNMOsPXHlFnqzVbmmqbwCKqlcMaBg4qVmRgVRc1Zx lquaAvLqrK/bxXAWnQikcCkJAvFX0Ii3Umedrs06a2qHN6xQQwwljCCWDDqCcGiiFSJUkwk8KZvr rn5uoK++4w74qo46IrADnQEcyi4JIMSLEA5qvTCDY8tmKGqf+1bc5ktGWtAuwAG8QKe7PukYwgva NigVvX1d6MMNFqBQQgk3tFmxxViyQMIIOBA5AgkhBMCxx+0eqsPOIliqUskU1vVCytbZYDPAZsaM 5cz73lACCz9orOMJN/iAQ7sBEB3ADjO0a60O/waAWA2YHRuawLj2QCbAsPuyWbEFFmyQA8APlAAw CCn4wHEKfhdNtsiWXhvCiWsj/RcM6P1bJp4D5ZDlviyUgIIFOz/Jgs8Iw3DDkwHY8PfhZSbObs+J O2eDthyElsJsI4ggArYmpCC61JdvMEK6IKAAuggIIGD21zybsELnI+8gtlU/mcC4c2w9RBcMKzxw ewBdm7qB1iRIJTJN7cKgdc8kxBDC1jug0LPaVgntnAwpKBybWjDcHjWoFji6d/KcQ5gJ/gc45Olo BAEgXM9cMIMUmEB+4nmBAwdiAgsgDSmkY8GrRgADRyHuB2YbHc8C4APJCYQGUOkY2fDjE+gcxAT2 w82Tbjc+LOVgBPsjsBwIEYYA5AHuf0UTkPbwtDSyPcxWunmBbwzSwwtmy28iAwGeEHAlHEAxBD/4 XwhS8LQtijAEJgBSD5Q4O8dAT4kJqZ8TC1K4gaQgBTFDngimKELiaZGKwutNgOJkxq688AFt80gb ZdcsHKAATyboYB1N8AMczJGRPkCA6DyUKrkgZokmAOQaFdICWHEAByaQWCKzmMWvFS1mN8gdnH4l GMRMKJObfEgnzcQpQ6Kge43KknICoKVVCoczunHhVDqJpxZAEVtd41MuJxajQFWSSYiZQSwhYsz1 0Q1bMIhRs7TpzC9Z0jkx5IgxoRYCKQYgm9psZjc5g8TTSPwzRcacIwXfCK50yig+3vymeHSip88l cAY0WFaQuNTNfEITP9N0CEs4EJfqAOihgcInO9spnhROKTgO/VZEq2PQg7JQB+HESGswylEeeImj 7Gzg0j5qlXcmpTHsVNAJfznRHUjpnywF6VRsUNMd8ECYPT2LMAVyNhYmFCEwnSgMMMnToJ6JICZ4 wfQQw8+WaGWiQ30Ap3qqg5tmywKaiupUdQCUpXClL2ikIGQCA8weLYcgLNFUClzAOIuSxChbCUsD C2IegoxUnzqoyxILgoO+ErVVOi2JaSQUG9IA9inlUahhE0iym+hmrwSxYEKMQlEphfSThp3sRRbb E697piWGNBCPYC0C2uh4BDH0K4hmH6LaBHKEA3jriFFMux+J3AcxiooIZGXL2qVYRUpHJUlOYIOA hJ5mtcFVCD9Fy5HfRja6zBFIc2+yFPKEVFE1WY1LSpst7DZkuzZBCW+Sa97iXre98P3Ld+FrEg6o hb30rUx+94tfhQQEACH5BAEKAAEALAMAAgBVAEsABwj8AAMIHEiwoMGDCBMOtKCwocOHECMmVCKx osWLD5VQxMixo0UORpJ4HElSoRIjSiwsKUlSipOSUoygDICE5cgtRl6OPDmzpk2PMnVyjKmR4oOf HpPIVJKFY1GNSEc6edrU4tSnAYBEHfqUacUtXSkCaGlECsmwFZsoefJk7RMAYzlmcSJT5MgsGtmy VcIBIge3et9y3EJXphGWgAObddgksN64Xwsb7hsAslPHehcnlIKZrVaJhA0bVuLzqMfGnZ9oNpgl 9ZMVAbY8nCt6qZG4ljk6ca0aIVsqnSPMlixaI2yBlEd2psKcyuqBzTszCZCcNfHRKDfa3IK5infv +1SiFGT+/QlwvU2oH6RdG+VSJZ9zd2z9+8n3+84HSqFy33vglwwVdB1KSmWnhF0BBFiSefz1h594 ATToYGAFzRVWdkMgYeBAn7EEnINVaCHiiFKMKOKE/NEk0G5haWREBEMMIYRGRGwVgBMSemfijjyC WAVNUTh2IYwyEoFgVPs1yOOSPfbHxHmBaYTEEC5OGSNB8pVEHpMiYsGlFhN25kSMQZxkZRAEyRaV kjti4eabby55n3mdnXkCaVfaONAU/PEI559uylleascBgOcQA2W5XhaMNiWbFJC65IQT3kFRRZ8m /nnFppv+2aR/nWmUhJR5qucQT+51hRl/+2x2+SansHYap4n4iZkhqYhWVKCqjpH3XZtuxirsFbOe +F1zu7E15hBAEHHoRUQV5dqvmQY7bKzFnsjcEk8sq1eMzSrxwJUKPlSTodKueh+w1w4bKK1UWBkj s08QCcSdSsQIQHUPcTDWCnl1Rq2IUWhhbbuwemnBjgHoO28ASSx7r0ZknsARAKmxSoUWARwR46ux WiHyyJxi4fEQBWtBRYxCNHylEssGga8Q+qIkhZoQWTBWEqvyt8S8VxIb8sgiX5EhFD+TCYUWUejb sYwBsEWms0qcHIBoSfDbkFZABMacvEAHcPAVJCNhhdFXAg1EEStfmQTLGD8xtUZE+wrhnmhO4NxQ gKi1zTKaA40tssdHMEEzyyuBu4IWLEc4b9dPHI7u2y0b2l5QVW0dANtt01zZClBA4SUWIf99BBDz EgGA4k0PEQQAFpwsxAmRv3ySxQDceXd7zyGEBFxNWFCE5xuPODbZSQ8xHZkBoB0EE1LAPUQEQZD5 xBEtB+CiEidkZ6CoRGit0Bb/PrxxFEu4CuvZcDNBJgCMu75C9GGvADXtquObaldJFAEZAD6BSE0a F7sYMcFgINvU+7AwtdYJgQhaOFmunpAeiLWlRU8pQkJgF5Et0EwIh3NdAIwXoyuEbmrOWxzcVBYA IWglCcDh2V66QqAOGYSD+xYBmhCCgCb4acEC8xICschUhKQFoQjxe53KqLACALANM11ZgQ0LUoRy 5bBURQDdD1mmFQCgTQgAaF0QIHi6yoCHVVDEykHGYkWMNE6DECQYsz7npnnBTwo79CEAFnesUHXF Mmy0idWo40MRQWGPJgLiEHzYBLjQClR+fIpIFEWSCpSKA0g4wpemM8JPVYE3NDSCabZiSTRZ8nFL YxIWnODJT6bmQiHRUymBdqUDfmlEIAJlKMtioynokIdoagKYQsSkXOryKbXJ3E8sucNEEQF0Poqm K10DS1QJ5SdT8EkRmuArafqITtTcJaqUaRML1MRr9rGPN6fJmwsi/HN3MrGYnjKWzjCBs50XOok+ J2Mj1PDmOziCUjufUASeIXOf+5QJOUuCl4F+UiD3bCeCihDKhAYlKlNpZxU0KBAgCJQ3HCUIRQ1k G8NM4Sd4SQxmGomlZIXzCVjCEsBIaphrtuQpnQlpQcIpKoH4ZAu/IwgQAGbRn7RIL04AZHKkoNKw 6JQgfbEMEEbFE+2MBCRhYctTDyJDd/6xMgnhwFMLKpPeYUSfXbFpbNaDwaJEhANTBIJV5TKaokwx gAdhKgaPIz6EwPUnkjFOQfblEKqGpYsXscBn+hqRut61se9UwlimWBEkbFUiMSHQYPXmEOK4VU8Q WcpjK5KF7kuNRjigfUhOTpoozkrEsWBNbUJEoje8XiQC75FtRYDg2ouMRiBt1C1BjmLbjligLgLp rXAFQkndGIGyy00tXqJL3QQBt7rChe5PAgIAIfkEAQoAAQAsAwACAFMATAAHCPwAAwgcSLCgwYMI Ew7koLChw4cQIx48IrGixYsNj1zAyLGjRTIUPYocORFkAAskPXLYOPICGZMoU3LkQOYCQ49HXo4J 8EBmx5chObrU6RMn0JsXX74sEyBMUYxDQSKVGPVlgARPL1YtM/UhTaVWiYzkwNUjWDJMJUIoAwas yJVAVYIFQ1ci27ZKO8LNK7IMGbqAwXQ9yCEwYDIY9ypl6dFwYMYILzimi1WiYqVHeoqEMJmum4SF O2MdTDjnWaskl3SmSzoA585evJo+TaYyyc6vIQ+E8Nrxl4aXT+8U6FSlY97IIXwmmLw34N8Ig9O2 PTZw8+TLA7i57hy6wQv7Y07Pfhnb52vuadKnWZ6Ge2/vAlf6FQ8nitLhV1Nyvq6+P4f+7V0HBgQn CSQZbS8tAQccbLxEXUoBIgfghBM2NyBPkh1Gm4JwvMFFeUUVJiGFJKp33ReOKWWBfS89sOAbBIll HgQl1thfcp2BtKAZLe5IUGsd8WbjkBam6OIbbHQxRhQLypjVfzWqkYaUUpaII2wCcTGGi3D86BAH YDIk5gVkXtBeejSeSaEabLbZppXITVZGGV54ER6TMAoUU0JH9IngcSMC6Oagb1J4pWFkLBHFA+Ed SdxD480FaJoTDroGoWwaGicYqtF1xI5ckMFlRVW9NFlya7a5xqX7q15aaIW8WXCGglCwxSERoQbQ ZEQxzafUpJSq52arxK7qpqFMLtgkp012oSMcTj7UhkBezHeqkOq5kd6wrYpB7LFtAKgrtMoS4QWH Zij5KYMgQuRUAnNeS2MbUUABx7ZsEivGvt4ayyaTUGibnr1sjAvjuaC+ZK+HY2gEJEJenHpGvcrC iIaqq/K77xpuQBHFGm0oa8YZaVjg44sBsJUwGckGEF5cEGGVgGEQUFwxjFPmm7EYErSxr7Lj7phA GvZ2mcDCAYCxLhuhirpgkuI9XBCKdCXboRkE5axGtwCjoWyHUYxrxtAon/EiEXShDBSDATRNm00N yUwXFG/71C1QAmegga/OYhTNBhREvJhA4NCG4cbTAtHNLhhIYyaQswiCtCdCMf0WxhtdktwftyC/ 2BPiJsMxdsgMBh4GGzuyzIZYL48BOW1dJGCB1PFhFQbSJLsR7t5bc4y416Jr97TsX0PRFN0BeHEE FwG8TpvrD06u0Ocd8mQvFHprrTPiEgh9OINDWy0WGNB5gVbkZHjx4EUcvIg54v3BAUWbQpM+9vcw 8na5WBGT7ytt6kvI+hxyMzNgbWhpIB2DJPA9NiQgWQ5MA+KQE5uZ0eUvwvECABJSnIssTEYJwFsC z3YV/CWge+BLQxTEgjfe5OgsHBQJ0mSWrRUSZz37KEvgG7CWngSE4VCBoY1BOijD6hWoP2doSn/a YLf0JBGBEXJOEE9THiKSBE8EiUIUaoQGgWhqU4hCkBVTwiQzEMFqcAiD5ih0hjWaCIhTpE1QfNI+ 1H2tS14Y0hvhqKHI6YYk7asYGwwYgDNgC05FShH6XkI7i+AJawPhQgtRRaNKcmc1eFnkEkIUtqtQ jS7uCaUUw7hIRj4FJfISpQsxWUqwHKGRF8FkKDHZx1aipiifpCUEcklLtCTAfLYkAywjQhNa0gU6 vHwhiODVyj96ZCi0tI0FVwOW9SVgkWMY5pck5RuDnIGaSkmLQKKVvJedZpMkKdVfAvOg4ijE8izl 0QwHHkCdX5qTL2+J1K/aZRALXDCTZxngowiSACU5biQIKkM7DfKFRQqUIFb85UukdxF9ps8gpCFL 5IYzxoM86JdyOYtCC6KZyESOnw+xQEehAs+KIuihD1kpMcEyhgeV1CEIGihGHnBTqigFpdpUJ36y glMHkdQiGgULSomKkJpMLgHaLMhZNsjUhqCzgw+IakGW4JamVDVmWj3Ifb4akZ6a5aIBCGtKYIqR nLCVrE8KiUzhSte6kvWtdn2KWh0SEAAh+QQBCgABACwCAAIAVABLAAcI/AADCBxIsKDBgwgTEmyj sKHDhxAjHpSCQqLFixgdjhiRsaPHi1JIcPxIsiTCESJxmCzZhoXJNiRKlAiwZOXHLCRckowpk6bN jyRyfoQpc2bNnx1RiszSMWjRAA6QdmQRcylGqiXk9AQgNSPREkGZSsSZVetMEyWliGAItGxQi3JI yJmrlWQWqiJLyqUbVwrEkHznos14F+xbvYH7Pkw8lzDeon4RM46csA1jOVzHPi464uicj3EvUzaY 5bKcz2IbZkHhtGjPlSwS06EzdzTBJHNpB/7scDVP1zLj/OQ7uzjtKAflGNc9N4lqrMBdD4xql+7y 2XXoICd4vXjzhPt3W0eXmXllaeXF66hfT4dyFDrrsxuX49x2gM2cgVcUaL9jbuzxxYdcFgGqd11B 4f3GGR52/DYQEamRlF6BAUpRBYUGFkcQXlqZVRQLeOAxgUxEdCUfhihSiB1NdSQGHAkBhIgHESNJ JQV8KF54YR07Yjgbbi6SsAQeMgkpI0Hl2YRjgVU06eSTKM4XGAohNgCWBSFOQFCEJmWx5HpPhgml j7MFVgKWDMZBgh0hDhYAbz8RGJ+YdI4ZoHdmChcAACSgeVEWTAHKXxtt1MECCynyKKYWVTBKp4pl BkaCCCiAxSYeA/VHkFqTGhbUp3tZ96V6YWph6qmnhgkpc/tz5eSBBUH5CdVDWYAFHGMTzvkkqrya quqdusU2F5V4NECEkZha1IZrlwEY4K69YsGrnewFQEcSIYbWpppD4gEAWw8dVRSuzoIJralYpJvu tE7GR8cPMrYpB4h4mCCCTG1aFFkcZQVmXIBROImqugRL62sVOPRYRxshAiAjACJgW6yaJWQpwkVR AdAhcRPiAC8ePA5cMBZ6lKyHqR9HsV6IdsQYYgAi0NsAxR40HFMbXCrEFgr+YodDvJg6IXLBemCB Bw56/FxlEnU4kW/NLceVJb9rvlwVCShoehBaGhOnNNABNHlqwUgbHeIc8ZoQRx1HinDkXFkSAVa3 dvvcW1RQKOQ8kUBAyhGvHQ0Q1OjY6bLpAdoy2qFSlWsfSYeMJkj9skwjMLjneEGxoHdBaBFBG8vJ xpGEEwKfWnTNxf7gcIhErK52FFkKhHrdJBxZ1H52Y75WREm0QcTLip6rBclffxY77BNLwbLDSUxQ JQke2IGWa7lHNwIRWpPGVRyoB6BeFAmXbmrRLAfgdLEBaDE18iF6EEAcbYpwPczjuTZCHG76BFFN R+KA+hxPOpkAY6e+YhGhCsurw6XqFYDGvC8u9aNciewCOhlp6UkhGl+ViHAHxhUQU+pxAOAeKAcR 0CUr0UFBkgqyQoj8rQGBA0CTvmaHOhRwAvtEUBoOESgi72VHOHFg1QmLoieEOABcF3mYQOIQB9Ip L18yXN4ND+gBrrEnUmZ6ihGRmJHuleiA36uiQADIQ0xVQQojvBAA1pYhIQ7xNQRxQPYs0r0AcMCH 6nHCm56ktLBVwTkAWBVj9CMQ6vzkYwT5mbnCxJt2FUhKLgKOIZECrwYA4GOsYxqTquAEJ6QIT4ME To2QkgcRAQ1TmkzUqtw4F8xxcSWljNcEYBiAVKryiqCMZHRIsLmPfCxwDxLdLd2VS13ucj8/ycNR iICecqlyOabxUP14KRW2iGo5UbpONFEYwRJcrCsN5Fh3xonFy3TTNSSYo3/IdZ0kaPwzmjSSZjdF 0MuO4CSaxhEIbViZGGTGYQTnBMsrSUKVaCrHkMw0aCsnSBB+dZOa5olJNJ1TEGEpdCBtyN/7polM lkj0MgwtpEAUWoL9WEAgWVhCkta4S5vYamN0QYFGKQOYUJagiAaZZACIUCnOmCQkzOpQSGdVENZk sSgtzGlBeCrQkgA0haQ5CE7kws1xidQhQyXCNz1CFmYN9SgI+QpU9RVSnV4EOjLpaERQMp6kRmSC 6lSIgr5aT4IoSItDtcgSzBqRr6g1AHWt6F1nAk6IiCAmGgVrRLJQvZIWFiI5iRAAApsQBWn0sQfZ jyEVexUHERWzDpmsXXInkIEjgnY6+vOoYwF72oS41SOVem1rwVmrq872tGyJ621XIluSBAQAIfkE AQoAAQAsAwACAFMASwAHCPwAAwgcSLCgwYMIEw6UorChw4cQIxosBEWixYsYG755k7GjR4uF4HD8 SLLkwTciLZgkKSWKSSlwYgZQudIjnIokY8qkWTNjoJsfo+iEE+BBz44ogXYcShTB0YxCY468GFVn ACBPMVaVedEQHENgDQUAYDKQS5tfw1ok9FWPHrAlo/zEadOQ27CFIBYC67Yv2Y5yrea02xfuQyh9 E3eE8lNn3sF9CUkm5DDK5MR6iFyEwlQkGoFGOxIiPFmyWIWlJfe1yLkzUZNODKUundCKldluY0Bs 7Vq3yUKzS1tBeDu4HkEOebt+XZQkh+CEsGAhZIUhwdvTcSNPGHh5TKz7NWdLH4/FylmBVshnn4wF 4VadSXWyOVo8uvor+KsH4GAFv/rS7RX0Hnx+/DHUQE6ZxB55+DV4xXAO+kfeZARFEZZrTvjhBx9g JdiTZQxGKKKIE7b3wF58gfXVUA/0oWEAU9E33og0RjihIKUVZogFfuiEhot9ZCVQIelhUeORDU6Y 411QaLjHVz/6EYSQ+6WH5JVXjJdaYWhoGIQZhnTpx1/N9cSBkTT2oOaaPRyp5ZJvmTFQmC9ixAEH ARRSSEtR9Dlef1mOyOagatL45mV3GRIIZ4b84WJEgUTa2FBh6QGgdIISSqih6xGSmCFNBgDlowHM 4RAH8enEl6X7l6IZoaawjijdZZa91aQfQCCwY50RhaRqYqnN+Cqssdo4HRqERKEhWIRoCASYD7zI U0OhrUiYW8G66iCxxTo43R8auoirIRniyoZXGpIpkRlvAdsqpg1yC+sS3lrwqIZ+BBAIFs6CCYeX bDwGkamiuhvsEuD6cYW8miY8SJbNbhgAvjAq68ce/opLREznOUSTIJEBKCbFgzDcQ4E9LCHuHoJg YTFWgPgRJFhOgtnoi0PR5RBWQIRMyMj45svtH2qGi0DQQBDB74tsABmAXV4+DUe0Uk4a06ISgexW 0H3sQdDChAIZA9dLTIxrDEsHGfG4hoQr9RtSCuRdFHj7KoQVAlvLnG+pgjwM9qArAwKEuAI5q1vU AcQs5bkUewXHfPp6B0cg1jlUHQKPWhkvoUvge3jcgzgZA48S+yHIHk62HQRWQ7Hh3RsESxQD4elZ sISRsEY99sUBXOGkZkHny4bMALChh0CuSw67utMqZJTbSygeA36aRn0y775LqXTCuAZgKfJeOe7a Gx56BKS4ccfr4poueh36xdO7Pd3RWBmvBxSEia8qFOCZxPUe4DFS5zTEBzW5aEoD9NrSpjSe+cwB M29hChv6ZxAEVM4iFBMIAmLwMNL1ATzv6wMRssdAwQnkTZbCjPhOc5A5XBAjbksQpkLXvza57Qr7 oVNge9B2KNX0hSkGiR1JFEcQePXghA0aYO+wsB0j/QdOeugM5B6QhZ4QcSB/AESgnOgg32grSbOC YhQ7I8SaxMxritMQAgRhqCu0zFhhhOJyYlSTKUgpePliI5YkFEdE/XA5HVuJHcXVhyDswWst+6Ks lCRGyQXiKTHrWkFiUCR4wZGRjZSczkwyhc8EAAFWYJV91ENKTGZScnCYwlGsgy3JTOeVpezhljCz IlQ+Mit2gU6wdOlHHaFSMEfBnyh1yUReQlAPc8Cf/rxzy56sapjBOiF0jkmXOfySYx96Zis9ZanY 9WyYx+xQEG2pypXE5Jh92U6F0Kmj4wnYxALqCoAZvLNJj0TlWpgpX5lGg8601DM0BEkeEE2SKjgk BgrxLIg29WeIMhIEoBoU6ORK4itK2UWfDlVmBJnCQoXoEwFJeSFGlBMTUEWkpK45jUMP8tFmLoWj +oSoQQYkH4yUb6URUY4hIMea5ejTIj+9CFNielLXaNAjD8CpQ2ASE55mxAmd6SiVEtIYCpbJIlaD w3aqOFWEwCGQH2GKVbtaECjkBaDNuwhUBaPUqXJVIGP1iWDSStaBGEWmHmGqU+taV84Ela9TvWVb AdsTuhJ2qnFdSUAAACH+/1RoaXMgSW1hZ2UgY3JlYXRlZCBhbmQgY29weXJpZ2h0ZWQgYnkgUmlj ayBMYXd3aWxsIG9mIEdsb2JhbCBQcmVzZW5jZSAxOTk1IC0gMTk5Ng0KDQpBbnlvbmUgbWF5IHVz ZSB0aGlzIGltYWdlIGZyZWUgb2YgcmVzdHJpY3Rpb25zICBwcm92aWRlZCB0aGV5IA0KZG9uJ3Qg c2VsbCBpdCBvciBpbmNsdWRlIGl0IGluIFdlYiBTaXRlcyB0aGV5IHNlbGwuIEl0IGlzIGEgdmlv bGF0aW9uIG9mIElOVEVSTkFUSU9OQUwgTEFXIHRvIHJlbW92ZSB0aGlzIIxjb3B5cmlnaHQgaW5m b3JtYXRpb24uIA0KQ29weXJpZ2h0cyBzdHJpY3RseSBlbmZvcmNlZCEhIQ0KDQpSaWNrIExhd3dp bGwNCkdsb2JhbCBQcmVzZW5jZQ0KaHR0cDovL2dsb2JhbHByZXNlbmNlLmNvbQ0KZ2xvYmFscEBj b25jZW50cmljLm5ldAAh/u9UaGlzIEdJRiBmaWxlIHdhcyBhc3NlbWJsZWQgd2l0aCBHSUYgQ29u c3RydWN0aW9uIFNldCBmcm9tOg0KDQpBbGNoZW15IE1pbmR3b3JrcyBJbmMuDQpQLk8uIEJveCA1 MDANCkJlZXRvbiwgT250YXJpbw0KTDBHIDFBMA0KQ0FOQURBLg0KDQpUaGlzIGNvbW1lbnQgYmxv Y2sgd2lsbCBub3QgYXBwZWFyIGluIGZpbGVzIGNyZWF0ZWQgd2l0aCBhIHJlZ2lzdGVyZWQgdmVy c2lvbiBvZiBHSUYgQ29uc3RydWN0aW9uIFNldAA7 --_========_000007057_========_ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jan 23 15:19:04 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 5C9F01C180D; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:19:04 +0100 (CET) From: romantic@marriage.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Incredible Information (PR#52) Date: Wed Jan 23 15:19:04 2002 Message-Id: <20020123141904.5C9F01C180D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: How much does a romantic marriage proposal cost? Well, a lot less that you think. Most guys actually ruin the day by spending too much. Find out the secrets the jewelry, candy and flower stores don't want you to know. http://hop.clickbank.net/hop.cgi?helloworld/proposals From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jan 26 14:50:21 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id E362C1C1817; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:50:20 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] OpenJade does not build under GCC 3.0 (PR#5) Date: Sat Jan 26 14:50:20 2002 Message-Id: <20020126135020.E362C1C1817@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Now fixed with OpenJade 1.3.1. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jan 30 15:22:21 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 326BB1C181B; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:22:21 +0100 (CET) From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] dsniff: can't find db -> does not build (PR#53) Date: Wed Jan 30 15:22:21 2002 Message-Id: <20020130142221.326BB1C181B@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: dsniff-2.3-20020206 OS: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) Just another problem with db during configure ... checking for MD5Update... no checking for warnx... yes checking for ether_ntoa... yes checking for Berkeley DB with 1.85 compatibility... /cw configure: error: db_185.h or libdb.a not found in /cw or not configured with --enable-compat185 error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.6511 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.6511 (%build) cw@foobar$ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 31 15:59:41 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id A74931C1812; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:59:41 +0100 (CET) From: chris@schug.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] log file rotation in general (PR#54) Date: Thu Jan 31 15:59:41 2002 Message-Id: <20020131145941.A74931C1812@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Christoph Schug Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.39) We have to think over our current log file handling approach. Currently it's only possible to rotate log files in packages like apache, proftpd etc day by day. But there might be other scenarios where a weekly, monthly, yearly rotation is needed as well. I already discussed this issue with Ralf. The most promising approach would be an enhancement of shtool's log file handling capabilites. To ensure persistance certain tag files would be needed which is a very practical and simple (= portable) method but certainly not the most elegant one. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Feb 2 14:24:44 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 58BEB1C1814; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:24:44 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] dsniff: can't find db -> does not build (PR#53) Date: Sat Feb 2 14:24:44 2002 Message-Id: <20020202132444.58BEB1C1814@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: One has to use the latest and greatest version of "db" from OpenPKG-CURRENT. With this it will work fine... Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 7 13:01:18 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id D76DE1C185A; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:01:17 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] [FWD] Request for dynamic libraries (PR#55) Date: Thu Feb 7 13:01:17 2002 Message-Id: <20020207120117.D76DE1C185A@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Should be remembered. ----- Forwarded message from Joerg Lehrke ----- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 10:06:41 +0100 From: Joerg Lehrke To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Request for dynamic libraries Reply-To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi developer team, I have a request for OpenPKG2.0. It would be nice to have an option within the spec-files to control dynamic library generation (the enable-shared and enable-static switch from configure). The current version of OpenPKG only generates static libraries and links all packages statically therefore. If someone wants to use dynamic linking he should be able to do so with a switch selected during bootstapping. - --enable-dynamic=[no|both|yes] (both can mean static and dynamic libraries). Every package should then respect the users choice and generate the proper library format. For packages with problems with dynamic linkage a static library can be enforced. Cheers! - -- Joerg Lehrke GnuPG-KeyID: C66844AC The Knoc http://k.noc.de/ Bgm.-Haffner-Str. 7, D-87600 Kaufbeuren, Germany Tel +49 8341 874647 GNU -- Protect your freedom! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8YkOnqBmc6cZoRKwRAvoaAJ4g8p2Jcp+/LLXRW7BIntTTmsR1ewCfaZkn SBH1eZGUuasaw3GFHQyBEig= =IzMU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----- End forwarded message ----- Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 7 16:08:20 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 43BAB1C1818; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:08:20 +0100 (CET) From: ps@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PAM: pam.d should be supported (PR#56) Date: Thu Feb 7 16:08:20 2002 Message-Id: <20020207150820.43BAB1C1818@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Peter Smej Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) During the installation of openssh just /etc/pam.conf is updated. But on some system an update of /etc/pam.d/ is required. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Feb 8 12:12:24 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 048D21C182A; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:12:20 +0100 (CET) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] tetex vs. texinfo: file conflicts (PR#34) Date: Fri Feb 8 12:12:20 2002 Message-Id: <20020208111220.048D21C182A@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Was resolved recently. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 24 07:16:11 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 9B2751C1927; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:16:11 +0200 (CEST) From: bugdb@en4.engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: Undeliverable mail: I trade blonde pics and movies (PR#76) Date: Wed Apr 24 07:16:11 2002 Message-Id: <20020424051611.9B2751C1927@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for submitting your feedback to our bug database. Your message was recognized and successfully filed under the problem report PR#76. You can monitor it under http://en4.engelschall.com/bugdb/guest?findid=76 If you want to submit for information for this particular bug report, please include the string "PR#76" in your the mail "Subject" header. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 24 07:16:46 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id DCC861C1925; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:16:45 +0200 (CEST) From: bugdb@en4.engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details (PR#77) Date: Wed Apr 24 07:16:45 2002 Message-Id: <20020424051645.DCC861C1925@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for submitting your feedback to our bug database. Your message was recognized and successfully filed under the problem report PR#77. You can monitor it under http://en4.engelschall.com/bugdb/guest?findid=77 If you want to submit for information for this particular bug report, please include the string "PR#77" in your the mail "Subject" header. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 24 07:16:53 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 14F5D1C1930; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:16:53 +0200 (CEST) From: bugdb@en4.engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details (PR#78) Date: Wed Apr 24 07:16:53 2002 Message-Id: <20020424051653.14F5D1C1930@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for submitting your feedback to our bug database. Your message was recognized and successfully filed under the problem report PR#78. You can monitor it under http://en4.engelschall.com/bugdb/guest?findid=78 If you want to submit for information for this particular bug report, please include the string "PR#78" in your the mail "Subject" header. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 24 07:41:44 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id D1F9C1C1925; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:41:43 +0200 (CEST) From: bugdb@en4.engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: Undeliverable: I trade blonde pics and movies (PR#79) Date: Wed Apr 24 07:41:43 2002 Message-Id: <20020424054143.D1F9C1C1925@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for submitting your feedback to our bug database. Your message was recognized and successfully filed under the problem report PR#79. You can monitor it under http://en4.engelschall.com/bugdb/guest?findid=79 If you want to submit for information for this particular bug report, please include the string "PR#79" in your the mail "Subject" header. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 24 08:44:54 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 72D7F1C1925; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:44:54 +0200 (CEST) From: bugdb@en4.engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: Undeliverable: I trade blonde pics and movies (PR#80) Date: Wed Apr 24 08:44:54 2002 Message-Id: <20020424064454.72D7F1C1925@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for submitting your feedback to our bug database. Your message was recognized and successfully filed under the problem report PR#80. You can monitor it under http://en4.engelschall.com/bugdb/guest?findid=80 If you want to submit for information for this particular bug report, please include the string "PR#80" in your the mail "Subject" header. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 24 09:27:10 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 612701C1925; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:27:10 +0200 (CEST) From: bugdb@en4.engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: Mail returned: Remote server didn't recognise recipient address. (PR#81) Date: Wed Apr 24 09:27:10 2002 Message-Id: <20020424072710.612701C1925@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for submitting your feedback to our bug database. Your message was recognized and successfully filed under the problem report PR#81. You can monitor it under http://en4.engelschall.com/bugdb/guest?findid=81 If you want to submit for information for this particular bug report, please include the string "PR#81" in your the mail "Subject" header. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 24 11:50:07 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 14DD11C1927; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:50:07 +0200 (CEST) From: bugdb@en4.engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: Undeliverable: I trade blonde pics and movies (PR#83) Date: Wed Apr 24 11:50:07 2002 Message-Id: <20020424095007.14DD11C1927@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for submitting your feedback to our bug database. Your message was recognized and successfully filed under the problem report PR#83. You can monitor it under http://en4.engelschall.com/bugdb/guest?findid=83 If you want to submit for information for this particular bug report, please include the string "PR#83" in your the mail "Subject" header. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 24 17:10:13 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 08BC01C1933; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:10:13 +0200 (CEST) From: thomas.lotterer@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] testerlie 9 (PR#91) Date: Wed Apr 24 17:10:12 2002 Message-Id: <20020424151013.08BC01C1933@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Thomas Lotterer Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) sdfsdfsdfsdf From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 09:47:47 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id BDF0A1C192F; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:47:47 +0200 (CEST) From: thomas.lotterer@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Testerli 9 (PR#92) Date: Thu Apr 25 09:47:47 2002 Message-Id: <20020425074747.BDF0A1C192F@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Thomas Lotterer Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) Testerli 9 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 09:52:51 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 1D83F1C192D; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:52:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Testerli 9 (PR#92) Date: Thu Apr 25 09:52:51 2002 Message-Id: <20020425075251.1D83F1C192D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: test reply 1 Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 09:58:12 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 19C831C192D; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:58:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Testerli 9 (PR#92) Date: Thu Apr 25 09:58:12 2002 Message-Id: <20020425075812.19C831C192D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: test reply 2 Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 10:12:34 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 389A51C192F; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:12:34 +0200 (CEST) From: thomas.lotterer@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-team@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Testerli 10 (PR#93) Date: Thu Apr 25 10:12:34 2002 Message-Id: <20020425081234.389A51C192F@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Thomas Lotterer Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) Testerli 10 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 10:15:15 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 656DA1C192D; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:15:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-team@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Testerli 10 (PR#93) Date: Thu Apr 25 10:15:15 2002 Message-Id: <20020425081515.656DA1C192D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Full_Name: Thomas Lotterer > Version: > OS: > Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) > > > Testerli 10 Solution is.... Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 10:18:34 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 9F77D1C192E; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:18:34 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-team@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Testerli 10 (PR#93) Date: Thu Apr 25 10:18:34 2002 Message-Id: <20020425081834.9F77D1C192E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Apr 25, 2002, thomas.lotterer@de.cw.net wrote: > Full_Name: Thomas Lotterer > Version: > OS: > Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) > > Testerli 10 Noch was, diesmal per Mail direkt. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 10:25:49 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id A83011C192E; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:25:49 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-team@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Testerli Testerli (PR#94) Date: Thu Apr 25 10:25:49 2002 Message-Id: <20020425082549.A83011C192E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This should trigger a new bug report in the BugDB. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 10:59:03 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id AA6611C192D; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:59:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Possible bug in openssh pkg on Solaris (PR#60) Date: Thu Apr 25 10:59:02 2002 Message-Id: <20020425085902.AA6611C192D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: >> Looks like modification of the /etc/pam.conf file on Solaris might be >> incorrect. >> >> Putting sshd in debug mode, I get a dlopen failed when trying to login. >> Looks like this is because the sshd entries all need to be of the form >> >> /usr/lib/security/$ISA/.... >> Rather than >> /usr/lib/security/... >> >> So that the 64bit libraries will get called (if in 64bit mode). It's >> probably minor and hasn't showed up because openpkg compiles everything in >> 32-bit. Reason I noticed is that my non-openpkg version of OpenSSH which I >> compiled 64bit stopped working. > > Yes, this is still not correct, I think. But for OpenPKG 1.1 we already have > to find a better solution to the PAM situation. We plan to create a "pam" > package which does all the fiddling with /etc/pam.conf and /etc/pam.d/ and let > all other modules which require PAM depend on this single "pam" module. This > way we do not have to maintain PAM stuff in every package like "openssh". Then > we also should use the $ISA in this new "pam" package. This is now fixed in OpenPKG-CURRENT (and this way in the forthcoming OpenPKG 1.1) by the introduction of the new "pam" package and by making PAM support optionally, too. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 11:01:10 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 380961C192D; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:01:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Openldap and buildroot (PR#59) Date: Thu Apr 25 11:01:10 2002 Message-Id: <20020425090110.380961C192D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > In article you wrote: > >> Anyone using the openldap rpm? >> >> I'm getting an error on starting slapd as it looks like the buildroot is >> getting hardcoded into the slapd binary. >> >> "/sw/RPM/TMP/openldap-2.0.23-root/sw/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema: No >> such file or directory" >> >> Does anyone have this working before I jump in to try and figure out what's >> going wrong? > > This is under Solaris, right? I've already seens this once in the past under > Solaris, although it did not occur under FreeBSD or Linux. I had no clue what > the problem is and how to workaround this. I'll investigate again next week. Michael investigated last week and said it now works fine under OpenLDAP. I don't know why it now works, but let's hope it keeps this way.. ;) Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 11:02:42 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 0F4261C192D; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:02:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - No such file or directory (2) (PR#58) Date: Thu Apr 25 11:02:41 2002 Message-Id: <20020425090242.0F4261C192D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Abstract: > when installing a new OpenPKG instance using > openpkg-20020208-20020208.src.sh the RPM DB does not exists > > Manifest: > # /cw/bin/rpm -qa > error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - No such file or directory (2) > > Issue: > The openpkg-20020208-20020208.src.sh script has a bug which makes it > "forget" initializing the RPM DB. > This is not a problem when upgrading, it appears only when installing a > new instance from scratch. The > solution below shows how to initialize the RPM DB and upgrade to itself, > which fixes the problem. > > Solution (workaround): > # /cw/bin/rpm --initdb > # /cw/bin/rpm -qa > (the error is gone but the database is empty) > # /cw/bin/rpm -Uvh openpkg-20020208-20020208.*-*.rpm > (ignore warnings) > > Verify the solution > # /cw/bin/rpm -qa > openpkg-20020208-20020208 This was already fixed a few weeks ago. The openpkg.boot was broken. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 11:04:46 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 387781C192D; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:04:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] PAM: pam.d should be supported (PR#56) Date: Thu Apr 25 11:04:46 2002 Message-Id: <20020425090446.387781C192D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > During the installation of openssh just /etc/pam.conf is updated. > But on some system an update of /etc/pam.d/ is required. This is now fixed in -CURRENT with the new "pam" package. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 11:06:01 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 1D3061C192D; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:06:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Ralf S.Engelschall To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Hexer package fails to build from source (PR#40) Date: Thu Apr 25 11:06:01 2002 Message-Id: <20020425090601.1D3061C192D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > bash-2.05# /sw/bin/rpm --rebuild > ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.0/SRC/hexer-0.1.4c-1.0.0.src.rpm > Installing ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.0/SRC/hexer-0.1.4c-1.0.0.src.rpm > Executing(%prep): /sw/lib/openpkg/bash -e /sw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.38922 > + umask 022 > + cd /sw/RPM/TMP > ... > ... > + cp config.bsd config.h > + /sw/bin/make --no-print-directory CC=/sw/bin/cc 'CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe > $(DEFINES)' > /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o buffer.o buffer.c > /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o tio.o tio.c > /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o edit.o edit.c > /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o main.o main.c > /sw/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DHEXER_VERSION=\"0.1.4c\" -c -o hexer.o hexer.c > hexer.c:73: conflicting types for `sys_nerr' > /usr/include/stdio.h:224: previous declaration of `sys_nerr' > make: *** [hexer.o] Error 1 > error: Bad exit status from /sw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.38922 (%build) > > > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /sw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.38922 (%build) > bash-2.05# This was also already fixed by me a few weeks ago. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 12:11:29 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 3702F1C192F; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:11:29 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] new PAM support in some packages still missing (PR#95) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:11:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20020425101129.3702F1C192F@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Ralf S. Engelschall Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.110) There are still a few packages in -CURRENT which have not been upgraded to the new introduced PAM approach. Let's do now forget this. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 25 15:44:46 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id BF31A1C1931; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:44:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrew J Caines To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Build error in gtk-1.2.10-20020206.src.rpm (PR#96) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:44:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20020425134446.BF31A1C1931@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: A long series of similar looking errors end with.. /cw/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"Gtk\" -DGTK_DISABLE_COMPAT_H -DGTK_LIBDIR=\"/cw/lib\" -DGTK_DATA_PREFIX=\"/cw\" -DGTK_SYSCONFDIR=\"/cw/etc\" -DGTK_LOCALEDIR=\"/cw/share/locale\" -I.. -DG_DISABLE_ASSERT -DG_DISABLE_CHECKS -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -DUSE_XIM -I/cw/include/glib-1.2 -I/cw/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -O2 -pipe -Wall -c gtkbindings.c -o gtkbindings.o In file included from gtkbindings.c:30: /usr/include/ctype.h:16: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /usr/include/ctype.h:18, from gtkbindings.c:30: /usr/include/iso/ctype_iso.h:28: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /usr/include/iso/ctype_iso.h:30, from /usr/include/ctype.h:18, from gtkbindings.c:30: /usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h:13: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h:15, from /usr/include/iso/ctype_iso.h:30, from /usr/include/ctype.h:18, from gtkbindings.c:30: /usr/include/sys/isa_defs.h:9: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from gtkbindings.c:31: /usr/include/string.h:16: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /usr/include/string.h:18, from gtkbindings.c:31: /usr/include/iso/string_iso.h:28: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from gtkbindings.c:32: /usr/include/stdarg.h:16: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /usr/include/stdarg.h:20, from gtkbindings.c:32: /usr/include/iso/stdarg_iso.h:28: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /usr/include/iso/stdarg_iso.h:30, from /usr/include/stdarg.h:20, from gtkbindings.c:32: /usr/include/sys/va_list.h:9: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /cw/lib/glib/include/glibconfig.h:9, from /cw/include/glib-1.2/glib.h:66, from ../gdk/gdktypes.h:33, from ../gdk/gdk.h:31, from gtkbindings.h:34, from gtkbindings.c:33: /usr/include/limits.h:16: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /usr/include/limits.h:20, from /cw/lib/glib/include/glibconfig.h:9, from /cw/include/glib-1.2/glib.h:66, from ../gdk/gdktypes.h:33, from ../gdk/gdk.h:31, from gtkbindings.h:34, from gtkbindings.c:33: /usr/include/iso/limits_iso.h:28: warning: ignoring #pragma ident In file included from /cw/lib/glib/include/glibconfig.h:10, from /cw/include/glib-1.2/glib.h:66, from ../gdk/gdktypes.h:33, from ../gdk/gdk.h:31, from gtkbindings.h:34, from gtkbindings.c:33: /usr/include/float.h:16: warning: ignoring #pragma ident gtkbindings.c: In function __builtin_va_alist' undeclared (first use in this function) gtkbindings.c:650: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once gtkbindings.c:650: for each function it appears in.) gtkbindings.c:659: warning: implicit declaration of function args' might be used uninitialized in this function make[2]: *** [gtkbindings.lo] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.22773 (%build) Build environment includes: autoconf-2.53-20020309 automake-1.6.1-20020412 bash-2.05a-20020308 binutils-2.12-20020310 bison-1.35-20020402 flex-2.5.4a-20020320 gawk-3.1.0-20020206 gcc-3.0.4-20020222 gettext-0.10.40-20020206 glib-1.2.10-20020206 gzip-1.3.3-20020314 libtool-1.4.2-20020206 m4-1.4o-20020206 make-3.79.1-20020206 patch-2.5.4-20020206 perl-5.6.1-20020331 -Andrew- -- ________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- 703-886-2689 Andrew.J.Caines@wcom.com | | Unix Systems Engineer, WorldCom Andrew.J.Caines+page@wcom.com | From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu May 2 09:42:29 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 20C9E1C18AA; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:42:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrea.Sikeler@de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Printing the Handbook (PR#97) Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:42:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20020502074229.20C9E1C18AA@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: OpenPKG_Package: Operating_System: Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.70.93) Printing the handbook is quite okay. However, page breaks and the like would improve reading. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu May 2 13:03:31 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 4CC0D1C18A7; Thu, 2 May 2002 13:03:31 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Printing the Handbook (PR#97) Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 13:03:31 +0200 Message-Id: <20020502110331.4CC0D1C18A7@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In article <20020502074229.20C9E1C18AA@mail.openpkg.org> you wrote: > Printing the handbook is quite okay. However, page breaks and the like would > improve reading. Hmmm.. yes, you are right. Currently we have only the HTML output of the DocBook sources and this one does not print very good. We should try to get a reasonable print version out of the DocBook XML sources. The problem is that the current DocBook XML stylesheets only provide XML-FO output beside HTML. And we currently have no running XML-FO to Postscript/PDF converter. Perhaps we should package Apache's FOP for this... let's see what we can do here. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu May 2 16:55:41 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 465631C18A7; Thu, 2 May 2002 16:55:41 +0200 (CEST) From: peter.smej@de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Automatic Build of new version on all OS required (PR#98) Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 16:55:41 +0200 Message-Id: <20020502145541.465631C18A7@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: We require an automatic (daily) build of new program version on the different operational system. The success of the build should be returned as information for the developers. Greetings, Peter -- -- Peter Smej peter.smej@de.cw.net Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu May 9 21:20:57 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id ADFAF1C191E; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:20:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrew J Caines To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] sudo upgrade overwrote sudoers file (PR#99) Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 21:20:56 +0200 Message-Id: <20020509192056.ADFAF1C191E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Folks, Upgrading an installed and configured sudo package to sudo-1.6.6-20020425 via.. # rpm --rebuild ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/sudo-1.6.6-20020425.src.rpm # rpm -Uvh RPM/PKG/sudo-1.6.6-20020425.rpm ..as user cw*, the config file /cw/etc/sudo/sudoers was overwritten with the default version. Let me know if I can provide any more useful information. * This is intentional. cw owns all the files in the OpenPKG heirarchy. When ownership changes are necessary (eg. SUID root), they are made by hand. I am aware that some packages need privileged operations during install. -Andrew- -- ________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- 703-886-2689 Andrew.J.Caines@wcom.com | | Unix Systems Engineer, WorldCom Andrew.J.Caines+page@wcom.com | From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri May 10 17:19:00 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id D2BEB1C1903; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:18:59 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] sudo upgrade overwrote sudoers file (PR#99) Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 17:18:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20020510151859.D2BEB1C1903@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In article <20020509192056.ADFAF1C191E@mail.openpkg.org> you wrote: > Upgrading an installed and configured sudo package to sudo-1.6.6-20020425 > via.. > > # rpm --rebuild ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/sudo-1.6.6-20020425.src.rpm > # rpm -Uvh RPM/PKG/sudo-1.6.6-20020425.rpm > > ..as user cw*, the config file /cw/etc/sudo/sudoers was overwritten with > the default version. > > Let me know if I can provide any more useful information. > > * This is intentional. cw owns all the files in the OpenPKG heirarchy. > When ownership changes are necessary (eg. SUID root), they are made by > hand. I am aware that some packages need privileged operations during > install. Hmmm... I've checked our "sudo" package and the sudoers file is explicitly tagged as %config since the early days. So RPM should not have overwritten this file. I've no clue how this is possible. The only explanation is that is is tagged as: '%config %attr(0400,root,%{l_mgrp}) %{l_prefix}/etc/sudo/sudoers' And perhaps because you have done it not as "root", RPM was not able to set the "root" ownership on the file and perhaps of this the %config tagging was also ignored. But this is only a wild guess. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon May 13 05:45:10 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 2007B1C189C; Mon, 13 May 2002 05:45:10 +0200 (CEST) From: To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] I saw your email (PR#100) Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 05:45:09 +0200 Message-Id: <20020513034510.2007B1C189C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hello - I saw your email on a website I visited yesterday, and thought you might be interested in this. A few months back I joined a program and then...promptly forgot about it. You may have done this yourself sometime...you intend to work the program but then get caught in your day-to-day activities and it's soon forgotten. The program was free to join so maybe I just didn't take it very seriously. Anyway, near the end of March I received a letter from my sponsor (Scott Johnson) informing me that I had more than 2000 PAID members in my downline! As you can imagine, I was very skeptical. After all, how could I have more than 2000 paid members under me in a program that I had never promoted? I took the time to check out the site...then wrote to Scott asking for confirmation that these were paid members and not just free sign-ups...like me :) Well, it was true...I had 2365 paid members in my downline. This in a program that I had never worked! All I had to do was upgrade to a paid membership before the end of the month and I would have my position locked in and a downline of 2365 people. You can bet I wasted no time in getting my membership upgraded! I can tell you, if I had known what was happening with this program, I would have become an active paid member months ago! With this program, you will get a HUGE downline of PAID MEMBERS. My sponsor's check, which is a minimum of $5,000, arrives every month...on time. How would you like to lock your position in FREE while you check out this opportunity and watch your downline grow? And not only that but save at online stores such as Walmart, Best Buy, and Spiegels To grab a FREE ID#, simply reply to: tim28146@yahoo.com and write this phrase: "Email me details about the club's business and consumer opportunities" Be sure to include your: 1. First name 2. Last name 3. Email address (if different from above) We will confirm your position and send you a special report as soon as possible, and also Your Free Member Number. I'll get you entered and let you know how you can keep track of your growing downline. That's all there's to it. I'll then send you info, and you can make up your own mind. Warm regards, Tim Lockhart P.S. After having several negative experiences with network marketing companies I had pretty much given up on them. This company is different--it offers value, integrity, and a REAL opportunity to have your own home-based business... and finally make real money on the internet. Don't pass this up..you can sign up and test-drive the program for FREE. All you need to do is get your free membership. 1246NuPA8-882bZhc4991Cl21 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jun 14 18:13:43 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 4CEDE1C193B; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:13:43 +0200 (CEST) From: sgros@zemris.fer.hr To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Problematic argument to gcc in config script (PR#101) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:13:43 +0200 Message-Id: <20020614161343.4CEDE1C193B@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT OpenPKG_Package: openssl-0.9.6d-20020604 Operating_System: Tru64, probably all Submission from: (NULL) (161.53.65.41) In config script of openssl package the option --version is used to query for gcc version. gcc2 gives only number, while gcc3 also gives some extra text which confuses script to think gcc is not available. Option -dumpversion works correctly on both versions. Furthermore, on Tru64, line 574 reads *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-cc" ;; while i think it should *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-" ;; SG P.S. I can send a new openssl.patch but I need address on which to send it. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jun 14 21:20:19 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 2E3C71C193D; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:20:19 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Problematic argument to gcc in config script (PR#101) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:20:19 +0200 Message-Id: <20020614192019.2E3C71C193D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Jun 14, 2002, sgros@zemris.fer.hr wrote: > OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT > OpenPKG_Package: openssl-0.9.6d-20020604 > Operating_System: Tru64, probably all > Submission from: (NULL) (161.53.65.41) > > In config script of openssl package the option --version is used to query for > gcc version. gcc2 gives only number, while gcc3 also gives some extra text which > confuses script to think gcc is not available. Option -dumpversion works > correctly on both versions. > > Furthermore, on Tru64, line 574 reads > > *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-cc" ;; > > while i think it should > > *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-" ;; > > SG > > P.S. I can send a new openssl.patch but I need address on which to send it. Just send it to openpkg-dev@openpkg.org or append it to this Bug Report by replying to it and including the patch. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jun 15 09:16:04 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 66AFE1C1944; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 09:16:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Stjepan Gros To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Problematic argument to gcc in config script (PR#101) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 09:16:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20020615071604.66AFE1C1944@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --=-kROs6aRkd2hvaIFM6tFw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! openssl.patch is attached to this mail. SG On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 21:20, rse@engelschall.com wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2002, sgros@zemris.fer.hr wrote: > > > OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT > > OpenPKG_Package: openssl-0.9.6d-20020604 > > Operating_System: Tru64, probably all > > Submission from: (NULL) (161.53.65.41) > > > > In config script of openssl package the option --version is used to query for > > gcc version. gcc2 gives only number, while gcc3 also gives some extra text which > > confuses script to think gcc is not available. Option -dumpversion works > > correctly on both versions. > > > > Furthermore, on Tru64, line 574 reads > > > > *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-cc" ;; > > > > while i think it should > > > > *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-" ;; > > > > SG > > > > P.S. I can send a new openssl.patch but I need address on which to send it. > > Just send it to openpkg-dev@openpkg.org or append it to this Bug Report > by replying to it and including the patch. > > Ralf S. Engelschall > rse@engelschall.com > www.engelschall.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org > Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org --=-kROs6aRkd2hvaIFM6tFw Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=openssl.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; name=openssl.patch; charset=ISO-8859-15 --- Configure.orig 2002-06-14 18:02:56.000000000 +0200 +++ Configure 2002-06-14 18:03:20.000000000 +0200 @@ -119,10 +119,10 @@ "debug-ben-debug", "gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG= -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DPEDANTIC -DDEBUG_SAFESTACK -g3 -O2 -pedantic -Wall -Wsha= dow -Werror -pipe::(unknown):::::", "debug-ben-strict", "gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBU= G -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DCONST_STRICT -O2 -Wall -Wshadow -Werror -Wpointer-arith= -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -pipe::(unknown):::::", "debug-rse","cc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -pipe -O -g -ggdb3 -Wall::(unknown)::= BN_LLONG :", -"debug-bodo", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX= _DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -DBIO_PAIR_DEBUG -g -m486 -pedantic -= Wshadow -Wall::-D_REENTRANT::BN_LLONG : elf_asm", -"debug-ulf", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_= DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -g -O2 -m486 -Wall -Werror -Wshadow -p= ipe::-D_REENTRANT:: :", -"debug-steve", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DD= EBUG_SAFESTACK -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -g -O2 -m486 -pedantic -Wall = -Werror -Wshadow -pipe::-D_REENTRANT:: : elf_asm", -"debug-levitte-linux-elf","gcc:-DUSE_ALLOCATING_PRINT -DRL_DEBUG -DREF_CHE= CK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DPEDANTIC -DNO_ASM -DL_ENDI= AN -DTERMIO -D_POSIX_SOURCE -ggdb -g3 -m486 -pedantic -ansi -Wall -Wshadow = -Wid-clash-31 -pipe::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:::::::::::dlfcn", +"debug-bodo", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX= _DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -DBIO_PAIR_DEBUG -g -march=3Di486 -pe= dantic -Wshadow -Wall::-D_REENTRANT::BN_LLONG :", +"debug-ulf", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_= DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -g -O2 -march=3Di486 -Wall -Werror -Ws= hadow -pipe::-D_REENTRANT:: :", +"debug-steve", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DD= EBUG_SAFESTACK -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -g -O2 -march=3Di486 -pedanti= c -Wall -Werror -Wshadow -pipe::-D_REENTRANT:: :", +"debug-levitte-linux-elf","gcc:-DUSE_ALLOCATING_PRINT -DRL_DEBUG -DREF_CHE= CK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DPEDANTIC -DNO_ASM -DL_ENDI= AN -DTERMIO -D_POSIX_SOURCE -ggdb -g3 -march=3Di486 -pedantic -ansi -Wall -= Wshadow -Wid-clash-31 -pipe::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:::::::::::dlfcn", "dist", "cc:-O::(unknown):::::", =20 # Basic configs that should work on any (32 and less bit) box @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ # surrounds it with #APP #NO_APP comment pair which (at least Solaris # 7_x86) /usr/ccs/bin/as fails to assemble with "Illegal mnemonic" # error message. -"solaris-x86-gcc","gcc:-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall -DL_ENDIAN -DN= O_INLINE_ASM::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl -ldl:BN_LLONG 6_gcc_opts::dlfcn:solaris-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).= $(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"solaris-x86-gcc","gcc:-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=3Di486 -Wall -DL_EN= DIAN -DNO_INLINE_ASM::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl -ldl:BN_LLONG es ::dlfcn:solaris-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB= _MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", =20 #### Solaris x86 with Sun C setups "solaris-x86-cc","cc:-fast -O -Xa::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl -ldl:BN_LLO= NG RC4_CHAR RC4_CHUNK DES_PTR DES_UNROLL BF_PTR::::::::::dlfcn:solaris-shar= ed:-KPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", @@ -334,10 +334,10 @@ =20 # The intel boxes :-), It would be worth seeing if bsdi-gcc can use the # bn86-elf.o file file since it is hand tweaked assembler. -"linux-elf", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall= ::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG ::= dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"debug-linux-elf","gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG = -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -m486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-lefence -= ldl:BN_LLONG ::dlfcn:linux-shar= ed:-fPIC:.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"debug-linux-elf-noefence","gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_C= TX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -m486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-= ldl:BN_LLONG ::dlfcn", -"linux-aout", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wal= l::(unknown)::BN_LLONG :", +"linux-elf", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=3Di4= 86 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG : lf_asm:dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"debug-linux-elf","gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG = -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -march=3Di486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-l= efence -ldl:BN_LLONG ::dlfcn:li= nux-shared:-fPIC:.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"debug-linux-elf-noefence","gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_C= TX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -march=3Di486 -Wall::-D_REE= NTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG ::dlfcn", +"linux-aout", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=3Di= 486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG : ", "linux-mipsel", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall:= :(unknown)::BN_LLONG:::", "linux-mips", "gcc:-DB_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall::(= unknown)::BN_LLONG:::", "linux-ppc", "gcc:-DB_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall::-D_R= EENTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG RC4_CHAR RC4_CHUNK DES_RISC1 DES_UNROLL::::::::::dlf= cn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", @@ -347,11 +347,11 @@ "linux-ia64", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall::-= D_REENTRANT:-ldl:SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG RC4_CHUNK RC4_CHAR:asm/ia64.o:::::::::= dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "NetBSD-sparc", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mv8 -Wall -DB_END= IAN::(unknown)::BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX DES_UNROLL::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-g= cc-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "NetBSD-m68", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -DB_ENDIAN::(u= nknown)::BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX DES_UNROLL::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shar= ed:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"NetBSD-x86", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall::(unknow= n)::BN_LLONG ::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-= fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"FreeBSD-elf", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -= Wall::-pthread -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_THREADSAFE::BN_LLONG c_des ::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SH= LIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"FreeBSD", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -= Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG : ", -"bsdi-gcc", "gcc:-O3 -ffast-math -DL_ENDIAN -DPERL5 -m486::(unknown)::= RSA_LLONG :", -"bsdi-elf-gcc", "gcc:-DPERL5 -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486= -Wall::(unknown):-ldl:BN_LLONG : m:dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"NetBSD-x86", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=3Di486 -Wall:= :(unknown)::BN_LLONG ::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-= shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"FreeBSD-elf", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march= =3Di486 -Wall::-pthread -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_THREADSAFE::BN_LLONG= ::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::= .so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"FreeBSD", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march= =3Di486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG : _asm", +"bsdi-gcc", "gcc:-O3 -ffast-math -DL_ENDIAN -DPERL5 -march=3Di486::(un= known)::RSA_LLONG :", +"bsdi-elf-gcc", "gcc:-DPERL5 -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -marc= h=3Di486 -Wall::(unknown):-ldl:BN_LLONG : 6_gcc_opts:dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)"= , "nextstep", "cc:-O -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG _gcc_opts:::", "nextstep3.3", "cc:-O3 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG $= {x86_gcc_opts}:::", # NCR MP-RAS UNIX ver 02.03.01 @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ "unixware-7","cc:-O -DFILIO_H -Kalloca::-Kthread:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG M= D2_CHAR RC4_INDEX ::", "unixware-7-pentium","cc:-O -DFILIO_H -Kalloca -Kpentium::-Kthread:-lsocke= t -lnsl:BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX ::", "unixware-7-pentium_pro","cc:-O -DFILIO_H -Kalloca -Kpentium_pro::-Kthread= :-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX ::", -"unixware-7-gcc","gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DFILIO_H -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 = -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG := :::::::::dlfcn:gnu-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"unixware-7-gcc","gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DFILIO_H -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march= =3Di486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG c_des::::::::::dlfcn:gnu-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR= )", =20 # OpenUNIX 8 "OpenUNIX-8","cc:-O -DFILIO_H -Kalloca::-Kthread:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG M= D2_CHAR RC4_INDEX ::", @@ -468,11 +468,11 @@ # Mingw32 # (Note: the real CFLAGS for Windows builds are defined by util/mk1mf.pl # and its library files in util/pl/*) -"Mingw32", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall::::BN_LLON= G ::::::::::win32", +"Mingw32", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=3Di486 -Wall:::= :BN_LLONG ::::::::::win32", =20 # Cygwin -"Cygwin-pre1.3", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -m486 = -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ::::::::::win32", -"Cygwin", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -m486 -Wall::= ::BN_LLONG ::::::::::win32:cygwin-shared:::.d= ll", +"Cygwin-pre1.3", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -march= =3Di486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ::::::::::= win32", +"Cygwin", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -march=3Di486= -Wall::::BN_LLONG ::::::::::win32:cygwin-sha= red:::.dll", =20 # Ultrix from Bernhard Simon "ultrix-cc","cc:-std1 -O -Olimit 1000 -DL_ENDIAN::(unknown)::::::", @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ =20 # Some OpenBSD from Bob Beck "OpenBSD-alpha","gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer::(unknown)::SIXTY_= FOUR_BIT_LONG DES_INT DES_PTR DES_RISC2::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC= ::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"OpenBSD-x86", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486::= (unknown)::BN_LLONG : :dlfcn:bsd= -gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"OpenBSD-x86", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march= =3Di486::(unknown)::BN_LLONG : := dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "OpenBSD", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer::(unknown)::BN_LLO= NG RC2_CHAR RC4_INDEX DES_UNROLL::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\= .$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "OpenBSD-mips","gcc:-O2 -DL_ENDIAN::(unknown):BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX = RC4_CHAR DES_UNROLL DES_RISC2 DES_PTR BF_PTR:::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared= :-fPIC::.so.$(SHLIB_MAJOR).$(SHLIB_MINOR)", =20 --- config.orig 2002-06-14 18:03:06.000000000 +0200 +++ config 2002-06-14 18:03:35.000000000 +0200 @@ -381,9 +381,11 @@ =20 # figure out if gcc is available and if so we use it otherwise # we fallback to whatever cc does on the system -GCCVER=3D2.95.3 +GCCVER=3D2.95.3 if [ "" !=3D "" ]; then CC=3Dgcc + # then strip off whatever prefix GCC 3.1 and higher prepends the number = with... + GCCVER=3D # then strip off whatever prefix Cygnus prepends the number with... GCCVER=3D # peak single digit before and after first dot, e.g. 2.95.1 gives 29 @@ -569,7 +571,7 @@ *-*-openbsd) OUT=3D"OpenBSD" ;; *86*-*-bsdi4) OUT=3D"bsdi-elf-gcc" ;; *-*-osf) OUT=3D"alphaold-cc" ;; - *-*-tru64) OUT=3D"alpha-cc" ;; + *-*-tru64) OUT=3D"alpha-" ;; *-*-OpenUNIX*) if [ "" =3D "gcc" ]; then OUT=3D"OpenUNIX-8-gcc"=20 --=-kROs6aRkd2hvaIFM6tFw-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jun 15 09:19:17 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id D368E1C1937; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 09:19:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Stjepan Gros To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Problematic argument to gcc in config script (PR#101) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 09:19:16 +0200 Message-Id: <20020615071916.D368E1C1937@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Well, the first one I sent as attachment and there might be problems because of that, so this is another try, this time as inline text. SG On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 21:20, rse@engelschall.com wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2002, sgros@zemris.fer.hr wrote: > > > OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT > > OpenPKG_Package: openssl-0.9.6d-20020604 > > Operating_System: Tru64, probably all > > Submission from: (NULL) (161.53.65.41) > > > > In config script of openssl package the option --version is used to query for > > gcc version. gcc2 gives only number, while gcc3 also gives some extra text which > > confuses script to think gcc is not available. Option -dumpversion works > > correctly on both versions. > > > > Furthermore, on Tru64, line 574 reads > > > > *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-cc" ;; > > > > while i think it should > > > > *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-" ;; > > > > SG > > > > P.S. I can send a new openssl.patch but I need address on which to send it. > > Just send it to openpkg-dev@openpkg.org or append it to this Bug Report > by replying to it and including the patch. > > Ralf S. Engelschall > rse@engelschall.com > www.engelschall.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org > Bug Database Interface www.openpkg.org/bugdb > Bug Database List openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org openssl.patch ========================================================== --- Configure.orig 2002-06-14 18:02:56.000000000 +0200 +++ Configure 2002-06-14 18:03:20.000000000 +0200 @@ -119,10 +119,10 @@ "debug-ben-debug", "gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DPEDANTIC -DDEBUG_SAFESTACK -g3 -O2 -pedantic -Wall -Wshadow -Werror -pipe::(unknown):::::", "debug-ben-strict", "gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DCONST_STRICT -O2 -Wall -Wshadow -Werror -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -pipe::(unknown):::::", "debug-rse","cc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -pipe -O -g -ggdb3 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}", -"debug-bodo", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -DBIO_PAIR_DEBUG -g -m486 -pedantic -Wshadow -Wall::-D_REENTRANT::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}", -"debug-ulf", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -g -O2 -m486 -Wall -Werror -Wshadow -pipe::-D_REENTRANT::${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}", -"debug-steve", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DDEBUG_SAFESTACK -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -g -O2 -m486 -pedantic -Wall -Werror -Wshadow -pipe::-D_REENTRANT::${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}", -"debug-levitte-linux-elf","gcc:-DUSE_ALLOCATING_PRINT -DRL_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DPEDANTIC -DNO_ASM -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -D_POSIX_SOURCE -ggdb -g3 -m486 -pedantic -ansi -Wall -Wshadow -Wid-clash-31 -pipe::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:::::::::::dlfcn", +"debug-bodo", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -DBIO_PAIR_DEBUG -g -march=i486 -pedantic -Wshadow -Wall::-D_REENTRANT::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}", +"debug-ulf", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -g -O2 -march=i486 -Wall -Werror -Wshadow -pipe::-D_REENTRANT::${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}", +"debug-steve", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DDEBUG_SAFESTACK -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG_ALL -DPEDANTIC -g -O2 -march=i486 -pedantic -Wall -Werror -Wshadow -pipe::-D_REENTRANT::${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}", +"debug-levitte-linux-elf","gcc:-DUSE_ALLOCATING_PRINT -DRL_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DPEDANTIC -DNO_ASM -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -D_POSIX_SOURCE -ggdb -g3 -march=i486 -pedantic -ansi -Wall -Wshadow -Wid-clash-31 -pipe::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:::::::::::dlfcn", "dist", "cc:-O::(unknown):::::", # Basic configs that should work on any (32 and less bit) box @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ # surrounds it with #APP #NO_APP comment pair which (at least Solaris # 7_x86) /usr/ccs/bin/as fails to assemble with "Illegal mnemonic" # error message. -"solaris-x86-gcc","gcc:-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall -DL_ENDIAN -DNO_INLINE_ASM::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl -ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_sol_asm}:dlfcn:solaris-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"solaris-x86-gcc","gcc:-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i486 -Wall -DL_ENDIAN -DNO_INLINE_ASM::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl -ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_sol_asm}:dlfcn:solaris-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", #### Solaris x86 with Sun C setups "solaris-x86-cc","cc:-fast -O -Xa::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl -ldl:BN_LLONG RC4_CHAR RC4_CHUNK DES_PTR DES_UNROLL BF_PTR::::::::::dlfcn:solaris-shared:-KPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", @@ -334,10 +334,10 @@ # The intel boxes :-), It would be worth seeing if bsdi-gcc can use the # bn86-elf.o file file since it is hand tweaked assembler. -"linux-elf", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"debug-linux-elf","gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -m486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-lefence -ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC:.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"debug-linux-elf-noefence","gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -m486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn", -"linux-aout", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_out_asm}", +"linux-elf", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"debug-linux-elf","gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -march=i486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-lefence -ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC:.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"debug-linux-elf-noefence","gcc:-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -march=i486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn", +"linux-aout", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_out_asm}", "linux-mipsel", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG:::", "linux-mips", "gcc:-DB_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG:::", "linux-ppc", "gcc:-DB_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:BN_LLONG RC4_CHAR RC4_CHUNK DES_RISC1 DES_UNROLL::::::::::dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", @@ -347,11 +347,11 @@ "linux-ia64", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-ldl:SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG RC4_CHUNK RC4_CHAR:asm/ia64.o:::::::::dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "NetBSD-sparc", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mv8 -Wall -DB_ENDIAN::(unknown)::BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX DES_UNROLL::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "NetBSD-m68", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -DB_ENDIAN::(unknown)::BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX DES_UNROLL::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"NetBSD-x86", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"FreeBSD-elf", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall::-pthread -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_THREADSAFE::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"FreeBSD", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_out_asm}", -"bsdi-gcc", "gcc:-O3 -ffast-math -DL_ENDIAN -DPERL5 -m486::(unknown)::RSA_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_bsdi_asm}", -"bsdi-elf-gcc", "gcc:-DPERL5 -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall::(unknown):-ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"NetBSD-x86", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"FreeBSD-elf", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i486 -Wall::-pthread -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_THREADSAFE::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"FreeBSD", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_out_asm}", +"bsdi-gcc", "gcc:-O3 -ffast-math -DL_ENDIAN -DPERL5 -march=i486::(unknown)::RSA_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_bsdi_asm}", +"bsdi-elf-gcc", "gcc:-DPERL5 -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i486 -Wall::(unknown):-ldl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_elf_asm}:dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "nextstep", "cc:-O -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:::", "nextstep3.3", "cc:-O3 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:::", # NCR MP-RAS UNIX ver 02.03.01 @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ "unixware-7","cc:-O -DFILIO_H -Kalloca::-Kthread:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX ${x86_gcc_des}::", "unixware-7-pentium","cc:-O -DFILIO_H -Kalloca -Kpentium::-Kthread:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX ${x86_gcc_des}::", "unixware-7-pentium_pro","cc:-O -DFILIO_H -Kalloca -Kpentium_pro::-Kthread:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX ${x86_gcc_des}::", -"unixware-7-gcc","gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DFILIO_H -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::dlfcn:gnu-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"unixware-7-gcc","gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DFILIO_H -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i486 -Wall::-D_REENTRANT:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::dlfcn:gnu-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", # OpenUNIX 8 "OpenUNIX-8","cc:-O -DFILIO_H -Kalloca::-Kthread:-lsocket -lnsl:BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX ${x86_gcc_des}::", @@ -468,11 +468,11 @@ # Mingw32 # (Note: the real CFLAGS for Windows builds are defined by util/mk1mf.pl # and its library files in util/pl/*) -"Mingw32", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall::::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::win32", +"Mingw32", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i486 -Wall::::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::win32", # Cygwin -"Cygwin-pre1.3", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -m486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::win32", -"Cygwin", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -m486 -Wall::::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::win32:cygwin-shared:::.dll", +"Cygwin-pre1.3", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -march=i486 -Wall::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::win32", +"Cygwin", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -march=i486 -Wall::::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::::::::::win32:cygwin-shared:::.dll", # Ultrix from Bernhard Simon "ultrix-cc","cc:-std1 -O -Olimit 1000 -DL_ENDIAN::(unknown)::::::", @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ # Some OpenBSD from Bob Beck "OpenBSD-alpha","gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer::(unknown)::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG DES_INT DES_PTR DES_RISC2::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -"OpenBSD-x86", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_out_asm}:dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", +"OpenBSD-x86", "gcc:-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i486::(unknown)::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}:${x86_out_asm}:dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "OpenBSD", "gcc:-DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer::(unknown)::BN_LLONG RC2_CHAR RC4_INDEX DES_UNROLL::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", "OpenBSD-mips","gcc:-O2 -DL_ENDIAN::(unknown):BN_LLONG MD2_CHAR RC4_INDEX RC4_CHAR DES_UNROLL DES_RISC2 DES_PTR BF_PTR:::::::::::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", --- config.orig 2002-06-14 18:03:06.000000000 +0200 +++ config 2002-06-14 18:03:35.000000000 +0200 @@ -381,9 +381,11 @@ # figure out if gcc is available and if so we use it otherwise # we fallback to whatever cc does on the system -GCCVER=`(gcc --version) 2>/dev/null` +GCCVER=`(gcc -dumpversion) 2>/dev/null | head -1` if [ "$GCCVER" != "" ]; then CC=gcc + # then strip off whatever prefix GCC 3.1 and higher prepends the number with... + GCCVER=`echo $GCCVER | sed 's/^gcc (GCC) //'` # then strip off whatever prefix Cygnus prepends the number with... GCCVER=`echo $GCCVER | sed 's/^[a-z]*\-//'` # peak single digit before and after first dot, e.g. 2.95.1 gives 29 @@ -569,7 +571,7 @@ *-*-openbsd) OUT="OpenBSD" ;; *86*-*-bsdi4) OUT="bsdi-elf-gcc" ;; *-*-osf) OUT="alphaold-cc" ;; - *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-cc" ;; + *-*-tru64) OUT="alpha-$CC" ;; *-*-OpenUNIX*) if [ "$CC" = "gcc" ]; then OUT="OpenUNIX-8-gcc" end of patch =========================================================== From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 4 10:54:45 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 646461C1896; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:54:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lotterer To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Fwd: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/bind8 bind8.spec (PR#102) Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 10:54:45 +0200 Message-Id: <20020704085445.646461C1896@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: >>> Christoph Schug 03.07.02 20:12:44 >>> [...] Index: openpkg-src/bind8/bind8.spec [...] +## FIXME: surely we need the patch for Linux only but those do not = work +## as documented in RPM-HOWTO. Any hints how to work around the +## situation without requireing external patch program? +%ifarch linux2.2 %patch0 -p0 +%endif -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Application Services, Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 8 13:19:48 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id BCD4A1C18C0; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:19:47 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] [FWD] RE: OpenPKG-CURRENT "apache" und suEXEC Feature (PR#103) Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 13:19:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20020708111947.BCD4A1C18C0@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ----- Forwarded message from Klaus Gruber ----- Delivered-To: rse@en1.engelschall.com Delivered-To: rse@engelschall.com From: "Klaus Gruber" To: Subject: RE: OpenPKG-CURRENT "apache" und suEXEC Feature Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:54:58 +0200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020706105850.GA11700@engelschall.com> die current version von apache kann auch keine user via php an mysql verifizieren. scheinbar hat sich da was geandert. man sieht zwar via php die header einer datenbank, aber nicht deren inhalt. -----Original Message----- From: hosting-owner@de.cw.com [mailto:hosting-owner@de.cw.com]On Behalf Of Ralf S. Engelschall Sent: 06 July 2002 12:59 To: hosting@de.cw.com; dev@de.cw.com; its@de.cw.com Subject: OpenPKG-CURRENT "apache" und suEXEC Feature Wenn ihr das "apache" Packet von OpenPKG-CURRENT mit einer Versionsnummer kleiner 1.3.26-20020706 laufen habt und bei Requests auf CGIs dauernd "Premature end of script header" bekommt, obwohl das CGI auf der Kommandozeile einwandfrei rennt, dann liegt das daran, dasz das /sbin/suexec Programm falsch kompiliert vorliegt. Der Bug ist in apache-1.3.26-20020706 oder hoeher behoben. Bitte upgraden! Das "apache" von OpenPKG-1.0 ist nicht betroffen soweit ich sehen kann, da wir den Bug erst danach eingebaut haben ;) Tja, habe auf meinen Servern auch laenger gebraucht, bis ich die Ursache dieser verwirrenden Apache-Fehlermeldung fand, denn ihr wisst ja: "any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature". ----- End forwarded message ----- Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 17 09:30:00 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 199BA1C18CE; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:30:00 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] problem bootstrapping openpkg on Solaris (PR#104) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:30:00 +0200 Message-Id: <20020717073000.199BA1C18CE@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In article you wrote: > First, this is a tremendously useful project. I've been looking for a > straightforward way to install opensource software in a NFS-shareable > location that would properly enforce library dependencies. The openpkg > tools work very well for this. > > I bootstrapped openpkg but had considerable problems building source > packages until I discovered that on my system, BUFSIZ is defined to be 1024 > in /usr/include/iso/stdio_iso.h, included from /usr/include/stdio.h. This > is much smaller than the 8192 that (seems to be) the value that RPM expects > (noted in the comments /Volumes/app/appman/RPM/SRC/rpm-4.0.2). > > The effect was that the long installation path name (not my choice), > /net/gsun492/Volumes/app/appman/, was causing the __build_pre macro to > overflow its buffer and get truncated, resulting in general havoc. (It > seems likely that short paths (/cm/) would not cause the problem to occur.) I've looked into the RPM sources and it seems that RPM uses the POSIX BUFSIZ (usually historically intended for maximum pathname length and in POSIX for the setvbuf stuff) for really any type of buffers, including macro expansion buffers. This certainly is a bad coding style and predestined to fail - as you discovered here. Just replacing all BUFSIZ occurences with an own (and numerically larger) definition is not recommended, because it would not just change the buffer sizes in the macro parts (where it is needed), but also in the I/O parts (where it is correct). A possible side-effect could be that an I/O buffer could be larger than usually expected and lead to I/O latency problems, whatever. So, IMHO the correct fix is to change only the RPM macro code to use a larger buffer. Can you try the following patch (against the latest OpenPKG-CURRENT "openpkg" package) and give feedback whether it also fixes your problems: Index: openpkg.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /e/openpkg/cvs/openpkg-src/openpkg/openpkg.spec,v retrieving revision 1.82 diff -u -d -u -d -r1.82 openpkg.spec --- openpkg.spec 14 Jul 2002 12:50:57 -0000 1.82 +++ openpkg.spec 17 Jul 2002 07:26:51 -0000 @@ -408,6 +408,9 @@ sed -e 's;^\(SUBDIRS[ ]*=.*\) po$;\1;' \ popt/Makefile.in.n && \ mv popt/Makefile.in.n popt/Makefile.in + sed -e 's;BUFSIZ;8192;g' \ + rpmio/macro.c.n && \ + mv rpmio/macro.c.n rpmio/macro.c ( echo 'ac_cv_path_MSGFMT=${ac_cv_path_MSGFMT=no}' echo 'ac_cv_path_GMSGFMT=${ac_cv_path_GMSGFMT=no}' ) >config.cache Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 17 09:38:20 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id E77741C18CE; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:38:19 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] problem compiling gcc3.1 on Solaris (PR#105) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:38:19 +0200 Message-Id: <20020717073819.E77741C18CE@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In article you wrote: > Attempting to build gcc31 package (gcc31-3.1s20020521-20020522.src.rpm) > results in the error below. It looks like some things are being built in 32 > bit mode and some in 64. Anyone know how to fix it? A few points: 1. Your gcc31-3.1sXXXX package is a pre-3.1 snapshot version of GCC we packaged temporarily before 3.1 became release status. Please do not use this version any longer. It is already removed from our FTP service. Use gcc-3.1-20020628.src.rpm or higher instead. Perhaps using the newer release version already fixes your problem. 2. We successfully tested gcc-3.1-20020628.src.rpm on both Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 on sun4u boxes. The only difference seems that you are building from scratch with a Sun compiler, right? We bootstrapped even with gcc. Can you retry with gcc-3.1-20020628.src.rpm? Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 23 10:02:20 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 168971C18F3; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:02:20 +0200 (CEST) From: venglin@freebsd.lublin.pl To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] mysql build fails on freebsd (PR#106) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:02:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20020723080220.168971C18F3@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT OpenPKG_Package: mysql-3.23.51-20020628 Operating_System: FreeBSD 4.5 Submission from: (NULL) (217.17.34.18) Configure script fails on: configure:4330: checking for ps configure:4347: found /bin/ps configure:4359: result: /bin/ps configure:4366: checking "how to check if pid exists" configure:4398: error: Could not find the right ps switches. Which OS is this ?. See the Installation chapter in the Reference Manual. When running ./configure without --with-client-ldflags=-all-static --with-mysqld-ldflags=-all-static everything works OK. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 25 02:04:16 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id F1FED1C18F5; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 02:04:15 +0200 (CEST) From: "Warnes, Gregory R" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] problem compiling gcc3.1 on Solaris (PR#107) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 02:04:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20020725000415.F1FED1C18F5@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Building gcc-3.1-20020628.src.rpm goes OK, but the resulting executables give this error: gsun492: PKG [64]> gcc -V gcc: Cannot find ELF Killed -Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf S. Engelschall [mailto:rse@engelschall.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:38 AM > To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org > Cc: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org > Subject: Re: problem compiling gcc3.1 on Solaris > > > > In article > > you wrote: > > > Attempting to build gcc31 package > (gcc31-3.1s20020521-20020522.src.rpm) > > results in the error below. It looks like some things are > being built in 32 > > bit mode and some in 64. Anyone know how to fix it? > > A few points: > > 1. Your gcc31-3.1sXXXX package is a pre-3.1 snapshot version of GCC we > packaged temporarily before 3.1 became release status. Please do > not use this version any longer. It is already removed from our FTP > service. Use gcc-3.1-20020628.src.rpm or higher instead. Perhaps > using the newer release version already fixes your problem. > > 2. We successfully tested gcc-3.1-20020628.src.rpm on both Solaris 8 > and Solaris 9 on sun4u boxes. The only difference seems > that you are > building from scratch with a Sun compiler, right? We bootstrapped > even with gcc. > > Can you retry with gcc-3.1-20020628.src.rpm? > > Ralf S. Engelschall > rse@engelschall.com > www.engelschall.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org > User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org > LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 25 09:08:13 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 71DE41C18F0; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:08:13 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] problem compiling gcc3.1 on Solaris (PR#107) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:08:13 +0200 Message-Id: <20020725070813.71DE41C18F0@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In article <20020725000415.F1FED1C18F5@mail.openpkg.org> you wrote: > Building gcc-3.1-20020628.src.rpm goes OK, but the resulting executables > give this error: > > gsun492: PKG [64]> gcc -V > gcc: Cannot find ELF > Killed Err... sorry, what are you trying? GCC 3's -V option is for dispatching internally into different compiler backend versions. (and the correct syntax is "-V"). Using this option makes no sense in OpenPKG because we do not install multiple backend versions. So, what are you trying? Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 31 14:37:22 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 6F11A1C1900; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:37:22 +0200 (CEST) From: thl@dev.de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] query for dependent packages build-time version (PR#108) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:37:22 +0200 Message-Id: <20020731123722.6F11A1C1900@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: 1.0 OpenPKG_Package: n/a Operating_System: n/a Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) It should be possible to query a package for the versions and install-dates of dependent packages as they were at build-time. From a user's perspective it could be something like the "with_..." macros in the information query (-qi). The issue is that when a library needs to be patched for security issues, currently there's now way to tell if a dependent application was linked against the vanilla or against the patched version. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 31 16:49:31 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 083091C1905; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:49:31 +0200 (CEST) From: michael.schloh@cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] openpkg-20020718-20020718 fails to find tar while bootstrapping (PR#109) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:49:30 +0200 Message-Id: <20020731144931.083091C1905@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT 20020718 OpenPKG_Package: openpkg-20020718-20020718 Operating_System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) Submitted by: admin dv1 $ pwd dv1 $ /u/ms/work/openpkg/pkg/src dv1 $ /re/bin/rpm --rebuild openpkg-20020718-20020718.src.rpm Installing openpkg-20020718-20020718.src.rpm [...] ++ echo /tmp/openpkg/SRC/openpkg/openpkg.pgp + cp /tmp/openpkg/SRC/openpkg/openpkg.pgp/ tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718-root/re/etc/openpkg/openpkg.pgp + exit 0 Processing files: openpkg-20020718-20020718 error: File not found: /tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718-root/re/lib/openpkg/tar Provides: OpenPKG RPM build errors: File not found: /tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718-root/re/lib/openpkg/tar *** Error code 1 Stop in /.am/sv1/d1/u/ms/work/openpkg/re. dv1 $ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 31 17:00:52 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id DA2C31C18FF; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:00:51 +0200 (CEST) From: michael.schloh@cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-20020718-20020718 fails to find tar while bootstrapping (PR#109) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:00:51 +0200 Message-Id: <20020731150051.DA2C31C18FF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 31, 2002, michael.schloh@cw.com wrote: > OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT 20020718 > OpenPKG_Package: openpkg-20020718-20020718 > Operating_System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE > Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) > Submitted by: admin > > dv1 $ pwd > dv1 $ /u/ms/work/openpkg/pkg/src > dv1 $ /re/bin/rpm --rebuild openpkg-20020718-20020718.src.rpm > Installing openpkg-20020718-20020718.src.rpm > [...] > ++ echo /tmp/openpkg/SRC/openpkg/openpkg.pgp > + cp /tmp/openpkg/SRC/openpkg/openpkg.pgp/ > tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718-root/re/etc/openpkg/openpkg.pgp > + exit 0 > Processing files: openpkg-20020718-20020718 > error: File not found: > /tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718-root/re/lib/openpkg/tar > Provides: OpenPKG > > > RPM build errors: > File not found: /tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718-root/re/lib/openpkg/tar > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /.am/sv1/d1/u/ms/work/openpkg/re. > dv1 $ I should have also mentioned that 1 This problem is not present when bootstrapping an instance for the first time. I was able to lay a new /re instance fine. But when installing the same version of OpenPKG as already bootstrapped, this problem appears. 2 You may ask, if this problem appears only when installing the same version of OpenPKG as is already bootstrapped, then why can't we forget it (since it makes no sense to upgrade a OpenPKG instance to anything other than a newer version)? 2a The answer is that the src2make script builds, installs, rebuilds, and reinstalls, deinstalls, and then rebuilds the same packages over and over again in a braindead manner. It will try to build and install an identical version of OpenPKG as that of the already bootstrapped instance that it is using, for example. 3 Lastly, if a nonworking src2make script is an OpenPKG 1.1 showstopper, then that implicitly makes this bug a showstopper as well. Sadly, because we recently stopped storing old versions of current packages, testing of the src2make script is limited. Regards, Michael -- michael.schloh@cw.com Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH --n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia iQCVAwUBPUf7omzoR8ltz6JNAQHu/QQAmkYu7TUFk1YFEZsXEPUvwuIQzqwGGBbd HjGzxJpo2fPb1vlLUdyArMKFzHtPiVcCLiyEZft4zHsZn11XDTr8Q2DOfRYnMiI9 hr8d0BI8M+c+UCMKD1QAbmHghYro0cPlwu+TOWXYmFOMt4hEtUVg/lxQD8jzu4iQ m1/kyvroyxg= =jQ1a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Aug 7 10:25:02 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 77B641C1895; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 10:25:02 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Spaces in filelist question (PR#110) Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 10:25:02 +0200 Message-Id: <20020807082502.77B641C1895@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In article you wrote: > Is there a workaround for rpmtool's handling of spaces in filenames (or is > this user error? :) > > In the .spec file I'm using the standard > > %{l_rpmtool} files -v -ofiles -r$RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_files_std} > > In the install directory there is a file > > ./opt/openpkg/share/config/colors/40 Colors (note the space in the > filename) > > However, when rpmtool runs, it results in a 'files' file that looks like > this > > %dir /opt/openpkg/share/config/colors > Colors /opt/openpkg/share/config/colors/40 > /opt/openpkg/share/config/colors/Web > > At which rpm then barfs. Hmmm... I've looked at our "rpmtool files" implementation and the problem is that "/foo/bar baz" is treated as "/foo/bar" with tags "baz" because that's the syntax which is usually used for the tags. One cannot easily change this as far as I see it. So I would recommend that you "mv" the problematic file to not contain a blank, especially because blanks in filenames are always nasty under Unix. Sorry, I know that this is a bad excuse, but with the current work load, fixing this issue has to become a low priority. I Cc: this to the BugDB so it is not forgotten, but please accept that we cannot easily fix this at this time. At a later time this certainly should be fixed by introducing some sort of quoting/escaping into the file list. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Aug 7 17:27:48 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 23BAE1C1883; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:27:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Garrett Conaty To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Spaces in filelist question (PR#110) Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 17:27:48 +0200 Message-Id: <20020807152748.23BAE1C1883@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Yep, The file is from kde (kdelibs actually). What I thought the most appropriate workaround was %{l_shtool} subst -e 's;Colors %{l_prefix}/kde/share/config/colors/40;\"%{l_prefix}/kde/share/config/colors/40 Colors\";g' files As I'm not sure if KDE specifically looks for the "40 Colors" file. On a separate note, I'm happy to announce that we've got openpkg-derived RPMs for installing KDE 3.0.2 built. To do this I started with the latest RPMs that existed in the current/SRC directory on the FTP site. These were then modified to use shared libraries :) and track provides/requires for the libraries. Finally we created some additional RPMs for stuff like ogg vorbis and the KDE rpms themselves. I know shared libraries are planned for a future release of OpenPKG, but with some fairly simple changes (and a few days of work) we now have a working KDE 3.0.2 system, with the great advantages of the OpenPKG structure and tools. If anyone's interested, we'd happily make these available. Best regards, Garrett Conaty 01:25, rse@engelschall.com wrote: > > In article you wrote: > > > Is there a workaround for rpmtool's handling of spaces in filenames (or is > > this user error? :) > > > > In the .spec file I'm using the standard > > > > %{l_rpmtool} files -v -ofiles -r$RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_files_std} > > > > In the install directory there is a file > > > > ./opt/openpkg/share/config/colors/40 Colors (note the space in the > > filename) > > > > However, when rpmtool runs, it results in a 'files' file that looks like > > this > > > > %dir /opt/openpkg/share/config/colors > > Colors /opt/openpkg/share/config/colors/40 > > /opt/openpkg/share/config/colors/Web > > > > At which rpm then barfs. > > Hmmm... I've looked at our "rpmtool files" implementation and the > problem is that "/foo/bar baz" is treated as "/foo/bar" with tags > "baz" because that's the syntax which is usually used for the tags. > One cannot easily change this as far as I see it. So I would recommend > that you "mv" the problematic file to not contain a blank, especially > because blanks in filenames are always nasty under Unix. Sorry, I know > that this is a bad excuse, but with the current work load, fixing this > issue has to become a low priority. I Cc: this to the BugDB so it is > not forgotten, but please accept that we cannot easily fix this at this > time. At a later time this certainly should be fixed by introducing > some sort of quoting/escaping into the file list. > > Ralf S. Engelschall > rse@engelschall.com > www.engelschall.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org > Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Aug 8 22:50:00 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id E8EA11C1884; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 22:49:59 +0200 (CEST) From: To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Create a PAYCHECK with your computer! (PR#111) Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 22:49:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20020808204959.E8EA11C1884@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: You get emails every day, offering to show you how to make money. Most of these emails are from people who are NOT making any money. And they expect you to listen to them? Enough! If you want to make money with your computer, then you should hook up with a group that is actually DOING it. We are making a large, continuing income every month. What's more - we will show YOU how to do the same thing. This business is done completely by internet and emai, and you can even join for free to check it out first. If you can send an email, you can do this. No special "skills" are required. How much are we making? Below are a few examples. These are real people, and most of them work at this business part-time. But keep in mind, they do WORK at it - I am not going to insult your intelligence by saying you can sign up, do no work, and rake in the cash. That kind of job does not exist. But if you are willing to put in 10-12 hours per week, this might be just the thing you are looking for. N. Gallagher: $3000 per month T. Hopkins: $1000 per month S. Johnson: $6000 -$7000 per month V. Patalano: $2000 per month M. South: $5000 per month J. Henslin: $7000 per month This is not income that is determined by luck, or work that is done FOR you - it is all based on your effort. But, as I said, there are no special skills required. And this income is RESIDUAL - meaning that it continues each month (and it tends to increase each month also). Interested? I invite you to find out more. You can get in as a free member, at no cost, and no obligation to continue if you decide it is not for you. We are just looking for people who still have that "burning desire" to find an opportunity that will reward them incredibly well, if they work at it. To grab a FREE ID#, simply reply to: Request.Information@Live-Your-Dreams.us and write this phrase: "Email me details about the club's business and consumer opportunities" Be sure to include your: 1. First name 2. Last name 3. Email address (if different from above) 4. Would you prefer your information in HTML or Text Format*. * This is optional, if neither is selected the information will be sent in Text Format. We will confirm your position and send you a special report as soon as possible, and also Your free Member Number. That's all there's to it. We'll then send you info, and you can make up your own mind. Looking forward to hearing from you! Sincerely, Stephen Chylinski P.S. After having several negative experiences with network marketing companies I had pretty much given up on them. This is different - there is value, integrity, and a REAL opportunity to have your own home-based business... and finally make real money on the internet. Don't pass this up..you can sign up and test-drive the program for FREE. All you need to do is get your free membership. Unsubscribing: Send a blank email to: Remove@Live-Your-Dreams.us with "Remove" in the subject line. 4931sxIq5-724WwMy2054fnvt2-909cOoF7703oxyr2-037ukl46 8555EFbk0-773XUgL0164mjWL9-466itIq5850uLsU4-630eRzf6654HyXz8-748xsDG6280rSmjl72 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 19 18:09:40 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 387811C18D4; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:09:40 +0200 (CEST) From: To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] This may seem wierd (PR#112) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:09:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20020819160940.387811C18D4@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi my name is Beth. I saw yourprofile on ICQ. I am new to the area and am looking for someone to show me around. If you're interested in hanging out with a cool girl send me an email at Beth_274_Wagner@hotmail.com and we can chat on instant messenger. Hope to hear from you soon!! 0 0 > - _ _ -Beth 7939FUwO8-3l10 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 3 03:42:57 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 4A3C2277A0D; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 03:42:57 +0200 (CEST) From: franuma2001@excite.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] project facilitation (PR#113) Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 03:42:57 +0200 Message-Id: <20020903014257.4A3C2277A0D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Pardon the abruptness and the liberty of this letter=3B It is due to its exigency=2E I am a government functionary in my country=2E I write to ask for your help=2E My colleagues and I are in need of a foreign partner to assist in the transfer of a considerable amount of money=2E My colleagues and I have deliberated much on the issue at hand=2E What we require is someone who is reliable and trustworthy=2C who has a vision and who will be able to manage whatever business in which we shall inject venture capital=2E We need someone who can share our dreams and ideals=2E I have the legal title to the sum and we shall go through the legal procedures entailed in both our laws and international laws in transferring the funds to you in trust=2E Please do not at this point misunderstand my intention=2C because understandably=2C we are not acqainted=2E I do not even know if you will be reliable and trustworthy=2C but I believe that everything starts with a first step=2E I know that I need to explain everything clearly to you before you can come to a decision as to whether you can assist me or not=2C and I will do this as soon as I get a response from you=2E I am sure that with the insider information I can provide=2C we will with your help=2C conclude the transaction within 21 working days=2E In consideration for your assistance=2C we have agreed to give you the normal transaction commission obtainable of 10% of the total sum=2C and another 5% if you can successfully put together an investment portfolio for us=2C as we will like to invest some of this money in your country=2C rather than leave it idle in a bank account=2E If you can be of assistance=2C please reach me at franuma=40mail=2Ecom or send a fax to 234 1 7594298 for more information=2C otherwise=2C I thank you for your patience=2E Thank you for your courtesies=2E Best regards=2C Francis Agedonuma From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Sep 20 12:31:12 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id CE838277A2F; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:31:11 +0200 (CEST) From: mlelstv@serpens.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] bootstrap fails (PR#114) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:31:11 +0200 Message-Id: <20020920103111.CE838277A2F@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: openpkg-1.1.0 OpenPKG_Package: openpkg-1.1.0 Operating_System: NetBSD 1.6 Submission from: (NULL) (194.120.0.8) Bootstrapping openpkg 1.1 fails on NetBSD because it relies on bash-2.0.5b which requires full wctype support from the system. The NetBSD implementation is incomplete and lacks functions like wctype(). I have replaced bash-2.0.5b with bash-2.0.5 and successfully bootstrapped openpkg and installed a few packages from the repository. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Sep 24 14:17:43 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 653CC277A30; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:17:43 +0200 (CEST) From: mosbach@onsys.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] bootstrap problem on HP-UX 11.00 (PR#115) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:17:43 +0200 Message-Id: <20020924121743.653CC277A30@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT OpenPKG_Package: openpkg-20020909-20020909.src.sh Operating_System: HP-UX 11.00 Submission from: (NULL) (141.6.7.28) I encountered an other error: openpkg.boot seems to use "uname -m" (here: "9000/800") to name files. But the "/" is not replaced everywhere by "_" hpmachine 147 # grep 9000 nohup.out ++ platform: 9000_800-hp-hpux11.00 (Good luck: unofficially supported) t=9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw + cp /tmp/openpkg-20020909-root/cw/RPM/PKG/openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.rpm ../ cp: cannot access /tmp/openpkg-20020909-root/cw/RPM/PKG/openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.rpm: No such file or directory + rm -f /tmp/openpkg-20020909-root/cw/RPM/PKG/openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.rpm + ./openpkg.boot[468]: ../openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.sh: Cannot create the specified file. + sed -e s;@SUSR@;root; -e s;@SGRP@;sys; -e s;@MUSR@;cw; -e s;@MGRP@;cw; -e s;@RUSR@;cw-r; -e s;@RGRP@;cw-r; -e s;@NUSR@;cw-n; -e s;@NGRP@;cw-n; -e s;@l_prefix@;/cw; -e s;@TGZ@;openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.tar.Z; -e /^@PRE@/r /tmp/rpm.pre + uuencode openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.tar.Z + ./openpkg.boot[479]: ../openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.sh: Cannot create the specified file. openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.sh not found openpkg-20020909-20020909.9000/800-hp-ux11.00-cw.rpm not found From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Oct 21 15:47:36 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 95D77277B1E; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:47:36 +0200 (CEST) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] fsl related bug reports (PR#116) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:47:36 +0200 Message-Id: <20021021134736.95D77277B1E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, Oct 19, 2002, konold@erfrakon.de wrote: > Hi, > > I just encountered the following problem (with postfix). > > If the log file is not writable by fsl the application using fsl > segfaults. > Thanks for pointing out. Bug located and fixed http://cvs.ossp.org/chngview?cn=2637 OSSP http://www.ossp.org/pkg/lib/fsl/ ftp://ftp.ossp.org/pkg/lib/fsl/fsl-1.0.4.tar.gz OpenPKG CURRENT ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/fsl-1.0.4-20021021.src.rpm OpenPKG v1.1 RELEASE As fsl was optional, only used by inn and an administrator can easily work around the problem by making the log file writeable we have no plans to release an update. -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Application Services, Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 4 11:29:29 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id D96B2277A26; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:29:28 +0100 (CET) From: "chsf_hdfw" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] $200 deposit bonus (PR#117) Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 11:29:28 +0100 Message-Id: <20021104102928.D96B2277A26@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: GaminglandCasino.com

WWW.GAMINGLANDCASINO.COM
See why Gamingland Casino is the most incredible online casino.
Whatever you level, whatever your game, we've got all the casino excitement you're looking for in the comfort of your home!
Tha'ts right, we'll match your 1st purchase 100% up to $200!
And no waiting...your Free Bonus is credited to your account instantly!

GET $200 FREE
Buy $50 Get $50 FREE!

Buy $100 Get $100 FREE!

Buy $200 Get $200 FREE!


Play our Free NO DOWNLOAD quality games with superb graphics & sounds.

OPEN ACCOUNT

 Security & Support

 Gamingland Casino is fully licensed by the Directorate of  Offshore Gaming. We provide friendly Customer Support via  phone, email & fax.

WWW.GAMINGLANDCASINO.COM
GaminglandCasino.com

You have received this Newsletter because you, or someone else, is registered to this Email Address with gambling related sites. If you no longer wish to be included in our Email Updates, please click here




6980-23061-29270
From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 11 03:06:56 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 7E635277A2F; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 03:06:56 +0100 (CET) From: "che_rini" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Bulk Email Sending & Bullet Proof Web Hosting (PR#118) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 03:06:56 +0100 Message-Id: <20021111020656.7E635277A2F@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: We offer you e-mail addresses databases for advertisement mailing; we sell databases also carry out mailing and hosting for the advertising projects. We can work on a turnkey project create a site with original design, program and subject contents. Our databases updates constantly with the e-mail addresses from all over the world. Their validity and originality are verified. Today they contains over than 50 million addresses. We use our own mailing soft which can be ideally adjusted for every customer. We have a high-speed channel and a high power server. The constant of our service demand allows us to keep low prices. http://www.e-mailpromo.net Please don't hesitate to contact us anytime! We'll be happy to answer every your question! HTTP: www.e-mailpromo.net E-mail: info@e-mailpromo.net We received your address from a public area. We apologize if this letter has reached you by mistake. We'll not disturb you any more. NB. This message is sent in compliance with the new e-mail bill section 301. Under Bill S. 1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th US Congress. This message can not be considered as Spam as long as we include the way to be Removed, Paragraph (a)(c) of S. 1618. TO REMOVE YOUR ADDRESS FROM YOUR MAILING LIST: you can send message to info@e-mailpromo.net with Subject "Remove". From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 18 15:47:41 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 143F9277B2C; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:47:41 +0100 (CET) From: peter.smej@dev.de.cw.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Test bug report (PR#119) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:47:41 +0100 Message-Id: <20021118144741.143F9277B2C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: OpenPKG_Package: Operating_System: Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) It is test. Ignore it From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 18 15:50:12 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 6E933277B2E; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:50:12 +0100 (CET) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] another Test (PR#120) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:50:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20021118145012.6E933277B2E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: 1 OpenPKG_Package: 2 Operating_System: 3 Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.112) 4 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 18 15:53:00 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id A43FF277B2B; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:53:00 +0100 (CET) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] bind-8.2.6-1.0.2.src.rpm (PR#121) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:53:00 +0100 Message-Id: <20021118145300.A43FF277B2B@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OpenPKG_Release: 1.0 OpenPKG_Package: bind-8.2.6-1.0.2 Operating_System: any Submission from: (NULL) (141.1.23.112) The bind-8.2.6-1.0.2.src.rpm was build using a correct spec file but it was created in a defective development environment. This caused some files, including rc.bind and the sample db files to come from bind9. The incorrect rc.bind uses "rndc" when ".../etc/rc bind stop" is executed but "rndc" is a utility only available in and usable with bind9. The resulting error message will be # /cw/etc/rc bind stop /tmp/root/rc.555.tmp: /cw/sbin/rndc: not found /cw/etc/rc:WARNING: script `/cw/etc/rc.d/rc.bind:stop' returned non-null (0) return code An updated package bind-8.2.6-1.0.3.src.rpm is available for download and deployment now. If you or the upgrade process encounter problems stopping an already running bind please kill the process manually. Please note the spec file between 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 had no change other than the release tag. The release increment was only done to notify users about the new package. The defective package was removed from or renamed on the ftp server. As of this writing the corrected file is not yet security tagged. This will be done in several hours causing the file to change. Do not be alarmed. Sorry for the inconvenience. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 18 22:14:35 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 72EE3277B2D; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:14:35 +0100 (CET) From: "jfoltin" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Bulk Email Sending & Bullet Proof Web Hosting (PR#122) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:14:35 +0100 Message-Id: <20021118211435.72EE3277B2D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: We offer you e-mail addresses databases for advertisement mailing; we sell databases also carry out mailing and hosting for the advertising projects. We can work on a turnkey project create a site with original design, program and subject contents. Our databases updates constantly with the e-mail addresses from all over the world. Their validity and originality are verified. Today they contains over than 50 million addresses. We use our own mailing soft which can be ideally adjusted for every customer. We have a high-speed channel and a high power server. The constant of our service demand allows us to keep low prices. http://www.e-mailpromo.net Please don't hesitate to contact us anytime! We'll be happy to answer every your question! HTTP: www.e-mailpromo.net E-mail: info@e-mailpromo.net We received your address from a public area. We apologize if this letter has reached you by mistake. We'll not disturb you any more. NB. This message is sent in compliance with the new e-mail bill section 301. Under Bill S. 1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th US Congress. This message can not be considered as Spam as long as we include the way to be Removed, Paragraph (a)(c) of S. 1618. TO REMOVE YOUR ADDRESS FROM YOUR MAILING LIST: you can send message to info@e-mailpromo.net with Subject "Remove". From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Nov 21 12:43:48 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 0DCB6277A2C; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:43:48 +0100 (CET) From: "Dr.Wilfred Mboyo" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Urgent Letter from Zimbabwe (PR#123) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:43:47 +0100 Message-Id: <20021121114348.0DCB6277A2C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sir, URGENT BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP Firstly, I have to introduce myself to you. My name is Dr Wilfred Mboyo from Zimbabwe. I was the chairman of contract review panel in my country before the problem of the land reform program. Before the escalation of the situation in Zimbabwe I recovered $16.8Million US dollars from over inflated contracts by some government officials. But I was a member of the opposition party the MDC(Movement for Democratic Change), and the ruling Party, (ZANU PF) has been against us. So I had to flee the country for a neighbouring African Country which I am currently residing. Before the escalation of the situation in Zimbabwe I had not reported The recovery of my findings to the panel. So this money was in my possession and I lodged it in a security company here in Africa and currently this money has been moved to their security branch in Europe. I have been trying to fly to Europe but it has been difficult for me to get a visa from Africa. So I want you to help me make claims of this fund($16.8m) in Europe as my beneficiary and transfer the money to your account or any account of your choice before I can get a visa to fly down. So that we can share this money. I have agreed to give you 10%,which would be ($1.6Million dollars) of this Money for your assistance, and 85% would be mine and the other 5% would be set aside for any expenses that we may incure during the course of this transaction. And my 85% would be invested in your country in any profitable business propossed by you. We have never met, but I want to trust you and please do not let me down when this fund finally gets into your account. Please if you are interested, get to me through the email address below to enable me feed you with more details and all necessary documentations. Please treat this as confidential. ( mboyo2000@post.com or mboyo2001@email.com ) Regards, Dr.Wilfred Mboyo NOTE: In the event of your inability to handle this transaction please inform me so that i can look for another reliable person who can assist me. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Nov 23 17:05:28 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id A562C277A2C; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:05:27 +0100 (CET) From: "pqasesor" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Get Out of Debt (PR#124) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:05:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20021123160527.A562C277A2C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ------------75F14A804407E Content-Type: text/html; name="message.htm" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="message.htm" PEhUTUw+PEhFQUQ+DQo8TUVUQSBodHRwLWVxdWl2PUNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0 L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9a29pOC1yIj4NCjwvSEVBRD4NCjxCT0RZIGJnQ29sb3I9I2ZmZmZmZj4N CjxESVYgYWxpZ249Y2VudGVyPjxGT05UIGZhY2U9QXJpYWw+PElNRyBhbHQ9IiIgaHNwYWNlPTAg DQpzcmM9ImNvbnNvbGlkYXRlLWRlYnQuZ2lmIiBhbGlnbj1iYXNlbGluZSANCmJvcmRlcj0wPjwv Rk9OVD48L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgZmFjZT1BcmlhbCBzaXplPTI+PC9GT05UPiZuYnNwOzwv RElWPjxGT05UIGZhY2U9QXJpYWwgc2l6ZT0yPg0KPEgyIGFsaWduPWNlbnRlcj48Rk9OVCBmYWNl PSJBcmlhbCwgSGVsdmV0aWNhLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIiBjb2xvcj0jMDAwMDAwIA0Kc2l6ZT00PjxB IGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29uc29saWRhdGVkZWJ0bm93Lm9yZyI+Q0xJQ0sgSEVSRSBGb3Ig SW5zdGFudCANCkhlbHAhPC9BPjwvRk9OVD48Rk9OVCBmYWNlPSJBcmlhbCwgSGVsdmV0aWNhLCBz YW5zLXNlcmlmIiBjb2xvcj0jOTk5OTMzIA0Kc2l6ZT00PjxCUj48QlI+PEZPTlQgY29sb3I9I2Zm MDAwMD6/IDIwMDIgQW1lcmlkZWJ0LCBJbmMuPC9GT05UPjwvRk9OVD48L0gyPg0KPERJViBhbGln bj1jZW50ZXI+PEEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnJlbW92ZW1lQGJrLnJ1Ij5DbGljayBoZXJlIHRvIGJl IHJlbW92ZWQgZnJvbSANCm91ciAxMDAlIG9wdC1pbiBkYXRhYmFzZTwvQT48L0RJVj48L0ZPTlQ+ PC9CT0RZPjwvSFRNTD4NCg0K ------------75F14A804407E Content-Type: image/gif; name="consolidate-debt.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="consolidate-debt.gif" R0lGODlh9AEkAcQAADc7GKm0Zc/VqPz89eT4WqW0Pe7/YtnsVbjISsndSrDCPeyZOLvEhW52Me6z Qu3TTsvZar3RQJWjO+f9XgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAAA AAAALAAAAAD0ASQBAAX/oCSOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ikcslsOp/QqHRK rVqv2Kx2y+16v+CweEwum8/otHrNbrvf8Lh8rgsIBviBoMfA7yV3AyUMLH15AwE9eSiGhwKEL4sq kCMBjnSYmXONh4g7jSKSEgV4K515fzqig6d5iS2rJZaCI4Gdr5q5umWzrbQ5hn+BI7Eltqe4OMUi nJ2ppqUoor2nu9bXXpcSh8ki3QEM3ZWEttLRJ5yJ1LLhKeLty4Ci3Owmku0kouWh59j+/1Jc5dPz CpkEagMoSWjmR8SwbZ1O7HPYkOIhSqf++GJUkd+5YwMKEGs18pA8Tx4B/6pcuQSUimoI8byKKalm RHsd0bUq2ImQr1/GVrlk+Ounx2UTWSpd+sNlCmcnE5qE6Efbw0aPTuRRiFMP1qOlqB3jqIeEy4uo jh7bg5VrVLdM48qdkVQrHpEeedLaejSlX7sJV4BbmJZqqn29UCQtl5hwtMKBNParxXeu5cswnHor scoo1RHBLJZ8mvNg0GqfS6aKFxr0IqKPZTKzCbQkXMy4c3uLJTA12Kn6aI821y/y74qrjP89DbQc SOAfkU9erru67qlR9Q5EiY+qXmHn4jlGSXWvbOXJ77Hu2ItQY3C4Ku9b5tW6fd3PsefkNn/rzXl+ 3PZTYL0E0ItkQFHDif9iqOihX0PQ+WELJKhwVdp9GMb1U3z90AQJTWWdVNJ0u210XGy1eWYCbOTl N+JN5aVIYoY0rvRcMqU188wxZ52zIAoxPcNJf7XFGE9+5FlUmZGyzcZbiDVGuRQDDAiAlwtUPmPW behwOU5WJwwGA3x8gMkIXN1JqeaabLbp5ptwxinnnHTWaeedeOap55589glQgYrkdKARS7bgJRFc PneHOCscasNaOM4Ig6JJ2tCaDAYOpwMnjrapzQ624FKXEIVOIukQhpDmS6cHnVoDiBwWKcOArDYq ngp3YOQqDCbaCeMOUw1K6IXEMSEekrtSp4qKt7qArKwyXPqCcr7dAJv/lnE2w+hmg7AQanlh3rBt qdxuh44K4mTKiDjiLfktCWKau6I7jvY2UbOw4EHJu/BuOwpXo8LrFrmMoFAAXJDhqyZJ2/GFkJdo NelkYX+p96tqHo01nsW9MalkPwxNjNR+HRlkZImFnsLlkg6OduBEAVNrWCVQkQASXqF9tTFKIFXM MMoORvPQKApHWeCTJtHkb5DwtrJaeEKjxpm+JwoC0h5K/7ZHr62QU/PUgU0MiYsx7kGKyWQDhsqV eUWoF6NLNvKh0y9KMmFhWaMGYEYinP0z2Ni+WQ7FZb+FnUQXO0KPbxwTW1jEpRy8lU/+SXdIAS8L ZBwokusL17MoU8mx/wCJ2CIAkQYSblavHmfc6oygq0WPWGkRNeJXL/us71Smawx2pXDylVQeV/bW 7EVNQx3i3kq+RLV3upekDm2H2d3QkN20u6HNpTPvEYUo6kG6YFz/CorMDZvMeEP79DH+c9tNHzWU 3qeW8HSLz0l7x52xjvhkMBOOXzTTFQRpam966wiyjqMraEXFd96An+5Qw5DArQhG6vsMwR54OKcM 7nms+JVnWKa84ZCwNoCq04CeBhQVkaU2AVxeCU9iwe9Fb4L/AeFP/mA7ZWFsHXWbIZOUh7wLQqk9 WrNZVSSVFiBGhTJlCcTnVBbE+TXwgCh6BQENUasoDago/ehNmhgEwP+9GfB1tCAg4G64Pu7ESonR sMOW7LC4Yz3PdBNLRP3EiAv4VOlwUCTP45ZIHoTUUIpK4qEZn+gYQshtb1qMFQuxaB4ZTsYSZppT XSpDMpkEbHX4q1yTtgJE9IENfGBMJTxcQaTkJQSJg0QJKQHTQE+UQ27f06MrQAEoU6JRfA+yWv86 1pVa6kUqAsEKHj9oSUTsY0JstB4hJ8NFX5UmQq4sYgrUSBQWUvBWsaRkKYiinfRJwm8YBKRFUrEO EKEyLF372AYX6JeOQdAE1AIibKroJKwlcyci02UqxXmxatIpha6RTY6+loKA6SibzySWbdiosatp qm6iklpUZFWob63/RZrReGjdarjRTjYPY6pSyLtEWrexUU+ez0DeHs+xPxiC0E9YqhLbbAAOC8rx CGTaEklLcLDxrahK6RrjDKgEpDFmaaf/yuQkHjHUMBXtBVUyGFKjldWj0qAPTB0PTscql9OpUxPK VB1Z1/qPW/jDf2yN6zXw6A+G+EuueM2rXvfK17769a+ADaxgB0vYwhr2sIhNrGIXy9jGOvaxkI2s ZNlQgMqKxLKXzewoLjuKzuKFs6DNLGZHS9rSmva0qE2takkbAAUgwLWwfa1sY0vb2dq2tri9rW5z y9vd+ra3wP2tcINL3OEat7jIPa5yk8vc5Tq3udB9rnQjgADqRkAB/9jNrnaxWwAFjNa1CGAABKiU JfFu97oRSK9618ve9rr3vfCNr3zhKwAD2Pe++M2vfvfL3/76978ADrCAB0zgAhv4wAhOsIIXzOAG O/jB91XAdber3dMiILxVytLpqnQ6AbyWwhKu7nxHTOISm/gOE0ixilfM4ha7+MUwjrGMZ0zjGtv4 xjjOsY53zOMe+/jHQA6ykFP82glXuLvfVQB5H0FeDjO5w6Q7b5ElbOIqW9nK9R2ylrfM5S57+ctg DrOYx4xjI1c4uwFAwHg1TNUMbxjKUGYAiNF75TrbOb4DMACZ98znPvv5z4AO9J5BrGQnw/nQHWYz nOV83hCL+M6Qvv9zffUs6Epb+tKYzrSmh7xdQyP60BnmsJM1LOfuUpjOkU41lgew6Va7+tWwjjWf tevpT4O6zaOGMgJMnd30UvnRqg62fLMs62Ib+9jITvaKuYsAWzfZ0M9W9KIre2oqC/vaeKa0srfN 7W57e8zZrbWtEy1uRDOA19hFr7WxzW72Tvrb8I63vOddY2aP+97OFrV30S3hELf73+lFMb0HTvCC d5u7osZ3vg2U6A7vmt+oBni7iW3wigeZAA94gMU37mOEK9zc4Xg2oh+u3SlbV+LYzjPHV65jAjhg AQs4AMtnXu/uNvvjcS6vzt+8YWrzms7rRrmq303zosP4ATBfwAP/tG30pqfY41TF+ZvDAY4lw3nf jRY6uwXu9K5P4OUw17jXnb7vcivcQFV3M89Jh+SSWxfYWoc0xcde9AeAXel0b3rZGy51nVs96o+g tnbVHfdgqzzvRb+7AwiA+KLv++ZSJzeV0v5prA/+14WPNNEbz3G7J33pnJ/53vn+cZGvXdeCv3zm U8310Ffc5UlfvOtZjvXTf1rtG4427nsO8aCvvs5znz3Bkf554a983wU4nYHMvmjd457Ulm003H9f 5cN7+b42ZvqOta99HHNfx9+XMfaHDHuYy178K+4++PGb4vFPYPzuNz6OkY/UBtgB1JN3/pOprnwn pz7dvkd9VbZ5/1t2AAZIAPHnYgQgcz22gIzXfgu4Yw64YgfwgDNmXxMQgSumgTBmgAeQgDxGfGHH Yhi4gQyYYgRggS9WgjCWABcmYfaVAKOAgAaAABKQAO9HAN2lfvInY9lVVBLQAICAaGhHeU2GdlS3 e5aXXUU2fQI4Yq03ZAaQAA0AAFYohAi4ggZQAA2QADx4gREAAAUQYQCgAF+4ghNQhV5oAAQgAWV4 hiqWAGbIhV6Yg0LIgwagAFV4hXXoYxgXeyo4hQXwge93AEH4flvYhV+ogwiwiHsIABIwhVYIiVs4 iR+oAG/Yg/OXCA3QiVXYACBHahuGhH8Hav/XbxH3hCQWfEJWif8A0IlWOIaISIIGoIYlqG0sOIvp dwBWiIBhCAA0iIvt134sKImQ+H4JEIvsN4y32Im1CAAfaF+82ADFSIx7GIRWmF/DqGJ61o2UxnQi qHTYZ1+dSIgGMI3dWIWNmIA1KIYYyH0I8IqVBQEHUIUQ4IZ62AAFAAAJUI/UCIeayGKfCItXyHwJ t39852kPh2505oSqCF/Wt30uRo78yIZuGIkTIBKEOAEHUAAIUIUHUF1sWAARYF82iIMjKQEb2X7q aABW+IEyGI27loISNgH7hoPvt4+U+IwVmZEKkIMXppGV2IXqWABemIwScGHvFwGDaF8EUIUpyIvQ WIOjIHOuhYz/g3hhSWkA1yVz5ygBseeRQqmTa8iVr3hfIOmC3rWRbFiFEoCACWCU31iJCUCDbniU sIgAvEiFDZCFAWljQrgZn1hraudmB0mYUHaKAPiQJ5aL2ZeRDWCGJJiGFWkA+PiUkxiJyTiJfUmJ yagAmGmFP/mIsth+m6mOoQmJT9mXvPiWnHlfbpiNUgmN8WiJs9mLe8iFkwgAExCPH9kAMteJjMeG r4iA05iaRAkA5CiEu7mH1LiZVrgADvCIwBibjfh+8RiJ51ic1GmOp0mFmRmMjwicVYiMkAiJneiG 0fiXNqYAAVBZPVWF93d6uRZ1o7ZkbBZ9vYZd1eVa8AV3Dil0/1GYfbX5j7v4iZzZhpC4mfUIAB8J iRBAifsIAW6ZjLAoAb/4fioWmpHollJpoQYQoTdohXqJlldoiFfokg56kbUJnjLIj7V5jwDAlPwI lfsoi9v5inuIAEjpoiCJiXoIibEZAcIZnZ9Ym0TKj25YmpbpoDEIiVJpg+5YiCBZoS9JpQ0gpRdp kmUYm3p4g3LJnjTmXftmB/J5a4Y5dUyGdgdhaAmhn6qnXpjXn9blb/6WeaxYY3k4iblojK8plQS5 j5EoqPFohuoJldJ4hXtYjJionFKJgGpIifEoEk76jZ5Yo24pqNupj5QIkm5IANnZpBHghk36oFlo lrv5lqCKjf+8eZdQCZLxSI3qyJnyeJaf6obXqWe22I4qeZaTel/o2IvPuJEG2JYkal/qeY6GGJmT 2IdiCmPIhzl7IIS3Zp/2OXmkqIRw2msfVl10CnR16mvp5a1aF5E3NoWd6KztF6r7SI2Amp62iKsT upqhuoCn6ZYa2n6YOIb12om/iqvJCoG1OqsiAAAQYJYF+4HCWYWl+owUSo3tmonvt6QpmIGu+Int WIWgaatOmp5XGItueLDlGbC6OpVN6pEVeaPd2JroOKx6dmHSmJf2VZxcmo9ICZDsGa3JFwCv2HAJ 97Nrip+iyHtkmnWEp26o2G90SmUBiG0EiGMV22K8SpG9So3/FDqq7qiG6jmNmAixnOquXRiIuJqx GbuPAaCitQic3NijVjiilDqG6siwBMCd1Jis5XiWp+mXDdt+xxmrIXqiItqkFSikrwhzDfAADJu2 q+mXlNmIDDq2L3lfyVgAEfqcNNukXliFXFi37ridvapmnfus0IpZ8QmKi2ath0k6RUiY23p5SUt4 sIW0hEeuAap5rKZlFLmObgicH2uw0Imbr5iiH9uZwduT3AiSObqHB9CoGEuz7Xejm/miEKCTn4iO INq2DDuNrZmjkkmlU8m3vUuNc+uO+4qZoCqGC9Cc/riAZyma36iTk2iG1KmdOfmKp2mFdeinHJui y8m+sLiS/6LbYmRqWVXSiXF2wNaqustHeYeGWYSmblM2WxMGuxR8ck6Lszp2kk4ZhAQAng1QkokY mOfolvo4wlDKlZ+orjmpkiZZvRaJnm+pj+kngxDwlJGoACwcmxKQYiVMoY0YhJv1lXp5gzP7vc/L wiv2oJ04hioKkw1QwyKArgiwAM65dCKwgJGZiBipodiYpRT5im/Jht7bjymMi3y5jpaJhS3ciAr6 hhgckNxFwOMDbajbZkxmmKV4Oj6nmITWx/y5mKhowcJmrq14i+NHg8Q4jvCnjWLsmImsoSmIgaf6 he9YydtYjcOZgbOoyDJamtzYfd6YgQ1qhmxYsRVYyne3AP9OWYEouKGB6I1OeZaOyYILOMuLzIIH kL8T0I+OHMAqhnWVdZAJDLR2nIRVB2V6gMOt68fM/Mevi3nC9rRh1o3oh4vhR2OznH45xnTCuI1S i5kGqqeI+In5OpcpdgBJJ47e3M20aJo7iYa6CH7p98Y5G63EPMw+m3vHLG4L6XPN/M/7GchNK2m3 68s9NpP0PIzexbgk+Ifmd4I8BqoQbdCVxl2Pl5DFjGtqapg9tWibFX38BtB+bHJ3OnTnuIGtrMkq /YAsndItvdIuHdMwPdMvXdMybdM0fdM6ndM8fV84/dOJzHg27Xlhh4BCvdM4PYtAzdNL3dRI/dRM DdVOHdX/VD3VVv10cSyt96ymPBdqSShtbIdafmxqId3HR2t4lNbBEZAAa93WbP3Wbh3XcD3Xcl3X dH3Xdp3XeL3Xet3XfP3Xcg3Yfw3Y6bwAay3Yfo3Yiu3XjL3Yjt3YkP3Ykh3Zaz3Acgx4aXrHunfM T4bMkPBde7xaDlzWRzvQWOaYV13VUr3aqt3aqf3aLn3Urp2BSc2R6bx4FQvbmizbut3brO3bsx3c wN3bFm1ZHW3HuKYOy/d3CzyfiSZapTXA0j3a4EUlZh27qqYAhEzRmaZ4E83d8vaDSFZUopamH3KY +LB8iKbMHy3avFaKVELa/la7JSbNrfhloPxjCX3JFyjP/9ocY0StdAy9fb0M3n5m2cbd1T9bXnas 3GDdYa8QWkiGAGlG4diVZnlsn601Z4tpu18WtVsG4pCsgufqlAX+Yrk9nKBs4vQs4ilNiwbg3dvc fSkYjDB24gYeZOKNWfeZ0cX8fIgmPpRg3BgWec3XWiGdipK233r6kdeJu6sZjf6Yr+c6AV1cknrK hWk8hQgQiCgKpXrahmGMjFnc0Bd2d2IHtQrAlg+qo1je0AqgwjnOacUtx16d0eYdaoAHaqNA4VQ3 n5mNc5NX1kobadsNZE3avdy46LpYydaMixpLte7XzfGXmpdryPP8jG0oq33pjfd7loj46MTYshO7 k/mFif/SaX4PuIx9+o77qMvOaYmwjJ1OGs+hPuc9tuOVNQqJ1lN5jpB3TsejCB9+VJhGTjoMsGtZ Z9r1jePi58i5e4sh+YHLe5RsDLNxuYYh+VreWZztal9xLo3h7oK5DF6rjrHPqJKyxXgLTWkdSaTA aZS1aY5Ryr5T2ZFNue1rzuWa2n64GpJxWZLgnHRhrNZKyYiQ7F1eGKXUjLyYOYYE4F0C75YmWQCn OqpPjus5VrSkxWHq7Xc/Tl6ZkuHDHnIMt3uRN+jyLcirxmM16MWTiagqRprb+6NlCL+DOom52qC7 64q+6qQAe6JP+o+C+OUO+oiNWJtt+5G6WalNqp1croP/u0mP8Qu/tV6yRu+gzJu+Os+TH8yZBoj0 OrnDhSjLmGmAu+ldfIj0Tdq2VK7x9ZbVu74Qj7DcwK7ZfXTcpBe0YbX3Rh7fSV7SwMfk5um83DiN GtqkWUqiC/qSkXr0K0qiJ9iOL7mZDyqlIguMn9iUJzvJz5ilF9mumxmkEoCJrXXpu4qIFpqkrhWL 7dqoO7+wrxirUknFAzu+Sam5oT/7UGq/7qyjbfuMr2W/vbj7XfiK8A7AcD9jdc7juffjd6zcB8HA B4ytOpcIzHdv4sNkJNdogl99TI6s/LuLoF7EkDqjHluGhCuEcWvE4NuxToqJCRvlsuzvxquhvfiu tRqJ/+oJAhKQiIkxGUYDEOf0GklRAABSqsBh1DuaABo8HU9yqC1qklUDKKQBlkGoJEEAFk4pRa2r aEEUUmP0GBTpag3E4eV+w+PyOb1uv+Pz+j1doZgBShRISDAIGDIgJh4qBjA4JkYyJgYESFQSGgoc VgZsfoKGfg6EkjIGFPip+kW0KrTCxsrORgik8MEcrCjEGSBEpRgcCeUkNDCpGasFIRz7uBkQrKSs 7NAUHBMME0QRQOOkEAJJ+KqtSO2UiOgSoeQE6yoAdY2sEHA3tDhrjePHACj4tSDJMkEAskBhQg7N iF8IXBgQIYGACCHS6BX4VQCCOWBQgLnAJXIkyZIm+f+k+vMn0KVNmhZFivmIwaVKkSxdIkTIUoNC jRyJCgrKlCmXDBAAWqUKAa2mtAQMIHkvJLSIB7UM+ydkBUAlOVqIC3ILWtaLO2o4MUCjCsCQViVM oBgkwtW1BiJUEQFhiK6tLLTkeMgO298gfVPUKNcABYprR8jRSJBkARNhTWg8XPFQQRNBF5ECiAB4 hQkzcrOsCGPjlxBjMhYCOyl7Nu3aeCSsBDRo90uZMjt1ykmop87iTBoYfeRJ6FChRRPNUPqK6Sun 1mtRpW01SE92XBVYbWAG/PEodMnBuSs2x7Eyyw7igMbtvYyrHIP0+IW/idgaWbTQhV8NF0mRBjHI dKP/hQigZSHCA1wRxBU7e+lXkXc1QFBRMEO0EB4NPaH14TwSVnTOWLahmKKKuOCmG0uCKOeJbzEO t0RPxAVAnI0FNiDjTZoEVRRUm5BClFFIRacUddc5NUB2sp0gBRMHzNOWVWwck4IywDTzUHrGiBYD V+QodgwJ4lHlC1cN7IXNXmqpIViJBZDQIEiMMURmgMdU0cB/3jUREmcHuBlRAw4QtEBCJizRwgFo BErYGop5E+VEJzRjxJri0SUeF0GY0IxXK5JaqqlxNJDbDDqtukQmv2GyI3E93kgrrZaoUcgkizA3 5ChBRpLUKhFMx2RTtjwJ5YYbdsjYPRO0oYU2wWgz/8eGjCXgDgqVelOtGwQ88MA9BxzQQlzlwgBt MNu6s+yzb0QTLQzCeFNuG/O6401V8bZwBaIDOZBCh8Lce0K0gMn75LrtpuBDuQ07ewvEJ55ascW0 +alqIDnWSAlwwt3IsY215nhMj+a8xEiQogg55HNHCTtsscbGAtXF2kKTbno547GwzhC98QDAO6QJ r8JyJMvYzkDDawdEQg+0wMEQpZmd1XlQrLTW+N7ctdci9RhdATjhVOPHOt3oqslrj7w2PUEst6tz RP7asimUqCSzKzTXHM3Xf7txwL8LBAx4SYJHHXDShjPeuOMv9ITU2SS7atwSHJvcNjLtvd2FBKBI 0v8c3b7+SrpRMbMSEN+wJGCLvo9XbADUUT8AO9bgJn6v7bvz3rWNwPG0U06zXp722scL2PnbPX4S U6+lQ383A3mnxAqxq7cCVbcJJBAB9953/7344ZMPvvnjn18++uur337676MftfzysA+/+/Xjf7/+ 5su/APj7589+AgwgAQFowAEesIAIXKACG5jA8OGqR8DhE8cYYDLMHc9tXFEeBwEQN+eNzmWkKxL0 JoG61EWAKXyzxbfu4cIXwjCGMpwhDWtowxvacHDyc0C5cOjDHwIxhjrsYRCLaMQjIjGJSlwiE4Go AI514hHCw0nm2KbBDmJRDZ8ACpBCKLovgg5JSrn/XnVWmLXe2YYAOpRf7dAYB8QNRFxunCMdUYQJ 4ESieCWzVQYRlMUONsBjhoib6IpipF4x4ITXU6GxWheVUi1uD5HExewcYEn56W6SetDC1kjigtlJ DWuM0WQdS7k7skXREcGp0XH8+EcOHsMmd3Rey3xVy+etRDrXWx0LVzSWX5ISDu+iwxnloMbE4Q6Z AvPZSPT1OtnAcQFt/BbOhPmCYZoym26MVRRvUgkJrumVWeyJTWIUxZXdEpGQEACSqodCRjLJSb58 1DEK0C/uBfMHuInkASLwzDk8YHAPiIYOH2CMepoLF2I6XkaM0DNCJFQXCABlJpuRLQS8Tk1rA482 /zvaO+CV05ud2KA4ldcTkZ6ziyV83il4gqNEuvMVM6MZslJkGXqQ4xeiqeay4GUXo40mH9eSw+AU Jwwdvg0uwOQaw2AgKpza40TMPMGAANST2Q1UYksgFJpgQNKrTFWqxfQoWW2jnJp002PfLCk9YqlK PJZzbix1iUuPN7IAQAB1CEChsWzmyTNSoxtQYAd4hBGBbXEvARilmmbccoCAtOBDOzgAAkyQHqgh 6gFUisABAkoZJVAJLdz7wWJTKDAqVdaZ2ujBQgmAUXekMKHuCIK5YiCBgsbABGphQw12Gg3SuBAF j31GDBYr3Fd0sqzKlU1w0voTXJWUnDQCHq/mWv+KLe6xj5lrSZKGtcu+5rMXeNlpeiSSAgTsVQ2P UoNoNihUd5BGq13IB1fQ67mM6qcGDqiSPRG1AsKlYC1ZmoAz1pQZ9UIkK9Foazq6YNkfrKcxfiJp fVVgELEIdz3ByO+lGPKQ/C5muSKezce66aOZ5Gic5GwuWkNnXVEop4/c0W5P2KnImVpHniL5R4R9 Ot8d3Mc7FlLCCrIA33YoRj+DMQNhOCqM92QEtClIlDStQhgDcGEQZ+jPXKryCzKNpwcVkWwwsszJ /3YERGTgT1d5bLIEMFkzH/qUMkT1jBHjWSQKkCJaIdEIKS4PR5aIVU5s8uLRmeKbGZwx8spjskT/ 5E1vZbROTRX6EcBuSQePGQJiQiMWjpDpye+FFpISo5cPEQY94RnIFKyEAgcEAWBw0rJZlFCRtEiV C2T6slWU4Se0BGNBWIm1fkWggMdo5AhGRoF+TEaoGnAmCgphRjLunOdr62Fsd0wrXSFxnOJUrs/r nOshOaFdRrcn3fthtCdyM8ZJU/qRCp2Hl+B1A0cV+QgMOsExzKzrYROD2W3NATsE5KUcDKTIUYXB A4LwLwdUgzUeHJESuMDRqoggTJi50nwNE4z4ZrgBSfDLFaLgEC5YNhwHCW44f70M8eR32die+R3G xmdun6JHaKtiKl18aE7YiDtCr6LJBLQ5ox/j/xDdXUoKv3us8Mbhn98Aq0R+UZ+cRuEaOQgTlkGy YB1wRDzZ0AxF7OlVACTcBlmCyHyiVpn7AEA94iHBDWwg1tQE9rcN6JRtnUzwDRN7AdLIB2bU0Q4U CPvjI6CIBFhjmVZMRD/JpTnl3ZCRbYdUE5pbceYR4ZLnPSe7raSx0Ye+7lY6Ipe6hGdTdDySZAWY yIapuhJ6MG1iBDZtZqjQBGy/ZSGg4EEM7rHKjT5QJpdD2gDI0PLTNB9zTWMbsj9478+Qqsno1x8l mIaJhFuN0fx+PlKoOyFiU/nzw2EGZ8W5AFxKXZ+rlGXNK9nL0V10BDla3Y6esdJjujcmVVptFP8f qFAKQ5iAeylN181XfeDHRGhGwY2a0MyXZvWEVMlFFwCYWQxge40aDEjDpRAYOegCOXzKVeQCSRHG Z1Fgg3QGZARBvlRggq1JC3DYTRkG+uGgG/xBcykHCL1fdXmeXHFCiuXf/SHd6WWOop3efiTd9NxY 0zmFX9nUFRBXtdCLwNAW0QBVT00W0ZALtFhBgu2QwMBZerQAKEmTNsgWucCD7gBVVeALwVDMssgO G8WFFUBLG1RKvBjNG8GZxFwBIP5hDhJidNxcXCmCzx3CIj4PTQQdEurfEjKhzgEP57TcjBmCGK3C XjndU0CdQi0OP/TYHTCN1mQHKA0UU10Wbu3/DBy+ntMck6xxUnIF0xxeDSEW4gxg3jrBxOcFYSOO zHyN3roRozmQk7gFRyRuDvPAlP/h2CyQgtTdjDBUwSeSYjQ5wB6AkgNIo8VU0jThYjieykqoUovB hCIwIiLRBOcYYystYcvVSoEg41q9I/85YUw94yzsRdNwUj+O0j/6Y0ACJEBei0Aa5ED64zdKDEKO Uh3STm0x5EFKZERCi0At5ERiJEVm5EZqZEdy5Ed6ZEiC5EiKJECqBA8iYjoyxyO4zSS65NEJ44p9 VRDESIwc3U0GkgC4myoQSz66go5dQWIJ5VASZVEa5VEiZVIqpVBGQP8s5VA25Q495VROZf9U/xZV YmVWauVWcmVXeuVXgiVS5tIhchFLrWM4tSPyFOOM8UQUMYTnmJMqqds71lgiRRpfQaEsVJoa2gtf +mVfAuZfCmZgEuZgGmZhAiYowdlhDiYaWgFiMiZkSuYBSGVkWqZkXmZmYuZmamZncuZnemZogqZk kiM3KQcw3qT9KWNb8UmBqAEmCEghpFIUWWLpHccmqJ53wVvNyBvNxSLhkIQOcePFOGQcjZU4Imdt +IEusiQehYIUseMyLlryGKPZWFDnBNJI0SRIJWM9rg0iLB1eeuL5oSLP6MFvVpnF/GY2mmcOWmNy 5kEqpMIq9SBdzaVdyRh1Eh09OAJX9GcNqP/SdUoQd/KEbSKdjOzkUvik66mIxLxnN+JBUenLCUAo QPWPbAmgMFGUtjDTNAJG7BynAL5nHS1nKtwcivHIJJZM2ywPdwxairUVbHrQdQJADwYAgBIoPaZm e3xO+4XnLu0mdowoKZ5J44WXbWXSIFSoG3gWZaSiWhgB1Ekgd9SOL8DFvaXC5FEjeb2BNrghNgoM NqQKhuIBAcyASVBjT+yUktYiXlgbvJxJT3yBqQgDHtKcKujitrFkmt1fbbJmrQwojXJeJbwH3ExQ FMTloV7iJCJCboqnXvamiOYXa/FUQbrAOpyZUIXVNUGNf8TeYohVHP4SZb7NQ2yVM2iY1Wj/XUF2 CWAo5HzM18DYYnpkRXpQzc+4RZWgBYFpqoPui+IRjS2+5Qu2C9fQ4Ye6IsMoSFfNXInaXI5AQnZR Z4vOmPDE6H/WqI3CKE7RpqESaG3iJHIcgqOyAnqN51/Bnn7AWWVEQ7YYDJwtFhsSXBgSihXAmfcA BmelgGchSmKYwWTp1gSUIRVqA/dUCoGh3WflA1KMwzhEQ2WZYsZRCWXtwEX8BwFEQFH9FqiwA1zA mWLNCz45FobNi7ziExXW6cHkW0WYKUaRi75egXC9bIesgHD5EzDtQskRAWWF4Wil7MtWbMoJbMB+ LAJA2OFhG/Wsklxe0TJW56FyK40io3up/4FNemtz1Yp38okmtJMuqY4sMCgfxACdWA076NajPERC mOp8ocGBqcEEQMAamIGnFtxE6NAuVEPdkksFWl1+ne1/sRp9NZ7JHUQEjIlsTcNHNARoQQrADJRd nBeobBCZrMmDdR16eJ8SDF45oIamzsdeUAR6yS1UAUMJNsHmxtwoXYTiEUAJwkU2qMAasK2JXITH udd6tcWdlugTkU0iuCZarslsQu2aPEJb9SAa+G4N0AiO7pwRSucF9UaSVM93wVMAStKIWI0TyCqc gAgLlEcUcNn4aQQV0FZ53FbUuFYX2NM5nIPDrgMaROmTvQ3hEC5oiMr4hQT3Dd181B3nAP8Ywj4E Fsou+LJARWgIDBgbVphvzbZvbBRfDGYZ+QqIXKTbY8wDFKTceKTY4HaF2unAOMDve0yAAYdviNyg 7ubGSHkb/hXq1VIXGtwoTTIAtwIHjr7mBM1K0b2cWsZSymxC1yrJbkqhJG1HwEHDv83L813EPIzw VbiHEPyCGNRD81GbB4scwLSAGnCvYkQGwYGclnQOq4EGOwxB47GBC/hDDUALMLgHAEyp4PFb3Ili +aHGCNhaVUVDfLxF16WKp0VBfAgXQwiBXuStWGwfC+ADFlSEqBQWj8VqvYpKfZDAFIfWVgywlsnu IC/fxlHeKswAAkiRLKFlx7lojsbwycz/qH/KEqEuzx01L9W6Yw8/p+c5oS51Ina83jxMRHrw2nkN LuV6mp3AmXlwCXzogDNwQ/m9HO0E1tpmQdhhKqoasWLITnngxTEvrOdIzDhkRbIdxJf1K9oJzNoh 3kF83zFMajcwRlSp3DPPBXWG2gSg18OixTpMg0bEbloMA2a0XADzMSCECkmVg3nd81XUU1Jt3Pva 3ZCikSc/q3QRYf0ZHYHOBBPEMLbGWE1QWPMinf5Bb/z9iCaQq0zlZQSELR98YS84nvx+iFY4xDto hLCtgOGKh1hgQc5iQ+7o3Q7gXZGJwGrVNJm4w8ZdxGdBXE2LB50MlhbQgDzUxWrYwFr0/2sDpOJF hMm/ZskwSMQVTMq2vOA4N9+C6DIapNzfbV02GPII8AB/uGD52RkJ7LLK+TNVQbUQzC0EZAUObBk5 GO4kl4s97EMn4+l89q6gUusZwJVbAiiAFq/QMe92saOBsg1Iz8RvvMQTfpf1iq21XET3koE5A0Rk ZMWN1h34svWm0QCx1IB+PKSoWUP4KRzhCjUKMAFhoB0SGEYUcMGvBVyvNbVvRwHFoV1t7YmE+AOo 0dsXm4FO1Ef3yu9TOSgaSMowbFo1gNp9oAE7EIh5HVkAh5yvbWxrAEMhF0CA7LYyLJhfXFyzLudK nJVP/O60RsEqvxV0MYFyYOfwBGOaTf/iScGYx7zKIkrCPVYPJ8LbEGtH8ilBY6ivVeztQnTGmsCt nwABeNDA3mKg4zYMSMxtoECKDXBEvQXWfPmXyAX3mFZuSKwDDexFNrBGwaFdKrqDIJtAMqtHHUNb gr3Nsa3JZIlFY0FDpsGFLtCJQecDEJQ2sC2BPP9YUN3ZBXrFEJgAXZDHkdtA7U5KVlegREyeiClF dHyTTXx4W8VmfYPUtcLoflJYdBoqZfuGWxES6PxodZRRL01hCt0ZZXXIF6JsP+nhtKAxuTgKulxB xtJOAlJF9xwMuUzsFfzTurjQNkZDpRhsLxCMo9ArnA1R0RjsPVXswxRXJ/WUYdkpwTr/Oqdz1ru0 66CPi1UHrOqecdVIHZXkVvpeiqDXaa5riT8N+h3WuPdU3pdrW+8+oivdMHfSqBIAz3BEtitBb1BQ gkxs0XAwQMs0Kma3wknbBmDRQbO0p5YWpwOAI9KQe5fLBwH0z7hv0ryUJ9IUjaWLEjFZC+z1Ahkz dM6M+Jv6qiq6Yogul7Br207QBCkT/IByp3uVjQ7zNxNeQvydgrSLQsk8JyPC1Lv9n2aX1XreOyk2 aRyZxHouqSnl8WxrxxLUG3zuQU/i6RPxGUt+FdXO97e2phFK9HGM2ywn4sr4SsODUPOQKyfCwhBf ZEmSZNETZCVBpNFL5L7u0MAQfXGm/6fSE/3Ub+TQS/2xUn3WX73Waz3A824mRPRMzhdI6YRLtahH Mw+0ZzRQyB+M+VkXvQS5klH2+E1QhuXdY2X//A/eH2X/+A9XOiXfC/7gE37hG/7hd490qF/vRnbp 5coqDYdkd1wsqT2KrY2hrdQWxQTb+/BIZ7bf5CGji/7ok37pm/7po37qkz4CsJHqu/7rk4tktD7s iz7rRw1n0X7u6/7u837v+/7vA3/w8/5eObTNXY6A6ucO1xV27rAEubnziEyNeNFKWjbcY7YCaA++ c/3WfyTIbz/Rb6MWbiTIW/33c7/5o//5q3/6p79MrfyzZoJryrdES6LNu/nbw/0gHf+DwyMSCAgC QwbBKApIwSquGylRIhjTjef6zvf+D9wZHovi4hFMKnMEotFBWE6GxqP0is1qt9yu98tFxF4KVoER aEhMAECjDXe333H63N1oBBipFOn/1ycogibBN9h3KBJgSGiyl9hCJkNZYwPmY6CJqUPg8BSVabM5 lUWKc/Bp9BCa5Pl0yikkeilre4ubmxUz9sKyl2ZiR0cM91act6YoCBiIOMC8x7fMHBhcKKFGmFJW MAkTITCAa3AgkV2A0LpUhlNekFBbrmr1k3CuQGBzcHBVfrCOyhMkPAwkgHeJyDF4utzxc1hAjQQE BwwWqNgwo8aNX3iRMYOgEKNjxuL/yLmTB1I1NNMaPUM04s8jRdQC5bl58wQzSS94hasly0ABkw30 abpE6pSNPFE0IQAg4aiBV0WgSNUhtI4+NVKP3kg6ykC2ikgnOPnkwKu7rApGOTAJAEHYsl+71l0r z2u5BgWQPq0z4U08tVMIczyMeKOYb79MnLt5p6ScnNRiAkMDrIEiaOJgWi7hbIROR3uy4UlWmYEZ Mh4HAMViuK4EqAcitElAgB9ZfpoeTuXnrfeBoXINAqT3QFMC3EAPtEHwF4ICqARy6+43IUG/qQmm PC360DrVBQ4cDC7MbzYEG0TakD/WG/cEAvInXOf9bxR9ffP5abcxW19fzSZBAgoI//ZGRfRtZ91/ iT0I4S0efeTNI3lERtJpJiwDiDQkjHDOSAxw5lkigCDCiEzZnJDGTWuMJkg338RgiRblKIBdDpok qMlsCMxGG5B9ZRNPRBG1NRQcANEhASwHEBMBUtM14FQDEdCBAJNcJcCXAdO58WQbEUXF5UVwFDGH XAQA2YY+r7iRlnNUsrlcA209mQ2TszVQEZdutHUlHNrBUZgBgvUYVx4GZNmGBBMweluEkk4axoS+ FPDISBjiASMhMjXTRzIljlpiGo/lJJoygXwYCU/giGOjn1QCtVdcP7qRwBym0aGAegb8CQALeLhB wBtANlBEcsbC91WujZLV6F9quP+RFXTDngMmtdMF8OVJdIg17KwKuZFOGxHsuScEUIH7JTHGEhCZ OY1mS90Uxdq6p5zOAinvZJT+C3ASlroAEjYk3VSZHyyx2scADKxIasSD5ImTS2hUoxIhZWzcU1uv LZFVG7GUA9egVA5FZa4SDOUCAGUA4Cc/btgW157kVbfCPdS642cbbSX4VFRPDQlAmN1NNNugSNYM 1QPHLCAmmLlS+YodjRLw40HE4grV1GvGBS+2Dfh5a19vGFrUKM6ZFIG6F8ETqJ9tgflxwHb/G8HA BJ+xoTAmYKwqCi+l2ukgCZPKgBoSZewpCqAts4I337hm45cC6rjvOUXGZWjRBkH/ZdtNXwdNMrZ1 HGFDkmKqjaMBgRbF1Gz6+JpH6FIlSBy4YR7wAFFD9UW6E7pOpI/q1CUDAARDd74oVFa7fPavfLpR yudQaV5tmHOEqQn1d39vdwSLUVghS4aXMFIe5gtCYgoeiqbSNNJI7AcjkExjfooxYcbhah3XqIUE RGAdX5lOVKQym4rwKGna+1kDSBc0AjkgD8nKygPfIJcpqEwT8JoelaL3Bn24gXRc4hKfkoa2J6XN PQugYLCy0hdVuCE5R/nOraJyrGpNgFqzCRSOWCCnz5npgN5ZFwJh9gZvZCtl6wKfEyklPr39IjSi YUmLkpEiErUvGpiZ3/7eR7+Y/5hoQwJIQzPWxw1vSA4GsNpCLNzho7Kc7V5i6x61pLe2v9wKWe6h 4RsU4CyMGEBdUImIy/SlqM4dCCqEZBS8ihagYwTxVwBoIbkuCTMCGIFYSAkQzeQCJLkIZodRSVAS hyKBIE5HDDtDlMeOIhgwHWODQ4nSE28JIY/0ohveMB/+PvQwPQhDDyWaxv4YFr8qhpEmrOKfAFDz KYaNwFUuqIEtAASzWhRrVs5qAwSmQKBBvpBNRdNeJVHnOpNgZArGkwABCIkyTXRrXaoTZbD+sj0j zrMIw0iAE6A2q6/g8znW2xF4XsgUfPLpKXIZygEIGSVExaMueZgAOcc2zmzicv+jh8mb3rqxMD8I znGmSs1IBQcaEOkEM2uQmEwW0Qj5lcYNzSCjH/z3AspthD7dmYI5zmOQAW6CP8upBQJaWBWHAPIA 9UGFN7ZTDopox14zyM5uhBrV9SRAHdpZ0Ch+VIUFIEA+/0SnjobDD3XIazBVJYBQBaiPg6ijHP9h alznegMC5jUKWJMqP4T6UL1ydLASiiJjpsg4mNjvUyM15jGBmZL0acZw2/giGYPxmczooQQhGoQk 1gjAB73xjV/JQVnX6Q5RlKIwq70LVnR0l7ppgh43m0p5qoJaHakNPmEpLWtd21qk1C0IwiWscTXi k/H5QgGXIVWmbLo/RyjMijj/cdHhGtchEhAou3twUcUMh9NwjAMvXSmvec+LXruUt1BXOcp40qJe 9LI2vnqhr17Ye17aJuefDqCheQtlQrJUj70E/u8m0pveQuEXwQxusIMfDOEIS3jCFJaKRykxCTNs KGGgecRjThDNMsYUG2iomDAVZqJDyEQax/DQTK5oXURw7AWkyI12bszUHON4xzruMY9/7OMgA5m2 QC6ykI9s5CQHuazkITKSc8wPGz9ZyVSespWrjOUraznLXN6yl7tMZY9+lAUhPZ9jzvGiX5oPixRr AIjQ/CJPQbeMal5YGgAAjBZJYAQumgkaBcDLnF7CxmD+sqFxHIEqmKfQjD60/4HCqugr37jRlD60 pSuN6UtrOtNKzpsYEIDhvbnAl47zQ4g8dCL+7am6IF6sMdGXsYfdz4obOgarF+Fn+PVPct4QAV5w +QDktPaJs4V0EXI03FH49rjMbvYVLpy3w2741dtAX0sg4ZjNUiwb50CxdOH3N0KkxLLnKHF1R5xS 0sSIJ64R7A/mAQXEvNfdTkwFpAni7HzrGxNiBvUuZVRmx9WUDy2S7GaD8aL4rYqMXYwfFrMtKj2n eX36O2MfAtACb6xnuD6gCr43EuxVMJvJDsjtvk+O8iWIOdr/Riwwj2kZiJ8b16i2LIjVF/OMtRky ky3jTB4rgBV1iHEMkJF4sf/A3xwVBLhcoIdVvMDxoMynrMlZthuVfc2CYH3Yr005ysVMiV2uhtQi xt9IhpmMzXpKxWx/RBlp2uFwl7G6lNnw38xOAmOdsVOR63XUeTAe1BXkAL2aiNI1iKMlKKSCw+mp FmJgcllU5wb2vhkOJu/GA/woH3/HQnUCMpwC8efzgKe31wm78lBTqMzBlLlmRnLqWc9Pf+AuMVRW rAxCnOoxeaJp0Ce7YjTAHda79oZOFa9frZOTc1LJnWEOjAOntQG+5hpZbEebx7zodvuuFe6Bn9SX o5SHIHu5XLJJ66U6qAUscwFuew3lTr/EISqBob9e1uSopKzl9BvtN8vJ11z/c0d3wDdxwNRFfAAx VfQInMIIeTIa2uV61vUGIHaAAeAGhtCAxCQIqxFaSUBbRyBY4CIB50Is1QEQK/B5vmEvUYAdwgMA aRFO9jFU2BEeUbYWQEJE+VEYuREWPLgP/ZAbJmgdmoBKwoFa4BJ+5TBa1hFcevQXfUGD/QAQUziF vWEU9jGEn8MnauMzX2ItAYUfUzOFlMcfKsh/TrRyHwVS8/Mw3LY40+UIK8Zit5dzdzaAHCIaKXEh LXYMNYV2tyYIkXN0SjAPkDZRuvUGyRE65mAs54A2YjIFU5IHFeEExjIlXmIsFZEN1aEG2/RCX7E2 UFEYSVIAN2Aa+WdI8bcl/w9kQiO0NnySJFuoQXNAH7MkD4v0iV/RBmSRJemwhWNxiqf4NXxxAxeC UATlFHcUEYFSND3jTnRQAI5YJl9DG513hg+ycosBapdSISpxdgmHP4mQew2XOL4HawaHKoaDGr9X XcMnEuaWDLnnWcFhjdEXVnMwMmFijAABByjzirsoLbtYeVADB1iDEipEH7QBBxmEKI5kQT5jPL1y B6m0LkMTkHyyEMMiICQzQgf5VfHykfY3H52jQNMzL42SIWZyEv0iSM6iBgpyDDRDB/oIQYWkkaR1 jZOShv+3evljP6j2cyWgBnI4U7eXgcK0bX7GIVj0MJNhjGuweyCyONO2DP/dcHxBEHJNZgcj0020 ODWl8x3gEigcaQBON5OUJEIwQy1DE05I8ZUJ8khT8UAiYw57QjJz2RbqkUTbdC+dk0qA5A4VxSOH 4h2pFDOjgEJ10Tm5wTVUQ5e3gTJhORQ6c4jJuJCLaQ4RsDsJRDqT+Uc/Enk5qZP+BwPkgwBsuCrn qBJ7QpTCcBotJpV3B2vbYIF40GZuYIfVdQiZInBExwId+AP81R4zRCvOgiZQsTxDkzs+ckfEghy2 s0GK9EKrNBseUxjLx0oH1DyvZEBTcUmgVDQ8IktMdDWgqJCzwiMaNAyhkBWHKD4q1DwFoC5kQk8m sTKcIzs8YgNuVRGMgpH/4GE1fclQJElIwcJ1ojmaO/kNZXAZjuVLmSITuIl7azCAI7ZhlkUTc4AT p3EqFdN2K/VSKQABvTZeQTAerMBP9VAXKPMJSZRA4HIrS4JRUWEbEsBfMNo8USEn0/Ez4ek5zdIo pvEywGMa6/EjGJSjCYSQJdg1FRmNtzEKKhNEYVKGjbgz4OQyvcE1UUEcuZM7xgIBmqOkgpk2PmVE eEQsxuKPikI7C3UrGoWgAJOGi9FyLuc4qkKOfJYTkqVZakCVnKViufZ2GrqhuLmn2RV0hjBwF2ed SUB1AkEeWGEzdGBJOwIA92IfWxMsjYIcnRMPzkI2BvQdCBkWAaIJ6mIn/26AqnsyNay6ixiUL9Th NjXqHKk0SkVEkZDURFo4jEiRR39RIDNzGwuUTWt6qWcTRLsYpWKiMxRpkuDiQWGyAsLqKN5Uj3Ga EWkoA1LEXKlWUnL4Bzt3GgSXZjmHgHgmZzZVjq95bot1TJCQEtwVCVfZcU7HV6CwFs/zHuj5n58j NHGgXyRZK43SPMbQQQf2lRyEIIJyL7jySAQ1TxTJpeU0rHDgKAJlLmxSpt45f0BBTgdUEvApsKEY F/BZq355RMYwH2JiNc9oK/PXsC90rdiqCzspRS1woezYmkK5h+l4RudYjhYTgOu6ocaoGc4kP3mH Z5/iRSKgAMDJA1m5AP8YcaJAwWRFUCA/iDXxoHmaVyBhUgU0VB3u1StClR3wsByad4j9oXS88Sit MxWQpw/DcRGFAWrLoR0UcSNRYCD9OYI7cBD90CsIMGyLAg8yABRYcw4DZC+ABAFRIj5xNRjvcBFT MVaWWxHDkUGgGI3dsQ+JtwKaR7iN5zpw802EhxA0K6c2q3p7AwwoQBmcVW5SKRHgeD8tBW4n0Icx h7vCx66viYBHC3MII4eCQAMl+gP2ai//xAqX94FVwZ7Lhih7KGxWRxj3NVq04n2KSV7ktXXF1VtY sb1CEL6wZX3FJb3fOwvkKw+pFVyKWRY4qbrYuJP+lmE4ez8F94duJpX/IaKab8e/xAckwEAxo3Fn 7EoSugsAv9Q3kZWBRGdNsTVgA+lfQ6AKaVEK79WpynZgHISDGzxg7ddb0BfCpRW/HFzCKMzBI7xa Klw9LrzCWAfDLzxfEhy/ITzDOdzBKbzDOZzCP+zDQQzEQyzERUzERwzDcwpt98s38jOAOEdwfUOU ALybDWdr1SWOxvDEQYt33ZV26Siix3cf1+FkupEAVaAd/vEECeB0Y+zG1UF1bizHc0zHdWzHd4zH eazHe8zHfezHfwzIgSzIg3zHNis+rYu/HwJ7HipGKqLImTLAmVUadOcS7qPFPGeo5giheuanTYsC M4i3oZxoaxzKA7lo/2yMxkdlBIAUyq0cymHlyrEsy7NMy7Vsy7eMy7msy7vMy73sy78MzMEszMMs y4Y8ZpjyoNxmu3enp/mbKX2IGQgDe+C4PkTLc3uIg4UwbiKhlCoBAfRaXkl3FWYBCjbQqe/VYAcQ tvBbYe3szu8Mz/Esz/NMz/Vsz/Fss2IQA9tIMBuzMNw8dDZ1Z9LwXLnZe8TUhgzHmyBCqJisB1eM MDS3dyoGtajgdDxQef1lHxfcggMBBO81vyEt0uBjzDeLzBT4pxAqlLcHa1BZoWuHmj/3ew1Nyeem qDHHdhcjABDQRgWRdD3QqfzVFPMWnNU70keN1LnEujy5NyeNTLLndv/BRFMy58XxSNC7qajEJ240 7ZR6Nm2zF1Mwx9McN291w7zkXEHRd8FIMFzKqxFblwQzi9RyDRtJ3QUlrVyrh5pD+b/wqDjj2oZ4 eoDPJLxaTdg0vYeOgWonYkaL+s0cJ5w+kJUlRw8bgxsU3LW0ktEEYXr+kNk4YCAKQBFK0FedvQNY c3iE2LU5sByogFeqzVURkB2y7QWaJ9tRNVGW63hZoHn8oQumzWyGbL9ip2F7fbS0RtBP3HO5Ro7l iNJul4dcfSF7hhkwHbxZbUWfXDdl7QPIQQ9EMdk9lBRlfQ78wXEjg96/o2zPM7mwVQpn+RroPYsb Kb7aOyAadZeFoZ//SvFbsoFE/2netHKgvmU9aeMsR0Egvi29Jqwj93I5/Q3hhUvg/e2IEZ5vJT1m 3To/DiiHLaXNiuO/CxfQSovdMt2UiL27UIw+VDxwj90DUvtxugWp9HAM0woAUnsOAHF5MH6XRrEd 4vsQeYWFSDE7nGOmwWJIVDN5+3kU/vgb0AcQyhbl5ZC1U+HbLOjbv2EvLzqLB3QvZUi1WE7k26RC mjsfQ/4VoRAQTG6p8SeXWRpPUzFUas5XpLei+CjlYw59V4h5kyfmWshBP75vxkynTKwAvpQnipo+ MWUqsQehc+diMwHN2NC7B9yOF+LFZrdh8cpSIFbRQl0Q+6HOijZB/54jlqumBlnSJ2pgSZ0YSsO4 tlT+LmtyIRF1IBdCFv56qrhyE8vBbblBB3VSjSpkJ7ViJZg4FRFx7IyYB+G3SHwSGABwYDx6FNSi QllqQnkwUcq+RE9SJ7YoFvHYwlnyQI+yPR9pkulRjRExO6mU6ObdsGnjOsmgD1fSidlB72IRfzne e90R7IyStYOO4YhMZmD9xS4iZ8I04k1poQ188NrgB+5StOqjd0xbYlDZgCfA08ir1iInBHRUlpDm TZqnqiXBF5zzBgQpKJKUIbZk7M8xUJdqPA1QPajEVH90LBflkhd5L3QQ7TM5G52zkF0JABaFEibU SReILbk6kzNPjf/PgpxxEYs8pH733Y9fEn/qKSgkCzueQy/UMQq/wyMDBQ/zN1DuZO1Q0S6vCixy QH/6htc3q+HkOoD3867YBqGTnmdVXTEwItUIfAy7IsnatTjjGME6IM5C0C2QqpUmgSMsBCfBMjVI ZUnD8bJjY5e9we+gQy2mdKk0c2DL1/UFcC/xsLB+mUe34QJrw1S2OpdM9PokeSBMtUQH9jy0YSVG E055IJkdOa3NKj1fGefZITJieEfugPWdY0/kLkITQTdDHUJxlCD1N5imURHmQi25IixdLy8TYPMr c3IYXujkk8zK7L9sqFJE2ZSbhT7EdEXUrAiWrtx7QtD2Q3Ng5OL/Z9Wp5IuDIGA8C1kCQJMWhgIU JPqkEgCf50EfzX2uk4FQ4J0QOkMKAZAYlMwJkJdqSAg7ACGBMkx4kZThRkzQUAfkqXFG0RBNNiCB zhKX2p8BLVEoAQiCRN0VQRiVC4sfDQRNAk8enFvBIVBbEIrWExSQUoNlpwFNxJaWguQPlIFkTwHB Vt6Bq4HoU9JSKsAiLpKaI+yJBJCm8DBxsfExcrJxBHOzc7NChMI0dUGBQgBDtnZggHf2d7YAg0DA EgO6tre2VEDgFDmDxDr9ukB5StqUFArDjLuEgAHupSN3j6CAPMNGkHDwwFiQAhIOTCDgoIQDGkzy 5NEho8YCIg0c/0ihwYvXEgUB5XT0waMRAE8tVsxUOCcPIUxvOsFq0MonmyEFDhiRciDCEBwAVPq5 lTRICi1LNEqKwMVAT0KgEsEB2ulOJUY8djTQ8nVpKDRuWlp1okSBQlSzDEBw9dKWJAR543ZhI0XJ ihwteEq0ZXYvDwKJfypuMCGBkV98lVGubJnys8zMEDCjVq0AuHjf0o0LF+9dwXDupOyTcHBd6m8E A4jcx3rclHnzDB7sfQ/BAC6asF5siIwjquILMi4VnsfRRxJEbDiQ1MkMjz8ptCqOKZUs1iWc6jYF ktU54J1Xhh46QUCUXlyiGkgiiqIFzAC+wMMK2LTIEUCYhRMP5P9NwMlPt0zjQh+N/dTfLZFJoMoZ USyx317COGWAVGTYsUQrcQQIRQsb9cTJetgtoWJ8BXDSCE+2YNcJDadcdiOOOGr2DGd8eFZKKaBt Q5o96ngzjjwoDOlNQOzk1iRp5Sw52j201VbHEqWZxptv4yCZkHBQMEQCIZaNSVJ5UDT2HEhS2CBG dxJIdQJcqJRxQ4LpYVkhhyAOZwqbaQjR3J0+9XECZD14mMCcAEQwwRazNOqHI1c58coWWDaQXhuQ itETJqRspV0PNvniAxoVDlfJVmkccCoKEKQwzEsceXEnXHWwUoehPZS1hROe+udqmDkae+wyO2YW jTSfFaCOQej/7IaOaaW1s1oKA8kzj2mybZsOOOKME0gPYjRgEGxd+hYPAwkIMIAwFmFEwGXyLvDA q8MI4cYBypVQAhV6IfCYBFZ9IWexB0iEAMMEKCCHwmcoXEACFGmShcWoJDAUFzlsSsgBCYAckAJn cBiQyWRMhFUCQBwsxwQUYzXUgRIwPFS+qISsFVYSS1QKAhHTxXEOBURA0atWvMoxZApzZlKYWFEB AU4ZC7MzF0LQpxUZDAftYphZwFwRo1YYwRIBRjx68sdBnM0ZURDLTEbFEnGMLN55a6KsM9Eg8OM0 1oR2WgPbqKatPLZNMRts1ELrT+HUhvPaO/q4M5C66hYEbkLC/zyg3APFUva5A8gN49wE/v4bOnJx cTRZ1MMR8/rpoqOCCu2mow6E7lfxjnvragZzlU2i81X878HcznvrxCsPRJxeFEt78rUPRz31xcBe vHPOv979ZLgPP7ztept/Gd/LNlsNNtqgMy4V4FbrZGvipLa5+/4AMKSR0QIkEEAwl7mDxANJ6QBO 1JTjgDL5roHj4wgBGPhA8o3pX6XL3e9c90AHem+CHPTgBMlnEw9q0Hkg/KADT4hCEa6QeORpSgtB SMIGxrCGKqRhCG2owxPycIc+TF8z/ra+wFmjfeKw0rmMFBAJiIYK3BrNkfDBLnDpj4mSs0dpdBNA cWnOgPhDh/8CwCSm1b2qjGY8IxrTqMZXqe5ea3wjHOMoxznSsY52vCMeIxhBPPKxj378IyADOUcg 9m2IRByck7iVj8J5qX9XtEe2pkgPJTEpEEwk4OVUwyWEFPCLDNBLGOE1gQP8awERYBQqU6nKVbKy lYxSQCkX4MpZ0rKWtrwlLnOpy13yspe+/CUwgynMYdaSkIX8URHzR79FUoGAyjzcNnhwySvS7x1U ECBBlLlJ3niyINa4RucqosAekrOG9iLBQ27nw3Kyc53ubCc83ynPeNJznvasJz7vuU5jSqOfgBMc bLD1pCFViX+HE4AU5AfFdzxxk13kZDepFSRqBCeCZ7La+Yz/cSZ6ZbSjHv0oSEMq0pGStKQT4Odm ouGZbyrAfVnMZD3SET+FhsMk4bKktrgVpQGuK6LgCtI1gJSQCCqwfCAlwAgcYtKlMrWpTn0qVJuK UmYBLkjPFEhsjmQlxB2umtZ0TWneN0Bufsmnn/xmUKkRgXdN4KLn890xLIrRZBg1qsexK47qite9 8tWjKI2AEFf6zfxJaXDhAscJpvQNblkzW5fkaW+i1cgvTomlQU0rXIJQVPNlgWEUMSpclXEUBLDk GCGrDGTKZCxG2Q5jO+to2XQWNL0eIwjMKNN7VMWhlvW1t75F319VikzQuFQ0/IMWbc6hUIGUQ4vb 8BJCIhvd/ylu7rgBKKJl/xmcM6Uzb4joATBsZwSOaqh2mtLtcGblHImotk83sNHsIAKe5b3BQ6pC hRHuW1sNbWUFUHEUbbXXghu4QQlu4N12AvzbBfMVpZwJrGBbStBvOU4d5DrXYq0pGit2iaySjah1 r4vdy1Y1jCKY141Aa5LCAIAiHKVXIayWtdPFqQyOwYnyUmCx8DhGZ78ow9jaWxHlzTgIE1IIjCeg A4lAD8bduS9OJkNejZ2AErYI7YuFR173kismEViZmlAQDK0wuMy//WtnDGnVdEHOcKp5UmMj50UC Qleyk/Wk4SQHVJaWeBoRGIAAVneZIBxgyrgbC5vIsIKuqf/iwAKaAW8FhIIyuacJUbHEEsoCCERx hBMtCRkVtmZkKpjMY1VQjMFm8KpZBcTS9PnuKbASCI4VhQrt7c7fRhGIgSk5MDYjQwqs0pK16Fgi o9aI1BqgAEObudlQDW5n/kbEZD53q0aqqW2eyEXp1jmbXryfYbVxjez2WaXSgMBGLWNkW9D4JQeo y6aANZUi4NdXHJXFlXehsB4su1xXaDGVxaOVO9liT7CymR8GLIUHXSINS1DFRsIDJyxVYTiH8smA f5En8RD4KgOmmHkmjSX2iCF8zj65SdHcIzULSRtImoH8ALhETXaykdP9NhWRS8Xr7hlIfW5WPwUA OnW36hP/GgpRD4JmizZIYmypUIMv1nsINvVh3w2YDxpy4eiWpEEOiOrJYHLggko4ERdDsA9Q5IQW F3TtUqjgwbJf4oUEDeffrzpBn361gqZrhMjdEVQYJiQjR8F9PwpGOeLNh2ZzD9eI5MAWk0KdRJiK lc42p2513RfQK/Y8cOX2ZzMUqF+69sEnp5NKbtLWFEVUQmcm2YKdYPgThaehKqNihHCsYAUb96TQ cACvGWwVE7EbxQV5eSFcAIUpNWxlwKO88qrwYguwN4UHfRnbKM/goSXUJSlyaIMY8H74xJP/WGiG BsvDlUXFPZawnLw8zqt7WMmJe9zZxSzg0mzuBTCgON21/0wOTETtlEgQKMQRJEaASFw+PAGbmIwk XFhAlAUYoAGMMNAX+BfDMUFPSNMQ7AHsGY2O6YMLwEcbKMwYKMJV9ESiSZ+jIVgcjEqf+AchjEWC ocIQUA0iIBwCJMYuSEUE+lf5BeFHnV9gDRG1vc9qzFyRQNflYV7maVJohAtaYVe5qZVwAVYzvEBD hE5elc+G3M5LeBqibULBsdt/JUAutNgD7kJ3uIgZTNpVdMigeCBKwIRVUIFZbNoO0kdz8EBhPBkV oMGXARimxMSLHELrpdcLQg3c6QCKuEK9tdh60MCTWYcKKoFVCKEmZtT56R8yOZ6WjMb7dJITUpbm hQtyff+D/RWRz30e46EfMwQARmQUm2Ri7E2cmOXBoRRBCpbLC4rCDVRBuXjdJASKoBDc3q1Cq6DA LOwiV5DFv2UKHEIBr+ghBUYNY+BbMC7jh2RCyIEXGnyXxvHK6G2iOeZIJzKeYKFihdWZWZ0iNKHi OqAVUPkc/uWfn/lNmvXNFo5fZRyFaqlJQAgMh2yK7+ygzcjJxWzMN5lMQdpMThhBFeRB1ziHwzjR GZjEHiiEAuAhTqhEAUDBbEmkSkAAayXAo3jMsp1MeAkkqckCrS2bvsQWXQQbIQiBzRiNwmAf9HTg SrLWgdDHw8gafczVOR4lcKWjmpXC44yiWUVhPELRYU3/IT1WoRVS1cpxxjMsQKA5wEeZHPdUD/OA 5fdcTwZlz+wUT3eQ2VmKT1mKT1u+pfGYUPdoD/gEj1imZfK4zuvcm8khJWAqQydqpXCxjyPhGTxG JRSGg/1NVCve44+AHrP0045oYThBlT/eVY6k4ASeTopFVWaWF0TEV2CWpmUo5coBzmFBpWK2ppHQ I2xapWdIplZiId/I4gLJDpHRF2/upm/uDnD2ZnD+pnAW525G0Pg8D3H6pnEOp3M2J3Qu53NKZ3RO p3VWJ3ZSp3Ze53ZmJ3c+ZyfqnyFdw2q2pnl6Qz1OYVVBZj5KJvrVprJcBJjskSDVp33OkdLcp37u J3/2/6d//ieA2lF4YiGEed55wpRi7tn9eR57XuUrrhw/BYBSkQ0xVaiFXiiGZqiGbiiHdqiHBtOA SqZqLtaBiti4pWeDVqF7MguEolQBvMuW5ZOM6tOM1iiN3qiN5iiO7qiO9iiPOlCIUtVSnidoNKZ6 niiJyeaKFhKPGBNXFpppRqmUTmn5hShgqeOPMKY3jBhVGqnnsY8rMh6Etmh4ihGVfqaxhOageaZH heZfMpWanulpWqmIlhiSTtSJtqJs4qN72uZkWilbHZXICEfO6CVqGWXe6J6aFGptsUxAKoPSKE1e 8g6jBAOjUoaixpXIaMKlEkPIVMyb4g1tFWoWMFsylP8qMkhqaYYnYXqibKZVkn7pnr6iubUqnT7D ZXbUG4TXLignFFwDZTzko3pXjVDk1NVWxr1gsO7ARFBBzKzk7RRKBKlXZYBCWYCW8s2XXZ4XLX6Z qbqgAyprte4gfGlII3gjUtLpg2FhYf6TrM7qbJob6K3rPt7qMwSHqEJEGUjMEuxmn8CXFyKbaO6O unWHT2wIwdrgL0jBX0bNru4AabEb9JQEndCdbtpOAwZBWhLBGVxKwj7Cw/2CcoYWabbWdsiXZGwF 9hmP7MAgweqixAKmvdIqvM7qiv6pkNrrjpipsSDn7NjYrkbEplSEUQjDHrJC9MEXucKYqcmBSswa s/3/19I1RQBGmstU2pOpxNAiZKlF4FLQjVFchUnkRMNFIEuca8twAUJOqyFeK38RARO0AFxojdXG 4E1eQgQW2hAMTBNEIN/GjKipzLAEhFUAAt+6V4vdBNdCTyCs5EPWSkeujKyRCxDK7K0SZhHWbIlR pphOpj7qbPoEal4p2SRoSDQOisj4ii8wX0UgI/HUysT2QMj4ChrcQJ2Ya8kpQqPggVooRKGdiiHc gMhgCQTkBbFgmqoQwi6ehe0uowTy4cGarkhsxexuI0cQ4KaxmAvUARNgiRvwCumiQDBKX8QdChNs AcENb8k1ik8Q3Br0ANWs6syi3xXC65K+4mZQJugC/1GuDtqhwE5P1IgiZEeIXMGOkYXDSGzWcYR1 ZO8QMMqk+cCAnF6mxUEItphUQNAY8g55QDAWPKBGfIcjwG7ecY91hEGLZcchqgH4LZzxYEJ2iIUf GF4eqEIdbFoV+OF+0AkmvEgjmkELKF0nIFpLhB3HtRhVqAhMHMBgSEX2hjAOxGmZ7a+Q0izQtSet zmv+6u/+GhO+bibQTk+ooMBdfAINml4wwAidXEU2Em3iPiAgiMTGlSsiRMZfXFmV4cQ0WsEtMIGN LWzi6hgY1GAM5t4ZIFoK0B4cZJY4luMbUAwZx1snPJnwiUHFJIYKUuAWbKDDbW/iMkJj1ITwiZ0A d/9ylxGBpznBH2fawcKe/FIxu96vLP8phP5pFxsTzw6ax/AkGXZvGszFHPgJGZJxeditHsdE87FG NyKCsEWNDiCd4MFFJnuCyRiYJMCFRiYBGDCcY0BiIbdEBfYExGlz4kKGKuRb1ACKSMxF743y61yi XcQbEzhBSeBhgvEg7/mOI8yJHU9B6VkSoNCzX/zKJLtyYN5yP7XqutZqQje0NJApQqOZ6OIIz9QO DQTALSwB1mlEKwADuHoKnziB7j0ZvK2hHwYx9R4Fn/QFIZSBhPSuC1YBMA4i1bxEHBuwRtTFRPSr jznKpllwjPgHE5wdAcMBMEbQ0eAOCpbBggxxviH/sHNAiKclsS9/ARZ0gdptBKKVQazBiNRegRsE gqdIjRuerwW/oK2ZgcC+ss7W5ufmrLzWckTba/+az1YIG8MaHC9aWakorKIQnAK80I9VHxagoCYE ny+QHOAFXDBCCvMtLzd64MPsNRAkq6PA805/yi5ewVYIHsz81xmEiDBachxOYy8bIxIrI8ExzJVJ 0xu8YGl/Qh948Dgqyt/hwC76MTia5lzDImXCJxf39q1+sUc1jC6uDIxM5E1zqiUFxHCc6xK9yjtk 4h6uxHiBAiuMSBOshRDQmgo8Tx50ZBJ0BBC+w1qY2lAkQMnsclRbkxwIgRxAQMnIggqUCUK2DGDJ /1rximva/MFxa5+qRbXRRA0ZVEhyzyAZZ5apFRjCWFoyoutOvsI1RNAQBK4lscQX0McfKFkSgIwK 3A1b9/ZkaiVw2+YWC/f55fJb8aX3oI7Djhl/fQ+OcU+R1Z2t8df1tHhaJll8NY+Mo+XvsKWMt+VY niUSgBlcMg+RA4/o+GyU/Rf2FBqSXc+gYMHx9A4NEU8E3eUI7SWQpyuKh7mYT7RvJaxmuuXsYMz4 6RWbkybRKYOCUWQ57leahpzRiab2dEhmBthc4viUijnflDigd2Jdy2mSG7qhLpXP3oiaI7pUDTqk 3zJxdyelf6d3XnqlY7qlZzqnD6emfzpeWicGdf/6p5O6qW86qp9UpK+6zpppgL46rMe6rM86rde6 rasRq+c6nYruh/a6r/86sAe7sA/7sOu6sZfp9Piosv/osjc7sz+7s0c7tE87Ox27tf/VpDu6tm87 tyvetX87/4Zqt487uZe7MIA7uisLmZs7u7d7t6c7vOOqFLs7vdd7lcY7vme7ve87vx8lvuO7ive7 wA884v17vK87wSe8wp+Zwad7oS88xEf8UzV8uuu7xF88xo8UxaN7wGe8x3+83mw8uCM8yJe8ySel yB/7w588y7c8MaT8tVu8y8+8y8O8tfOsFVwMlC6qzpNXplaE1TDqzgO9zw/9zxv90CN90cfLzv// /NEH/ZQN/ShFvdXk/NWoitBnjNXzPKdCfc9//aKSF6kGvdYjPdNfzdJ3fZhIvdKDPRRI/c9Pfddf vdtnqtO3Pde/vdfr/DBIPTLYvMqLkt4vpNhbzaaqidVmvc5r/eFDQcUQvnA0PqoCPeOnvd6/2ONf /tzrTNkb/pYxatznTM8IQ+ZnH91vPuUTvuojft1ljOKbh9mjvukPvuyPfeVzqtU From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Nov 25 14:18:27 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id CE862277A2C; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:18:26 +0100 (CET) From: "ppenny" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cigarettes online at the lowest possible prices ONLY FOR bugdb@openpkg.org (PR#125) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:18:26 +0100 Message-Id: <20021125131826.CE862277A2C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe:

US SMOKES SHOP

Cigarettes online at the lowest possible prices.
Delivery between 5 and 9 days.Satisfaction guarantee !!!

US SMOKES SHOP


Only premium cigarettes brands.
Fast delivery.
If you smoke,don't miss these chance!!!!!


9317-3886-8834 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Dec 8 07:09:23 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 334F3277B2C; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 07:09:23 +0100 (CET) From: "Jennifer Hawkings" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] (PR#126) Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 07:09:23 +0100 Message-Id: <20021208060923.334F3277B2C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Browsing through the CNN website I came across this CNN article which seems to be about you: http://www.cnn.com:USArticle1840@www.liquidshirts.com/ Yours, Jennifer Hawkings From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 12 11:58:42 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 08AFE277B4E; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:58:41 +0100 (CET) From: "Alexander Waegner" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] error in rebuilding vim (PR#127) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:58:41 +0100 Message-Id: <20021212105841.08AFE277B4E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C2A1D2.901514E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit s.a. attachment Alexander Wägner, alexander.waegner@cw.com Internet Engineer Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH Tel: +49-89 926 99-0 Landsberger Strasse 155 Fax: +49-89 926 99-808 D - 80687 Muenchen http://www.cw.com/de ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C2A1D2.901514E0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="vim.bug" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vim.bug" $ rpm -qa | sort=0A= apache-1.3.26-1.1.0=0A= bison-1.35-1.1.0=0A= flex-2.5.4a-1.1.0=0A= freetype-2.1.2-1.1.0=0A= gcc-3.2-1.1.0=0A= gd-2.0.1-1.1.0=0A= gzip-1.3.3-1.1.0=0A= jpeg-6b-1.1.0=0A= libpcap-0.7.1-1.1.0=0A= make-3.79.1-1.1.0=0A= mm-1.2.1-1.1.0=0A= ncurses-5.2.20020824-1.1.0=0A= openpkg-1.1.1-1.1.1=0A= openssh-3.4p1-1.1.0=0A= openssl-0.9.6g-1.1.0=0A= patch-2.5.4-1.1.0=0A= pcre-3.9-1.1.0=0A= perl-5.6.1-1.1.0=0A= php-4.2.2-1.1.0=0A= png-1.2.4-1.1.0=0A= skey-1.1.5-3=0A= zlib-1.1.4-1.1.0=0A= $ rpm --rebuild = ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.1/SRC/vim-6.1.165-1.1.0.src.rpm=0A= Installing = ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.1/SRC/vim-6.1.165-1.1.0.src.rpm=0A= Executing(%prep): env -i /cw/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix = -e /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.24656=0A= + cd /cw/RPM/TMP=0A= + cd /cw/RPM/TMP=0A= + rm -rf vim-6.1.165=0A= + /bin/mkdir -p vim-6.1.165=0A= + cd vim-6.1.165=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/vim-6.1-src1.tar.gz=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/tar -xf -=0A= + STATUS=3D0=0A= + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'=0A= ++ id -u=0A= + '[' 1001 =3D 0 ']'=0A= ++ id -u=0A= + '[' 1001 =3D 0 ']'=0A= + chmod -Rf a+rX,g-w,o-w .=0A= + cd /cw/RPM/TMP=0A= + cd vim-6.1.165=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/vim-6.1-src2.tar.gz=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/tar -xf -=0A= + STATUS=3D0=0A= + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'=0A= ++ id -u=0A= + '[' 1001 =3D 0 ']'=0A= ++ id -u=0A= + '[' 1001 =3D 0 ']'=0A= + chmod -Rf a+rX,g-w,o-w .=0A= + cd /cw/RPM/TMP=0A= + cd vim-6.1.165=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/vim-6.1-rt1.tar.gz=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/tar -xf -=0A= + STATUS=3D0=0A= + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'=0A= ++ id -u=0A= + '[' 1001 =3D 0 ']'=0A= ++ id -u=0A= + '[' 1001 =3D 0 ']'=0A= + chmod -Rf a+rX,g-w,o-w .=0A= + cd /cw/RPM/TMP=0A= + cd vim-6.1.165=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/vim-6.1-rt2.tar.gz=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/tar -xf -=0A= + STATUS=3D0=0A= + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'=0A= ++ id -u=0A= + '[' 1001 =3D 0 ']'=0A= ++ id -u=0A= + '[' 1001 =3D 0 ']'=0A= + chmod -Rf a+rX,g-w,o-w .=0A= + /cw/bin/gzip -d -c /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.1-100.gz=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= + true=0A= + i=3D101=0A= + '[' 101 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 101=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.101=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 101 + 1=0A= + i=3D102=0A= + '[' 102 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 102=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.102=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 102 + 1=0A= + i=3D103=0A= + '[' 103 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= ++ echo 103=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.103=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 103 + 1=0A= + i=3D104=0A= + '[' 104 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 104=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.104=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 104 + 1=0A= + i=3D105=0A= + '[' 105 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 105=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.105=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 105 + 1=0A= + i=3D106=0A= + '[' 106 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 106=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.106=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 106 + 1=0A= + i=3D107=0A= + '[' 107 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 107=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.107=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 107 + 1=0A= + i=3D108=0A= + '[' 108 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 108=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.108=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 108 + 1=0A= + i=3D109=0A= + '[' 109 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 109=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.109=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 109 + 1=0A= + i=3D110=0A= + '[' 110 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 110=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.110=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 110 + 1=0A= + i=3D111=0A= + '[' 111 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 111=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.111=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 111 + 1=0A= + i=3D112=0A= + '[' 112 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 112=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.112=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 112 + 1=0A= + i=3D113=0A= + '[' 113 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= ++ echo 113=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.113=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 113 + 1=0A= + i=3D114=0A= + '[' 114 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 114=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.114=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 114 + 1=0A= + i=3D115=0A= + '[' 115 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 115=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.115=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 115 + 1=0A= + i=3D116=0A= + '[' 116 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= ++ echo 116=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.116=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 116 + 1=0A= + i=3D117=0A= + '[' 117 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 117=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.117=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 117 + 1=0A= + i=3D118=0A= + '[' 118 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 118=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.118=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 118 + 1=0A= + i=3D119=0A= + '[' 119 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 119=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.119=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 119 + 1=0A= + i=3D120=0A= + '[' 120 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 120=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.120=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 120 + 1=0A= + i=3D121=0A= + '[' 121 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 121=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.121=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 121 + 1=0A= + i=3D122=0A= + '[' 122 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 122=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.122=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 122 + 1=0A= + i=3D123=0A= + '[' 123 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 123=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.123=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 123 + 1=0A= + i=3D124=0A= + '[' 124 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 124=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.124=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 124 + 1=0A= + i=3D125=0A= + '[' 125 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 125=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.125=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 125 + 1=0A= + i=3D126=0A= + '[' 126 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 126=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.126=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 126 + 1=0A= + i=3D127=0A= + '[' 127 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 127=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.127=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 127 + 1=0A= + i=3D128=0A= + '[' 128 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= ++ echo 128=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.128=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 128 + 1=0A= + i=3D129=0A= + '[' 129 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 129=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.129=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 129 + 1=0A= + i=3D130=0A= + '[' 130 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 130=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.130=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 130 + 1=0A= + i=3D131=0A= + '[' 131 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 131=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.131=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 131 + 1=0A= + i=3D132=0A= + '[' 132 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 132=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.132=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 132 + 1=0A= + i=3D133=0A= + '[' 133 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 133=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.133=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 133 + 1=0A= + i=3D134=0A= + '[' 134 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 134=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.134=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 134 + 1=0A= + i=3D135=0A= + '[' 135 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 135=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.135=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 135 + 1=0A= + i=3D136=0A= + '[' 136 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 136=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.136=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 136 + 1=0A= + i=3D137=0A= + '[' 137 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 137=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.137=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 137 + 1=0A= + i=3D138=0A= + '[' 138 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 138=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.138=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 138 + 1=0A= + i=3D139=0A= + '[' 139 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= ++ echo 139=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.139=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 139 + 1=0A= + i=3D140=0A= + '[' 140 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 140=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.140=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 140 + 1=0A= + i=3D141=0A= + '[' 141 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 141=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.141=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 141 + 1=0A= + i=3D142=0A= + '[' 142 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 142=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.142=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 142 + 1=0A= + i=3D143=0A= + '[' 143 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 143=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.143=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 143 + 1=0A= + i=3D144=0A= + '[' 144 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 144=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.144=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 144 + 1=0A= + i=3D145=0A= + '[' 145 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 145=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.145=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 145 + 1=0A= + i=3D146=0A= + '[' 146 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 146=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.146=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 146 + 1=0A= + i=3D147=0A= + '[' 147 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 147=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.147=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 147 + 1=0A= + i=3D148=0A= + '[' 148 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 148=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.148=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 148 + 1=0A= + i=3D149=0A= + '[' 149 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 149=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.149=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 149 + 1=0A= + i=3D150=0A= + '[' 150 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 150=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.150=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 150 + 1=0A= + i=3D151=0A= + '[' 151 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 151=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.151=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 151 + 1=0A= + i=3D152=0A= + '[' 152 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 152=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.152=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 152 + 1=0A= + i=3D153=0A= + '[' 153 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 153=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.153=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 153 + 1=0A= + i=3D154=0A= + '[' 154 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 154=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.154=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 154 + 1=0A= + i=3D155=0A= + '[' 155 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 155=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.155=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 155 + 1=0A= + i=3D156=0A= + '[' 156 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 156=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.156=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 156 + 1=0A= + i=3D157=0A= + '[' 157 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 157=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.157=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 157 + 1=0A= + i=3D158=0A= + '[' 158 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= ++ echo 158=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.158=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 158 + 1=0A= + i=3D159=0A= + '[' 159 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 159=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.159=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 159 + 1=0A= + i=3D160=0A= + '[' 160 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 160=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.160=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 160 + 1=0A= + i=3D161=0A= + '[' 161 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= ++ echo 161=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.161=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 161 + 1=0A= + i=3D162=0A= + '[' 162 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 162=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.162=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 162 + 1=0A= + i=3D163=0A= + '[' 163 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 163=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.163=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 163 + 1=0A= + i=3D164=0A= + '[' 164 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= ++ echo 164=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.164=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 164 + 1=0A= + i=3D165=0A= + '[' 165 -le 165 ']'=0A= + /cw/bin/patch -p0 -E -t -s=0A= ++ echo 165=0A= ++ awk '{ printf("%03d", 2931BCD02F168A1D71E415EF5008AFBD); }'=0A= + cat /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/6.1.165=0A= + true=0A= ++ expr 165 + 1=0A= + i=3D166=0A= + '[' 166 -le 165 ']'=0A= + exit 0=0A= Executing(%build): env -i /cw/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile = --posix -e /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.52940=0A= + cd /cw/RPM/TMP=0A= + cd vim-6.1.165=0A= + cd vim61/src=0A= + CC=3D/cw/bin/cc=0A= + CFLAGS=3D-O=0A= + ./configure --prefix=3D/cw --enable-max-features --with-tlib=3Dtermcap = --without-x --disable-gui=0A= creating cache auto/config.cache=0A= checking whether make sets ... yes=0A= checking for gcc... /cw/bin/cc=0A= checking whether the C compiler (/cw/bin/cc -O ) works... yes=0A= checking whether the C compiler (/cw/bin/cc -O ) is a cross-compiler... = no=0A= checking whether we are using GNU C... yes=0A= checking whether /cw/bin/cc accepts -g... yes=0A= checking how to run the C preprocessor... /cw/bin/cc -E=0A= checking for POSIXized ISC... no=0A= checking for mawk... mawk=0A= checking for strip... strip=0A= checking for Cygwin environment... no=0A= checking for mingw32 environment... no=0A= checking for executable suffix... no=0A= checking for buggy tools=0A= - sh is 'GNU bash, version 2.05a.0(1)-release (i386-pc-linux-gnu)=0A= Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.' - probably OK.=0A= - sed is 'GNU sed version 3.02=0A= =0A= Copyright (C) 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.=0A= This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is = NO=0A= warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR = PURPOSE,=0A= to the extent permitted by law.'.=0A= checking for BeOS... no=0A= checking for QNX... no=0A= checking --with-vim-name argument... Defaulting to vim=0A= checking --with-ex-name argument... Defaulting to ex=0A= checking --with-view-name argument... Defaulting to view=0A= checking --with-global-runtime argument... no=0A= checking --with-modified-by argument... no=0A= checking if character set is EBCDIC... no=0A= checking --with-features argument... Defaulting to normal=0A= checking --with-compiledby argument... no=0A= checking --enable-perlinterp argument... no=0A= checking --enable-pythoninterp argument... no=0A= checking --enable-tclinterp argument... no=0A= checking --enable-rubyinterp argument... no=0A= checking --enable-cscope argument... no=0A= checking --enable-workshop argument... no=0A= checking --enable-sniff argument... no=0A= checking --enable-multibyte argument... no=0A= checking --enable-hangulinput argument... no=0A= checking --enable-xim argument... defaulting to auto=0A= checking --enable-fontset argument... no=0A= defaulting to: don't HAVE_X11=0A= checking --enable-gui argument... no GUI support=0A= checking quality of toupper... good=0A= checking whether __DATE__ and __TIME__ work... yes=0A= checking for elf.h... yes=0A= checking for main in -lelf... no=0A= checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes=0A= checking for opendir in -ldir... no=0A= checking for ANSI C header files... yes=0A= checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes=0A= checking for stdlib.h... yes=0A= checking for string.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/select.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/utsname.h... yes=0A= checking for termcap.h... yes=0A= checking for fcntl.h... yes=0A= checking for sgtty.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/time.h... yes=0A= checking for termio.h... yes=0A= checking for iconv.h... yes=0A= checking for langinfo.h... yes=0A= checking for unistd.h... yes=0A= checking for stropts.h... yes=0A= checking for errno.h... yes=0A= checking for strings.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/resource.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/systeminfo.h... no=0A= checking for locale.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/stream.h... no=0A= checking for sys/ptem.h... no=0A= checking for termios.h... yes=0A= checking for libc.h... no=0A= checking for sys/statfs.h... yes=0A= checking for poll.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/poll.h... yes=0A= checking for pwd.h... yes=0A= checking for utime.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/param.h... yes=0A= checking for libintl.h... yes=0A= checking for libgen.h... yes=0A= checking for util/debug.h... no=0A= checking for util/msg18n.h... no=0A= checking for frame.h... no=0A= checking for sys/acl.h... no=0A= checking for sys/access.h... no=0A= checking for sys/sysctl.h... yes=0A= checking for sys/sysinfo.h... yes=0A= checking if strings.h can be included after string.h... yes=0A= checking whether /cw/bin/cc needs -traditional... no=0A= checking for working const... yes=0A= checking for mode_t... yes=0A= checking for off_t... yes=0A= checking for pid_t... yes=0A= checking for size_t... yes=0A= checking for uid_t in sys/types.h... yes=0A= checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes=0A= checking for ino_t... yes=0A= checking for dev_t... yes=0A= checking for rlim_t... yes=0A= checking for stack_t... yes=0A= checking --with-tlib argument... termcap=0A= checking whether we talk terminfo... yes -- terminfo spoken here=0A= checking whether termcap.h contains ospeed... yes=0A= checking whether termcap.h contains UP, BC and PC... yes=0A= checking whether tputs() uses outfuntype... no=0A= checking whether sys/select.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes=0A= checking for /dev/ptc... no=0A= checking for SVR4 ptys... yes=0A= checking for ptyranges... abcdepqrstuvwxyz / 0123456789abcdef=0A= checking default tty permissions/group... can't determine - assume ptys = are world accessable=0A= checking return type of signal handlers... void=0A= checking for struct sigcontext... yes=0A= checking getcwd implementation... it is usable=0A= checking for bcmp... yes=0A= checking for fchdir... yes=0A= checking for fchown... yes=0A= checking for fseeko... yes=0A= checking for fsync... yes=0A= checking for ftello... yes=0A= checking for getcwd... yes=0A= checking for getpseudotty... no=0A= checking for getpwnam... yes=0A= checking for getpwuid... yes=0A= checking for getrlimit... yes=0A= checking for gettimeofday... yes=0A= checking for getwd... yes=0A= checking for lstat... yes=0A= checking for memcmp... yes=0A= checking for memset... yes=0A= checking for nanosleep... yes=0A= checking for opendir... yes=0A= checking for putenv... yes=0A= checking for qsort... yes=0A= checking for readlink... yes=0A= checking for select... yes=0A= checking for setenv... yes=0A= checking for setpgid... yes=0A= checking for setsid... yes=0A= checking for sigaltstack... yes=0A= checking for sigstack... yes=0A= checking for sigset... yes=0A= checking for sigsetjmp... no=0A= checking for sigaction... yes=0A= checking for sigvec... yes=0A= checking for strcasecmp... yes=0A= checking for strerror... yes=0A= checking for strftime... yes=0A= checking for stricmp... no=0A= checking for strncasecmp... yes=0A= checking for strnicmp... no=0A= checking for strpbrk... yes=0A= checking for strtol... yes=0A= checking for tgetent... yes=0A= checking for usleep... yes=0A= checking for utime... yes=0A= checking for utimes... yes=0A= checking for st_blksize... yes=0A= checking for iconv_open()... yes=0A= checking for nl_langinfo(CODESET)... yes=0A= checking for acl_get_file in -lposix1e... no=0A= checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no=0A= checking for POSIX ACL support... no=0A= checking for Solaris ACL support... no=0A= checking for AIX ACL support... no=0A= checking --disable-gpm argument... no=0A= checking for gpm... no=0A= checking for rename... yes=0A= checking for sysctl... not usable=0A= checking for sysinfo... yes=0A= checking for sysconf... yes=0A= checking size of int... 4=0A= checking whether memmove/bcopy/memcpy handle overlaps... memmove does=0A= checking for _xpg4_setrunelocale in -lxpg4... no=0A= checking how to create tags... =0A= checking how to run man with a section nr... man=0A= checking --disable-nls argument... no=0A= checking for msgfmt... msgfmt=0A= checking for NLS... no po directory - disabled=0A= checking for dlfcn.h... yes=0A= checking for dlopen()... no=0A= checking for dlopen() in -ldl... yes=0A= checking for dlsym()... yes=0A= checking for setjmp.h... yes=0A= updating cache auto/config.cache=0A= creating auto/config.status=0A= creating auto/config.mk=0A= creating auto/config.h=0A= + /cw/bin/make --no-print-directory -j4=0A= mkdir objects=0A= CC=3D"/cw/bin/cc -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = " srcdir=3D. sh ./osdef.sh=0A= creating auto/pathdef.c=0A= cd xxd; CC=3D"/cw/bin/cc" CFLAGS=3D"-I/usr/local/include -O" \=0A= /cw/bin/make -f Makefile=0A= /cw/bin/cc -I/usr/local/include -O -DUNIX -o xxd xxd.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/buffer.o buffer.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/charset.o charset.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/diff.o diff.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/digraph.o digraph.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/edit.o edit.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/eval.o eval.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/ex_cmds.o ex_cmds.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/ex_cmds2.o ex_cmds2.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/ex_docmd.o ex_docmd.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/ex_getln.o ex_getln.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/fileio.o fileio.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/fold.o fold.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/getchar.o getchar.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/if_cscope.o if_cscope.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/if_xcmdsrv.o if_xcmdsrv.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/main.o main.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/mark.o mark.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/memfile.o memfile.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/memline.o memline.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/menu.o menu.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/message.o message.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/misc1.o misc1.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/misc2.o misc2.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/move.o move.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/mbyte.o mbyte.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/normal.o normal.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/ops.o ops.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/option.o option.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/os_unix.o os_unix.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/pathdef.o auto/pathdef.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/quickfix.o quickfix.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/regexp.o regexp.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/screen.o screen.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/search.o search.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/syntax.o syntax.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/tag.o tag.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/term.o term.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/ui.o ui.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/undo.o undo.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = -o objects/window.o window.c=0A= /cw/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include -O = version.c -o objects/version.o=0A= /cw/bin/cc -L/usr/local/lib -o vim objects/buffer.o = objects/charset.o objects/diff.o objects/digraph.o objects/edit.o = objects/eval.o objects/ex_cmds.o objects/ex_cmds2.o objects/ex_docmd.o = objects/ex_getln.o objects/fileio.o objects/fold.o objects/getchar.o = objects/if_cscope.o objects/if_xcmdsrv.o objects/main.o objects/mark.o = objects/memfile.o objects/memline.o objects/menu.o objects/message.o = objects/misc1.o objects/misc2.o objects/move.o objects/mbyte.o = objects/normal.o objects/ops.o objects/option.o objects/os_unix.o = objects/pathdef.o objects/quickfix.o objects/regexp.o objects/screen.o = objects/search.o objects/syntax.o objects/tag.o objects/term.o = objects/ui.o objects/undo.o objects/window.o objects/version.o = -ltermcap -ldl =0A= link.sh: Linked fine, no libraries can be removed=0A= + exit 0=0A= Executing(%install): env -i /cw/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile = --posix -e /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.7243=0A= + cd /cw/RPM/TMP=0A= + cd vim-6.1.165=0A= + cd vim61/src=0A= + rm -rf /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root=0A= + /cw/bin/make --no-print-directory install = prefix=3D/cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin=0A= if test -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim; then \=0A= mv -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim.rm; \=0A= rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim.rm; \=0A= fi=0A= cp vim /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin=0A= strip /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/doc=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/doc=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/doc=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/colors=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/colors=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/colors=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/syntax=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/syntax=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/syntax=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indent=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indent=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indent=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugin=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugin=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugin=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/plugin=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/plugin=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/plugin=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tutor=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tutor=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tutor=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/compiler=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/compiler=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/compiler=0A= generating /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vim.1=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vim.1=0A= generating /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vimtutor.1=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vimtutor.1=0A= cp ../runtime/doc/vimdiff.1 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vimdiff.1=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vimdiff.1=0A= generating /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/evim.1=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/evim.1=0A= cd ../runtime/doc; cp *.txt tags = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/doc=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/doc; chmod 644 *.txt = tags=0A= cp ../runtime/doc/*.pl = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/doc=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/doc/*.pl=0A= cp ../runtime/menu.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/menu.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/menu.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/delmenu.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/delmenu.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/delmenu.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/mswin.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/mswin.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/mswin.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/evim.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/evim.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/evim.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/bugreport.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/bugreport.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/bugreport.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/vimrc_example.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61=0A= chmod 644 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/vimrc_example.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/gvimrc_example.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61=0A= chmod 644 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/gvimrc_example.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/filetype.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/filetype.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/filetype.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/ftoff.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftoff.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftoff.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/scripts.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/scripts.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/scripts.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/ftplugin.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugin.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugin.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/ftplugof.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugof.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugof.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/indent.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indent.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indent.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/indoff.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indoff.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indoff.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/optwin.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/optwin.vim=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/optwin.vim=0A= cp ../runtime/procset.ps = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/procset.ps=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/procset.ps=0A= cp ../runtime/eviso.ps = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/eviso.ps=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/eviso.ps=0A= cp ../runtime/evebcdic.ps = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/evebcdic.ps=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/evebcdic.ps=0A= cd ../runtime/colors; cp *.vim README.txt = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/colors=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/colors; chmod 644 = *.vim README.txt=0A= cd ../runtime/syntax; cp *.vim README.txt = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/syntax=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/syntax; chmod 644 = *.vim README.txt=0A= cd ../runtime/indent; cp *.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indent=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/indent; chmod 644 = *.vim=0A= cd ../runtime/plugin; cp *.vim README.txt = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/plugin=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/plugin; chmod 644 = *.vim README.txt=0A= cd ../runtime/ftplugin; cp *.vim README.txt = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugin=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/ftplugin; chmod 644 = *.vim README.txt=0A= cd ../runtime/compiler; cp *.vim README.txt = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/compiler=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/compiler; chmod 644 = *.vim README.txt=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin; ln -s vim ex=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin; ln -s vim view=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin; ln -s vim rvim=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin; ln -s vim rview=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin; ln -s vim vimdiff=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1; ln -s vim.1 ex.1=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1; ln -s vim.1 view.1=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1; ln -s vim.1 rvim.1=0A= cd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1; ln -s vim.1 rview.1=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/macros=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/macros=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/macros=0A= cp -r ../runtime/macros/* = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/macros=0A= chmod 755 =0A= chmod 644 =0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/macros/less.sh=0A= cp vimtutor /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vimtutor=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vimtutor=0A= cp ../runtime/tutor/* = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tutor=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tutor/*=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools=0A= if test -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/xxd; then \=0A= mv -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/xxd = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/xxd.rm; \=0A= rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/xxd.rm; \=0A= fi=0A= cp xxd/xxd /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin=0A= strip /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/xxd=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/xxd=0A= cp ../runtime/doc/xxd.1 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/xxd.1=0A= cp -r ../runtime/tools/* = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools/*=0A= perlpath=3D && sed -e "s+/usr/bin/perl++" = ../runtime/tools/efm_perl.pl = >/cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools/efm_perl.pl=0A= awkpath=3D && sed -e "s+/usr/bin/nawk++" = ../runtime/tools/mve.awk = >/cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools/mve.awk; if test = -z ""; then \=0A= awkpath=3D && sed -e "s+/usr/bin/nawk++" = ../runtime/tools/mve.awk = >/cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools/mve.awk; if test = -z ""; then \=0A= awkpath=3D && sed -e "s+/usr/bin/nawk++" = ../runtime/tools/mve.awk = >/cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/tools/mve.awk; fi; fi=0A= chmod 755 =0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/lang=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/lang=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/lang=0A= /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/keymap=0A= mkdir /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/keymap=0A= chmod 755 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/keymap=0A= if test -n ""; then \=0A= cd po; /cw/bin/make prefix=3D/cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw = LOCALEDIR=3D/cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/lang \=0A= INSTALL_DATA=3Dcp FILEMOD=3D644 install; \=0A= fi=0A= if test -d ../runtime/lang; then \=0A= cp ../runtime/lang/README.txt ../runtime/lang/*.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/lang; \=0A= chmod 644 /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/lang/*.vim; = \=0A= fi=0A= if test -d ../runtime/keymap; then \=0A= cp ../runtime/keymap/README.txt ../runtime/keymap/*.vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/keymap; \=0A= chmod 644 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/vim/vim61/keymap/*.vim; \=0A= fi=0A= if test -d = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps -a -w = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps \=0A= -a ! -f = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/gvim.png; = then \=0A= cp ../runtime/vim48x48.png = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/gvim.png; = \=0A= fi=0A= if test -d = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/locolor/32x32/apps -a -w = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/locolor/32x32/apps \=0A= -a ! -f = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/locolor/32x32/apps/gvim.png; = then \=0A= cp ../runtime/vim32x32.png = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/locolor/32x32/apps/gvim.png; = \=0A= fi=0A= if test -d = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps -a -w = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps \=0A= -a ! -f = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps/gvim.png; = then \=0A= cp ../runtime/vim16x16.png = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps/gvim.png; = \=0A= fi=0A= + strip /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/xxd=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/xxd.1=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vi=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vi=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vi.1=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vim.1 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vi.1=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/ex=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/ex=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/ex.1=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vim.1 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/ex.1=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/rview=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/rview=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/rview.1=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vim.1 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/rview.1=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/rvim=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/rvim=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/rvim.1=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vim.1 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/rvim.1=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/view=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/vim = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/bin/view=0A= + rm -f /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/view.1=0A= + ln /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/vim.1 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/man/man1/view.1=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/shtool mkdir -f -p -m 755 = /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/etc/rc.d=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/shtool install -c -m 755 -e 's;@l_prefix@;/cw;g' = /cw/RPM/SRC/vim/rc.vim /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root/cw/etc/rc.d/=0A= + /cw/lib/openpkg/rpmtool files -v -ofiles = -r/cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165-root '%defattr(-,cw,cw)' /cw '%not %dir = {/cw,/cw/*,/cw/etc/rc.d,/cw/man/*}'=0A= Can't load '/cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so' for = module File::Glob: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No = such file or directory at /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/XSLoader.pm = line 75.=0A= at /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/File/Glob.pm line 101=0A= Compilation failed in require at /cw/RPM/TMP/.rpmtool.10247 line 102.=0A= BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /cw/RPM/TMP/.rpmtool.10247 line 102.=0A= + exit 0=0A= Processing files: vim-6.1.165-1.1.0=0A= error: Could not open %files file /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165/files: No such = file or directory=0A= PreReq: OpenPKG rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <=3D 3.0.3-1 openpkg >=3D = 1.1.0=0A= Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <=3D 3.0.3-1=0A= =0A= =0A= RPM build errors:=0A= Could not open %files file /cw/RPM/TMP/vim-6.1.165/files: No such = file or directory=0A= $ ls -l /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so=0A= -r-xr-xr-x 1 cw cw 17610 Dec 6 10:43 = /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so=0A= $ uname -a; cat /etc/debian_version =0A= Linux modjo 2.2.20 #5 SMP Fri Jan 4 19:22:57 CET 2002 i686 unknown=0A= 3.0=0A= ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C2A1D2.901514E0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 12 12:09:49 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 316E9277B4E; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:09:49 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] error in rebuilding vim (PR#127) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:09:49 +0100 Message-Id: <20021212110949.316E9277B4E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002, Alexander Waegner wrote: > Can't load '/cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so' for = > module File::Glob: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No = > such file or directory at /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/XSLoader.pm = > line 75.=0A= > at /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/File/Glob.pm line 101=0A= [...] libgcc_s.so.1 is missing. As far as I can see this is a library that belongs to the system's gcc installation and is not part of openpkg. Was anything changed on the system ? Like a gcc update ? In any case, if you cannot restore the library somehow you have to recompile and reinstall perl. -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 12 12:14:16 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id B2C18277B4E; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:14:16 +0100 (CET) From: Joe Orton To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] error in rebuilding vim (PR#127) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:14:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20021212111416.B2C18277B4E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:09:49PM +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2002, Alexander Waegner wrote: > > > Can't load '/cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so' for = > > module File::Glob: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No = > > such file or directory at /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/XSLoader.pm = > > line 75.=0A= > > at /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/File/Glob.pm line 101=0A= > > [...] > > libgcc_s.so.1 is missing. As far as I can see this is a library > that belongs to the system's gcc installation and is not part > of openpkg. The default configuration of gcc 3.0 on Solaris will introduce a dependency on libgcc_s.so for anything linked with -shared (e.g. perl modules), but doesn't add an RPATH for the directory in which libgcc_s.so is stored (e.g. /usr/local/lib), so they are broken by default unless you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH or so on. (you can configure it not to with produce a shared libgcc_s.so using some flag) The gcc packages from sunfreeware.com do this, for example; have you checked that the OpenPKG gcc doesn't? joe From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 12 12:15:03 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id ED2FD277B4E; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:15:02 +0100 (CET) From: Joe Orton To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] error in rebuilding vim (PR#127) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:15:02 +0100 Message-Id: <20021212111502.ED2FD277B4E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:09:49PM +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2002, Alexander Waegner wrote: > > > Can't load '/cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so' for = > > module File::Glob: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No = > > such file or directory at /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/XSLoader.pm = > > line 75.=0A= > > at /cw/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/File/Glob.pm line 101=0A= > > [...] > > libgcc_s.so.1 is missing. As far as I can see this is a library > that belongs to the system's gcc installation and is not part > of openpkg. The default configuration of gcc 3.0 on Solaris will introduce a dependency on libgcc_s.so for anything linked with -shared (e.g. perl modules), but doesn't add an RPATH for the directory in which libgcc_s.so is stored (e.g. /usr/local/lib), so they are broken by default unless you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH or so on. (you can configure it not to with produce a shared libgcc_s.so using some flag) The gcc packages from sunfreeware.com do this, for example; have you checked that the OpenPKG gcc doesn't? joe From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 12 12:17:29 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 91D24277B4E; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:17:29 +0100 (CET) From: Joe Orton To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] error in rebuilding vim (PR#127) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:17:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20021212111729.91D24277B4E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:15:02PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > (you can configure it not to with produce a shared libgcc_s.so using > some flag) s/with// and this makes more sense :), and I mean a configure flag when you build gcc in case that wasn't clear either. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 12 12:17:31 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id B7665277CE3; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:17:30 +0100 (CET) From: Joe Orton To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] error in rebuilding vim (PR#127) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:17:30 +0100 Message-Id: <20021212111730.B7665277CE3@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:15:02PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > (you can configure it not to with produce a shared libgcc_s.so using > some flag) s/with// and this makes more sense :), and I mean a configure flag when you build gcc in case that wasn't clear either. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 12 12:43:40 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id E0CA0277B4E; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:43:39 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] error in rebuilding vim (PR#127) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:43:39 +0100 Message-Id: <20021212114339.E0CA0277B4E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002, Joe Orton wrote: > (you can configure it not to with produce a shared libgcc_s.so using > some flag) That would be --disabled-shared. > The gcc packages from sunfreeware.com do this, for example; have you > checked that the OpenPKG gcc doesn't? Good question. According to the CVS archive we do not build the shared libraries since about November 2001 (with gcc 3.0.2 at that time). This predates openpkg-1.0. I still guess it is more likely that the perl-build on that machine picked up a dependency on a system installed library. Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 12 12:43:59 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id C492F277D2B; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:43:58 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] error in rebuilding vim (PR#127) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:43:58 +0100 Message-Id: <20021212114358.C492F277D2B@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Dec 12, 2002, Joe Orton wrote: > (you can configure it not to with produce a shared libgcc_s.so using > some flag) That would be --disabled-shared. > The gcc packages from sunfreeware.com do this, for example; have you > checked that the OpenPKG gcc doesn't? Good question. According to the CVS archive we do not build the shared libraries since about November 2001 (with gcc 3.0.2 at that time). This predates openpkg-1.0. I still guess it is more likely that the perl-build on that machine picked up a dependency on a system installed library. Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Dec 15 18:42:48 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 62C57277D13; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:42:48 +0100 (CET) From: To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Make your PC earn its keep! 8556nyIQ0-085bp-14 (PR#128) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:42:48 +0100 Message-Id: <20021215174248.62C57277D13@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: It's very simple. We make money. Do You Want To As Well? Hello fellow marketer - Do you like long, boring "sales pitch" emails? Me neither. It's simple: We have found a way to make money, using the internet, from home. It's not "get rich quick", and it does take work. But it does work - we are doing it and people in my group are making substantial incomes! Want to know how? Just send an email to: CARRSBUSINESS@aol.com with the subject line " Please Send the info!" and I will make sure you get the details. Unsubscribing: Send a blank email to: CARRSBUSINESS@aol.com with "Remove" in the subject line. This message is not intended for residents of the state of Washington, and screening of addresses has been done to the best of our technical ability. If you are Washington resident or otherwise wish to be removed from this list, just follow the removal instructions above. 5356vaQW6-637kFeu7700cRfM5-256yeej1339Jpl38 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Dec 18 21:51:33 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 3CF7C277AC6; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:51:33 +0100 (CET) From: jani@mikkonen.org To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Relocating openpkg from /cw to /opt/cw (PR#129) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:51:33 +0100 Message-Id: <20021218205133.3CF7C277AC6@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Jani Mikkonen Version: 1.1.0 OS: solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (195.197.240.114) I was giving openpkg a test run on one of my sol9 boxes and found something that seems to be some kind of bug.. i installed the bootstrap as instructed but with different path, something like this: setenv opkg_root /opt/cw sh openpkg*.sh --prefix=/opt/cw this install files just fine but.. rpm -ql shows files are in /cw/ .. I cannot even make a query without generating a symlink from /opt/cw to /cw .. This hardly makes the statement "Supports multiple instances" as valid .. Also.. there seems to be some problems with rpm itself.. At this point i thought, ok, im going to stick with /cw symlink but the rest of the programs will have to be installed to /opt/cw .. but now, everything goes under /cw no matter what. If i try to use --relocate /cw=/opt/cw things get even worse.. Package installs just fine BUT, rpm -ql package name says all the files are /optcw and that file is the last that got extracted from that latest installed rpm .. Not good. ALSO.. /cw/etc scripts seem to have /cw as hardcoded into the scripts.. It would make a hell of a lot sense if this wouldnt be hardcoded but would use opkg_root variable (and the existence of the opkg_variable would be verified) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 19 14:02:03 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 163B9277B02; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:02:03 +0100 (CET) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Relocating openpkg from /cw to /opt/cw (PR#129) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:02:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20021219130203.163B9277B02@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: >I was giving openpkg a test run on one of my sol9 boxes and found something that >seems to be some kind of bug.. > >i installed the bootstrap as instructed but with different path, something like >this: > >setenv opkg_root /opt/cw >sh openpkg*.sh --prefix=/opt/cw > [...] > Jani, something must have gone wrong. OpenPKG definitely supports multiple instances and does not requite /cw in any way. Every package that is build from source might receive pathes being hardcoded into files from that instance. That is what you have seen in the /etc/rc.d/* files. If you want to use the same package in multiple instances you will have to build it multiple times using the correct rpm for each build. Packages are usually not relocateable. Not using the correct rpm is the number one issue for OpenPKG adminsitrators. Please note that the binaries available for download from the OpenPKG ftp site are build for /cw and can only be used there. They are provided for bootstrapping purposes (i.e. not having gcc on Solaris) and emergency cases where packages must be available quickly (i.e. having openssh available soon after a crash recovery). You are free to build your own binaries for prefixes of your choice. This requires an OpenPKG instance at the prefix of your choice which is supported by building OpenPKG from a shell script (as you don't have OpenPKG available at the desired prefix at the time of creating OpenPKG for the prefix, eh) by just providing the --prefix=/my/desire option. This bootstrapping process requires development tools. Being a Solaris user you are already a candidate which could benefit from the provided binaries as it is unlikely that you have a C compiler available. So my suggestions for you is to try: 1.) get a C compiler for solaris. Use any option you like, the OpenPKG way of doing it is to use the prebuild binaries which *are* locked to /cw - fetch ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.1/BIN/solaris-9/openpkg-1.1.0-1.1.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.sh - fetch ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.1/BIN/solaris-9/gcc-3.2-1.1.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.rpm - avoid filling up your root filesystem # mkdir /bigfilesystem/OpenPKG-bootstrap # ln -s /bigfilesystem/OpenPKG-bootstrap /cw - bootstrap the prebuild OpenPKG and gcc binaries to /cw # sh openpkg-1.1.0-1.1.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.sh # /cw/bin/rpm -Uvh gcc-3.2-1.1.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.rpm - make this gcc available in your shell path # eval `/cw/etc/rc --eval all env` 2.) install as many new OpenPKG instances as you like by starting from scratch (which needs development tools like gcc which you now have readily available) - have lots of space (250-500MB) available in $TMP or redirect using "TMPDIR=/bigfilesystem/tmp; export TMPDIR" - follow the instructions for bootstrapping a new OpenPKG instance from source listed on http://www.openpkg.org/tutorial.html#bootstrap-source - use anything you like as prefix but not /cw (it would collide with your existing instance) REMEMBER: always use the correct rpm for doing your maintenance jobs # /cw/bin/rpm -qa # /usr/opkg/bin/rpm -qa both lines will act on different instances! 3.) remove the prebuild binary stuff. It is no longer needed if you are ready with building or have a C compiler available available from somewhere else (OpenPKG ...) # /cw/bin/rpm -e rpm openpkg # rm -rf /bigfilesystem/OpenPKG-bootstrap /cw Have fun! -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Application Services, Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 19 14:02:04 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 2C5B5277CA7; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:02:04 +0100 (CET) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Relocating openpkg from /cw to /opt/cw (PR#129) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:02:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20021219130204.2C5B5277CA7@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: >I was giving openpkg a test run on one of my sol9 boxes and found something that >seems to be some kind of bug.. > >i installed the bootstrap as instructed but with different path, something like >this: > >setenv opkg_root /opt/cw >sh openpkg*.sh --prefix=/opt/cw > [...] > Jani, something must have gone wrong. OpenPKG definitely supports multiple instances and does not requite /cw in any way. Every package that is build from source might receive pathes being hardcoded into files from that instance. That is what you have seen in the /etc/rc.d/* files. If you want to use the same package in multiple instances you will have to build it multiple times using the correct rpm for each build. Packages are usually not relocateable. Not using the correct rpm is the number one issue for OpenPKG adminsitrators. Please note that the binaries available for download from the OpenPKG ftp site are build for /cw and can only be used there. They are provided for bootstrapping purposes (i.e. not having gcc on Solaris) and emergency cases where packages must be available quickly (i.e. having openssh available soon after a crash recovery). You are free to build your own binaries for prefixes of your choice. This requires an OpenPKG instance at the prefix of your choice which is supported by building OpenPKG from a shell script (as you don't have OpenPKG available at the desired prefix at the time of creating OpenPKG for the prefix, eh) by just providing the --prefix=/my/desire option. This bootstrapping process requires development tools. Being a Solaris user you are already a candidate which could benefit from the provided binaries as it is unlikely that you have a C compiler available. So my suggestions for you is to try: 1.) get a C compiler for solaris. Use any option you like, the OpenPKG way of doing it is to use the prebuild binaries which *are* locked to /cw - fetch ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.1/BIN/solaris-9/openpkg-1.1.0-1.1.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.sh - fetch ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.1/BIN/solaris-9/gcc-3.2-1.1.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.rpm - avoid filling up your root filesystem # mkdir /bigfilesystem/OpenPKG-bootstrap # ln -s /bigfilesystem/OpenPKG-bootstrap /cw - bootstrap the prebuild OpenPKG and gcc binaries to /cw # sh openpkg-1.1.0-1.1.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.sh # /cw/bin/rpm -Uvh gcc-3.2-1.1.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.rpm - make this gcc available in your shell path # eval `/cw/etc/rc --eval all env` 2.) install as many new OpenPKG instances as you like by starting from scratch (which needs development tools like gcc which you now have readily available) - have lots of space (250-500MB) available in $TMP or redirect using "TMPDIR=/bigfilesystem/tmp; export TMPDIR" - follow the instructions for bootstrapping a new OpenPKG instance from source listed on http://www.openpkg.org/tutorial.html#bootstrap-source - use anything you like as prefix but not /cw (it would collide with your existing instance) REMEMBER: always use the correct rpm for doing your maintenance jobs # /cw/bin/rpm -qa # /usr/opkg/bin/rpm -qa both lines will act on different instances! 3.) remove the prebuild binary stuff. It is no longer needed if you are ready with building or have a C compiler available available from somewhere else (OpenPKG ...) # /cw/bin/rpm -e rpm openpkg # rm -rf /bigfilesystem/OpenPKG-bootstrap /cw Have fun! -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Application Services, Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Dec 23 20:49:28 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id CF43C277D95; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:49:27 +0100 (CET) From: Artur Meski To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] OpenPKG current: freetype-2.1.3-20021014. (PR#130) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:49:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20021223194927.CF43C277D95@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: # rpm --rebuild freetype-2.1.3-20021014.src.rpm [...] # cd /cw/RPM/PKG # rpm -qplv freetype-2.1.3-20021014.ix86-freebsd4.7-uc.rpm (contains no files) Why is it so? ;-) -- Artur Meski, artur@black.pl, http://artur.black.pl/ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Dec 23 20:55:18 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 98729277D2C; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:55:18 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] OpenPKG current: freetype-2.1.3-20021014. (PR#130) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:55:18 +0100 Message-Id: <20021223195518.98729277D2C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Dec 23, 2002, Artur Meski wrote: > # rpm --rebuild freetype-2.1.3-20021014.src.rpm > [...] > # cd /cw/RPM/PKG > # rpm -qplv freetype-2.1.3-20021014.ix86-freebsd4.7-uc.rpm > (contains no files) > > Why is it so? ;-) This means the build operation failed somewhere but continued and so RPM rolled an empty binary RPM. Look for the lines before, they has to be an error somewhere. Can you show me the whole session? Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Dec 26 19:33:20 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 0DF5C277B35; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 19:33:20 +0100 (CET) From: To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Put your computer to work for you! 2180SZXK0-192trDk5418mAsC6-972LA-30 (PR#131) Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 19:33:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20021226183320.0DF5C277B35@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: NEED EXTRA $$$ It's very simple. We make money. I am doing it So can YOU! You get emails every day, offering to show you how to make money. Most of these emails are from people who are NOT making any money. And they expect you to listen to them? Enough. If you want to make money with your computer, then you should hook up with a group that is actually DOING it. We are making a large, continuing income every month. What's more - we will show YOU how to do the same thing. This business is done completely by internet and email, and you can even join for free to check it out first. If you can send an email, you can do this. No special "skills" are required. How much are we making? Anywhere from $2000 to $9000 per month. We are real people, and most of us work at this business part-time. But keep in mind, we do WORK at it - I am not going to insult your intelligence by saying you can sign up, do no work, and rake in the cash. That kind of job does not exist. But if you are willing to put in 10-12 hours per week, this might be just the thing you are looking for. This is not income that is determined by luck, or work that is done FOR you - it is all based on your effort. But, as I said, there are no special skills required. And this income is RESIDUAL - meaning that it continues each month (and it tends to increase each month also). Interested? I invite you to find out more. You can get in as a free member, at no cost, and no obligation to continue if you decide it is not for you. We are just looking for people who still have that "burning desire" to find an opportunity that will reward them incredibly well, if they work at it. To grab a FREE ID#, simply reply to: CARRSBUSINESS#aol.com and in the body of the email, write this phrase: "Please secure my free membership" Be sure to include: 1. First name 2. Last name 3. Email address (if different from above) We will confirm your position and send you a special report as soon as possible, and also Your free Member Number. That's all there's to it. We'll then send you info, and you can make up your own mind. Looking forward to hearing from you! Sincerely, James Carr P.S. After having several negative experiences with network marketing companies I had pretty much given up on them. This is different - there is value, integrity, and a REAL opportunity to have your own home-based business... and finally make real money on the internet. Don't pass this up..you can sign up and test-drive the program for FREE. All you need to do is get your free membership. Unsubscribing: Send a blank email to: CARRSBUSINESS@aol.com with "Remove" in the subject line. This message is not sent to residents of the state of Washington, and screening of addresses has been done to the best of our technical ability. If you are Washington resident or otherwise don't want this email, just follow the instructions above 4413igKQ6-165xjzZ2222yyld6-212IsZel32 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Dec 31 03:09:16 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 8A18D277AFF; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 03:09:16 +0100 (CET) From: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] cfengine: does not build by default (PR#132) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 03:09:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20021231020916.8A18D277AFF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Vinod Kutty Version: 2.0.5pre2-20021204 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) Hi, I tried to build cfengine from the CURRENT snapshot dir, and this is what happen. I was initially using openpkg build ... then also tried manually with rpm --rebuild with the same results ... the output below is reconstructed from copy 'n paste o: ----------------------------------------- $ sh ./build.cfengine :::: ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/cfengine-2.0.5pre2-20021204.src.rpm :::: Installing ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/cfengine-2.0.5pre2-20021204.src.rpmExecuting(%prep): env -i /plocal/apps/opkg/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.27097 + cd /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP + cd /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP + rm -rf cfengine-2.0.5pre2 + /plocal/apps/opkg/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/SRC/cfengine/cfengine-2.0.5pre2.tar.gz + /plocal/apps/opkg/lib/openpkg/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd cfengine-2.0.5pre2 ++ id ++ sed 's/[^=]*=\([0-9][0-9]*\).*$/\1/' + '[' 60000 = 0 ']' ++ id ++ sed 's/[^=]*=\([0-9][0-9]*\).*$/\1/' + '[' 60000 = 0 ']' + chmod -Rf a+rX,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): env -i /plocal/apps/opkg/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.11167 + cd /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP + cd cfengine-2.0.5pre2 + CC=/plocal/apps/opkg/bin/cc + CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe + ./configure --prefix=/plocal/apps/opkg checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.9 checking host system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.9 checking target system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.9 checking for a BSD compatible install... ./install-sh -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for mawk... no checking for gawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking whether make sets ... yes checking for gcc... /plocal/apps/opkg/bin/cc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for executable suffix... checking for object suffix... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether /plocal/apps/opkg/bin/cc accepts -g... yes checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of /plocal/apps/opkg/bin/cc... gcc3 checking for flex... no checking for lex... lex checking for yywrap in -lfl... no checking for yywrap in -ll... yes checking lex output file root... lex.yy checking whether yytext is a pointer... no checking for bison... no checking for byacc... no checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for a BSD compatible install... ./install-sh -c checking for latex... false checking for texi2dvi... false checking for dvips... false checking for makeinfo... false checking for main in -lm... yes checking for door_create... no checking for setsockopt... no checking for setsockopt in -lsocket... yes checking for gethostent... no checking for gethostent in -lnsl... yes checking for getaddrinfo... yes checking for library containing socket... none required checking for BerkeleyDB location... configure: error: Cannot find BerkeleyDB error: Bad exit status from /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.11167 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.11167 (%build) $ ----------------------------------------- I had similar problems later with it not finding openssl. Both berkeleydb AND openssl are installed. The workaround was to change the cfengine.spec %build section FROM this: ----------------------------------------- %build CC="%{l_cc}" CFLAGS="%{l_cflags -O}" ./configure --prefix=%{l_prefix} %{l_make} %{l_mflags -O} ----------------------------------------- TO this: ----------------------------------------- %build CC="%{l_cc}" CFLAGS="%{l_cflags -O}" ./configure --prefix=%{l_prefix} --with-berkeleydb=%{l_prefix} --with-openssl=%{l_prefix} %{l_make} %{l_mflags -O} ----------------------------------------- Then I ran 'rpm -bb ./cfengine.spec' (in /RPM/SRC/cfengine) and successfully built the .rpm From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Dec 31 08:26:49 2002 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 82562277AFF; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 08:26:49 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] cfengine: does not build by default (PR#132) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 08:26:49 +0100 Message-Id: <20021231072649.82562277AFF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In article <20021231020916.8A18D277AFF@mail.openpkg.org> you wrote: > Full_Name: Vinod Kutty > Version: 2.0.5pre2-20021204 > OS: Solaris 9 > Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) > > I tried to build cfengine from the CURRENT snapshot dir, and this is what > happen. I was initially using openpkg build ... then also tried manually with > rpm --rebuild with the same results ... the output below is reconstructed from > copy 'n paste o: > [...] This should be now fixed with cfengine-2.0.5pre2-20021231 and higher. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 2 22:40:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 7636C277ACB; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 22:40:34 +0100 (CET) From: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Perl: possible build problem - copying into /usr/local/scripts (PR#133) Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:40:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20030102214034.7636C277ACB@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Vinod Kutty Version: perl-5.6.1-1.1.1 OS: Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (4.19.111.130) I encountered the following problems building under Solaris 8. 1. A few warnings such as the 'make test' not being performed. These seem harmless, and I could live without them, but it might be nice to run 'em if it's feasible. 2. What I'm more concerned about are the attempts to copy files into /usr/local/scripts, and the xargs errors. The RPM was built, but I haven't tested it out yet. Some details of my environment: $ rpm -qa make-3.79.1-1.1.0 perl-5.6.1-1.1.0 zlib-1.1.4-1.1.0 screen-3.9.11-1.1.0 openpkg-1.1.1-1.1.1 gcc-3.2-1.1.0 openssl-0.9.6g-1.1.0 wget-1.8.2-20021206 openssh-3.4p1-1.1.0 $ id -a uid=1226(opkg) gid=450(opkg) groups=450(opkg) $ echo $PATH /opt/opkg/bin:/opt/opkg/sbin:/opt/opkg/local/bin:/opt/opkg/local/sbin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/dt/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin $ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH /opt/opkg/lib:/opt/opkg/local/lib::/lib:/usr/lib $ Here's the output (with lots of extraneous stuff chopped out): -------------------------------------------------------------- rpm --rebuild ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.1/UPD/perl-5.6.1-1.1.1.src.rpm . . . Do you want to install only the version-specific parts of perl? [n] What shall I put after the #! to start up perl ("none" to not use #!)? [/opt/opkg/bin/perl] Where do you keep publicly executable scripts? (~name ok) [/usr/local/scripts] Pathname where the add-on public executables should be installed? (~name ok) [/opt/opkg/bin] Use the experimental PerlIO abstraction layer? [n] qgcvt() found. Checking how to print long doubles... . . . Everything is up to date. 'make test' to run test suite. if [ -n "" ]; \ then \ cd utils; /opt/opkg/bin/make compile; \ cd ../x2p; /opt/opkg/bin/make compile; \ cd ../pod; /opt/opkg/bin/make compile; \ else :; \ fi ./perl installperl WARNING: You've never run 'make test'!!! (Installing anyway.) /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/perl5.6.1 /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/AnyDBM_File.pm /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/AutoLoader.pm . . . /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/CORE/warnings.h /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/CORE/XSUB.h /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/CORE/libperl.a /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/perl /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/a2p /usr/local/scripts/c2ph Couldn't copy utils/c2ph to /usr/local/scripts/c2ph: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/c2ph: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/h2ph Couldn't copy utils/h2ph to /usr/local/scripts/h2ph: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/h2ph: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/h2xs Couldn't copy utils/h2xs to /usr/local/scripts/h2xs: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/h2xs: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/perlbug Couldn't copy utils/perlbug to /usr/local/scripts/perlbug: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/perlbug: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/perldoc Couldn't copy utils/perldoc to /usr/local/scripts/perldoc: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/perldoc: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/pl2pm Couldn't copy utils/pl2pm to /usr/local/scripts/pl2pm: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/pl2pm: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/splain Couldn't copy utils/splain to /usr/local/scripts/splain: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/splain: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/perlcc Couldn't copy utils/perlcc to /usr/local/scripts/perlcc: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/perlcc: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/dprofpp Couldn't copy utils/dprofpp to /usr/local/scripts/dprofpp: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/dprofpp: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/s2p Couldn't copy x2p/s2p to /usr/local/scripts/s2p: Permission denied Couldn't chmod 755 /usr/local/scripts/s2p: No such file or directory /usr/local/scripts/find2perl . . . /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/pod/perlwin32.pod /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/pod/perlxs.pod /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/pod/perlxstut.pod Warning: perl appears in your path in the following locations beyond where we just installed it: /bin/perl /usr/bin/perl ./perl installman WARNING: You've never run 'make test'!!! (Installing anyway.) /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/man/man1/perl.1 /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/man/man1/perl5004delta.1 /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/man/man1/perl5005delta.1 . . . /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/man/man1/xsubpp.1 + cd /usr/include ++ /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/perl -V:installsitearch + eval 'installsitearch='\''/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/sun4-solaris'\'';' ++ installsitearch=/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/sun4-solaris + xargs /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/h2ph -d /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/sun4-solaris + echo aio.h alloca.h apptrace.h apptrace_impl.h ar.h archives.h assert.h auth_attr.h bzlib.h config_admin.h cpio.h crypt.h ctype.h curses.h deflt.h demangle.h devid.h devmgmt.h devpoll.h dhcp_svc_public.h dial.h dirent.h dlfcn.h door.h elf.h errno.h eti.h euc.h exacct.h exacct_impl.h exec_attr.h fatal.h fcntl.h float.h floatingpoint.h ........... sys/vuid_state.h sys/vuid_store.h sys/wait.h sys/watchpoint.h sys/xti_inet.h sys/xti_osi.h sys/xti_xtiopt.h sys/zsdev.h xargs: Could not exec command: No such file or directory xargs: Could not exec command: No such file or directory xargs: Could not exec command: No such file or directory xargs: Could not exec command: No such file or directory xargs: Could not exec command: No such file or directory + rm -f /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/perl5.6.1 ++ find /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/ -type f -name .packlist -print + /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/perl -pi.orig -e s:/opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg:/opt/opkg:g /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/Config.pm /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/.packlist + find /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/lib/perl5/ -name '*.orig' -print + xargs rm -f + strip /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/a2p /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root/opt/opkg/bin/perl + /opt/opkg/lib/openpkg/rpmtool files -v -ofiles -r/opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root '%defattr(-,opkg,opkg)' /opt/opkg '%not %dir {/opt/opkg,/opt/opkg/*,/opt/opkg/etc/rc.d,/opt/opkg/man/*}' rpmtool:files: pass 1 (preparation and syntactical expansions) rpmtool:files: pass 2 (filesystem-based expansions) rpmtool:files: pass 3 (duplication removal and cleanup) + exit 0 Processing files: perl-5.6.1-1.1.1 PreReq: OpenPKG rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 openpkg >= 1.1.0 gcc rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Wrote: /opt/opkg/RPM/PKG/perl-5.6.1-1.1.1.sparc64-solaris2.8-oo.rpm Executing(%clean): env -i /opt/opkg/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.21822 + cd /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP + cd perl-5.6.1 + rm -rf /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/perl-5.6.1-root + exit 0 Executing(--clean): env -i /opt/opkg/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.21822 + cd /opt/opkg/RPM/TMP + rm -rf perl-5.6.1 + exit 0 $ -------------------------------------------------------------- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 2 23:29:02 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id CF617277ACB; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:29:01 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Perl: possible build problem - copying into /usr/local/scripts (PR#133) Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 23:29:01 +0100 Message-Id: <20030102222901.CF617277ACB@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi, > 2. What I'm more concerned about are the attempts to copy files into > /usr/local/scripts, and the xargs errors. what happens is that the perl configure script 'guesses' directories. It uses $bin (== $prefix/bin) as default but overrides that first guess if there is one of the following directories (last match is used): /usr/share/scripts /usr/share/bin /usr/local/script /usr/local/scripts $prefix/script This could be fixed by specifying an explicit 'scriptdir' to Configure. The xargs is just a secondary fault because it tries to run one of the scripts that were not installed earlier during the build because of the errroneous guess of the script directory. For a short term solution you could rename the /usr/local/scripts directory while building the package. Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jan 3 08:07:32 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id C7509277AD0; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 08:07:31 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Perl: possible build problem - copying into /usr/local/scripts (PR#133) Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 08:07:31 +0100 Message-Id: <20030103070731.C7509277AD0@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Jan 02, 2003, Michael van Elst wrote: > > 2. What I'm more concerned about are the attempts to copy files into > > /usr/local/scripts, and the xargs errors. > > what happens is that the perl configure script 'guesses' directories. > It uses $bin (== $prefix/bin) as default but overrides that first guess > if there is one of the following directories (last match is used): > > /usr/share/scripts > /usr/share/bin > /usr/local/script > /usr/local/scripts > $prefix/script > > This could be fixed by specifying an explicit 'scriptdir' to Configure. Then let us specify explicitly this $scriptdir variable. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jan 6 09:52:09 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 5C950277AF4; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 09:52:09 +0100 (CET) From: "SAMUEL" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] FROM SAMUEL (PR#134) Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 09:52:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20030106085209.5C950277AF4@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Dear Sir, This letter may come to you as surprise due to the fact that we have not met before, but only hope it will find you and your business in the best of interest. Let me quickly introduce myself and the purpose of my contacting you.My name is Samuel Savimbi, son of the late rebel leader, Jonas Savimbi of the popular ANGOLA UNITA MOVEMENT.My father was killed on the 22nd of February, 2002 while my mother CATARINA was captured and currently in a hospital in Luena, capital of Moxico province inAngola and we the children are desperately looking for a trust worthy person to assist us in this confidential business. The abstract of the business, is that my father deposited huge sums of money realised from the sales of diamond and other precious stones and metals in a security company off-shore and as a signatory to the deposit and financial confidante of my father, I was advised by my father's account officer to seek for a reliable and trustworthy person who can quietly secure the money amounting to US$28,500,000.00 (Twenty-eight million, five hundred thousand dollars) since we have been restricted from travelling out of our immediate localities. My reason for seeking your assistance primarily, is that the Angolan government cannot trace the money to an off-shore individual or corporate account especially when such person bear nither blood nor financial relationship with us. After negotiations, I will give you a power of attorney, the personal identification number (pin), the particulars of the finance and security company which is off-shore and our contact officer there to facilitate the clearance. Angola at the moment is very tense and unstable but I am presently living somewhere in the Southern Africa Border with my family and we have never experienced this financial difficulty presently facing us hence the need to secure the money through your assistance from the security company with the information I will give to you as stated above and also with the assistance of my father's finance officer there, as we must secure what rightly belong to us with respect to the social cause that my father stood and died for. As for your compensation, we will have to negotiate in terms of percentage how much will accrue to you from the money deposited (US$28,500,000.00) which will be released to you and with the help of our link man in the finance and security firm you can have the fund deposited into any account of your choice that is convenient or safe after your personal collection of the money. Presently, we have applied for refugee status which may be granted in the on going peace process between UNITA and the Angola Government and you will be generously rewarded at the conclusion of the peace process by investing on behalf of the family in DIAMOND and related businesses in the future if you assist us in securing the money quietly. Please,let me know immediately whether or not you are willing to assist us through my e-mail address and provide me also with your phone & fax numbers. I will be the one to contact you for now for security reasons here in my country. Finally,I crave your indulgence to treat this correspondence confidentially in order not to compromise my family and myself. Yours Sincerely Samuel Savimbi From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 9 10:14:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 061BD277A0D; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:14:14 +0100 (CET) From: Take-a-look@usbpros.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Replace your floppy disks with this new technology... (PR#135) Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 10:14:14 +0100 Message-Id: <20030109091414.061BD277A0D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --MWZAlternativeMessage Content-Type: text/plain Never before has there been an easier way for a computer user to transport their computer files. The USB Drive makes carrying your computer files around easier than ever. With tens of thousands of happy customers behind us, you can trust that our product is easy to use and helps safeguard your data. Simply plug the device into any PC and instantly have access to your data. The data transfer rate is an amazing 1MB per second! The device is roughly the size of a car key and allows you to transport your files both securely and easily. The USBDrive can quickly synchronize vital personal files between computers at work, home, or school without hassle. There is no software to install and no settings to make! Simply Plug and Play. With the USB Drive you can carry up to 2 GB of data from PC to PC. Simply put, the USB Drive is a durable water proof floppy disk. You can now copy up to 2GB of files (data) from your PC's hard drive to the USB Drive and take it to any other PC without hassle. You can copy any file to your USB Drive; Office Documents, Faxes, Emails, pictures, databases, word processing files etc. Clip the USB Drive to your key-ring and have access to your data wherever you go. For Windows Users, Simply Plug the USB Drive into your computer and a new drive letter automatically appears under your My Computer Icon. Once the drive letter appears (less than three seconds), you can copy the files from your PC to the USB Drive in exactly the same manner as you would a floppy disk, Zip disk, or Digital Camera file. The USB Drives comes with a one year manufacture warranty and a money back guarantee! Included with your USB drive is an easy 1 - 2 - 3 step-by-step instruction manual. We guarantee that you can use this drive with less than 5 minutes of training, regardless of your computer knowledge. Using a USB Drive is exactly the same as using a floppy disk. The only difference between a Floppy disk and The USB Drive is that the USB drive is inserted into the USB port of the PC, and the Floppy disk is inserted into the Floppy disk Drive. Windows reacts to both the USB drive and the Floppy Disk drive exactly the same. Why is the USB Drive better than a floppy disk? Floppy disks are extremely fragile, hold a very small amount of data, and the floppy disk is not designed for long-term data storage. The USB Drive is 1/5 the size of a floppy disk weighing only 1 ounce. The USB Drives are extremely durable and even water proof. The USB Drive can hold up to 2 GB (two-thousand times the amount of data of the floppy disk) and the drive is designed for storage up to 15 years. The USB Drives are compatible with Win98, ME, 2K, XP, Mac OS 9.2 & above, Linux 2.4.24 & Please visit us at http://on-click.net or by calling us at 562-856-0256 --MWZAlternativeMessage Content-Type: text/html

 

The USB Drive is a portable hard drive! It works just like a floppy disk but it's durable and can hold over 2000 times the amount of data.

Works on all computers PC's and MAC's. Different capacities available from 32MB to 2GB!

Starting at Only $39.95 (regularly $49.95 ) No software to install and no settings to make.. simply plug-and-play!
Act now and you'll receive:
» » Free Shipping on selected models
» » Free Neck Strap
» » Free Keychain Ring
» » Free 3-ft. USB extension cable!		 » No drivers to install
» Weights only 1 oz.
» PC and Mac
» Money-back Guarantee
» Two-year Warranty

Click here to view our list of Happy USB Drive Customers!

 

Never before has there been an easier way for a computer user to transport their computer files.  The USB Drive makes carrying your computer files around easier than ever.  With tens of thousands of happy customers behind us, you can trust that our product is easy to use and helps safeguard your data.

 

Simply plug the device into any PC and instantly have access to your data.  The data transfer rate is an amazing 1MB per second!  The device is roughly the size of a car key and allows you to transport your files both securely and easily. The USBDrive can quickly synchronize vital personal files between computers at work, home, or school without hassle.  There is no software to install and no settings to make!  Simply Plug and Play. 

 

With the USB Drive you can carry up to 2 GB of data from PC to PC.  Simply put, the USB Drive is a durable water proof floppy disk.  You can now copy up to 2GB of files (data) from your PC's hard drive to the USB Drive and take it to any other PC without hassle.  You can copy any file to your USB Drive; Office Documents, Faxes, Emails, pictures, databases, word processing files etc. Clip the USB Drive to your key-ring and have access to your data wherever you go.

 

For Windows Users, Simply Plug the USB Drive into your computer and a new drive letter automatically appears under your My Computer Icon.  Once the drive letter appears (less than three seconds), you can copy the files from your PC to the USB Drive in exactly the same manner as you would a floppy disk, Zip disk, or Digital Camera file. 

 

The USB Drives comes with a one year manufacture warranty and a money back guarantee!  Included with your USB drive is an easy 1 - 2 - 3 step-by-step instruction manual.  We guarantee that you can use this drive with less than 5 minutes of training, regardless of your computer knowledge. 

 

Using a USB Drive is exactly the same as using a floppy disk.  The only difference between a Floppy disk and The USB Drive is that the USB drive is inserted into the USB port of the PC, and the Floppy disk is inserted into the Floppy disk Drive.  Windows reacts to both the USB drive and the Floppy Disk drive exactly the same.

 

Why is the USB Drive better than a floppy disk?  Floppy disks are extremely fragile, hold a very small amount of data, and the floppy disk is not designed for long-term data storage.  The USB Drive is 1/5 the size of a floppy disk weighing only 1 ounce.  The USB Drives are extremely durable and even water proof.  The USB Drive can hold up to 2 GB (two-thousand times the amount of data of the floppy disk) and the drive is designed for storage up to 15 years.

Driverless USBDrive - 32MB
Only $39.95 (regularly $49.95)

Driverless USBDrive - 64MB
Only $69.95 (regularly $79.95)

Driverless USBDrive - 128MB
Only $99.95 (regularly $119.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!
Driverless USBDrive - 256MB
Only $179.99 (regularly $199.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!
Driverless USBDrive - 512MB
Only $349.95 (regularly $399.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!
Driverless USBDrive - 1GB
Only $699.95 (regularly $749.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!

 

Driverless USBDrive - 2GB
Only $998.95 (regularly $1299.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!
To order visit On-Click.net
or call (866) 432-4022
money-back guarantee and two-year warranty
We accept:
This message was sent to address Jack@on-click.com  
Remove yourself from this recurring list by:bugdb@openpkg.org

sending a blank email to unsub-80124975-3735@greatfamilyoffers.com
OR
Sending a postal mail to CustomerService, Box 432 - 8912 E. Pinnacle Peak Rd F-8, Scottsdale, AZ 85255
--MWZAlternativeMessage-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jan 11 07:16:32 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 3DA5C277A19; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 07:16:32 +0100 (CET) From: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] apache2: installs libexpat, conflicts with expat-1.95 (PR#136) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 07:16:32 +0100 Message-Id: <20030111061632.3DA5C277A19@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Vinod Kutty Version: 2.0.43-20021004 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) Built apache2-2.0.43-20021004 on Solaris 9 using openpkg-20030108-20030108 When installing the resulting rpm, got these errors: --------------------------------- file /plocal/apps/opkg/lib/libexpat.a from install of apache2-2.0.43-20021004 conflicts with file from package expat-1.95.5-20021111 file /plocal/apps/opkg/lib/libexpat.la from install of apache2-2.0.43-20021004 conflicts with file from package expat-1.95.5-20021111 --------------------------------- After some tweaking, adding the following line to apache2.spec in the %build section as an argument to ./configure: --------------------------------- --with-expat=%{l_prefix} \ --------------------------------- seemed to resolve the issue. However this does not address whether a build dependency needs to be introduced on the expat package, or perhaps an alternate solution exists? Thanks, -- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jan 11 09:53:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 55049277A19; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 09:53:12 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] apache2: installs libexpat, conflicts with expat-1.95 (PR#136) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 09:53:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20030111085312.55049277A19@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, Jan 11, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: > Full_Name: Vinod Kutty > Version: 2.0.43-20021004 > OS: Solaris 9 > Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) > > Built apache2-2.0.43-20021004 on Solaris 9 using openpkg-20030108-20030108 > > When installing the resulting rpm, got these errors: > > --------------------------------- > file /plocal/apps/opkg/lib/libexpat.a from install of apache2-2.0.43-20021004 > conflicts with file from package expat-1.95.5-20021111 > file /plocal/apps/opkg/lib/libexpat.la from install of apache2-2.0.43-20021004 > conflicts with file from package expat-1.95.5-20021111 > --------------------------------- > > After some tweaking, adding the following line to apache2.spec in the %build > section as an argument to ./configure: > --------------------------------- > --with-expat=%{l_prefix} \ > --------------------------------- > > seemed to resolve the issue. > > However this does not address whether a build dependency needs to be introduced > on the expat package, or perhaps an alternate solution exists? Yes, an additional BuildPreReq is required, too. I've done this now. Additionally I've fixed the package to correctly build against DB 4.1. The result is apache2-2.0.43-20030111. Thanks for your feedback. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 12 05:42:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 938DC277A19; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 05:42:13 +0100 (CET) From: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] netpbm: symbol ref errors (PR#137) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 05:42:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20030112044213.938DC277A19@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Vinod Kutty Version: 10.11.4-20030104 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) When building netpbm (using openpkg-20030108-20030108 ), I encountered these errors at the stage where it builds ppmtompeg: ------------------------------ /plocal/apps/opkg/bin/cc -o ppmtompeg -L/plocal/apps/opkg/lib \ ppmtompeg.o mfwddct.o postdct.o huff.o bitio.o mheaders.o mpeg.o subsample.o param.o rgbtoycc.o readframe.o combine.o jrevdct.o frame.o fsize.o frametype.o specifics.o rate.o opts.o iframe.o pframe.o bframe.o psearch.o bsearch.o block.o parallel.o jpeg.o `/plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP/netpbm-10.11.4/buildtools/libopt /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP/netpbm-10.11.4/lib/libnetpbm.a libjpeg.a` \ -lm \ Undefined first referenced symbol in file socket parallel.o gethostbyname parallel.o accept parallel.o bind parallel.o listen parallel.o connect parallel.o ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to ppmtompeg collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [ppmtompeg] Error 1 make[2]: *** [ppmtompeg/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [ppm/all] Error 2 make: *** [converter/all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /plocal/apps/opkg/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.5503 (%build) ------------------------------ I worked around it by adding two 'echo' lines to the %build section in netpbm.spec: ------------------------------ %build ( cat Makefile.config.in echo . . . echo "NETWORKLD = -lsocket -lnsl" . . . ) >Makefile.config %{l_make} %{l_mflags} -f GNUmakefile ------------------------------ 1. The first echo is for a newline, otherwise Makefile.config looks like this at the start of the block of cat-inserted text: . . . PKGDIR = /tmp/netpbmDEFAULT_TARGET = nonmerge . . . (This actually had no *verified* impact on the above error -- just thought it should be eliminated as a potential prob.) 2. The NETWORKLD settings appear to be OS dependent, according to the Makefile.config comments. Another option is to turn this ppmtompeg-specific functionality off with the value NONE, which I have not tried. Perhaps some more general conditional setting based on OS would be best. Thanks, -- Vinod From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 12 11:14:26 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 4DEDB277A1B; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:14:26 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] netpbm: symbol ref errors (PR#137) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:14:26 +0100 Message-Id: <20030112101426.4DEDB277A1B@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sun, Jan 12, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: > Full_Name: Vinod Kutty > Version: 10.11.4-20030104 > OS: Solaris 9 > Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) > > When building netpbm (using openpkg-20030108-20030108 ), I encountered these > errors at the stage where it builds ppmtompeg: > [...] > socket parallel.o > gethostbyname parallel.o > accept parallel.o > bind parallel.o > listen parallel.o > connect parallel.o > ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to ppmtompeg > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > [...] > 2. The NETWORKLD settings appear to be OS dependent, according to the > Makefile.config comments. Another option is to turn this ppmtompeg-specific > functionality off with the value NONE, which I have not tried. Perhaps some more > general conditional setting based on OS would be best. This is nowed fixed with your NETWORKLD suggestion in netpbm-10.11.4-20030112: http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=6439 Thanks for your feedback and help. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 12 11:14:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 824F4277A1E; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:14:27 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] netpbm: symbol ref errors (PR#137) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:14:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20030112101427.824F4277A1E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sun, Jan 12, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: > Full_Name: Vinod Kutty > Version: 10.11.4-20030104 > OS: Solaris 9 > Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) > > When building netpbm (using openpkg-20030108-20030108 ), I encountered these > errors at the stage where it builds ppmtompeg: > [...] > socket parallel.o > gethostbyname parallel.o > accept parallel.o > bind parallel.o > listen parallel.o > connect parallel.o > ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to ppmtompeg > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > [...] > 2. The NETWORKLD settings appear to be OS dependent, according to the > Makefile.config comments. Another option is to turn this ppmtompeg-specific > functionality off with the value NONE, which I have not tried. Perhaps some more > general conditional setting based on OS would be best. This is nowed fixed with your NETWORKLD suggestion in netpbm-10.11.4-20030112: http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=6439 Thanks for your feedback and help. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jan 14 16:29:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 9F40D277A0E; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:29:05 +0100 (CET) From: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] apache2: missing rc script (PR#138) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:29:05 +0100 Message-Id: <20030114152905.9F40D277A0E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Vinod Kutty Version: 2.0.43-20030111 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (4.19.111.130) There seems to be no rc script in the apache2 src.rpm (unless it's dynamically generated). I haven't installed 2.0.43-20030111, but I noticed the prob with my existing 2.0.43-20021004 (modified to fix an earlier prob with expat), so I did an rpm --rebuild of the 20030111 version and grep'd for it in the output of rpm -ql. Hopefully that's a sufficient test. -- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jan 14 17:33:22 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id ECF05277A17; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:33:21 +0100 (CET) From: michael.schloh@cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] apache2: missing rc script (PR#138) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:33:21 +0100 Message-Id: <20030114163321.ECF05277A17@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --DWg365Y4B18r8evw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 14, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: > Full_Name: Vinod Kutty > Version: 2.0.43-20030111 > OS: Solaris 9 > Submission from: (NULL) (IP.IP.IP.IP) > > There seems to be no rc script in the apache2 src.rpm (unless it's dynami= cally > generated). I haven't installed 2.0.43-20030111, but I noticed the prob w= ith my > existing 2.0.43-20021004 (modified to fix an earlier prob with expat), so= I did > an rpm --rebuild of the 20030111 version and grep'd for it in the output = of rpm > -ql. Hopefully that's a sufficient test. > Hello Vinod, Thanks for the bug report, which will be resolved. I just hope you are pati= ent with this issue, because I don't expect to work on the apache2 package for some time. The only HTTP server we release (in OpenPKG 1.0, 1.1, 1.2...) is= in the package 'apache' where you will find a run command script, and many many many options (PHP, Modperl...) Some day, the package you refer to 'apache2' will take its place and also have these things. Not until apache2 is equally robust, however. I don't expect you to be satisfied with this answer. In the worst case, put together a run command script like you would want it and contribute it! You= 'll get hints from the run command script in 'apache', though it might not be totally compatible with version 2. I'm not sure how version 2 goes about starting and stopping its server. =46rom the description in apache2...src.rpm: NOTICE: This is version 2.0 of Apache, a complete overhauled version of the Apache HTTP server. It is mostly Apache 1.3 compatible, but is not a direct drop-in replacement. Use with great care and follow our recommendation to still not use it on production machines. Regards, Michael --DWg365Y4B18r8evw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia+4K iQEVAgUBPiQ7z1uYv80UoVTdAQGprAgAu0xVwpgZ4sEx+slp5fPwJJFJughdhXNV nvO434MzwliV8rAEgb907f+TFR0ytCFnWahBho7TqGJRFYnPYkrwNcELS+zmHPmT OqFy2rLS8js0xdJ+DCNByz4spQSW1T8dMHqhSh0fLge3YZMpCPx9L+8H2JP7+txi z0gQ806P0Xk2RhXNTP+O5/g3l+q+SoEJHxeunPzI+m+gt0w8TzKColedkbPCdt1B igM66g/R2M4CCaWgKI8nbmlqsSGGulFeXDy3YGcRvXzH3iHe4VZcMsUK6tHmwq7Y BrE0f7JcN5R8CMBQsjBouLL0QmTCGjhV4UoA+ijdrzszILlJJGsxjQ== =xQH7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DWg365Y4B18r8evw-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jan 22 23:02:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 81127277A13; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:02:17 +0100 (CET) From: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] openpkg-tool doesn't pick up gcc dependency on binutils (PR#139) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:02:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20030122220217.81127277A13@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Vinod Kutty Version: openpkg-tool=1.2.0, gcc=3.2.1 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (4.19.111.130) I'm not sure exactly where the prob is, but I'm trying to build gcc on a brand new from-source bootstrap. rpm -qa: $ rpm -qa make-3.80-1.2.0 openpkg-1.2.0-1.2.0 openpkg-tool-1.2.0-1.2.0 $ which openpkg /plocal/apps/opkg/1.2/bin/openpkg $ $ openpkg build gcc > b.gcc $ more b.gcc # openpkg-build.pl release(1.2) # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/00INDEX.rdf # using simple text parser # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/00INDEX.rdf.bz2 # using simple text parser # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/PLUS/00INDEX.rdf.bz2 # using simple text parser # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/UPD/00INDEX.rdf.bz2 # using simple text parser # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/BIN/00INDEX.rdf # using simple text parser # source for gcc is gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 # recursing over dependencies for gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 # gcc uses openpkg-1.2.0-1.2.0 for openpkg # gcc uses make-3.80-1.2.0 for make # adding gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 to list echo :::: ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0.src.rpm :::: /plocal/apps/opkg/1.2/bin/rpm --define 'with_binutils yes' --define 'with_cxx yes' --define 'with_optimize yes' --define 'with_threads yes' --rebuild ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0.src.rpm || exit $? /plocal/apps/opkg/1.2/bin/rpm -Uvh /plocal/apps/opkg/1.2/RPM/PKG/gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0.sparc64-solaris2.9-pao.rpm || exit $? echo :::: ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0.src.rpm = $? ::: : $ $ sh ./b.gcc > b.gcc.out.1 2>&1 & $ more b.gcc.out.1 :::: ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0.src.rpm :::: /plocal/apps/opkg/1.2/lib/openpkg/rpmtool: cc: not found error: failed build dependencies: binutils >= 2.13 is needed by gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 Installing ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0.src.rpm $ The "cc: not found" is because I did not add --define "with_cc /cw/bin/gcc" to the rpm command line -- this is something I can correct. However, the bigger problem appears to be openpkg-tool not recognizing binutils as a dependency. I don't know if this is something in the rdf files or elsewhere; I haven't investigated further. Thanks, -- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 23 06:20:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 07B5B277A13; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 06:20:04 +0100 (CET) From: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 06:20:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20030123052004.07B5B277A13@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Vinod Kutty Version: 1.2.0 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) Here's what I'm doing: ------------------------------------- $ openpkg build -UA > b.all.1 FATAL: cannot find source for 'KSH' $ more b.all.1 # openpkg-build.pl release(1.2) # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/00INDEX.rdf # using simple text parser # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/00INDEX.rdf.bz2 # using simple text parser # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/PLUS/00INDEX.rdf.bz2 # using simple text parser # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/UPD/00INDEX.rdf.bz2 # using simple text parser # curling index ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/BIN/00INDEX.rdf # using simple text parser # source for bochs is bochs-2.0.1-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_php_curl is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for cdk is cdk-4.9.10.20020809-1.2.0 # source for minicom is minicom-2.00.0-1.2.0 # source for vcheck is vcheck-1.2.1-1.2.0 # source for lftp is lftp-2.6.4-1.2.0 # source for perl-util is perl-util-1.2.0-1.2.0 # source for perl-inline is perl-inline-1.2.0-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_php3_gd is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for vim is vim-6.1.290-1.2.0 # source for glimpse is glimpse-4.17.2-1.2.0 # source for adns is adns-1.0-1.2.0 # source for gcc::with_threads is gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_throttle is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for rfc is rfc-3.2.3-1.2.0 # source for popt is popt-1.7-1.2.0 # source for ircd is ircd-2.10.3p3-1.2.0 # source for nspr is nspr-4.2.2-1.2.0 # source for ruby is ruby-1.6.8-1.2.0 # source for hexcurse is hexcurse-1.54-1.2.0 # source for whois is whois-4.6.1-1.2.0 # source for ethereal::with_openssl is ethereal-0.9.8-1.2.0 # source for calc is calc-2.11.6.2-1.2.0 # source for gc is gc-6.1-1.2.0 # source for gd is gd-2.0.11-1.2.0 # source for mcrypt is mcrypt-2.6.3-1.2.0 # source for ssmtp is ssmtp-2.48-1.2.0 # source for perl-dbix is perl-dbix-1.2.0-1.2.0 # source for audiofile is audiofile-0.2.3-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_php3_jpeg is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for atool is atool-0.25.0-1.2.0 # source for txt2pdf is txt2pdf-6.3-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_php_java is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for precc is precc-2.51e-1.2.0 # source for ghostscript::with_x11 is ghostscript-8.00-1.2.0 # source for tinyca is tinyca-0.4.4-1.2.0 # source for prngd is prngd-0.9.27-1.2.0 # source for sablotron is sablotron-0.97-1.2.0 # source for ghostscript is ghostscript-8.00-1.2.0 # source for nail is nail-10.2-1.2.0 # source for multisort is multisort-1.1-1.2.0 # source for tftp is tftp-0.32-1.2.0 # source for nntpcache is nntpcache-3.0.1-1.2.0 # source for squid is squid-2.5.1-1.2.0 # source for pstoedit is pstoedit-3.33-1.2.0 # source for sqlite::with_assert is sqlite-2.7.5-1.2.0 # source for pccts is pccts-1.33mr33-1.2.0 # source for dhcpd is dhcpd-3.0.1rc11-1.2.0 # source for spread is spread-3.17.0-1.2.0 # source for perltidy is perltidy-20021130-1.2.0 # source for cocor is cocor-1.07-1.2.0 # source for graphviz is graphviz-1.8.10-1.2.0 # source for sdl is sdl-1.2.5-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_dav is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_php_ftp is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for psutils is psutils-1.17-1.2.0 # source for vim::with_x11 is vim-6.1.290-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_php_mm is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for tar is tar-1.13.25-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_php_xml is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for xsel is xsel-0.04.1-1.2.0 # source for unrar is unrar-3.1.3-1.2.0 # source for binutils is binutils-2.13.2.1-1.2.0 # source for whatmask is whatmask-1.1-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_php_bzip2 is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # source for limo is limo-0.3.2-1.2.0 # source for screen is screen-3.9.13-1.2.0 # source for bash is bash-2.05b-1.2.0 # source for qpopper is qpopper-4.0.4-1.2.0 # source for dxpc is dxpc-3.8.2-1.2.0 # source for txt2regex is txt2regex-0.7-1.2.0 # source for sed is sed-4.0.5-1.2.0 # source for devtodo is devtodo-0.1.17-1.2.0 # source for fetchmail is fetchmail-6.2.1-1.2.0 # source for cronolog is cronolog-1.6.2-1.2.0 # source for jpeg is jpeg-6b-1.2.0 # source for apache::with_mod_relocate is apache-1.3.27-1.2.0 # ambigous sources for KSH # 0: pdksh-5.2.14-1.2.0 = ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/pdksh-5.2.14-1.2.0.src.rpm # 1: ksh-20021221-1.2.0 = ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/ksh-20021221-1.2.0.src.rpm $ ------------------------------------- I also tried with "openpkg build -iUA ..." with the same results. This may not be a "bug" with openpkg-tool per se, but with whatever files it's looking at to determine the dependencies. I realize both versions of ksh are probably interchangeable -- in which case there is no "right" version of ksh, but the power of a tool like "openpkg" lies in being able to build everything with one command, as I'm attempting to do. If this is a user error on my part, please let me know what the best way to do this is. Thanks, -- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 23 07:13:46 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 4B785277A13; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:13:46 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool doesn't pick up gcc dependency on binutils (PR#139) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:13:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20030123061346.4B785277A13@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Jan 22, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: > error: failed build dependencies: > binutils >= 2.13 is needed by gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 > Installing ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/SRC/gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0.src.rpm You are right. There is a bug in openpkg-tool that fails to see dependencies that are enabled by an option that have a default of 'yes'. One solution is to define the option also on the command line: $ openpkg build -Dwith_binutils gcc The other is to install the version from OpenPKG-current where the bug is fixed. You can do this with: openpkg build \ -f ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/00INDEX.rdf \ openpkg-tool \ | sh Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 23 07:39:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 33E72277A1A; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:39:36 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:39:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20030123063936.33E72277A1A@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Jan 23, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: Hi, > Here's what I'm doing: > > ------------------------------------- > $ openpkg build -UA > b.all.1 > FATAL: cannot find source for 'KSH' [...] > This may not be a "bug" with openpkg-tool per se, but with whatever files it's > looking at to determine the dependencies. I realize both versions of ksh are > probably interchangeable -- in which case there is no "right" version of ksh, > but the power of a tool like "openpkg" lies in being able to build everything > with one command, as I'm attempting to do. You are correct. The problem is that there is no "right" version of ksh. The same is true for a few other dependencies like MTA or MYSQL where you have to make a choice. The solution is to make the choice by specifying the particular package on the command line. openpkg-tool will take such a precedence (as well as any previously installed package) as a hint to resolve the ambiguity. Unfortunately this does not yet work together with -A. On the other side you may note that -A (== building all packages) does not work against the OpenPKG repository at all because packages exist that have conflicts and that are therefore mutually exclusive. The option was left in the tool to support administrators who create their own non-conflicting repository. So you do have to make a list of packages that you do want to install. Here is the list that we use for a "base" installation: amd autoconf bash binutils bison bzip2 flex gcc gdb gzip lftp libtool lynx m4 make mutt ntp openpkg-tool openssh patch perl rsync screen shtool slang ssmtp sudo texinfo vim w3m which is of course a bit centric to development work :-) BTW, a common set of options is $ openpkg build -Ua | sh which will automatically upgrade all previously installed packages to the versions in the repository. This will pick up possible security fixes that might be added to OpenPKG-1.2 in the future and we use it ourselves to maintain OpenPKG-current installations. Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jan 23 07:39:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 4D7BF277A22; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:39:37 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:39:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20030123063937.4D7BF277A22@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Jan 23, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: Hi, > Here's what I'm doing: > > ------------------------------------- > $ openpkg build -UA > b.all.1 > FATAL: cannot find source for 'KSH' [...] > This may not be a "bug" with openpkg-tool per se, but with whatever files it's > looking at to determine the dependencies. I realize both versions of ksh are > probably interchangeable -- in which case there is no "right" version of ksh, > but the power of a tool like "openpkg" lies in being able to build everything > with one command, as I'm attempting to do. You are correct. The problem is that there is no "right" version of ksh. The same is true for a few other dependencies like MTA or MYSQL where you have to make a choice. The solution is to make the choice by specifying the particular package on the command line. openpkg-tool will take such a precedence (as well as any previously installed package) as a hint to resolve the ambiguity. Unfortunately this does not yet work together with -A. On the other side you may note that -A (== building all packages) does not work against the OpenPKG repository at all because packages exist that have conflicts and that are therefore mutually exclusive. The option was left in the tool to support administrators who create their own non-conflicting repository. So you do have to make a list of packages that you do want to install. Here is the list that we use for a "base" installation: amd autoconf bash binutils bison bzip2 flex gcc gdb gzip lftp libtool lynx m4 make mutt ntp openpkg-tool openssh patch perl rsync screen shtool slang ssmtp sudo texinfo vim w3m which is of course a bit centric to development work :-) BTW, a common set of options is $ openpkg build -Ua | sh which will automatically upgrade all previously installed packages to the versions in the repository. This will pick up possible security fixes that might be added to OpenPKG-1.2 in the future and we use it ourselves to maintain OpenPKG-current installations. Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 26 15:56:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id C8AAA277ACC; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:56:48 +0100 (CET) From: andreas.ahlenstorf@sopic.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] gdbm 1.8.3 build error (PR#141) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:56:48 +0100 Message-Id: <20030126145648.C8AAA277ACC@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Version: OS: Debian 3.0r0 Submission from: (NULL) (80.218.65.10) Building gdbm 1.8.3 with "rpm --bb gdbm.spec" fails as follows: mkdir /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/include mkdir /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/man mkdir /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/man/man3 mkdir /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/info /bin/sh ./libtool /usr/bin/install -c -c libgdbm.la /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.la /usr/bin/install -c -c .libs/libgdbm.lai /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.la /usr/bin/install -c -c .libs/libgdbm.a /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.a ranlib /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.a chmod 644 /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.a libtool: install: warning: remember to run /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/include/gdbm.h': Operation not permitted make: *** [install] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /marvin/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.69053 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /marvin/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.69053 (%install) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jan 26 17:31:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id DB09E277ACB; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:31:33 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] gdbm 1.8.3 build error (PR#141) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:31:33 +0100 Message-Id: <20030126163133.DB09E277ACB@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sun, Jan 26, 2003, andreas.ahlenstorf@sopic.com wrote: > libtool: install: warning: remember to run /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/include/gdbm.h': Operation not > permitted Here is something missing in the log. It should read: libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish /marvin/lib' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 -o USER -g GROUP gdbm.h \ -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jan 28 02:01:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id B3F87277AEE; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 02:01:48 +0100 (CET) From: To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] LASER PRINTER, COPIER, & FAX SUPPLIES. (PR#142) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 02:01:47 +0100 Message-Id: <20030128010148.B3F87277AEE@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: GTTS | January 2003 Newsletter
GT Toner Supplies
Laser Printer, Copier, and Fax Supplies
1-888-662-2256
1-866-237-7397

Hp-Hp color - Lexmark - Epson - Panasonic - Apple - Cannon - Xerox
 
Please forward to the person responsible for purchasing your laser printer supplies.
If you received this email on error, please reply to gtts001@cable.net.co with subject: REMOVE... sorry for the inconvenience.
University and/or School purchase orders WELCOME. (no credit approval required)
Pay by check, c.o.d, or purchase order (net 30 days).

WE ACCEPT ALL MAJOR CREDIT CARDS!

New! HP 4500/4550 series color cartridges in stock!

 
Order by phone: Toll free 1-866-237-7397 Toll free 1-888-662-2256

Order by email: gtts001@cable.net.co subject: ORDER
Our cartridge prices are as follows:
(please order by item number)
Item

HP

Price
1 92274A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 4L, 4ML, 4P, 4MP $47.50
2 C4092A Black Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 1100A, ASE, 3200SE $45.50
2A C7115A Toner Cartridge For HP LaserJet 1000, 1200, 3330 $55.50
2B C7115X High Capacity Toner Cartridge for HP LaserJet 1000, 1200, 3330 $65.50
3 92295A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet II, IID, III, IIID $49.50
4 92275A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet IIP, IIP+, IIIP $55.50
5 C3903A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 5P, 5MP, 6P, 6Pse, 6MP, 6Pxi $46.50
6 C3909A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 5Si, 5SiMX, 5Si Copier, 8000 $92.50
7 C4096A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 2100, 2200DSE, 2200DTN $72.50
8 C4182X UltraPrecise High Capacity Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 8100 Series $125.50
9 C3906A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 5L, 5L Xtra, 6Lse, 6L, 6Lxi, 3100se $42.50
9A C3906A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 3100, 3150 $42.50
10 C3900A Black Toner Cartridge for HP LaserJet 4MV, 4V $89.50
11 C4127A Black Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 4000SE, 4000N, 4000T, 4000TN $76.50
11A C8061A Black Laser Toner for HP LaserJet 4100, 4100N $76.50
11B C8061X High Capacity Toner Cartridge for LJ4100, 4100N $85.50
11C C4127X High Capacity Black Cartridge for LaserJet 4000SE,4000N,4000T,4000TN $84.50
12 92291A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet IIISi, 4Si, 4SiMX $57.50
13 92298A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 4, 4 Plus, 4M, 4M Plus, 5, 5se, 5M, 5N $46.50
14 C4129X High Capacity Black Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 5000N $97.50
15 LASERFAX 500, 700 (FX1) $49.00
16 LASERFAX 5000, 7000 (FX2) $54.00
17 LASERFAX (FX3) $49.00
18 LASERFAX (FX4) $49.00
Item

HP COLOR

Price
C1 C4194a Toner Cartridge, Yellow (color lj 4500/4550 series) $89.50
C2 C4193a Toner Cartridge, Magenta (color lj 4500/4550 series) $89.50
C3 C4192a toner cartridge, cyan (color lj 4500/4550 series) $89.50
C4 c4191a toner cartridge, black (color lj 4500/4550 series) $74.50
Item

LEXMARK

Price
19 1380520 High Yield Black Laser Toner for 4019, 4019E, 4028, 4029, 6, 10, 10L $109.50
20 1382150 High Yield Toner for 3112, 3116, 4039-10+, 4049- Model 12L,16R, Optra $109.50
21 69G8256 Laser Cartridge for Optra E, E+, EP, ES, 4026, 4026 (6A,6B,6D,6E) $49.00
22 13T0101 High Yield Toner Cartridge for Lexmark Optra E310, E312, E312L $89.00
23 1382625 High-Yield Laser Toner Cartridge for Lexmark Optra S (4059) $129.50
24 12A5745 High Yield Laser Toner for Lexmark Optra T610, 612, 614 (4069) $165.00
Item

EPSON

Price
25 S051009 Toner Cartridge for Epson EPL7000, 7500, 8000+ $115.50
25A S051009 LP-3000 PS 7000 $115.50
26 AS051011 Imaging Cartridge for ActionLaser-1000, 1500 $99.50
26A AS051011 EPL-5000, EPL-5100, EPL-5200 $99.50
Item

PANASONIC

Price
27 Nec series 2 models 90 and 95
 $109.50
Item

APPLE

Price
28 2473G/A Laser Toner for LaserWriter Pro 600, 630, LaserWriter 16/600 PS
 $57.50
29 1960G/A Laser Toner for Apple LaserWriter Select, 300, 310, 360 $ 71.50
30 M0089LL/A Toner Cartridge for Laserwriter 300, 320 (74A) $ 52.50
31 M6002 Toner Cartridge for Laserwriter IINT, IINTX, IISC, IIF, IIG (95A) $ 47.50
31A M0089LL/A Toner Cartridge for Laserwriter LS, NT, NTR, SC (75A) $ 55.50
32 M4683G/A Laser Toner for LaserWriter 12, 640PS $85.50
Item

CANON

Price
33 Fax CFX-L3500, CFX-4000 CFX-L4500, CFX-L4500IE & IF FX3 $49.50
33A L-250, L-260i, L-300 FX3 $49.50
33B LASER CLASS 2060, 2060P, 4000 FX3 $49.50
34 LASER CLASS 5000, 5500, 7000, 7100, 7500, 6000 FX2 $49.50
35 FAX 5000 FX2 $49.50
36 LASER CLASS 8500, 9000, 9000L, 9000MS, 9500, 9500 MS, 9500 S FX4  $49.50
36A Fax L700,720,760,770,775,777,780,785,790, & L3300 FX1 $49.50
36B L-800, L-900 FX4 $49.50
37 A30R Toner Cartridge for PC-6, 6RE, 7, 11, 12 $59.50
38 E-40 Toner Cartridge for PC-720, 740, 770, 790,795, 920, 950, 980 $85.50
38A E-20 Toner Cartridge for PC-310, 325, 330, 330L, 400, 420, 430 $85.50
Item

XEROX

Price
39 6R900 75A $ 55.50
40 6R903 98A $ 46.50
41 6R902 95A $ 49.50
42 6R901 91A $ 65.50
43 6R908 06A $ 42.50
44 6R899 74A $ 47.50
45 6R928 96A $ 72.50
46 6R926 27X $ 84.50
47 6R906 09A $ 92.50
48 6R907 4MV $ 89.50
49 6R905 03A $46.50

call toll free 1-866-237-7397
30 Day unlimited warranty included on all products
GT Toner Supplies guarantees these cartridges to be free from defects in workmanship and material.

We look forward in doing business with you.

We Guarantee your satisfaction!!!
If you are ordering by purchase order please fill out an order form
with the following information: 

purchase order number
phone number
company or school name
shipping address and billing address
city, state zip code Order Now 

call toll free

1-866-237-7397
If you are ordering by e-mail or c.o.d. please fill out an order
form with the following information: 

phone number
company name
first and last name
street address
city, state zip code 

call toll free

1-866-237-7397
All trade marks and brand names listed above are property of the respective
holders and used for descriptive purposes only.
 
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 5 22:01:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 386E9277C79; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:01:12 +0100 (CET) From: bill@celestial.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 22:01:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20030205210112.386E9277C79@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:39:36AM +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: ... >You are correct. The problem is that there is no "right" version of ksh. >The same is true for a few other dependencies like MTA or MYSQL where you >have to make a choice. > ... >So you do have to make a list of packages that you do want to install. >Here is the list that we use for a "base" installation: > >amd autoconf bash binutils bison bzip2 flex gcc gdb gzip lftp >libtool lynx m4 make mutt ntp openpkg-tool openssh patch perl >rsync screen shtool slang ssmtp sudo texinfo vim w3m > >which is of course a bit centric to development work :-) > >BTW, a common set of options is > >$ openpkg build -Ua | sh Is there any documentation available on openpkg-tool other than the man page? I would like to see more examples of how openpkg is used such as the one above. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Systems, Inc. UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will go to the stars...'' -Dr. Isaac Asimov From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 5 22:30:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 79A08277B07; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:30:02 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 22:30:02 +0100 Message-Id: <20030205213002.79A08277B07@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Feb 05, 2003, bill@celestial.com wrote: > Is there any documentation available on openpkg-tool other than > the man page? I would like to see more examples of how openpkg > is used such as the one above. Sorry, just the man page and of course the source ;-) Lots of functionality in openpkg-tool comes from special use-cases. But the most common uses are: openpkg build [-Doption ...] -> install the package and all dependencies [with build options] openpkg build -Ua -> keep system as current as possible. Be aware that some packages require manual adjustments after an upgrade (like adapting config files). openpkg build -za -> rebuild all installed programs (e.g after an OS upgrade) The options -P and -N are used to avoid building packages as root by running utilities like 'su' or 'sudo'. You usually store these options in the $HOME/.openpkg/build file. If you have a private package repository (e.g. an ftp mirror) you want to use the -r and -f options and also store these in the config file. The tool will only generate a script that you can pipe directly into a shell. I usually look at the script first to see if there are any difficulties (like package conflicts) and then rerun the command with '| sh'. For larger runs or automated installations you should redirect output to a logfile and verify the results. Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 5 23:07:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 4C288277B07; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:07:36 +0100 (CET) From: bill@celestial.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 23:07:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20030205220736.4C288277B07@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:30:02PM +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: >On Wed, Feb 05, 2003, bill@celestial.com wrote: > >> Is there any documentation available on openpkg-tool other than >> the man page? I would like to see more examples of how openpkg >> is used such as the one above. > >Sorry, just the man page and of course the source ;-) I was afraid of that :-). I'm in the process of writing some documentation to help bring some our people up to speed, and for a presentation on openpkg at next month's Seattle Unix Group Meeting. At this point I'm still learning my way around openpkg, and various things like how it interacts with SuSE 8.1's runlevel manager (more on that later). My goal is something like ``Life With djbdns'' where I get more into some specific examples and configurations. >Lots of functionality in openpkg-tool comes from special use-cases. >But the most common uses are: > >openpkg build [-Doption ...] >-> install the package and all dependencies [with build options] Good stuff. Do you have any examples on using ``openpkg index''?, and perhaps some sample configuration files? Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ The is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. -- Robert Heinlein From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 6 01:03:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id E22FA277C7D; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:03:58 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 01:03:58 +0100 Message-Id: <20030206000358.E22FA277C7D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Feb 05, 2003, bill@celestial.com wrote: > Do you have any examples on using ``openpkg index''?, and perhaps > some sample configuration files? Nothing to configure with "openpkg index". It either reads a source directory containing .spec-files (i.e. our CVS tree) or it reads a directory that contains RPMs and then builds the index, which is basically a more formal format to represent the package data. When it indexes source RPMs it simply extracts the .spec-files. When it indexes binary RPMs it puts the output of rpm -qi into the index. Note that it cannot read or understand arbitrary .spec-files, it uses a simple parser that only understands the openpkg .spec-files that have to follow some tight conventions. openpkg index -o 00INDEX.rdf -> indexes spec-files openpkg index -o 00INDEX.rdf -i -> indexes RPMs You can use "-C cache.db" with the latter to cache extracted .spec-files in a database. You need to have the perl module DB_File (package perl-db) installed. With "-c" the output is piped through bzip2 (use -o 00INDEX.rdf.bz2 or similar). The -r is used to denote the RDF "resource" that is referenced in upper-level indexes. If you index binary RPMs you must specify "-p platform" and all RPMs must be for the specified platform. openpkg build uses the same string to identify RPMs that it can install. The string itself is arbitrary but best is to follow some convention, e.g. ix86-freebsd4.7 or x86-debian2.2. Have a look at ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/BIN/00INDEX.rdf Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 6 01:04:00 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 1B906277C80; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:04:00 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 01:03:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20030206000400.1B906277C80@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Feb 05, 2003, bill@celestial.com wrote: > Do you have any examples on using ``openpkg index''?, and perhaps > some sample configuration files? Nothing to configure with "openpkg index". It either reads a source directory containing .spec-files (i.e. our CVS tree) or it reads a directory that contains RPMs and then builds the index, which is basically a more formal format to represent the package data. When it indexes source RPMs it simply extracts the .spec-files. When it indexes binary RPMs it puts the output of rpm -qi into the index. Note that it cannot read or understand arbitrary .spec-files, it uses a simple parser that only understands the openpkg .spec-files that have to follow some tight conventions. openpkg index -o 00INDEX.rdf -> indexes spec-files openpkg index -o 00INDEX.rdf -i -> indexes RPMs You can use "-C cache.db" with the latter to cache extracted .spec-files in a database. You need to have the perl module DB_File (package perl-db) installed. With "-c" the output is piped through bzip2 (use -o 00INDEX.rdf.bz2 or similar). The -r is used to denote the RDF "resource" that is referenced in upper-level indexes. If you index binary RPMs you must specify "-p platform" and all RPMs must be for the specified platform. openpkg build uses the same string to identify RPMs that it can install. The string itself is arbitrary but best is to follow some convention, e.g. ix86-freebsd4.7 or x86-debian2.2. Have a look at ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/BIN/00INDEX.rdf Greetings, -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Feb 11 21:28:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 5BC4A277ACB; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:28:11 +0100 (CET) From: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... (PR#143) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:28:11 +0100 Message-Id: <20030211202811.5BC4A277ACB@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Vinod Kutty Version: openpkg 1.2.0 / openssh 3.5p1-1.2.0 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.80.24) Does openpkg's rc script depend on /usr/ucb/whoami ? Is there a better way to check simply that a user has effective id root? I'd like to avoid having to add /usr/ucb to root's PATH if possible, and more importantly avoid probs with 'su' vs. 'su -', etc. In this case I'm logged in as 'guest' then did an 'su -' to root, which has a minimal environment. ------------------------------- # pwd /plocal/apps/opkg/1.x/RPM/PKG # /plocal/apps/opkg/1.x/etc/rc openssh start /plocal/apps/opkg/1.x/etc/rc:ERROR: require root priviledges to run `/plocal/apps/opkg/1.x/etc/rc.d/rc.openssh:start' as user `root' # id uid=0(root) gid=1(other) # echo $PATH /usr/sbin:/usr/bin # export PATH=$PATH:/usr/ucb # echo $PATH /usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb # /plocal/apps/opkg/1.x/etc/rc openssh start # ps -ef |fgrep -i ssh root 5945 1 3 14:02:56 ? 0:01 /plocal/apps/opkg/1.x/bin/sshd # # ../../bin/rpm -qa perl-5.6.1-1.1.1 gcc-3.2-1.1.0 openpkg-tool-1.2.0-1.2.0 zlib-1.1.4-1.2.0 jpeg-6b-1.2.0 fsl-1.0.7-1.2.1 make-3.79.1-1.1.0 openpkg-1.2.0-1.2.0 wget-1.8.2-1.1.1 freetype-2.1.3-1.2.0 png-1.2.5-1.2.0 gd-2.0.11-1.2.0 openssl-0.9.7-1.2.0 x11-1.2.0-1.2.0 openssh-3.5p1-1.2.0 # # who am i guest pts/4 Feb 9 19:37 (laptop-a) # whoami root # ------------------------------- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 13 12:00:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 8B497277AF0; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:00:10 +0100 (CET) From: michael.schloh@cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... (PR#143) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:00:10 +0100 Message-Id: <20030213110010.8B497277AF0@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 11, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: > Does openpkg's rc script depend on /usr/ucb/whoami ? Is there a better wa= y to > check simply that a user has effective id root? I'd like to avoid having = to add > /usr/ucb to root's PATH if possible, and more importantly avoid probs wit= h 'su' > vs. 'su -', etc. > [...] > > # who am i > guest pts/4 Feb 9 19:37 (laptop-a) > # whoami > root > #=20 Hello Vinod, Yes, this is a known problem. Today's OpenPKG 'rc' bourne shell bundled with OpenPKG 1.[0-2] prefers 'whoami' to discover the username, but will use 'wh= o' as the next alternative. It seems that you've learned this yourself the hard way, because running 'who am i' does not return the correct username in some cases. I expect that a fully rewritten 'rc' program will be bundled with OpenPKG 2= .0, and the bug you reported will then be solved. Until then, the work around is to truly log in as root or have the 'whoami' command appear before 'who' according to the PATH variable of your environment. -- michael.schloh@cw.com Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia+4K iQEVAgUBPkt6tVuYv80UoVTdAQHh/Qf9ESBBsxdWAeUNKf6fTfalI3XEpM6Tam7s Kj9dRW0AJAttl/nANFS7hg5hV1jHuZVGxAUjqQDsgEqk+wl9sMX0z8ieDi9PRVRU N9GuDJyQBeK/yKnah+SKrxPB854Ki5H8bVw2jLXq+PDMLfGLievdnckGZbCoqti/ FRtv74j7++eJRNOlAxDhKdZTJr338+pMkP5ZSTFRd9udhKxrf7/fj3hc/M0TjwVv Akyv0NboQKSkJxdR4NIBMkvuCvF9kSAkrex2w/wzO29U5CEtNqhw4fZH326xpv30 bkOidOSW9YtzPQJ2iQYhbHhxfi4Rgq9owoKE8dnvRJcdPxKSVsimAA== =QFgB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 13 20:15:00 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 80158277AF2; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:15:00 +0100 (CET) From: bill@celestial.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... (PR#143) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:15:00 +0100 Message-Id: <20030213191500.80158277AF2@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:00:10PM +0100, michael.schloh@cw.com wrote: > >--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >On Tue, Feb 11, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: >> Does openpkg's rc script depend on /usr/ucb/whoami ? Is there a better wa= >y to >> check simply that a user has effective id root? I'd like to avoid having = >to add >> /usr/ucb to root's PATH if possible, and more importantly avoid probs wit= >h 'su' >> vs. 'su -', etc. >> >[...] >> >> # who am i >> guest pts/4 Feb 9 19:37 (laptop-a) >> # whoami >> root >> #=20 > >Hello Vinod, >Yes, this is a known problem. Today's OpenPKG 'rc' bourne shell bundled >with OpenPKG 1.[0-2] prefers 'whoami' to discover the username, but will >use 'who' as the next alternative. It seems that you've learned this >yourself the hard way, because running 'who am i' does not return the >correct username in some cases. May I suggest using the ``id'' program in place of ``who'' or ``whoami'' (it's already in the coreutils and could be added to the bootstrap binaries)? The ``id'' program is far more flexible, returning numric uid, gid, or names depending on the options. At least on Linux systems, it's well integrated with the underlying authentication method, using /etc/nsswitch.conf, to return the appropriate information from files, nis, ldap, etc. as necessary. Using ``id'' would also simplify several of the macros and methods used during the bootstrap process that now use a combination of cat, ypcat, grep, and awk to extract this information from the system. whoami -> id -un %define l_muid %(id -u %{l_musr}) %define l_mgid %(id -g %{l_musr}) %define l_mgrp %(id -gn %{l_musr}) >I expect that a fully rewritten 'rc' program will be bundled with OpenPKG >2= .0, and the bug you reported will then be solved. Until then, the work >around is to truly log in as root or have the 'whoami' command appear >before 'who' according to the PATH variable of your environment. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation. -- Johnny Hart From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 13 21:59:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 26720277AF2; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:59:04 +0100 (CET) From: michael.schloh@cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... (PR#143) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:59:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20030213205904.26720277AF2@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 13, 2003, bill@celestial.com wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:00:10PM +0100, michael.schloh@cw.com wrote: >>On Tue, Feb 11, 2003, vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc wrote: >>> Does openpkg's rc script depend on /usr/ucb/whoami ? Is there a better = way to >>> check simply that a user has effective id root? I'd like to avoid havin= g to add >>> /usr/ucb to root's PATH if possible, and more importantly avoid probs w= ith 'su' >>> vs. 'su -', etc. >>> >>[...] >>> >>> # who am i >>> guest pts/4 Feb 9 19:37 (laptop-a) >>> # whoami >>> root >>> # >> >>Yes, this is a known problem. Today's OpenPKG 'rc' bourne shell bundled >>with OpenPKG 1.[0-2] prefers 'whoami' to discover the username, but will >>use 'who' as the next alternative. It seems that you've learned this >>yourself the hard way, because running 'who am i' does not return the >>correct username in some cases. >=20 > May I suggest using the ``id'' program in place of ``who'' or ``whoami'' > (it's already in the coreutils and could be added to the bootstrap > binaries)? The ``id'' program is far more flexible, returning numric uid, > gid, or names depending on the options. At least on Linux systems, it's > well integrated with the underlying authentication method, using > /etc/nsswitch.conf, to return the appropriate information from files, nis, > ldap, etc. as necessary. >=20 It is a good idea, though I also view growing of the bootstrap as a hefty disadvantage. That should be kept as simple as possible, and might outweigh the easier macro usage you mentioned. In any case, I'll leave the decision = up to Ralf the bootstrap architect. -- michael.schloh@cw.com Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia+4K iQEVAgUBPkwHFFuYv80UoVTdAQF2xAf9EvKnboX9iBY21znQ2XHpJPOLJ9G+7mbu 3u64AZ//otWt/bDpb5mao2y5crZsNn77FKDRGcVWczALVEVM7FtyV1OwAxWyPk1T hdIXN1piNmWlFN/Gh6A+011KjqcCnHBVc01SjAu9OjoHnoebT9Euw9ildfTymfig 2NuveiMlreCXl7IgXE4xPLfR/vH9b/MYtGYeKOkWfRrA/HDOXGjEAP0Ab7Yl7obi 2SgseIPiZqF2AMaLRfLtsP7TzgDDgANxbtzoEULmsz28xOw9tC0wTOtu4DZ4oim1 PTfWSUEj7/ucOk2n4ryxcdlqyOpVPJPUGCs/fNfbFOe9oJZrSrKT6w== =f/gE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 13 22:09:46 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 216F0277AF2; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:09:46 +0100 (CET) From: bill@celestial.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... (PR#143) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:09:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20030213210946.216F0277AF2@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:59:04PM +0100, michael.schloh@cw.com wrote: ... >It is a good idea, though I also view growing of the bootstrap as a hefty >disadvantage. That should be kept as simple as possible, and might outweigh >the easier macro usage you mentioned. In any case, I'll leave the decision >up to Ralf the bootstrap architect. Currently the bootstrap causes problems when used on a network where the openpkg users are on an LDAP server since there's nothing in the /etc/... files on the local system. Running the binary bootstrap script then inserts the files with the next available user and group IDs. The extra entries then need to be removed from the files, and the permissions for the new instance fixed using ``rpm --setugids openpkg'' which is a bit of a PITA. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there. --GEORGE ORWELL From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Feb 14 18:37:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 371D6277B26; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:37:45 +0100 (CET) From: To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Toner Cartridges For Printer, Copier And Fax Machines. (PR#144) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:37:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20030214173745.371D6277B26@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: GT TONER SUPPLIES Laser printer and computer supplies 1

GT TONER SUPPLIES
Laser printer and computer supplies
1-888-662-2256
1-866-237-7397

 

Save up to 40% from retail price on laser printer toner cartridges,
copier and fax cartridges

CHECK OUT OUR GREAT PRICES AT THE BOTTOM !

If you received this email on error, please reply to gtts002@cable.net.co with subject: REMOVE... sorry for the inconvenience.

Please forward to the person responsible for purchasing your laser printer supplies

  • Order by phone: Toll free 1-866-237-7397   Toll free 1-888-662-2256

  • Order by email:  gtts002@cable.net.co  subject: ORDER

University and/or School purchase orders WELCOME. (no credit approval required)
Pay by check, c.o.d, or purchase order (net 30 days).

WE ACCEPT ALL MAJOR CREDIT CARDS!

New! HP 4500/4550 series color cartridges in stock!

Our cartridge prices are as follows:
(please order by item number)

Item                Hewlett Packard                   Price

1 -- 92274A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 4L, 4ML, 4P, 4MP ------------------------$47.50
2 -- C4092A Black Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 1100A, ASE, 3200SE-----------------$45.50
2A - C7115A Toner Cartridge For HP LaserJet 1000, 1200, 3330 ---------------------$55.50
2B - C7115X High Capacity Toner Cartridge for HP LaserJet 1000, 1200, 3330 -------$65.50
3 -- 92295A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet II, IID, III, IIID ----------------------$49.50
4 -- 92275A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet IIP, IIP+, IIIP -------------------------$55.50
5 -- C3903A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 5P, 5MP, 6P, 6Pse, 6MP, 6Pxi ------------$46.50
6 -- C3909A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 5Si, 5SiMX, 5Si Copier, 8000 ------------$92.50
7 -- C4096A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 2100, 2200DSE, 2200DTN ------------------$72.50
8 - C4182X UltraPrecise High Capacity Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 8100 Series---$125.50
9 -- C3906A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 5L, 5L Xtra, 6Lse, 6L, 6Lxi, 3100se------$42.50
9A - C3906A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 3100, 3150 ------------------------------$42.50
10 - C3900A Black Toner Cartridge for HP LaserJet 4MV, 4V ------------------------$89.50
11 - C4127A Black Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 4000SE, 4000N, 4000T, 4000TN ------$76.50
11A- C8061A Black Laser Toner for HP LaserJet 4100, 4100N ------------------------$76.50
11B- C8061X High Capacity Toner Cartridge for LJ4100, 4100N ----------------------$85.50
11C- C4127X High Capacity Black Cartridge for LaserJet 4000SE,4000N,4000T,4000TN -$84.50
12 - 92291A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet IIISi, 4Si, 4SiMX -----------------------$57.50
13 - 92298A Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 4, 4 Plus, 4M, 4M Plus, 5, 5se, 5M, 5N --$46.50
14 - C4129X High Capacity Black Toner Cartridge for LaserJet 5000N ---------------$97.50
15 - LASERFAX 500, 700 (FX1) -----------------------------------------------------$49.00
16 - LASERFAX 5000, 7000 (FX2) ---------------------------------------------------$54.00
17 - LASERFAX (FX3) --------------------------------------------------------------$49.00
18 - LASERFAX (FX4) --------------------------------------------------------------$49.00

Item            Hewlett Packard - Color                   Price

C1 -- C4194a Toner Cartridge, Yellow (color lj 4500/4550 series)------------------ $ 89.50
C2 -- C4193a Toner Cartridge, Magenta (color lj 4500/4550 series)----------------- $ 89.50
C3 -- C4192a toner cartridge, cyan (color lj 4500/4550 series)-------------------- $ 89.50
C4 -- c4191a toner cartridge, black (color lj 4500/4550 series)------------------- $ 74.50

Item                    Lexmark                         Price

19 - 1380520 High Yield Black Laser Toner for 4019, 4019E, 4028, 4029, 6, 10, 10L -- $109.50
20 - 1382150 High Yield Toner for 3112, 3116, 4039-10+, 4049- Model 12L,16R, Optra - $109.50
21 - 69G8256 Laser Cartridge for Optra E, E+, EP, ES, 4026, 4026 (6A,6B,6D,6E)  ---- $ 49.00
22 - 13T0101 High Yield Toner Cartridge for Lexmark Optra E310, E312, E312L -------- $ 89.00
23 - 1382625 High-Yield Laser Toner Cartridge for Lexmark Optra S (4059) ----------- $129.50
24 - 12A5745 High Yield Laser Toner for Lexmark Optra T610, 612, 614 (4069) -------- $165.00

Item                Epson                     Price

25 ---- S051009 Toner Cartridge for Epson EPL7000, 7500, 8000+ - $115.50
25A --- S051009 LP-3000 PS 7000 -------------------------------- $115.50
26 ---- AS051011 Imaging Cartridge for ActionLaser-1000, 1500 -- $ 99.50
26A --- AS051011 EPL-5000, EPL-5100, EPL-5200 ------------------ $ 99.50

Item            Panasonic                Price

27 ------Nec series 2 models 90 and 95 ---------------------- $109.50

Item                     Apple                                Price

28 ---- 2473G/A Laser Toner for LaserWriter Pro 600, 630, LaserWriter 16/600 PS - $ 57.50
29 ---- 1960G/A Laser Toner for Apple LaserWriter Select, 300, 310, 360 --------- $ 71.50
30 ---- M0089LL/A Toner Cartridge for Laserwriter 300, 320 (74A) ---------------- $ 52.50
31 ---- M6002 Toner Cartridge for Laserwriter IINT, IINTX, IISC, IIF, IIG (95A) - $ 47.50
31A --- M0089LL/A Toner Cartridge for Laserwriter LS, NT, NTR, SC (75A) --------- $ 55.50
32 ---- M4683G/A Laser Toner for LaserWriter 12, 640PS -------------------------- $ 85.50

Item                Canon                           Price

33 --- Fax CFX-L3500, CFX-4000 CFX-L4500, CFX-L4500IE & IF FX3 ----------- $ 49.50
33A -- L-250, L-260i, L-300 FX3 ------------------------------------------ $ 49.50
33B -- LASER CLASS 2060, 2060P, 4000 FX3 --------------------------------- $ 49.50
34 --- LASER CLASS 5000, 5500, 7000, 7100, 7500, 6000 FX2 ---------------- $ 49.50
34A ---LBP-200V, LBP-8 II, IIR, IIIT, IIIR EP-S--------------------------- $ 49.50
35 --- FAX 5000 FX2 ------------------------------------------------------ $ 49.50
36 --- LASER CLASS 8500, 9000, 9000L, 9000MS, 9500, 9500 MS, 9500 S FX4 -- $ 49.50
36A -- Fax L700,720,760,770,775,777,780,785,790, & L3300 FX1 ------------- $ 49.50
36B -- L-800, L-900 FX4 -------------------------------------------------- $ 49.50
37 --- A30R Toner Cartridge for PC-6, 6RE, 7, 11, 12 --------------------- $ 59.50
38 --- E-40 Toner Cartridge for PC-720, 740, 770, 790,795, 920, 950, 980 - $ 85.50
38A -- E-20 Toner Cartridge for PC-310, 325, 330, 330L, 400, 420, 430 ---- $ 85.50

Item   Xerox    Price

39 ---- 6R900 75A ---- $ 55.50
40 ---- 6R903 98A ---- $ 46.50
41 ---- 6R902 95A ---- $ 49.50
42 ---- 6R901 91A ---- $ 65.50
43 ---- 6R908 06A ---- $ 42.50
44 ---- 6R899 74A ---- $ 47.50
45 ---- 6R928 96A ---- $ 72.50
46 ---- 6R926 27X ---- $ 84.50
47 ---- 6R906 09A ---- $ 92.50
48 ---- 6R907 4MV ---- $ 89.50
49 ---- 6R905 03A ---- $ 46.50

call toll free 1-866-237-7397

30 Day unlimited warranty included on all products
GT Toner Supplies guarantees these cartridges to be free from defects in workmanship and material.

We look forward in doing business with you.

Customer  Satisfaction guaranteed !

If you are ordering by e-mail (subject:order) or c.o.d. please fill out an order
form with the following information:              

phone number
company name
first and last name
street address
city, state zip code         Order Now call toll free 1-866-237-7397

If you are ordering by purchase order please fill out an order form
with the following information:           

purchase order number
phone number
company or school name
shipping address and billing address
city, state zip code         Order Now call toll free 1-866-237-7397

All trade marks and brand names listed above are property of the respective
holders and used for descriptive purposes only.

 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Feb 16 20:40:02 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 98F87277B03; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:40:02 +0100 (CET) From: Vinod Kutty To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... (PR#143) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:40:02 +0100 Message-Id: <20030216194002.98F87277B03@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: I haven't subscribed to this list until just now, as it appears this is the forum for interaction on bug reports ... I'd like to second Bill's suggestion to use 'id'. In day-to-day interactive use, I rarely use 'who' or 'whoami' to determine my current id; instead I use 'id' for accuracy (as shown in the inital bug submission). One caveat: under Solaris, /usr/xpg4/bin/id (rather than /usr/bin/id) is closer to Linux in terms of command line args supported. I don't know about others, but hopefully anything POSIX friendly would have it. -- Vinod From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Feb 16 20:48:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 2E637277B00; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:48:58 +0100 (CET) From: Vinod Kutty To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... (PR#143) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:48:58 +0100 Message-Id: <20030216194858.2E637277B00@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This brings up a question for me: Is there currently a way to instruct the bootstrap process to skip certain tasks done outside the $root of the openpkg installation? At the moment, it seems the answer is "no", and that it's an all-or-nothing affair by installing as non-root (i.e. rc hooks, /etc/shells, user acct creation, etc. are skipped if you're not root). However, as root it would be nice to pass command line args to the bootstrap script to tell it to "skip /etc/shells", "skip crontab entries", etc. I've gotten around this under Solaris by writing a Sun package wrapper that runs the bootstrap as non-root, but creates just the external pieces I want. -- Vinod On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:59:04PM +0100, michael.schloh@cw.com wrote: ... >It is a good idea, though I also view growing of the bootstrap as a hefty >disadvantage. That should be kept as simple as possible, and might outweigh >the easier macro usage you mentioned. In any case, I'll leave the decision >up to Ralf the bootstrap architect. Currently the bootstrap causes problems when used on a network where the openpkg users are on an LDAP server since there's nothing in the /etc/... files on the local system. Running the binary bootstrap script then inserts the files with the next available user and group IDs. The extra entries then need to be removed from the files, and the permissions for the new instance fixed using ``rpm --setugids openpkg'' which is a bit of a PITA. Bill -- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Feb 18 22:12:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id CDD2A277B27; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:12:03 +0100 (CET) From: Ma Kisha To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#145) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:12:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20030218211203.CDD2A277B27@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Feb 18 22:33:14 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 22AA0277B27; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:33:14 +0100 (CET) From: Lashawn Annemarie To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#146) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:33:14 +0100 Message-Id: <20030218213314.22AA0277B27@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Feb 18 23:44:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 00235277B27; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 23:44:14 +0100 (CET) From: Rosina Barb To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#147) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 23:44:14 +0100 Message-Id: <20030218224414.00235277B27@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 19 02:12:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 87910277AF1; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 02:12:06 +0100 (CET) From: Francis Clarissa To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#148) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 02:12:06 +0100 Message-Id: <20030219011206.87910277AF1@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 19 03:41:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id AC2EF277AF1; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 03:41:22 +0100 (CET) From: Elana Greta To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#149) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 03:41:22 +0100 Message-Id: <20030219024122.AC2EF277AF1@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 19 05:30:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 3F48C277AF1; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:30:12 +0100 (CET) From: Rosalinda Nanci To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#150) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:30:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20030219043012.3F48C277AF1@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 19 06:50:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 369F2277AF1; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:50:07 +0100 (CET) From: Lavada Kirsten To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#151) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:50:07 +0100 Message-Id: <20030219055007.369F2277AF1@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 03:21:52 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 0EC34277B40; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 03:21:52 +0100 (CET) From: ihgszC7rUNNo1@ara.seed.net.tw To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] CFy3x44GB9oSnd6AXSxulIKvOyrO (PR#152) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 03:21:51 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220022152.0EC34277B40@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: =B1z=AA=BE=B9D=B8U=AB=C8=B6=A9=B5L=B9w=C4=B5=A6a=B5=B2=A7=F4=C0=E7=B7~=B6=DC=A1H =AC=B0=A4=B0=BB=F2=B4=BF=B8g=AD=B7=A5=FA=A4@=AE=C9=AA=BA=B8U=AB=C8=B6=A9=B7|=AD=B1=C1{=A8=EC=B3o=BB=F2=A4@=A4=D1=A1H =C5w=AA=EF=B0=D1=C6[=A7=DA=AA=BA=BA=F4=AF=B8 http://home.kimo.com.tw/amity508 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 05:47:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 6BA7F277AF0; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:47:16 +0100 (CET) From: Paulette Elissa To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#153) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:47:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220044716.6BA7F277AF0@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 07:02:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id DED30277AF0; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:02:38 +0100 (CET) From: Lina Olivia To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#154) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:02:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220060238.DED30277AF0@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 13:00:22 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 2E760277AFF; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:00:22 +0100 (CET) From: Chandra Adell To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Cheap Software Development Services Available Right Now.. (PR#155) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:00:21 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220120022.2E760277AFF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002 Content-Type: text/html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications
  • Desktop applications
  • Data Warehouses
  • Security and Cryptography systems

and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.


Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates

Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

Application Platforms
 .: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase

Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
--NS_MAIL_Boundary_07132002-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 15:19:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 531AC277B08; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:19:37 +0100 (CET) From: msander@ecrc.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] AMD automounter does not create PID-File (PR#156) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:19:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220141937.531AC277B08@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Version: amd-6.0.8-1.2.0 OS: RedHat/Debian Linux Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.181.49) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 15:51:29 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7001) id 1F27C277AFF; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:51:29 +0100 (CET) From: Admin To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] AMD automounter does not create PID-File (PR#156) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:51:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220145129.1F27C277AFF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: amd only writes the pid-file if the print_pid config option is set to "yes". amd-6.0.9-20030220 now sets print_pid to yes as the default. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 18:42:25 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 610B7277B01; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:42:25 +0100 (CET) From: bill@celestial.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] AMD automounter does not create PID-File (PR#156) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:42:25 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220174225.610B7277B01@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Admin wrote: >amd only writes the pid-file if the print_pid config option is set to "yes". >amd-6.0.9-20030220 now sets print_pid to yes as the default. Not on the version I just built. Not only did it leave print_id = no, it dropped the pid_file line. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ When I hear a man applauded by the mob I always feel a pang of pity for him. All he has to do to be hissed is to live long enough. -- H.L. Mencken, ``Minority Report'' From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 20:44:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 22E57277B01; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:44:11 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] AMD automounter does not create PID-File (PR#156) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:44:11 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220194411.22E57277B01@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003, bill@celestial.com wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Admin wrote: > >amd only writes the pid-file if the print_pid config option is set to "yes". > >amd-6.0.9-20030220 now sets print_pid to yes as the default. > > Not on the version I just built. Not only did it leave print_id = no, it > dropped the pid_file line. Can't repeat that, the installed file is correct. $ rpm -q amd amd-6.0.9-20030220 $ ls -l /cw/etc/amd/amd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 1016 Feb 20 20:40 /cw/etc/amd/amd.conf $ sum /cw/etc/amd/amd.conf 16319 1 $ grep pid /cw/etc/amd/amd.conf pid_file = /cw/var/amd/amd.pid print_pid = yes $ Maybe you had an old amd.conf file lying around ? -- Michael van Elst mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Feb 20 23:30:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id B35AB277B01; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:30:10 +0100 (CET) From: bill@celestial.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] AMD automounter does not create PID-File (PR#156) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:30:10 +0100 Message-Id: <20030220223010.B35AB277B01@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:44:11PM +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: >On Thu, Feb 20, 2003, bill@celestial.com wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Admin wrote: >> >amd only writes the pid-file if the print_pid config option is set to "yes". >> >amd-6.0.9-20030220 now sets print_pid to yes as the default. >> >> Not on the version I just built. Not only did it leave print_id = no, it >> dropped the pid_file line. > >Can't repeat that, the installed file is correct. > >$ rpm -q amd >amd-6.0.9-20030220 >$ ls -l /cw/etc/amd/amd.conf >-rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 1016 Feb 20 20:40 /cw/etc/amd/amd.conf >$ sum /cw/etc/amd/amd.conf >16319 1 >$ grep pid /cw/etc/amd/amd.conf >pid_file = /cw/var/amd/amd.pid >print_pid = yes >$ > >Maybe you had an old amd.conf file lying around ? It got moved to a .rpmsave file. The rc.amd file was different in that it uses ``amq -p'' to get the pid file. I'm off-site now so can't easily check to see the build log. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ DOS: n., A small annoying boot virus that causes random spontaneous system crashes, usually just before saving a massive project. Easily cured by UNIX. See also MS-DOS, IBM-DOS, DR-DOS. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Feb 21 03:43:19 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 15248277AFF; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 03:43:19 +0100 (CET) From: erosprodutions@lycos.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] This is not Junk mail (PR#157) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 03:43:18 +0100 Message-Id: <20030221024319.15248277AFF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hello, My name is Micah I'm going get strait to the point. This is not junk mail nor is it Spam I will only send you this Email once and once only. Here is your chance to have a second income from your home or your business. It's easy and it DOESEN'T cost you a penny to start. It's a great company that's been around for a while and income made can far surpass your current income. Check it out you have nothing to lose. www.ezinfocenter.com/2005669 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Feb 21 15:31:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id A63E0277C1C; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:31:04 +0100 (CET) From: it-pkg@computerbild.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] typo in squid %post scriplet (PR#158) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:31:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20030221143104.A63E0277C1C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Ingo T. Storm Version: squid-2.5.1-1.2.0 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (145.243.187.225) installing squid from 1.2 barks error: execution of %post scriptlet from squid-2.5.1-1.2.0 failed, exit status 1 the reason is squid.spec %post /bin/squid -z >/dev/null should be /sbin/squid -z >/dev/null From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Feb 22 01:30:55 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 6F74A277ACF; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 01:30:55 +0100 (CET) From: erosprodutions@lycos.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Stop looking I found the best (PR#159) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 01:30:55 +0100 Message-Id: <20030222003055.6F74A277ACF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Dear xxFNamexx xxLNamexx -- Find Your Next Credit Card Today!


 

iCreditSearch.com is a web-based resource for credit card offers. We provide real-time unbiased information to help the consumer make informed decisions about their credit. This means that by filling out our credit profile, you can find out which banks will approve you BEFORE applying! This is all accomplished without adding a single inquiry to your credit file!

CLICK HERE GET YOUR CREDIT SEARCH NOW!

Sincerely, 

Micah H

 

 

You are receiving this message as a result of joining our mailing list on 02-03 at Worlwideclublink.com or one of our many affiliate websites!

To be removed from this email list, please click on the following link: http://www.Erosproductions@lycos.com

Please Send a Blank Email with subject line as "Remove"

 

From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Feb 25 18:24:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 49CF9277ACC; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:24:45 +0100 (CET) From: Henry Lienardi To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] KOMISI RP.35.000 SETIAP PENJUALAN (PR#160) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:24:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20030225172445.49CF9277ACC@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --Boundary_(ID_CmZfWn6kG5reP5x89lhfXQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable =20 KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui internet merupakan tren yang sedang berk= embang di Indonesia? Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini: =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia sek= itar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat e-m= ail dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) menulis bahwa = 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media promosi mereka=2E=94 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran baik oleh perus= ahaan besar maupun kecil=2E=20 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda sebuah peru= sahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan, bag= aimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan peng= hasilan yang bagus=2E =20 PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan Anda diberikan= komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E=20 Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang bisa Anda peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarn= ya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung pada usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda menyimak proyeksi dibawah ini:=20 1 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan 2 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan 5 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan Sebenarnya, kalau Anda bisa menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatk= an Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah sangat lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E= ? =20 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL Produk yang akan Anda promosikan adalah sebuah paket informasi & software=2E= Produk intinya adalah sebuah software (39 links) yang mampu melipat-ganda= kan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Pengguna komputer akan sangat mengh= argai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pengguna komputer sekarang=2E= Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk ini, kemungkinan be= sar mereka akan membeli=2E=20 Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda juga akan menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E= Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat mengharga tips-tips ini karena bisa me= mbantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komputer baik untuk bekerja maupun= untuk hiburan=2E Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan informasi bagaimana cara mendapatkan soft= ware apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Mereka yang suka berselancar di i= nternet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual dengan harga mahal=2E Banya= k pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alamat situs dimana semu= a software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mudah menjual = informasi ini kepada mereka=2E =20 BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI Berapa biaya yang harus Anda keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak = ada! Tetapi, Anda perlu membeli produk tersebut untuk dipelajari=2E Anda = hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan baik=2E Download so= ftware tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-gandakan kecepat= an kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-lain=2E = Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, seti= ap penjualan adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E Kami juga akan mengajari Anda bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet= =2E Kami akan berikan contoh naskah iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman= -teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di mana Anda bisa memasang iklan secara grat= is di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi Anda sebuah software pengirim e= mail massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda berhasil=2E =20 JANGAN MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA! Apakah Anda akan sia-siakan kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda p= asti akan terkesan dan TERTARIK! Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah email ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ec= om dan dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk= memulai bisnis internet ini=2E =20 Salam Hangat, Henry Lienardi =20 =20 --Boundary_(ID_CmZfWn6kG5reP5x89lhfXQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

 

KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN

Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui = internet=20 merupakan tren yang sedang berkembang di Indonesia?=20 Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini:

 =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di=20= Indonesia=20= sekitar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat = e-mail=20 dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94

 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) me= nulis bahwa=20 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media=20 promosi mereka=2E=94

 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran bai= k oleh=20 perusahaan besar maupun kecil=2E

 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda= sebuah=20 perusahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan,= =20 bagaimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan=20= penghasilan yang bagus=2E

 

PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA

 Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan An= da diberikan=20 komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E

Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang b= isa Anda=20 peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarnya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung p= ada=20 usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E

Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda m= enyimak=20 proyeksi dibawah ini:

1=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan

2=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan

5=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan

Sebenarnya, kalau And= a bisa=20 menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatkan Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah = sangat=20 lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E?

&= nbsp;

 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL

Produk yang akan Anda promosikan a= dalah=20 sebuah paket informasi & software=2E Produk intinya adalah sebuah soft= ware (39=20 links) yang mampu melipat-gandakan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Peng= guna=20 komputer akan sangat menghargai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pen= gguna=20 komputer sekarang=2E Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk= ini,=20 kemungkinan besar mereka akan membeli=2E

Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda ju= ga akan=20 menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat meng= harga=20 tips-tips ini karena bisa membantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komput= er=20 baik untuk bekerja maupun untuk hiburan=2E

Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan i= nformasi=20 bagaimana cara mendapatkan software apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Me= reka=20 yang suka berselancar di internet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual d= engan=20 harga mahal=2E Banyak pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alam= at situs=20 dimana semua software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mud= ah=20 menjual informasi ini kepada mereka=2E

 

BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI

Berapa biaya yang har= us Anda=20 keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak ada! Tetapi, Anda  perlu membeli produk tersebut un= tuk=20 dipelajari=2E Anda hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan = baik=2E=20 Download software tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-ganda= kan=20 kecepatan kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-l= ain=2E=20 Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda=20 sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, setiap penjua= lan=20 adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E

Kami juga akan mengaj= ari Anda=20 bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet=2E Kami akan berikan contoh n= askah=20 iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman-teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di man= a Anda=20 bisa memasang iklan secara gratis di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi = Anda=20 sebuah software pengirim email massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda=20 berhasil=2E

 

JANGAN=20 MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA!

Apakah Anda akan sia-= siakan=20 kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda pasti akan terkesan dan=20 TERTARIK!

Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah ema= il ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ecom dan=20 dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk memula= i=20 bisnis internet ini=2E

 

Salam Hangat,

Henry Lienardi

 

 

--Boundary_(ID_CmZfWn6kG5reP5x89lhfXQ)-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Feb 25 18:27:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id A3C1D277ACC; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:27:15 +0100 (CET) From: Henry Lienardi To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] KOMISI RP.35.000 SETIAP PENJUALAN (PR#161) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:27:15 +0100 Message-Id: <20030225172715.A3C1D277ACC@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --Boundary_(ID_Zc7dICsyjsYOFr0II35Wvg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable =20 KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui internet merupakan tren yang sedang berk= embang di Indonesia? Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini: =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia sek= itar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat e-m= ail dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) menulis bahwa = 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media promosi mereka=2E=94 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran baik oleh perus= ahaan besar maupun kecil=2E=20 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda sebuah peru= sahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan, bag= aimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan peng= hasilan yang bagus=2E =20 PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan Anda diberikan= komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E=20 Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang bisa Anda peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarn= ya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung pada usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda menyimak proyeksi dibawah ini:=20 1 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan 2 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan 5 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan Sebenarnya, kalau Anda bisa menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatk= an Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah sangat lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E= ? =20 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL Produk yang akan Anda promosikan adalah sebuah paket informasi & software=2E= Produk intinya adalah sebuah software (39 links) yang mampu melipat-ganda= kan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Pengguna komputer akan sangat mengh= argai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pengguna komputer sekarang=2E= Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk ini, kemungkinan be= sar mereka akan membeli=2E=20 Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda juga akan menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E= Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat mengharga tips-tips ini karena bisa me= mbantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komputer baik untuk bekerja maupun= untuk hiburan=2E Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan informasi bagaimana cara mendapatkan soft= ware apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Mereka yang suka berselancar di i= nternet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual dengan harga mahal=2E Banya= k pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alamat situs dimana semu= a software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mudah menjual = informasi ini kepada mereka=2E =20 BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI Berapa biaya yang harus Anda keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak = ada! Tetapi, Anda perlu membeli produk tersebut untuk dipelajari=2E Anda = hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan baik=2E Download so= ftware tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-gandakan kecepat= an kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-lain=2E = Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, seti= ap penjualan adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E Kami juga akan mengajari Anda bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet= =2E Kami akan berikan contoh naskah iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman= -teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di mana Anda bisa memasang iklan secara grat= is di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi Anda sebuah software pengirim e= mail massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda berhasil=2E =20 JANGAN MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA! Apakah Anda akan sia-siakan kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda p= asti akan terkesan dan TERTARIK! Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah email ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ec= om dan dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk= memulai bisnis internet ini=2E =20 Salam Hangat, Henry Lienardi =20 =20 --Boundary_(ID_Zc7dICsyjsYOFr0II35Wvg) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

 

KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN

Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui = internet=20 merupakan tren yang sedang berkembang di Indonesia?=20 Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini:

 =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di=20= Indonesia=20= sekitar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat = e-mail=20 dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94

 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) me= nulis bahwa=20 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media=20 promosi mereka=2E=94

 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran bai= k oleh=20 perusahaan besar maupun kecil=2E

 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda= sebuah=20 perusahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan,= =20 bagaimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan=20= penghasilan yang bagus=2E

 

PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA

 Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan An= da diberikan=20 komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E

Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang b= isa Anda=20 peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarnya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung p= ada=20 usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E

Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda m= enyimak=20 proyeksi dibawah ini:

1=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan

2=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan

5=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan

Sebenarnya, kalau And= a bisa=20 menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatkan Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah = sangat=20 lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E?

&= nbsp;

 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL

Produk yang akan Anda promosikan a= dalah=20 sebuah paket informasi & software=2E Produk intinya adalah sebuah soft= ware (39=20 links) yang mampu melipat-gandakan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Peng= guna=20 komputer akan sangat menghargai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pen= gguna=20 komputer sekarang=2E Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk= ini,=20 kemungkinan besar mereka akan membeli=2E

Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda ju= ga akan=20 menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat meng= harga=20 tips-tips ini karena bisa membantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komput= er=20 baik untuk bekerja maupun untuk hiburan=2E

Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan i= nformasi=20 bagaimana cara mendapatkan software apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Me= reka=20 yang suka berselancar di internet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual d= engan=20 harga mahal=2E Banyak pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alam= at situs=20 dimana semua software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mud= ah=20 menjual informasi ini kepada mereka=2E

 

BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI

Berapa biaya yang har= us Anda=20 keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak ada! Tetapi, Anda  perlu membeli produk tersebut un= tuk=20 dipelajari=2E Anda hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan = baik=2E=20 Download software tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-ganda= kan=20 kecepatan kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-l= ain=2E=20 Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda=20 sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, setiap penjua= lan=20 adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E

Kami juga akan mengaj= ari Anda=20 bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet=2E Kami akan berikan contoh n= askah=20 iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman-teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di man= a Anda=20 bisa memasang iklan secara gratis di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi = Anda=20 sebuah software pengirim email massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda=20 berhasil=2E

 

JANGAN=20 MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA!

Apakah Anda akan sia-= siakan=20 kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda pasti akan terkesan dan=20 TERTARIK!

Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah ema= il ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ecom dan=20 dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk memula= i=20 bisnis internet ini=2E

 

Salam Hangat,

Henry Lienardi

 

 

--Boundary_(ID_Zc7dICsyjsYOFr0II35Wvg)-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Feb 25 18:31:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id C8259277ACC; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:31:16 +0100 (CET) From: Henry Lienardi To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] KOMISI RP.35.000 SETIAP PENJUALAN (PR#162) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:31:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20030225173116.C8259277ACC@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --Boundary_(ID_PNX4zRwG/32HbJXytoJLig) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable =20 KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui internet merupakan tren yang sedang berk= embang di Indonesia? Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini: =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia sek= itar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat e-m= ail dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) menulis bahwa = 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media promosi mereka=2E=94 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran baik oleh perus= ahaan besar maupun kecil=2E=20 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda sebuah peru= sahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan, bag= aimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan peng= hasilan yang bagus=2E =20 PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan Anda diberikan= komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E=20 Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang bisa Anda peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarn= ya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung pada usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda menyimak proyeksi dibawah ini:=20 1 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan 2 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan 5 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan Sebenarnya, kalau Anda bisa menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatk= an Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah sangat lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E= ? =20 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL Produk yang akan Anda promosikan adalah sebuah paket informasi & software=2E= Produk intinya adalah sebuah software (39 links) yang mampu melipat-ganda= kan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Pengguna komputer akan sangat mengh= argai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pengguna komputer sekarang=2E= Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk ini, kemungkinan be= sar mereka akan membeli=2E=20 Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda juga akan menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E= Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat mengharga tips-tips ini karena bisa me= mbantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komputer baik untuk bekerja maupun= untuk hiburan=2E Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan informasi bagaimana cara mendapatkan soft= ware apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Mereka yang suka berselancar di i= nternet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual dengan harga mahal=2E Banya= k pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alamat situs dimana semu= a software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mudah menjual = informasi ini kepada mereka=2E =20 BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI Berapa biaya yang harus Anda keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak = ada! Tetapi, Anda perlu membeli produk tersebut untuk dipelajari=2E Anda = hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan baik=2E Download so= ftware tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-gandakan kecepat= an kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-lain=2E = Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, seti= ap penjualan adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E Kami juga akan mengajari Anda bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet= =2E Kami akan berikan contoh naskah iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman= -teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di mana Anda bisa memasang iklan secara grat= is di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi Anda sebuah software pengirim e= mail massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda berhasil=2E =20 JANGAN MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA! Apakah Anda akan sia-siakan kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda p= asti akan terkesan dan TERTARIK! Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah email ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ec= om dan dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk= memulai bisnis internet ini=2E =20 Salam Hangat, Henry Lienardi =20 =20 --Boundary_(ID_PNX4zRwG/32HbJXytoJLig) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

 

KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN

Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui = internet=20 merupakan tren yang sedang berkembang di Indonesia?=20 Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini:

 =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di=20= Indonesia=20= sekitar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat = e-mail=20 dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94

 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) me= nulis bahwa=20 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media=20 promosi mereka=2E=94

 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran bai= k oleh=20 perusahaan besar maupun kecil=2E

 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda= sebuah=20 perusahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan,= =20 bagaimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan=20= penghasilan yang bagus=2E

 

PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA

 Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan An= da diberikan=20 komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E

Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang b= isa Anda=20 peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarnya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung p= ada=20 usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E

Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda m= enyimak=20 proyeksi dibawah ini:

1=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan

2=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan

5=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan

Sebenarnya, kalau And= a bisa=20 menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatkan Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah = sangat=20 lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E?

&= nbsp;

 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL

Produk yang akan Anda promosikan a= dalah=20 sebuah paket informasi & software=2E Produk intinya adalah sebuah soft= ware (39=20 links) yang mampu melipat-gandakan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Peng= guna=20 komputer akan sangat menghargai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pen= gguna=20 komputer sekarang=2E Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk= ini,=20 kemungkinan besar mereka akan membeli=2E

Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda ju= ga akan=20 menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat meng= harga=20 tips-tips ini karena bisa membantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komput= er=20 baik untuk bekerja maupun untuk hiburan=2E

Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan i= nformasi=20 bagaimana cara mendapatkan software apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Me= reka=20 yang suka berselancar di internet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual d= engan=20 harga mahal=2E Banyak pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alam= at situs=20 dimana semua software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mud= ah=20 menjual informasi ini kepada mereka=2E

 

BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI

Berapa biaya yang har= us Anda=20 keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak ada! Tetapi, Anda  perlu membeli produk tersebut un= tuk=20 dipelajari=2E Anda hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan = baik=2E=20 Download software tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-ganda= kan=20 kecepatan kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-l= ain=2E=20 Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda=20 sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, setiap penjua= lan=20 adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E

Kami juga akan mengaj= ari Anda=20 bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet=2E Kami akan berikan contoh n= askah=20 iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman-teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di man= a Anda=20 bisa memasang iklan secara gratis di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi = Anda=20 sebuah software pengirim email massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda=20 berhasil=2E

 

JANGAN=20 MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA!

Apakah Anda akan sia-= siakan=20 kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda pasti akan terkesan dan=20 TERTARIK!

Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah ema= il ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ecom dan=20 dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk memula= i=20 bisnis internet ini=2E

 

Salam Hangat,

Henry Lienardi

 

 

--Boundary_(ID_PNX4zRwG/32HbJXytoJLig)-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 26 04:20:20 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id F2B9D277ACF; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:20:19 +0100 (CET) From: Henry Lienardi To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] KOMISI RP.35.000 SETIAP PENJUALAN (PR#163) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:20:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20030226032019.F2B9D277ACF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --Boundary_(ID_sUPu09PFof7pwvI+uqSNnw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable =20 KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui internet merupakan tren yang sedang berk= embang di Indonesia? Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini: =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia sek= itar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat e-m= ail dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) menulis bahwa = 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media promosi mereka=2E=94 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran baik oleh perus= ahaan besar maupun kecil=2E=20 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda sebuah peru= sahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan, bag= aimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan peng= hasilan yang bagus=2E =20 PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan Anda diberikan= komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E=20 Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang bisa Anda peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarn= ya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung pada usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda menyimak proyeksi dibawah ini:=20 1 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan 2 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan 5 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan Sebenarnya, kalau Anda bisa menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatk= an Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah sangat lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E= ? =20 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL Produk yang akan Anda promosikan adalah sebuah paket informasi & software=2E= Produk intinya adalah sebuah software (39 links) yang mampu melipat-ganda= kan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Pengguna komputer akan sangat mengh= argai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pengguna komputer sekarang=2E= Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk ini, kemungkinan be= sar mereka akan membeli=2E=20 Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda juga akan menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E= Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat mengharga tips-tips ini karena bisa me= mbantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komputer baik untuk bekerja maupun= untuk hiburan=2E Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan informasi bagaimana cara mendapatkan soft= ware apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Mereka yang suka berselancar di i= nternet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual dengan harga mahal=2E Banya= k pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alamat situs dimana semu= a software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mudah menjual = informasi ini kepada mereka=2E =20 BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI Berapa biaya yang harus Anda keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak = ada! Tetapi, Anda perlu membeli produk tersebut untuk dipelajari=2E Anda = hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan baik=2E Download so= ftware tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-gandakan kecepat= an kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-lain=2E = Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, seti= ap penjualan adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E Kami juga akan mengajari Anda bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet= =2E Kami akan berikan contoh naskah iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman= -teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di mana Anda bisa memasang iklan secara grat= is di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi Anda sebuah software pengirim e= mail massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda berhasil=2E =20 JANGAN MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA! Apakah Anda akan sia-siakan kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda p= asti akan terkesan dan TERTARIK! Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah email ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ec= om dan dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk= memulai bisnis internet ini=2E =20 Salam Hangat, Henry Lienardi =20 =20 --Boundary_(ID_sUPu09PFof7pwvI+uqSNnw) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

 

KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN

Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui = internet=20 merupakan tren yang sedang berkembang di Indonesia?=20 Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini:

 =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di=20= Indonesia=20= sekitar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat = e-mail=20 dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94

 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) me= nulis bahwa=20 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media=20 promosi mereka=2E=94

 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran bai= k oleh=20 perusahaan besar maupun kecil=2E

 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda= sebuah=20 perusahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan,= =20 bagaimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan=20= penghasilan yang bagus=2E

 

PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA

 Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan An= da diberikan=20 komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E

Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang b= isa Anda=20 peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarnya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung p= ada=20 usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E

Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda m= enyimak=20 proyeksi dibawah ini:

1=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan

2=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan

5=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan

Sebenarnya, kalau And= a bisa=20 menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatkan Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah = sangat=20 lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E?

&= nbsp;

 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL

Produk yang akan Anda promosikan a= dalah=20 sebuah paket informasi & software=2E Produk intinya adalah sebuah soft= ware (39=20 links) yang mampu melipat-gandakan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Peng= guna=20 komputer akan sangat menghargai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pen= gguna=20 komputer sekarang=2E Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk= ini,=20 kemungkinan besar mereka akan membeli=2E

Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda ju= ga akan=20 menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat meng= harga=20 tips-tips ini karena bisa membantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komput= er=20 baik untuk bekerja maupun untuk hiburan=2E

Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan i= nformasi=20 bagaimana cara mendapatkan software apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Me= reka=20 yang suka berselancar di internet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual d= engan=20 harga mahal=2E Banyak pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alam= at situs=20 dimana semua software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mud= ah=20 menjual informasi ini kepada mereka=2E

 

BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI

Berapa biaya yang har= us Anda=20 keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak ada! Tetapi, Anda  perlu membeli produk tersebut un= tuk=20 dipelajari=2E Anda hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan = baik=2E=20 Download software tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-ganda= kan=20 kecepatan kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-l= ain=2E=20 Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda=20 sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, setiap penjua= lan=20 adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E

Kami juga akan mengaj= ari Anda=20 bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet=2E Kami akan berikan contoh n= askah=20 iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman-teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di man= a Anda=20 bisa memasang iklan secara gratis di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi = Anda=20 sebuah software pengirim email massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda=20 berhasil=2E

 

JANGAN=20 MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA!

Apakah Anda akan sia-= siakan=20 kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda pasti akan terkesan dan=20 TERTARIK!

Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah ema= il ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ecom dan=20 dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk memula= i=20 bisnis internet ini=2E

 

Salam Hangat,

Henry Lienardi

 

 

--Boundary_(ID_sUPu09PFof7pwvI+uqSNnw)-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 26 04:31:32 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 38058277ACF; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:31:32 +0100 (CET) From: Henry Lienardi To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] KOMISI RP.35.000 SETIAP PENJUALAN (PR#164) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:31:32 +0100 Message-Id: <20030226033132.38058277ACF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --Boundary_(ID_dg54BhAiqivY7rRdevi0Sg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable =20 KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui internet merupakan tren yang sedang berk= embang di Indonesia? Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini: =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia sek= itar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat e-m= ail dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) menulis bahwa = 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media promosi mereka=2E=94 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran baik oleh perus= ahaan besar maupun kecil=2E=20 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda sebuah peru= sahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan, bag= aimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan peng= hasilan yang bagus=2E =20 PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan Anda diberikan= komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E=20 Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang bisa Anda peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarn= ya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung pada usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda menyimak proyeksi dibawah ini:=20 1 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan 2 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan 5 penjualan/ hari =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan Sebenarnya, kalau Anda bisa menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatk= an Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah sangat lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E= ? =20 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL Produk yang akan Anda promosikan adalah sebuah paket informasi & software=2E= Produk intinya adalah sebuah software (39 links) yang mampu melipat-ganda= kan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Pengguna komputer akan sangat mengh= argai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pengguna komputer sekarang=2E= Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk ini, kemungkinan be= sar mereka akan membeli=2E=20 Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda juga akan menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E= Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat mengharga tips-tips ini karena bisa me= mbantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komputer baik untuk bekerja maupun= untuk hiburan=2E Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan informasi bagaimana cara mendapatkan soft= ware apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Mereka yang suka berselancar di i= nternet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual dengan harga mahal=2E Banya= k pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alamat situs dimana semu= a software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mudah menjual = informasi ini kepada mereka=2E =20 BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI Berapa biaya yang harus Anda keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak = ada! Tetapi, Anda perlu membeli produk tersebut untuk dipelajari=2E Anda = hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan baik=2E Download so= ftware tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-gandakan kecepat= an kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-lain=2E = Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, seti= ap penjualan adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E Kami juga akan mengajari Anda bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet= =2E Kami akan berikan contoh naskah iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman= -teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di mana Anda bisa memasang iklan secara grat= is di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi Anda sebuah software pengirim e= mail massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda berhasil=2E =20 JANGAN MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA! Apakah Anda akan sia-siakan kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda p= asti akan terkesan dan TERTARIK! Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah email ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ec= om dan dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk= memulai bisnis internet ini=2E =20 Salam Hangat, Henry Lienardi =20 =20 --Boundary_(ID_dg54BhAiqivY7rRdevi0Sg) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

 

KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN

Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui = internet=20 merupakan tren yang sedang berkembang di Indonesia?=20 Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini:

 =93Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di=20= Indonesia=20= sekitar 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat = e-mail=20 dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E=94

 =93Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) me= nulis bahwa=20 30% perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai = media=20 promosi mereka=2E=94

 Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran bai= k oleh=20 perusahaan besar maupun kecil=2E

 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda= sebuah=20 perusahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan,= =20 bagaimana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan=20= penghasilan yang bagus=2E

 

PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA

 Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan An= da diberikan=20 komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E

Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang b= isa Anda=20 peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarnya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung p= ada=20 usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E

Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda m= enyimak=20 proyeksi dibawah ini:

1=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan

2=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan

5=20 penjualan/ hari        = ;  =20 =3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan

Sebenarnya, kalau And= a bisa=20 menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatkan Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah = sangat=20 lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E?

&= nbsp;

 PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL

Produk yang akan Anda promosikan a= dalah=20 sebuah paket informasi & software=2E Produk intinya adalah sebuah soft= ware (39=20 links) yang mampu melipat-gandakan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Peng= guna=20 komputer akan sangat menghargai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pen= gguna=20 komputer sekarang=2E Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk= ini,=20 kemungkinan besar mereka akan membeli=2E

Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda ju= ga akan=20 menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat meng= harga=20 tips-tips ini karena bisa membantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komput= er=20 baik untuk bekerja maupun untuk hiburan=2E

Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan i= nformasi=20 bagaimana cara mendapatkan software apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Me= reka=20 yang suka berselancar di internet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual d= engan=20 harga mahal=2E Banyak pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alam= at situs=20 dimana semua software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mud= ah=20 menjual informasi ini kepada mereka=2E

 

BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI

Berapa biaya yang har= us Anda=20 keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak ada! Tetapi, Anda  perlu membeli produk tersebut un= tuk=20 dipelajari=2E Anda hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan = baik=2E=20 Download software tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-ganda= kan=20 kecepatan kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-l= ain=2E=20 Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda=20 sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, setiap penjua= lan=20 adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E

Kami juga akan mengaj= ari Anda=20 bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet=2E Kami akan berikan contoh n= askah=20 iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman-teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di man= a Anda=20 bisa memasang iklan secara gratis di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi = Anda=20 sebuah software pengirim email massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda=20 berhasil=2E

 

JANGAN=20 MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA!

Apakah Anda akan sia-= siakan=20 kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda pasti akan terkesan dan=20 TERTARIK!

Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah ema= il ke mailto:infopenting@GetResponse=2Ecom dan=20 dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk memula= i=20 bisnis internet ini=2E

 

Salam Hangat,

Henry Lienardi

 

 

--Boundary_(ID_dg54BhAiqivY7rRdevi0Sg)-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 26 04:40:31 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id ED198277ACF; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:40:30 +0100 (CET) From: Henry Lienardi To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] KOMISI RP.35.000 SETIAP PENJUALAN (PR#165) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:40:30 +0100 Message-Id: <20030226034030.ED198277ACF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui internet merupakan tren yang sedang berk= embang di Indonesia? Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini: "Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia sekita= r 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat e-mail= dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E" "Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) menulis bahwa 30%= perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai med= ia promosi mereka=2E" Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran baik oleh perusa= haan besar maupun kecil=2E=20 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda sebuah perus= ahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan, baga= imana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan pengh= asilan yang bagus=2E PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan Anda diberikan = komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E=20 Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang bisa Anda peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarn= ya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung pada usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda menyimak proyeksi dibawah ini:=20 1 penjualan/ hari=09=3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan 2 penjualan/ hari=09=3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan 5 penjualan/ hari=09=3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan Sebenarnya, kalau Anda bisa menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatk= an Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah sangat lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E= ? PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL Produk yang akan Anda promosikan adalah sebuah paket informasi & software=2E= Produk intinya adalah sebuah software (39 links) yang mampu melipat-ganda= kan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Pengguna komputer akan sangat mengh= argai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pengguna komputer sekarang=2E= Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk ini, kemungkinan be= sar mereka akan membeli=2E=20 Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda juga akan menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E= Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat mengharga tips-tips ini karena bisa me= mbantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komputer baik untuk bekerja maupun= untuk hiburan=2E Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan informasi bagaimana cara mendapatkan soft= ware apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Mereka yang suka berselancar di i= nternet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual dengan harga mahal=2E Banya= k pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alamat situs dimana semu= a software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mudah menjual = informasi ini kepada mereka=2E BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI Berapa biaya yang harus Anda keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak = ada! Tetapi, Anda perlu membeli produk tersebut untuk dipelajari=2E Anda = hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan baik=2E Download so= ftware tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-gandakan kecepat= an kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-lain=2E = Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, seti= ap penjualan adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E Kami juga akan mengajari Anda bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet= =2E Kami akan berikan contoh naskah iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman= -teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di mana Anda bisa memasang iklan secara grat= is di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi Anda sebuah software pengirim e= mail massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda berhasil=2E JANGAN MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA! Apakah Anda akan sia-siakan kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda p= asti akan terkesan dan TERTARIK! Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah email ke infopenting@GetResponse=2Ecom dan = dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk memula= i bisnis internet ini=2E Salam Hangat, Henry Lienardi From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Feb 26 04:55:25 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 4DDBE277ACF; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:55:25 +0100 (CET) From: Henry Lienardi To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] KOMISI RP.35.000 SETIAP PENJUALAN (PR#166) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:55:25 +0100 Message-Id: <20030226035525.4DDBE277ACF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: KOMISI RP=2E35=2E000 SETIAP PENJUALAN Tahukah Anda bahwa Bisnis melalui internet merupakan tren yang sedang berk= embang di Indonesia? Cobalah simak dua kutipan berikut ini: "Business Intelligence Report (BIRO) menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia sekita= r 60% responden yang disurvey sudah terbiasa berkorespondensi lewat e-mail= dan siap bertransaksi secara online=2E" "Majalah Warta Ekonomi (edisi No=2E25/XIII/25 Juni 2001) menulis bahwa 30%= perusahaan UKM di wilayah Jabotabek telah menggunakan website sebagai med= ia promosi mereka=2E" Internet sudah mulai dimanfaatkan sebagai media pemasaran baik oleh perusa= haan besar maupun kecil=2E=20 Dan, melalui email ini, kami ingin memperkenalkan kepada Anda sebuah perus= ahaan kecil yang menjalankan bisnisnya hanya melalui internet=2E Dan, baga= imana Anda juga bisa berperan dalam perusahaan ini serta mendapatkan pengh= asilan yang bagus=2E PROYEKSI PENGHASILAN ANDA Perusahaan ini menjual produknya seharga Rp=2E70=2E000 dan Anda diberikan = komisi 50% atau Rp=2E35=2E000 untuk setiap penjualan=2E=20 Berapa besarkah penghasilan yang bisa Anda peroleh dalam sebulan? Sebenarn= ya tidak ada batasan, semuanya tergantung pada usaha dan kemauan Anda=2E Sebagai perkiraan, silahkan Anda menyimak proyeksi dibawah ini:=20 1 penjualan/ hari=09=3D Rp=2E 1=2E050=2E000/ bulan 2 penjualan/ hari=09=3D Rp=2E 2=2E100=2E000/ bulan 5 penjualan/ hari=09=3D Rp=2E 5=2E250=2E000/ bulan Sebenarnya, kalau Anda bisa menjual sebuah saja dalam sehari dan mendapatk= an Rp=2E1=2E050=2E000 sudah sangat lumayan, bukan? Apalagi kalau =85=2E=2E= ? PRODUK YANG PASTI LAKU DIJUAL Produk yang akan Anda promosikan adalah sebuah paket informasi & software=2E= Produk intinya adalah sebuah software (39 links) yang mampu melipat-ganda= kan kecepatan kerja sebuah komputer=2E Pengguna komputer akan sangat mengh= argai software ini=2E Dan, ada banyak sekali pengguna komputer sekarang=2E= Asal Anda bisa menjelaskan dengan baik manfaat produk ini, kemungkinan be= sar mereka akan membeli=2E=20 Dalam produk unggulan ini, Anda juga akan menemukan ratusan tips komputer=2E= Pengguna komputer juga akan sangat mengharga tips-tips ini karena bisa me= mbantu mereka semakin mahir menggunakan komputer baik untuk bekerja maupun= untuk hiburan=2E Dan, produk ini juga menyertakan informasi bagaimana cara mendapatkan soft= ware apapun secara gratis di internet=2E Mereka yang suka berselancar di i= nternet tahu bahwa software di internet dijual dengan harga mahal=2E Banya= k pecandu internet akan senang apabila diberitahu alamat situs dimana semu= a software bisa diperoleh secara gratis=2E Anda akan dengan mudah menjual = informasi ini kepada mereka=2E BIAYA MENGIKUTI BISNIS ONLINE INI Berapa biaya yang harus Anda keluarkan untuk mengikuti program ini? Tidak = ada! Tetapi, Anda perlu membeli produk tersebut untuk dipelajari=2E Anda = hanya bisa mempromosikan sesuatu yang Anda tahu dengan baik=2E Download so= ftware tersebut dan dipakai=2E Lihat bagaimana ia melipat-gandakan kecepat= an kerja komputer Anda, kecepatan sambungan ke internet, dan lain-lain=2E = Harganya hanya Rp=2E70=2E000! Jangan khawatir dengan angka kecil ini=2E Mo= dal Anda sudah kembali dengan melakukan dua penjualan=2E Selanjutnya, seti= ap penjualan adalah keuntungan bersih Anda=2E Kami juga akan mengajari Anda bagaimana melakukan promosi melalui internet= =2E Kami akan berikan contoh naskah iklan yang bisa Anda kirimkan ke teman= -teman=2E Kami akan tunjukkan di mana Anda bisa memasang iklan secara grat= is di internet=2E Kami bahkan akan memberi Anda sebuah software pengirim e= mail massal secara gratis=2E Kami ingin Anda berhasil=2E JANGAN MENUNGGU! MULAI BISNIS INI SEKARANG JUGA! Apakah Anda akan sia-siakan kesempatan ini? Kunjungi situs kami dan Anda p= asti akan terkesan dan TERTARIK! Sekarang silahkan kirim sebuah email ke infopenting@GetResponse=2Ecom dan = dalam waktu 30 detik, Anda akan mendapatkan informasi lengkap untuk memula= i bisnis internet ini=2E Salam Hangat, Henry Lienardi From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Mar 2 02:53:50 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 40990277A1D; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 02:53:50 +0100 (CET) From: donsmith3@pinoymail.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION. (PR#167) Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 02:53:50 +0100 Message-Id: <20030302015350.40990277A1D@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ATTENSION PLEASE=2C MY NAME IS DON SMITH=2C I AM A PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND I HAVE A CLIENT WHO IS INTERESTED IN INVESTING SOME GOOD MONEY IN YOUR COMPANY=2E MY CLIENT IS A VERY IMPORTANT AND PROMINENT PERSON WHO HAS MANDATED ME TO CONTACT YOU OR YOUR COMPANY FOR A VERY IMPORTANT BUSINESS TRANSACTION=2E MY CLIENT IS BY NAME MRS=2E MARYAM ABACHA AND SHE IS THE WIFE OF A LATE MILITARY HEAD OF STATE IN MY COUNTRY=2E HER HUSBAND LATE GENERAL SANNI ABACHA MADE A LOT OF MONEY THROUGH OIL PROCEEDS DURING HIS TENURE IN OFFICE=2E INFACT=2C IT WAS DISCOVERED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT HE WAS WORTH WELL OVER $1=2E5 BILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS AND SOME OF THIS MONEY WAS RETRIEVED AFTER HE DIED WHILE SOME WAS RECOVERED FROM OFFICIALS THAT SERVED UNDER HIM DURING HIS REIGN AS PRESIDENT OF NIGERIA=2E THE TRUTH OF THIS CASE IS THAT MY CLIENT DESPITE THE PROBLEM SHE IS GOING THROUGH NOW=2C SHE STILL HAS A LOT OF MONEY IN HER POSSESSION=2E WHICH SHE INTENDS TOINVEST OUTSIDE OUR COUNTRY=2EWHAT MY CLIENT NEEDS FROM YOU NOW IS A RELIABLE ACCOUNT WHERE SHE CAN TRANSFER SOME MONEY BUT MIND YOU=2C ALL THE MONEY IN HER POSSESSION CAN NOT LEAVE AT ONCE BECAUSE SHE NEEDS TO BUILD CONFIDENCE AND TRUST IN SOMEONE WHO WOULD NOT EXPOSE HER PLAN TO REMIT AND POSSIBLY INVEST IN YOUR COMPANY=2E SO SHE HAS AGREED THAT I SHOULD MAKE ARRANGEMENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF $32 MILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS AND YOU ARE FREE TO NEGOTIATE YOUR MODE OF COMPENSATION EVEN IF SHE INTENDS TO INVEST THE MONEY IN YOUR COUNTRY=2E PLEASE=2C DO NOT HESITATE TO INDICATE YOUR VIEW OF THIS REQUEST BY CONTACTING ME IMMEDIATELY YOU RECEIVE THIS MAIL=2C SO THAT THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE FOR THE MONEY TO LEAVE IMMEDIATELY=2E DUE TO THE PRESENT SITUATION OF MY CLIENT=2C I WOULD BE HAPPY IF THIS REQUEST CAN BE KEPT A SECRET=2E I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO NOTE THAT THERE IS NO RISK INVOLVED=2E I HOPE MY CLIENT WOULD BE HAPPY INVESTING WITH YOU=2E PLEASE KINDLY SEND DOWN YOUR REPLY THROUGH MY PERSONAL E-MAIL ADDRESS THANKS AND BEST REGARDS SINCERELY DON SMITH=28ESQ=29 PLEASE NOTE=3ATHAT THE CHANGE IN EMAIL ADDRESS WAS BECOUSE OF THE CONFIDENTIALITY INVOLVED IN THIS TRANSACTION=2E From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Mar 6 18:18:02 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 19B1C277AF0; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:18:02 +0100 (CET) From: USB-Drive@on-click.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Replace your floppy disks with this new technology... (PR#168) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:18:01 +0100 Message-Id: <20030306171802.19B1C277AF0@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --MWZAlternativeMessage Content-Type: text/plain Never before has there been an easier way for a computer user to transport their computer files. The USB Drive makes carrying your computer files around easier than ever. With tens of thousands of happy customers behind us, you can trust that our product is easy to use and helps safeguard your data. Simply plug the device into any PC and instantly have access to your data. The data transfer rate is an amazing 1MB per second! The device is roughly the size of a car key and allows you to transport your files both securely and easily. The USBDrive can quickly synchronize vital personal files between computers at work, home, or school without hassle. There is no software to install and no settings to make! Simply Plug and Play. With the USB Drive you can carry up to 2 GB of data from PC to PC. Simply put, the USB Drive is a durable water proof floppy disk. You can now copy up to 2GB of files (data) from your PC's hard drive to the USB Drive and take it to any other PC without hassle. You can copy any file to your USB Drive; Office Documents, Faxes, Emails, pictures, databases, word processing files etc. Clip the USB Drive to your key-ring and have access to your data wherever you go. For Windows Users, Simply Plug the USB Drive into your computer and a new drive letter automatically appears under your My Computer Icon. Once the drive letter appears (less than three seconds), you can copy the files from your PC to the USB Drive in exactly the same manner as you would a floppy disk, Zip disk, or Digital Camera file. The USB Drives comes with a one year manufacture warranty and a money back guarantee! Included with your USB drive is an easy 1 - 2 - 3 step-by-step instruction manual. We guarantee that you can use this drive with less than 5 minutes of training, regardless of your computer knowledge. Using a USB Drive is exactly the same as using a floppy disk. The only difference between a Floppy disk and The USB Drive is that the USB drive is inserted into the USB port of the PC, and the Floppy disk is inserted into the Floppy disk Drive. Windows reacts to both the USB drive and the Floppy Disk drive exactly the same. Why is the USB Drive better than a floppy disk? Floppy disks are extremely fragile, hold a very small amount of data, and the floppy disk is not designed for long-term data storage. The USB Drive is 1/5 the size of a floppy disk weighing only 1 ounce. The USB Drives are extremely durable and even water proof. The USB Drive can hold up to 2 GB (two-thousand times the amount of data of the floppy disk) and the drive is designed for storage up to 15 years. The USB Drives are compatible with Win98, ME, 2K, XP, Mac OS 9.2 & above, Linux 2.4.24 & Please visit us at http://on-click.net or by calling us at 562-856-0256 --MWZAlternativeMessage Content-Type: text/html

 

The USB Drive is a portable hard drive! It works just like a floppy disk but it's durable and can hold over 2000 times the amount of data.

Works on all computers PC's and MAC's. Different capacities available from 32MB to 2GB!

Starting at Only $39.95 (regularly $49.95 ) No software to install and no settings to make.. simply plug-and-play!
Act now and you'll receive:
» » Free Shipping on selected models
» » Free Neck Strap
» » Free Keychain Ring
» » Free 3-ft. USB extension cable!		 » No drivers to install
» Weights only 1 oz.
» PC and Mac
» Money-back Guarantee
» Two-year Warranty

Click here to view our list of Happy USB Drive Customers!

 

Never before has there been an easier way for a computer user to transport their computer files.  The USB Drive makes carrying your computer files around easier than ever.  With tens of thousands of happy customers behind us, you can trust that our product is easy to use and helps safeguard your data.

 

Simply plug the device into any PC and instantly have access to your data.  The data transfer rate is an amazing 1MB per second!  The device is roughly the size of a car key and allows you to transport your files both securely and easily. The USBDrive can quickly synchronize vital personal files between computers at work, home, or school without hassle.  There is no software to install and no settings to make!  Simply Plug and Play. 

 

With the USB Drive you can carry up to 2 GB of data from PC to PC.  Simply put, the USB Drive is a durable water proof floppy disk.  You can now copy up to 2GB of files (data) from your PC's hard drive to the USB Drive and take it to any other PC without hassle.  You can copy any file to your USB Drive; Office Documents, Faxes, Emails, pictures, databases, word processing files etc. Clip the USB Drive to your key-ring and have access to your data wherever you go.

 

For Windows Users, Simply Plug the USB Drive into your computer and a new drive letter automatically appears under your My Computer Icon.  Once the drive letter appears (less than three seconds), you can copy the files from your PC to the USB Drive in exactly the same manner as you would a floppy disk, Zip disk, or Digital Camera file. 

 

The USB Drives comes with a one year manufacture warranty and a money back guarantee!  Included with your USB drive is an easy 1 - 2 - 3 step-by-step instruction manual.  We guarantee that you can use this drive with less than 5 minutes of training, regardless of your computer knowledge. 

 

Using a USB Drive is exactly the same as using a floppy disk.  The only difference between a Floppy disk and The USB Drive is that the USB drive is inserted into the USB port of the PC, and the Floppy disk is inserted into the Floppy disk Drive.  Windows reacts to both the USB drive and the Floppy Disk drive exactly the same.

 

Why is the USB Drive better than a floppy disk?  Floppy disks are extremely fragile, hold a very small amount of data, and the floppy disk is not designed for long-term data storage.  The USB Drive is 1/5 the size of a floppy disk weighing only 1 ounce.  The USB Drives are extremely durable and even water proof.  The USB Drive can hold up to 2 GB (two-thousand times the amount of data of the floppy disk) and the drive is designed for storage up to 15 years.

Driverless USBDrive - 32MB
Only $35.95 (regularly $49.95)

Driverless USBDrive - 64MB
Only $55.95 (regularly $79.95)

Driverless USBDrive - 128MB
Only $85.95 (regularly $119.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!
Driverless USBDrive - 256MB
Only $169.99 (regularly $199.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!
Driverless USBDrive - 512MB
Only $335.95 (regularly $399.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!
Driverless USBDrive - 1GB
Only $559.95 (regularly $749.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!

 

Driverless USBDrive - 2GB
Only $998.95 (regularly $1299.95)



FREE SHIPPING!!!
To order visit On-Click.net
or call (866) 432-4022
money-back guarantee and two-year warranty
We accept:
This message was sent to address Jack@on-click.com  
Remove yourself from this recurring list by:bugdb@openpkg.org

sending a blank email to unsub-80124975-3735@greatfamilyoffers.com
OR
Sending a postal mail to CustomerService, Box 432 - 8912 E. Pinnacle Peak Rd F-8, Scottsdale, AZ 85255
--MWZAlternativeMessage-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Mar 12 16:00:42 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 78522277AF1; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:00:42 +0100 (CET) From: itpkg@computerbild.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] mysql-3.23.54a-1.2.1 is missing a dep (PR#169) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:00:42 +0100 Message-Id: <20030312150042.78522277AF1@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Ingo T. Storm Version: 3.23.54a-1.2.1 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (145.243.187.7) I rebuilt the updated 3.23.54a-1.2.1 and installed it on a system where mysql had not been installed previously. I get an error message -Uvh UPDBIN/mysql-3.23.54a-1.2.1.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:mysql ########################################### [100%] /cw/bin/mysql_install_db: /cw/bin/hostname: not found Sorry, the host '' could not be looked up. Please configure the 'hostname' command to return a correct hostname. If you want to solve this at a later stage, restart this script with the --force option /cw/bin/hostname is in coreutils, so I guess coreutils should be added to the "Requieres"-clause in mysql.spec or /cw/bin/mysql_install_db shoul check if it can live with /bin/hostname . Cheers, From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Mar 12 16:24:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id B0252277AEE; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:24:03 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] mysql-3.23.54a-1.2.1 is missing a dep (PR#169) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:24:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20030312152403.B0252277AEE@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In article <20030312150042.78522277AF1@mail.openpkg.org> you wrote: > Full_Name: Ingo T. Storm > Version: 3.23.54a-1.2.1 > OS: Solaris 9 > Submission from: (NULL) (145.243.187.7) > > I rebuilt the updated 3.23.54a-1.2.1 and installed it on a system where mysql > had not been installed previously. I get an error message > > -Uvh UPDBIN/mysql-3.23.54a-1.2.1.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > 1:mysql ########################################### [100%] > /cw/bin/mysql_install_db: /cw/bin/hostname: not found > Sorry, the host '' could not be looked up. > Please configure the 'hostname' command to return a correct hostname. > If you want to solve this at a later stage, restart this script with > the --force option > > /cw/bin/hostname is in coreutils, so I guess coreutils should be added to the > "Requieres"-clause in mysql.spec or /cw/bin/mysql_install_db shoul check if it > can live with /bin/hostname The use of /bin/hostname by /bin/resolveip is strange, of course. But your real problem seems to be that the output of /bin/hostname cannot be resolved to a valid IP address for your host. Fix this and it should no longer complain, too. Additionally we should determine why MySQL's resolveip tries /bin/hostname... Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Mar 12 17:20:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 2D23A277AEE; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:20:04 +0100 (CET) From: "Ingo T. Storm" To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] mysql-3.23.54a-1.2.1 is missing a dep (PR#169) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:20:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20030312162004.2D23A277AEE@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: >> /cw/bin/mysql_install_db: /cw/bin/hostname: not found >The use of /bin/hostname by /bin/resolveip is strange, of >course. But your real problem seems to be that the output of /bin/hostname >cannot be resolved to a valid IP address for your host. Fix this and >it should no longer complain, too. Additionally we should determine >why MySQL's resolveip tries /bin/hostname... a. [openpkg12]$/cw/bin/resolveip `/bin/hostname` IP address of installsrv is 172.29.5.181 [root@installsrv] [openpkg12]$/cw/bin/resolveip `/cw/bin/hostname` IP address of installsrv is 172.29.5.181 Not a fqdn, I concede, since I am still in my setup phase, but the output of either "hostname" is resolvable. b. /cw/bin/mysql_install_db has 110:hostname=`/cw/bin/hostname` # Install this too in the user table which should be the result of ./mysql-3.23.54a/scripts/mysql_install_db.sh 110:hostname=`@HOSTNAME@` # Install this too in the user table Ingo From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Mar 17 09:20:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id EF09C277B04; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:20:34 +0100 (CET) From: martin.sperl@ucpag.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] rpmtoll/shtool problem on Alpha - gcc bootstrap problem in %install (PR#170) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:20:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20030317082034.EF09C277B04@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Martin Sperl Version: 1.2 OS: Tru64 Submission from: (NULL) (62.178.145.10) Hi! We have got a Problem bootstrapping gcc for Alpha-Tru64... We know that gcc3.2.1 does not bootstrap on Tru64, se we decided to use the version 3.02 from OpenPKG 1.0. But as far as looking at the spec files I see that if gcc3.2 would compile then the problem would be the same. Now to the basic facts: rpm -ba gcc.spec We get as far as this: fi + exit 0 Executing(%install): env -i /cw/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.31622 + cd /cw/RPM/TMP + cd gcc-3.0.2 + rm -rf /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.0.2-root ++ ./config.guess + triple=alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 ++ ./config.sub alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 ++ sed -e 's;-unknown-;--;' + triple=alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 + cd obj ++ find . -name Makefile -type f -print + /cw/lib/openpkg/rpmtool subst -v -s 's;^\(prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.0.2-root/cw;' 's;^\(exec_prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.0.2-root/cw;' 's;^\(gcc_gxx_include_dir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.0.2-root/cw/include/g++;' 's;^\(gxx_include_dir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.0.2-root/cw/include/g++;' 's;^\(glibcppinstalldir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.0.2-root/cw/include/g++;' 's;^\(local_prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.0.2-root/cw/lib/gcc-lib;' -- ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libstdc++-v3/Makefile ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libstdc++-v3/libmath/Makefile ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libstdc++-v3/libio/Makefile ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/Makefile ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/Makefile ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libiberty/Makefile ./alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/libiberty/testsuite/Makefile ./libiberty/Makefile ./libiberty/testsuite/Makefile ./Makefile ./gcc/intl/Makefile ./gcc/po/Makefile ./gcc/Makefile ./gcc/fixinc/Makefile rpmtool:Error: unknown command /cw/lib/openpkg/rpmtool -h' for usage error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.31622 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.31622 (%install) The error-script looks like this: #!env -i /cw/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix HOME="/cw" SHELL="/cw/lib/openpkg/bash" TERM="xterm" TMPDIR="/cw/RPM/TMP" TEMPDIR="/cw/RPM/TMP" USER="root" LOGNAME="root" PATH="/cw/bin:/cw/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin" LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/cw/lib:/usr/lib" export HOME SHELL TMPDIR TEMPDIR USER LOGNAME PATH LD_LIBRARY_PATH RPM_SOURCE_DIR="/cw/RPM/SRC/gcc" RPM_BUILD_DIR="/cw/RPM/TMP" RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2" RPM_ARCH="alpha" RPM_OS="osf" RPM_DOC_DIR="/cw/doc" RPM_PACKAGE_NAME="gcc" RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION="3.0.2" RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE="1.0.0" export RPM_SOURCE_DIR RPM_BUILD_DIR RPM_OPT_FLAGS RPM_ARCH RPM_OS RPM_DOC_DIR export RPM_PACKAGE_NAME RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE RPM_BUILD_ROOT="/cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.0.2-root" export RPM_BUILD_ROOT : umask 022 set -x cd /cw/RPM/TMP cd gcc-3.0.2 rm -rf triple= triple= cd obj # redirect to temporary build root /cw/lib/openpkg/rpmtool subst -v -s "s;^\(prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw;" "s;^\(exec_prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw;" "s;^\(gcc_gxx_include_dir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/include/g++;" "s;^\(gxx_include_dir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/include/g++;" "s;^\(glibcppinstalldir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/include/g++;" "s;^\(local_prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/lib/gcc-lib;" -- # make sure the install procedure doesn't compile anything # (or else we would have wrong paths hard-coded in the programs) /cw/lib/openpkg/rpmtool subst -v -s 's;^install-cpp:.*;install-cpp:;' 's;^install-common:.*;install-common: installdirs lang.install-common;' 's;^install-driver:.*;install-driver:;' 's;^install-libgcc:.*;install-libgcc: installdirs;' 's;^install-build:.*;install-build:;' 's;^install-collect2:.*;install-collect2: installdirs;' 's;^install-assert-h:.*;install-assert-h: installdirs;' 's;^install: stmp-dirs ./libgcc.a;install: stmp-dirs;' 's;^\(install-.*:.*\) all *\(.*\)$;\1\2;' -- gcc/Makefile gcc/libgcc.mk gcc/*/Makefile # make sure the Makefiles are not re-generated for file in ; do ( echo "#!/bin/sh" echo ":" ) > done # run the standard installation procedure /cw/bin/make --no-print-directory install # strip the installation mv /cw//include/* /cw/lib/gcc-lib//3.0.2/include/ >/dev/null 2>&1 || true rm -rf /cw/ rm -f /cw/lib/*.la rm -f /cw/bin/*-gcc rm -f /cw/bin/*-c++ rm -f /cw/bin/*-g++ strip /cw/bin/* >/dev/null 2>&1 || true for prog in cc1 cc1plus collect2 cpp; do strip /cw/lib/gcc-lib//3.0.2/ >/dev/null 2>&1 || true done # make additional links ln /cw/bin/gcc /cw/bin/cc ln /cw/man/man1/gcc.1 /cw/man/man1/cc.1 ln /cw/man/man1/g++.1 /cw/man/man1/c++.1 # create file list /cw/lib/openpkg/rpmtool files -v -o/gcc-3.0.2/files -r '%defattr(-,cw,cw)' '/cw' '%not %dir {/cw,/cw/*,/cw/etc/rc.d,/cw/man/*}' exit 0 And the strange thing is that compiling the same thing on an Intel box with Redhat8.0 works and gives a different command: shtool instead of rpmtool... + /cw/lib/openpkg/shtool subst -v -s -e 's;^\(prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/g cc-3.2.1-root/cw;' -e 's;^\(exec_prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.2.1 -root/cw;' -e 's;^\(gcc_gxx_include_dir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.2.1 -root/cw/include/g++;' -e 's;^\(gxx_include_dir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/RPM/TMP/g cc-3.2.1-root/cw/include/g++;' -e 's;^\(glibcppinstalldir[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/R PM/TMP/gcc-3.2.1-root/cw/include/g++;' -e 's;^\(local_prefix[ ]*=\).*;\1 /cw/R PM/TMP/gcc-3.2.1-root/cw/lib/gcc-lib;' ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/Makefile ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++ -v3/src/Makefile ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libmath/Makefile ./i686-pc-lin ux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libio/Makefile ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/Ma kefile ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/po/Makefile ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc+ +-v3/testsuite/Makefile ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libiberty/Makefile ./i686-pc-linux-g nu/libiberty/testsuite/Makefile ./Makefile ./libiberty/Makefile ./libiberty/test suite/Makefile ./gcc/Makefile ./gcc/intl/Makefile ./gcc/fixinc/Makefile So rpm acts differently when used on Tru64 and on Linux... Have you got an explaination for this behaviour? Thanks, From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Mar 18 01:06:43 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 7A916277A18; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 01:06:43 +0100 (CET) From: hellobob@mailvault.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Offshore Software Development Makes You Money 1.7 (PR#171) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 01:06:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20030318000643.7A916277A18@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe:
Dear Sir or Madam,

We are glad to deliver cutting-edge solutions to your IT challenges at a quality that is equivalent or superior to that offered by domestic companies, but at a fraction of the cost of domestic development.

We represent a number of well-established companies staffed with over 1000 qualified developers with a record of successfully completing hundreds of small and midsize projects and tens of wide-scale projects for Fortune 100 corporations.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to testing and porting we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Working both on-site and offshore our specialists develop and integrate

  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet applications
  • Business applications
  • ERP, CRM systems
  • e-Business (B2B, B2C) solutions
  • Mobile and Wireless applications 
  • Desktop applications 
  • Data Warehouses 
  • Security and Cryptography systems 
and more...

Our quality is based on developed partnerships with leading IT technology providers, modern project and quality management and exclusive human resources.

  

Rates only $20 an hour!

For more info...CLICK HERE!!!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!

Cost effective IT solutions
Experienced teams of specialists
Fair rates
Here is a list of some of the technologies and platforms that our specialists employ to bring you only the best, most efficient and cost-effective solution:

 
Application Platforms
.: .Net
.: Java2EE
.: IBM WebSphere Suite
.: Lotus Domino
.: BEA WebLogic
.: ColdFusion
.: Enhydra
Operating Systems
.: all Windows, Mac,
and Unix platforms
.: Epoc
.: Windows CE
.: Palm OS
.: Java2Microedition
Databases
.: MS SQL
.: Oracle
.: DB2
.: FoxPro
.: Informix
.: Sybase		 Real time embedded systems
.: QNX 4RT
.: QNX Neutrio RT

 

Free quotes!
Please include your phone number,
and we will be happy to call you!
If you received this letter by mistake, please click here
From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Mar 22 21:20:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id D8F71277D3C; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:20:05 +0100 (CET) From: matt@cis.ksu.edu To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Config file location wrong in libxml (PR#172) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:20:05 +0100 Message-Id: <20030322202005.D8F71277D3C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Matt Hoosier Version: OS: Solaris 9 / UltraSparc Submission from: (NULL) (129.130.10.83) The libxml package seems to be compiled with the expectation that config file are found under /etc/sgml (rather than the correct %{l_prefix}/etc/sgml). This seems to be a bug in the upstream libxml2 package; the autoconf infrastructure for this package doesn't properly relocate the binaries' expectations of where the config file should reside. This was easily remedied with a small patch to the upstream source, plus a small diff against the provided .spec file. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Mar 22 21:24:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 8C6B9277D38; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:24:12 +0100 (CET) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] Config file location wrong in libxml (PR#172) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:24:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20030322202412.8C6B9277D38@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, Mar 22, 2003, matt@cis.ksu.edu wrote: > Full_Name: Matt Hoosier > Version: > OS: Solaris 9 / UltraSparc > Submission from: (NULL) (129.130.10.83) > > The libxml package seems to be compiled with the expectation that config file > are found under /etc/sgml (rather than the correct %{l_prefix}/etc/sgml). > > This seems to be a bug in the upstream libxml2 package; the autoconf > infrastructure for this package doesn't properly relocate the binaries' > expectations of where the config file should reside. > > This was easily remedied with a small patch to the upstream source, plus a small > diff against the provided .spec file. Can you send us your particular changes (diff), too? Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Mar 26 06:35:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 38E52277ACC; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 06:35:23 +0100 (CET) From: mnagel@willingminds.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] coreutils su not setuid root (PR#173) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 06:35:23 +0100 Message-Id: <20030326053523.38E52277ACC@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Mark Nagel Version: coreutils-4.5.4-1.2.0 OS: Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (67.115.210.114) After building and installing coreutils, using rc to start services began to fail. I traced this to the use of the su version installed with coreutils, which was setuid to the OpenPKG user (in my case this was okpg). The RPM spec should install this program suid root. From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Mar 26 09:31:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id DEB50277ACB; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:31:17 +0100 (CET) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] coreutils su not setuid root (PR#173) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:31:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20030326083117.DEB50277ACB@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Mar 26, 2003, mnagel@willingminds.com wrote: Hi, > After building and installing coreutils, using rc to start services began to > fail. I traced this to the use of the su version installed with coreutils, > which was setuid to the OpenPKG user (in my case this was okpg). The RPM spec > should install this program suid root. I checked the build process: su is only installed into the package when you build the package as user root, which you shouldn't but which on the other side shouldn't have side effects either. In that case it gets a suid-bit but the file will belong to the OpenPKG user. I have fixed this in coreutils-4.5.11-20030326 Thanks for your report :) Greetings, -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Apr 1 00:18:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id C643B277B03; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:18:14 +0200 (CEST) From: bill@celestial.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:18:14 +0200 Message-Id: <20030331221814.C643B277B03@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:03:58AM +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: ... >Note that it cannot read or understand arbitrary .spec-files, >it uses a simple parser that only understands the openpkg >.spec-files that have to follow some tight conventions. Is there any documentation on these conventions? (the openpkg.org web pile seems to be in April Fools mode today :-) Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ What's this script do? unzip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; gasp ; yes ; umount ; sleep Hint for the answer: not everything is computer-oriented. Sometimes you're in a sleeping bag, camping out. (Contributed by Frans van der Zande.) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Apr 1 07:13:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id DC02D277AFF; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:13:06 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH (PR#140) Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 07:13:06 +0200 Message-Id: <20030401051306.DC02D277AFF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, Apr 01, 2003, bill@celestial.com wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:03:58AM +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: > ... > >Note that it cannot read or understand arbitrary .spec-files, > >it uses a simple parser that only understands the openpkg > >.spec-files that have to follow some tight conventions. > > Is there any documentation on these conventions? (the openpkg.org web pile > seems to be in April Fools mode today :-) April Fools mode? No, openpkg.org is available. Just order your copy of "OpenPKG in a box" and you immediately get to openpkg.org permanently and can stay there. Alternatively press "Complain" too achieve the same... ;-) Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Apr 6 08:37:02 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id E3DE1277AEC; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 08:37:01 +0200 (CEST) From: kunle_cole1@indiatimes.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] treat as urgent nd confidential (PR#174) Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 08:37:01 +0200 Message-Id: <20030406063701.E3DE1277AEC@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From The Desk of =3A DR=2E KUNLE COLE DIRECTOR=2C PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION FEDERAL MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES DAKAR - SENEGAL DIRECT TEL=3A 008821688854690 STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DEAR FRIEND=2C TRANSFER OF US$11=2E5MILLION INTO A PERSONAL=2FCOMPANY'S OFFSHORE ACCOUNT Based on the information gathered from the Ministry of Trade and Industries=2C we intend to solicit for your assistance on this transaction with you on the assumption that you will not disappoint us=2E We have eleven Million=2C Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars =28US$11=2C500=2C000=2E00=29 which we made over time from over inflated contracts in my Ministry =28Federal Ministry of Health and Social Services=29=2E We are seeking your assistance and permission to remit this amount into your account or any other nominated account you can provide for us=2E Your commission will be 20% of the total sum=2C 10% for expenses and the remaining 70% is for my colleagues and me=2E Could you please notify me of your acceptance to carry out this transaction urgently by e-mail or via my direct telephone line only on the receipt of this message=2E Kindly=2C acknowledge the receipt of this letter by sending to me by email a copy of this letter with your private Tel=2E And Fax number=2E I shall in turn inform you of the modalities for a formal application to secure the necessary approvals for the immediate release of this fund into your account=2E Thanks for your co-operation=2E Yours faithfully=2C DR=2E Kunle Cole From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Apr 7 05:29:55 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id DC715277AD0; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 05:29:54 +0200 (CEST) From: matt@cis.ksu.edu To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] mozilla 1.3's nspr doesn't build on Solaris (PR#175) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 05:29:54 +0200 Message-Id: <20030407032954.DC715277AD0@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Matt Hoosier Version: openpkg 20030324, mozilla 20030316 OS: SunOS 5.9 Submission from: (NULL) (129.130.10.83) The NSPR bundled with Mozilla (1.3) doesn't build on the Sun platform. Configuration succeeds, but compilation fails when an attempted link is aborted claiming that the file 'nsprmap.sun' (one of the files to be linked into a library) has an unknown type. Since NSPR depends heavily on the threading model, I have tried several threading options (--with-pthreads, --with-native-threads), but these don't seem to affect the error. The same version of Mozilla builds cleanly on Debian 3.0/Intel. Error trace below (built as "cw" user): > $rpm --rebuild mozilla-1.3-20030316.src.rpm > Executing(%prep): env -i /cw/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.15276 > > ... > /cw/bin/cc -B/usr/ccs/bin/ -shared -Wl,-h,libnspr4.so,-z,combreloc,-z,defs -Wl,-f,\$ORIGIN/cpu/\$ISALIST/libnspr_flt4.so -o libnspr4.so -Wl,-M,./nsprmap.sun ./prvrsion.o io/./prfdcach.o io/./prmwait.o io/./prmapopt.o io/./priometh.o io/./pripv6.o io/./prlayer.o io/./prlog.o io/./prmmap.o io/./prpolevt.o io/./prprf.o io/./prscanf.o io/./prstdio.o threads/./prcmon.o threads/./prrwlock.o threads/./prtpd.o linking/./prlink.o malloc/./prmem.o md/./prosdep.o memory/./prshm.o memory /./prshma.o memory/./prseg.o misc/./pralarm.o misc/./pratom.o misc/./prcountr.o misc/./prdtoa.o misc/./prenv.o misc/./prerr.o misc/./prerror.o misc/./prerrortab le.o misc/./prinit.o misc/./prinrval.o misc/./pripc.o misc/./prlog2.o misc/./prlong.o misc/./prnetdb.o misc/./prolock.o misc/./prrng.o misc/./prsystem.o misc/./prthinfo.o misc/./prtpool.o misc/./prtrace.o misc/./prtime.o malloc/./prmalloc.o pthreads/./ptsynch.o pthreads/./ptio.o threads/./ptthread.o pthreads/./ptmisc.o md/unix/./unix.o md/unix/./unix_errors.o md/unix/./uxproces.o md/unix/./uxrng.o md/unix/./uxshm.o md/unix/./uxwrap.o md/unix/./solaris.o md/unix/./os_SunOS.o -lpthread -lthread -lrt -lsocket -lnsl -ldl -lc ./nsprmap.sun: file not recognized: File format not recognized collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libnspr4.so] Error 1 make[3]: *** [export] Error 2 make[2]: *** [export] Error 2 make[1]: *** [nspr] Error 2 make: *** [default] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /cw/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.7988 (%build) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Apr 8 23:34:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 54065277AF6; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 23:34:58 +0200 (CEST) From: matt@cis.ksu.edu To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] [sendmail] dev files not included (PR#176) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 23:34:58 +0200 Message-Id: <20030408213458.54065277AF6@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Matt Hoosier Version: OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (129.130.10.83) Hi, It appears that the spec file for Sendmail doesn't currently package up the development headers and libraries. These are needed for building milters (sendmail mail filters), so I've created a patch to include these are part of the standard sendmail package. Patch: --- sendmail.spec.orig 2003-04-08 15:50:53.860553000 -0500 +++ sendmail.spec 2003-04-08 16:15:58.103440000 -0500 @@ -165,6 +165,13 @@ # build Sendmail package %{l_make} %{l_mflags} + +%if "%{with_milter}" == "yes" + # have to separately invoke "Build" script in libmilter dir + ( cd libmilter + ./Build + ) +%endif ) %install @@ -223,6 +230,35 @@ mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/bin/rmail \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/sbin/rmail + ## + ## get the development headers and libraries + ## + + # make the heirarchy + %{l_shtool} mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/include + %{l_shtool} mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/lib + + HEADER_DIRS="" + LIB_FILES="libsm.a libsmutil.a libsmdb.a" + +%if "%{with_milter}" == "yes" + HEADER_DIRS="${HEADER_DIRS} include/libmilter" + LIB_FILES="${LIB_FILES} libmilter.a" +%endif + + # headers + for header_dir in ${HEADER_DIRS} ; do + %{l_shtool} move ${header_dir} {RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/include + done + + + # libraries: exact path to these libraries varies depending on your + # platform, so we just do a search for each + for lib_file in ${LIB_FILES} ; do + ${l_shtool} install $(find . -name ${lib_file}) \ + ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/lib + done + # install OSSP fsl support %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/fsl %{l_shtool} install -c -m 644 \ From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 9 12:09:19 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 53A70277D39; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:09:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] [sendmail] dev files not included (PR#176) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 12:09:19 +0200 Message-Id: <20030409100919.53A70277D39@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, Apr 08, 2003, matt@cis.ksu.edu wrote: Hi Matt, > It appears that the spec file for Sendmail doesn't currently package up the > development headers and libraries. These are needed for building milters > (sendmail mail filters), so I've created a patch to include these are part of > the standard sendmail package. > + HEADER_DIRS="" > + LIB_FILES="libsm.a libsmutil.a libsmdb.a" > + > +%if "%{with_milter}" == "yes" > + HEADER_DIRS="${HEADER_DIRS} include/libmilter" > + LIB_FILES="${LIB_FILES} libmilter.a" > +%endif Why do you require libsm.a, libsmutil.a and libsmdb.a installed when not building milters ? Greetings, -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 9 12:09:20 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 81B06277D3C; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:09:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] [sendmail] dev files not included (PR#176) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 12:09:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20030409100920.81B06277D3C@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, Apr 08, 2003, matt@cis.ksu.edu wrote: Hi Matt, > It appears that the spec file for Sendmail doesn't currently package up the > development headers and libraries. These are needed for building milters > (sendmail mail filters), so I've created a patch to include these are part of > the standard sendmail package. > + HEADER_DIRS="" > + LIB_FILES="libsm.a libsmutil.a libsmdb.a" > + > +%if "%{with_milter}" == "yes" > + HEADER_DIRS="${HEADER_DIRS} include/libmilter" > + LIB_FILES="${LIB_FILES} libmilter.a" > +%endif Why do you require libsm.a, libsmutil.a and libsmdb.a installed when not building milters ? Greetings, -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 9 16:38:30 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id E29D9277D3A; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:38:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Matt Hoosier To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] [sendmail] dev files not included (PR#176) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 16:38:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20030409143829.E29D9277D3A@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --=-xtLgl9VP8K9HSova4MyE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > + HEADER_DIRS=3D"" > + LIB_FILES=3D"libsm.a libsmutil.a libsmdb.a" > + > +%if "%{with_milter}" =3D=3D "yes" > + HEADER_DIRS=3D"${HEADER_DIRS} include/libmilter" > + LIB_FILES=3D"${LIB_FILES} libmilter.a" > +%endif > > Why do you require libsm.a, libsmutil.a and libsmdb.a installed > when not building milters ? Those libraries are built regardless of whether one selects the "with_milte= r" or not. It seemed appropriate to include them as part of the standard package, then= .=20 This is not a particularly important issue to me, though. --=20 Matt Hoosier CIS Accounts Manager Kansas State University --=-xtLgl9VP8K9HSova4MyE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+lDBWo7bVohB7b+8RAmwPAJ4unWFvPm0kHlvxTzePsKXCpr63lACfTjl/ a65UN4zAtOAhYrKsmBJlUzA= =Ee4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xtLgl9VP8K9HSova4MyE-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Apr 9 16:41:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 76F7D277D3A; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:41:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael van Elst To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] [sendmail] dev files not included (PR#176) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 16:41:45 +0200 Message-Id: <20030409144145.76F7D277D3A@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Apr 09, 2003, Matt Hoosier wrote: Hi, > Those libraries are built regardless of whether one selects the "with_milte= > r" or not. I understand, but if these libraries are useful you'd probably require some headers to go with them. So for now I just put them into the package if compiled "with_milter". Greetings, -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Apr 14 02:18:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 8E4EA277ACF; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:18:24 +0200 (CEST) From: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] mozilla 1.3's nspr doesn't build on Solaris (PR#175) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:18:24 +0200 Message-Id: <20030414001824.8E4EA277ACF@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 05:29:54AM +0200, matt@cis.ksu.edu wrote: > The NSPR bundled with Mozilla (1.3) doesn't build on the Sun platform. > > /cw/bin/cc -B/usr/ccs/bin/ -shared > -Wl,-h,libnspr4.so,-z,combreloc,-z,defs > -Wl,-f,\$ORIGIN/cpu/\$ISALIST/libnspr_flt4.so -o libnspr4.so > -Wl,-M,./nsprmap.sun ./prvrsion.o io/./prfdcach.o io/./prmwait.o > io/./prmapopt.o io/./priometh.o io/./pripv6.o io/./prlayer.o > io/./prlog.o io/./prmmap.o io/./prpolevt.o io/./prprf.o > io/./prscanf.o io/./prstdio.o threads/./prcmon.o > threads/./prrwlock.o threads/./prtpd.o linking/./prlink.o > malloc/./prmem.o md/./prosdep.o memory/./prshm.o memory /./prshma.o > memory/./prseg.o misc/./pralarm.o misc/./pratom.o misc/./prcountr.o > misc/./prdtoa.o misc/./prenv.o misc/./prerr.o misc/./prerror.o > misc/./prerrortab le.o misc/./prinit.o misc/./prinrval.o > misc/./pripc.o misc/./prlog2.o misc/./prlong.o misc/./prnetdb.o > misc/./prolock.o misc/./prrng.o misc/./prsystem.o misc/./prthinfo.o > misc/./prtpool.o misc/./prtrace.o misc/./prtime.o > malloc/./prmalloc.o pthreads/./ptsynch.o pthreads/./ptio.o > threads/./ptthread.o pthreads/./ptmisc.o md/unix/./unix.o > md/unix/./unix_errors.o md/unix/./uxproces.o md/unix/./uxrng.o > md/unix/./uxshm.o md/unix/./uxwrap.o md/unix/./solaris.o > md/unix/./os_SunOS.o -lpthread -lthread -lrt -lsocket -lnsl -ldl -lc > ./nsprmap.sun: file not recognized: File format not recognized http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196004 BTW, I binutils as/ld isn't necessary on Solaris 7+. -- albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com) From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Apr 14 17:06:40 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 770B9277AEC; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:06:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Matt Hoosier To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] mozilla 1.3's nspr doesn't build on Solaris (PR#175) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:06:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20030414150640.770B9277AEC@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --=-h495npKwp37VYDTZCa9D Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196004 Here are two patches: * one against the mozilla source to adjust some Makefiles, and * one against mozilla.spec to apply the above patch when building on Solaris These patches are styled after the recommendations from Mozilla developers on Bugzilla. They allowed me to build mozilla with the OpenPKG binutils installed. -- Matt Hoosier CIS Accounts Manager Kansas State University --=-h495npKwp37VYDTZCa9D Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mozilla-1.3-openpkg-solaris.patch Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=mozilla-1.3-openpkg-solaris.patch; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit diff -uNr orig/directory/c-sdk/build.mk patched/directory/c-sdk/build.mk --- orig/directory/c-sdk/build.mk 2003-04-14 01:20:49.014746000 -0500 +++ patched/directory/c-sdk/build.mk 2003-04-14 01:22:03.022013000 -0500 @@ -240,8 +240,8 @@ endif ifeq ($(OS_ARCH), SunOS) -DLLEXPORTS_PREFIX=-Blocal -M -USE_DLL_EXPORTS_FILE = 1 +#DLLEXPORTS_PREFIX=-Blocal -M +#USE_DLL_EXPORTS_FILE = 1 endif ifeq ($(OS_ARCH), IRIX) diff -uNr orig/nsprpub/lib/ds/Makefile.in patched/nsprpub/lib/ds/Makefile.in --- orig/nsprpub/lib/ds/Makefile.in 2003-04-13 22:34:35.087917000 -0500 +++ patched/nsprpub/lib/ds/Makefile.in 2003-04-14 00:47:25.275090000 -0500 @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ MAPFILE = $(OBJDIR)/pldsmap.sun GARBAGE += $(MAPFILE) ifdef NS_USE_GCC -MKSHLIB += -Wl,-M,$(MAPFILE) +#MKSHLIB += -Wl,-M,$(MAPFILE) else MKSHLIB += -M $(MAPFILE) endif diff -uNr orig/nsprpub/lib/libc/src/Makefile.in patched/nsprpub/lib/libc/src/Makefile.in --- orig/nsprpub/lib/libc/src/Makefile.in 2003-04-13 22:34:50.135454000 -0500 +++ patched/nsprpub/lib/libc/src/Makefile.in 2003-04-14 00:47:25.301537000 -0500 @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ MAPFILE = $(OBJDIR)/plcmap.sun GARBAGE += $(MAPFILE) ifdef NS_USE_GCC -MKSHLIB += -Wl,-M,$(MAPFILE) +#MKSHLIB += -Wl,-M,$(MAPFILE) else MKSHLIB += -M $(MAPFILE) endif diff -uNr orig/nsprpub/pr/src/Makefile.in patched/nsprpub/pr/src/Makefile.in --- orig/nsprpub/pr/src/Makefile.in 2003-04-13 22:34:22.945220000 -0500 +++ patched/nsprpub/pr/src/Makefile.in 2003-04-14 00:47:25.334153000 -0500 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ MAPFILE = $(OBJDIR)/nsprmap.sun GARBAGE += $(MAPFILE) ifdef NS_USE_GCC -MKSHLIB += -Wl,-M,$(MAPFILE) +#MKSHLIB += -Wl,-M,$(MAPFILE) else MKSHLIB += -M $(MAPFILE) endif diff -uNr orig/security/coreconf/SunOS5.mk patched/security/coreconf/SunOS5.mk --- orig/security/coreconf/SunOS5.mk 2003-04-14 01:20:10.902994000 -0500 +++ patched/security/coreconf/SunOS5.mk 2003-04-14 01:22:35.287586000 -0500 @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ MKSHLIB = $(LD) $(DSO_LDOPTS) ifdef MAPFILE - MKSHLIB += -M $(MAPFILE) +# MKSHLIB += -M $(MAPFILE) endif PROCESS_MAP_FILE = grep -v ';-' $(LIBRARY_NAME).def | \ sed -e 's,;+,,' -e 's; DATA ;;' -e 's,;;,,' -e 's,;.*,;,' > $@ diff -uNr orig/security/nss/lib/freebl/Makefile patched/security/nss/lib/freebl/Makefile --- orig/security/nss/lib/freebl/Makefile 2003-04-14 01:19:51.078132000 -0500 +++ patched/security/nss/lib/freebl/Makefile 2003-04-14 07:53:09.259739000 -0500 @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ SOLARIS_AS = /usr/ccs/bin/as ifdef NS_USE_GCC LD = gcc -DSO_LDOPTS = -B/usr/ccs/bin/ -shared -h,$(notdir $@) -Wl,-B,symbolic,-z,defs,-z,now,-z,text,-M,mapfile.Solaris +DSO_LDOPTS = -B/usr/ccs/bin/ -shared -h,$(notdir $@) -Wl,-Bsymbolic,-z,defs,-z,now,-z,text +#DSO_LDOPTS = -B/usr/ccs/bin/ -shared -h,$(notdir $@) -Wl,-B,symbolic,-z,defs,-z,now,-z,text,-M,mapfile.Solaris else MKSHLIB += -B symbolic -z defs -z now -z text -M mapfile.Solaris endif --=-h495npKwp37VYDTZCa9D Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mozilla.spec.patch Content-Type: text/plain; name=mozilla.spec.patch; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --- mozilla.spec.orig 2003-04-14 07:58:34.367099000 -0500 +++ mozilla.spec 2003-04-13 22:41:12.689996000 -0500 @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ Source2: mozilla.sh Source3: mozilla.pod Patch0: mozilla.patch +Patch1: mozilla-1.3-openpkg-solaris.patch # build information Prefix: %{l_prefix} @@ -81,6 +82,16 @@ # patch source distribution %patch -p0 + # apply Solaris patches + case "%{l_target}" in + *solaris* ) + %patch1 -p1 + ;; + * ) + : + ;; + esac + # strip down source distribution (save disk space) find . -type d -name "CVS" -print | xargs rm -rf find . -type d -name "macbuild" -print | xargs rm -rf --=-h495npKwp37VYDTZCa9D-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 17 19:22:52 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id AE392277ACB; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:22:51 +0200 (CEST) From: matt@cis.ksu.edu To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] [glib2] libiconv inconsistency during compilation (PR#177) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:22:51 +0200 Message-Id: <20030417172251.AE392277ACB@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Matt Hoosier Version: 2.2.1-20030203 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (129.130.10.83) During compilation on at least Solaris, that AutoConf gets confused about the status of libiconv (required by the prerequisite package gettext). "Configure" determines that libiconv isn't present (when it actually is), and sets Makefiles accordingly. At compile-time, though, the system headers for libiconv are found. This causes compilation to crash. I have included a patch below that fixes this by explicitly selecting a configure-time option to specify the GNU libiconv is installed on the system. This should be OK since the glib2 package is transitively Build-dependent on libiconv anyway. -- Matt Hoosier Accounts Manager Computing and Information Systems Department Kansas State University *** BEGIN PATCH *** --- glib2.spec.orig 2003-04-17 12:11:40.881422000 -0500 +++ glib2.spec 2003-04-17 12:12:15.272701000 -0500 @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ --prefix=%{l_prefix} \ --disable-debug \ --disable-shared \ + --with-libiconv=gnu \ %if "%{with_threads}" == "yes" --enable-threads %else From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Apr 24 15:25:46 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 2A1BD277A22; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:25:46 +0200 (CEST) From: lisa_ribes@firstclassemails.org To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] t's absolutely astounding! (PR#178) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:25:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20030424132546.2A1BD277A22@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ------=_NextPart_26812_17828_6D15.7B9D780215A5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Untitled Document

Want to know THE TRUTH???

Find out THE TRUTH about ANYONE . .

What do you really know about your girlfriend, boyfriend, employees, boss, spouse, neighbors or friends?

Micro Detective knows and it will show you how to find all the information you need, quickly and easily.

  • Use Unlimited Times - FREE Lifetime Updates
  • Uncover Your OWN Family History!
  • Find Birth, Death, SOCIAL SECURITY, Adoption, DMV Records & More!
  • Find UNLISTED Phone Numbers
  • Powerful Reverse Search To Find Address, Phone Number and Email Addresses FAST!
  • Investigate Your Own CREDIT REPORTS!
  • Uncover Exciting Job Opportunities World Wide!

Protect your family, your business and yourself. Expose the sordid past of criminals before they rob you too or harm your loved ones. Be your own detective for lawsuits, adoption, business disputes, child support, simple curiosity or reunions. Begin snooping, spying, researching and discovering the lowdown just minutes from now!

  • Find information easily
    Look up virtually anything about a person and/or a business at no per search charge!
  • Conduct researches
    Perform your online researches without the need of hiring expensive investigation firms.
  • Find lost friends & family
    Get unlisted phone numbers and addresses from old friends or family members and contact them.

Click Here To Order ONLY 19.95

Do you want to know more? Visit us at www.micro-detective.com

 

To be optout from our future mailing please email optout@firstclassemails.org

You can also opt out by mail; Please send your request to:

11314 Ventura Blvd Suite #141
Studio City, CA 91604

Or by Phone (213) 216 8305

------=_NextPart_26812_17828_6D15.7B9D780215A5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat May 31 23:31:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 23B83277B3A; Sat, 31 May 2003 23:31:18 +0200 (CEST) From: hds@hds-xs.de To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] [infozip] build with gcc3 incomplete (PR#179) Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 23:31:18 +0200 Message-Id: <20030531213118.23B83277B3A@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Full_Name: Hans-Dieter Schuster Version: infozip-20030306 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (217.115.74.12) With Linux gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 (from OpenPKG 1.2) the build of the infozip package is not complete: the package can be built, but some programs are missing. The problem is the handling of a huge CPP construct in the file zip-2.3/unix/unix.c; the gcc3 preprocessor flags this construct as invalid, while gcc2 accepts it. The problem does not occur on Solaris, because the native C preprocessor is used there. The problem is known elsewhere too, see http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-support/2001/06/0905.html (a patch is also found there). From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jun 1 10:19:56 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 41B3E277B4F; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 10:19:56 +0200 (CEST) From: rse@engelschall.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [BugDB] [infozip] build with gcc3 incomplete (PR#179) Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 10:19:56 +0200 Message-Id: <20030601081956.41B3E277B4F@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, May 31, 2003, hds@hds-xs.de wrote: > Full_Name: Hans-Dieter Schuster > Version: infozip-20030306 > OS: Linux > Submission from: (NULL) (217.115.74.12) > > With Linux gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 (from OpenPKG 1.2) the build of the infozip package > is not complete: the package can be built, but some programs are missing. > The problem is the handling of a huge CPP construct in the file > zip-2.3/unix/unix.c; the gcc3 preprocessor flags this construct as invalid, > while gcc2 accepts it. > The problem does not occur on Solaris, because the native C preprocessor is used > there. > The problem is known elsewhere too, see > http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-support/2001/06/0905.html > (a patch is also found there). Hmmm.... intresting. At least in OpenPKG-CURRENT (where we are at GCC 3.2.3), the infozip package builds fine on FreeBSD, Linux and Solaris and results in exactly the same files on all platforms: ++ peeking at file list of binary RPM: infozip-20030306-20030306.ix86-freebsd4.8-cw.rpm -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 18052 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/funzip -rwxr-xr-x 2 cw cw 96508 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/unzip -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 46928 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/unzipsfx -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 64628 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/zip -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 22636 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/zipcloak -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 1180 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/zipgrep -rwxr-xr-x 2 cw cw 96508 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/zipinfo -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 26740 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/zipnote -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 27636 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/bin/zipsplit -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 4941 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/man/man1/funzip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 40158 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/man/man1/unzip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 14660 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/man/man1/unzipsfx.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 33167 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/man/man1/zip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 3814 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/man/man1/zipgrep.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 22059 Jun 1 09:12 /cw/man/man1/zipinfo.1 ++ peeking at file list of binary RPM: infozip-20030306-20030306.ix86-linux2.4-cw.rpm -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 16816 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/funzip -rwxr-xr-x 2 cw cw 100904 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/unzip -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 47228 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/unzipsfx -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 62448 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/zip -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 18824 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/zipcloak -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 1180 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/zipgrep -rwxr-xr-x 2 cw cw 100904 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/zipinfo -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 22960 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/zipnote -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 24304 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/bin/zipsplit -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 4941 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/man/man1/funzip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 40158 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/man/man1/unzip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 14660 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/man/man1/unzipsfx.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 33167 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/man/man1/zip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 3814 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/man/man1/zipgrep.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 22059 Jun 1 09:13 /cw/man/man1/zipinfo.1 ++ peeking at file list of binary RPM: infozip-20030306-20030306.sparc64-solaris2.9-cw.rpm -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 22484 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/funzip -rwxr-xr-x 2 cw cw 117588 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/unzip -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 59768 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/unzipsfx -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 72376 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/zip -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 23792 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/zipcloak -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 1180 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/zipgrep -rwxr-xr-x 2 cw cw 117588 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/zipinfo -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 28020 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/zipnote -rwxr-xr-x 1 cw cw 30156 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/bin/zipsplit -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 4941 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/man/man1/funzip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 40158 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/man/man1/unzip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 14660 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/man/man1/unzipsfx.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 33167 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/man/man1/zip.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 3814 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/man/man1/zipgrep.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 cw cw 22059 Jun 1 09:14 /cw/man/man1/zipinfo.1 Perhaps the problem was fixed between GCC 3.2.1 and GCC 3.2.3? Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 01:40:28 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 6404A277C28; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 01:40:28 +0200 (CEST) From: drsrobinson@lycos.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] CREEK (PR#180) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 01:40:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20030602234028.6404A277C28@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: The Desk Dr Smith Robinson Head Credit Control Pacific International Bank Plc. Fax: 234-1-7591494 Dear friend, First, I must solicit your confidence in this transaction. This is by virtue of its nature being utterly confidential and top secret. We have decided to contact you due to the urgency of this transaction, as we have been reliably informed of your discretness, trustworthy and ability to carry out legitimate business. THE PROPOSITION: A foreigner and American, Late Engr. Johnson Creek, an Oil merchant with the Federal Government of Nigeria, until his death on 30th January, 2000 in Kenya Air Bus (A310-300) Flight KQ430, banked with us at Pacific International Bank Plc Lagos and had a closing balance of US$10,000,000.00 (Ten Milion United States Dollars Only) as at the end of September, 2000. Valuable efforts are being made by the Pacific International Bank Plc to get in touch with any of the Creek's family or relative, but to no avail. The only Next of Kin address that was given to Pacific International Bank Plc by Late Engr. Johnson Creek was at Sierra Loene, West Africa, in the person of Mrs. Mabel Brain. However, the said address was destroyed during the last rebel crisis in Sierra Leone and the woman was reportedly killed together with other United Nations Officials. It is because of the perceived impossibility of locating a relative of the Late Engr. Creek (he had neither a wife nor children) that the Pacific International Bank Plc is making plans to ceed the said amount to the Defence Ministry for the procurement of weapons of war. In order to avert this ugly situation, few of my colleagues and I have decided to contact you and seek your permission to have you stand as Next of Kin to Late Engr. Johnson Creek so that the total amount of US$10 Million Dollars will be processed and released in your favour into your personal account. All documents and proofs to enable you get this fund will be carefully worked out. We have secured from the probate, an order of Madamus, to locate any of the deceased beneficiary. Be rest assured that this transaction is risk-free. Also, your share for offering to assist us and provide the receiving account will be 20% of the total sum, while 80% will be for my colleagues and I, which also would be in your account for safe custody, pending my coming over to meet with you, and probable future investment purpose in your country. As soon as we receive an acknowledgement of your willingness to accept our proposal, we shall furnish you with further details as we concluded all arrangements to have the money transferred to you within 7 working days from the date of commencement. If this proposal is acceptable to you, then furnish us with your most confidential telephone and fax numbers including the details of the receiving account immediately, at which time an application for the fund release will be forwarded in your favour. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Regards, Dr Smith Robinson NB: Please send your reply also by fax number +23417591494 for confidentiality. Email;DrSmithRobinson@netscape.net ____________________________________________________________ Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:03:32 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id EAAA8277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:03:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #79] deploy RT as the new bug tracking system From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054649011-11436-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #79": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:03:31 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054649011-11436-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 79 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/79 Ticket: [OpenPKG #79] Subject: deploy RT as the new bug tracking system Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:03:29 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > Deploy RT as the new bug tracking system on rt.openpkg.org. > At least once we got familiar with RT on rt.dev.de.cw.net and > it proofed to be a reasonable solution... Done. https://rt.openpkg.org/, openpkg-rt@openpkg.org -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054649011-11436-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:25:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DF777277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #3] bootstrap (openpkg) requires 150MB of disk space [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650312-11439-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #3": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650312-11439-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 3 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/3 Ticket: [OpenPKG #3] Subject: bootstrap (openpkg) requires 150MB of disk space Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:25:12 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Cannot be easily solved without having to completely change the build procedure of the bootstrapping package. Keep this for later consideration only. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054650312-11439-2-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:29:09 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D22A3277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #4] Qpopper and PID file creation From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650548-11440-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #4": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650548-11440-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 4 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/4 Ticket: [OpenPKG #4] Subject: Qpopper and PID file creation Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:29:07 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ This was already solved some time ago: http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile?f=openpkg-src/qpopper/qpopper.patch -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054650548-11440-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:29:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BED56277C84; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:29:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #4] Qpopper and PID file creation From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650550-11440-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #4": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:29:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650550-11440-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 4 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/4 Ticket: [OpenPKG #4] Subject: Qpopper and PID file creation Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:29:09 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054650550-11440-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:31:48 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 25C65277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:31:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #5] SSL does not work with apache-1.3.20-22 [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650708-11437-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #5": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:31:48 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650708-11437-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 5 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/5 Ticket: [OpenPKG #5] Subject: SSL does not work with apache-1.3.20-22 Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:31:46 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ AFAIK this was solved by mod_ssl bugfixes which were then part of the OpenPKG "apache" package implicitly. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054650708-11437-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:31:50 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 20203277C84; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:31:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #5] SSL does not work with apache-1.3.20-22 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650709-11437-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #5": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:31:50 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650709-11437-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 5 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/5 Ticket: [OpenPKG #5] Subject: SSL does not work with apache-1.3.20-22 Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:31:49 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054650709-11437-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:33:31 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 88576277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:33:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #6] proftpd: log file handling not yet implemented [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650811-11436-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #6": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:33:31 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650811-11436-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 6 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/6 Ticket: [OpenPKG #6] Subject: proftpd: log file handling not yet implemented Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:33:30 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This was already solved some time ago: http://cvs.openpkg.org/openpkg-src/proftpd/rc.proftpd -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054650811-11436-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:33:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 434B4277C84; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #6] proftpd: log file handling not yet implemented From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650813-11436-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #6": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650813-11436-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 6 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/6 Ticket: [OpenPKG #6] Subject: proftpd: log file handling not yet implemented Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:33:32 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054650813-11436-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:34:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5B97C277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:34:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #7] mysql: log file handling not yet implemented [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650876-11437-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #7": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:34:36 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650876-11437-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 7 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/7 Ticket: [OpenPKG #7] Subject: mysql: log file handling not yet implemented Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:34:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Already solved some time ago: http://cvs.openpkg.org/openpkg-src/mysql/rc.mysql -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054650876-11437-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:34:38 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F332B277C84; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:34:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #7] mysql: log file handling not yet implemented From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054650877-11437-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #7": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:34:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054650877-11437-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 7 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/7 Ticket: [OpenPKG #7] Subject: mysql: log file handling not yet implemented Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:34:37 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054650877-11437-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:37:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 94A78277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:37:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #9] sudo: log file handling not implemented [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651036-11438-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #9": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:37:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651036-11438-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 9 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/9 Ticket: [OpenPKG #9] Subject: sudo: log file handling not implemented Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:37:15 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > - log file handling not implemented (daily log file rotation) > - what about relocating the log file from > %{l_prefix}/var/sudo/log/sudo.log to > %{l_prefix}/var/sudo/sudo.log since the extension says it all :-) On > the other > hand we are more compliant to other packages like sendmail Sudo certainly is not a big problem when it comes to logfile size. It currently not even has a rc.sudo at all. But it can be added if time permits. ------------=_1054651036-11438-2-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:38:38 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 853A0277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:38:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #11] inn: various log files to be written [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651118-11440-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #11": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:38:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651118-11440-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 11 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/11 Ticket: [OpenPKG #11] Subject: inn: various log files to be written Requestors: chris@schug.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:38:37 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This was already solved some time ago by the introduction of OSSP fsl. The OpenPKG "inn" package now correctly logs as expected. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054651118-11440-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:38:41 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 72C18277CDE; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:38:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #11] inn: various log files to be written From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651120-11440-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #11": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:38:40 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651120-11440-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 11 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/11 Ticket: [OpenPKG #11] Subject: inn: various log files to be written Requestors: chris@schug.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:38:39 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054651120-11440-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:40:31 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 3AF9A277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:40:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #12] postfix reloading after logrotating [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651231-11439-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #12": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:40:31 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651231-11439-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 12 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/12 Ticket: [OpenPKG #12] Subject: postfix reloading after logrotating Requestors: Manuel.Hendel@hendel.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:40:30 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > Postfix (or any mailserver) should not be reloaded after > logfilerotation. This > could lead to a heavy load, because after reload, postfix is trying to > manage > the whole queue. This is correct. But because of open filehandles, there is unfortunately no solution to this AFAIK. If you have a suggestion just drop us a note and we'll investigate on this. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054651231-11439-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:40:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 386B6277C89; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #12] postfix reloading after logrotating From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651232-11439-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #12": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651232-11439-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 12 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/12 Ticket: [OpenPKG #12] Subject: postfix reloading after logrotating Requestors: Manuel.Hendel@hendel.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:40:32 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054651232-11439-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:41:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 75A95277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:41:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #15] apache: ivm zmod log file handling not implemented [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651294-11446-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #15": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:41:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651294-11446-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 15 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/15 Ticket: [OpenPKG #15] Subject: apache: ivm zmod log file handling not implemented Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:41:33 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ mod_zmod was removed from the OpenPKG "apache" package some time ago, so this is no longer an issue. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054651294-11446-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:41:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 00F8C277C84; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #15] apache: ivm zmod log file handling not implemented From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651295-11446-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #15": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651295-11446-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 15 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/15 Ticket: [OpenPKG #15] Subject: apache: ivm zmod log file handling not implemented Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:41:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054651295-11446-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:42:33 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 06144277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:42:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #13] logging [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651352-11439-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #13": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:42:32 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651352-11439-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 13 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/13 Ticket: [OpenPKG #13] Subject: logging Requestors: Manuel.Hendel@hendel.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:42:32 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This was a long-standing bug in the old fakesyslog library. But with the introduction of OSSP fsl, this issue went away, too. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054651352-11439-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:42:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BE25F277CE3; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:42:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #13] logging From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651354-11439-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #13": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:42:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651354-11439-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 13 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/13 Ticket: [OpenPKG #13] Subject: logging Requestors: Manuel.Hendel@hendel.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:42:33 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054651354-11439-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:45:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id EEE1F277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:45:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #14] apache: invalid rc script arguments are ignored [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651509-11436-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #14": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:45:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651509-11436-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 14 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/14 Ticket: [OpenPKG #14] Subject: apache: invalid rc script arguments are ignored Requestors: markus.sander@de.cw.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:45:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This should be fixed with the new OSSP rc, but unfortunately the situation is complex: on "rc foo bad", "rc" could complain if rc.foo does not contain a "%bad". But what should it do on "rc all bad"? I think, in this situation is should not complain for all rc.* which do not contain "%bad", of course. Except: IF ALL rc.* DO NOT CONTAIN %bad! -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054651509-11436-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:48:52 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0700F277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:48:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #16] bind 8.2.5 dislikes install db 3.3.11 package on building [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651731-11438-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #16": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:48:51 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651731-11438-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 16 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/16 Ticket: [OpenPKG #16] Subject: bind 8.2.5 dislikes install db 3.3.11 package on building Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:48:51 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ We've not heard about this for a longer time. Additionally, we're already at BIND 8.4.0 and DB 4.1.25. So close this until someone reports the problem still exists. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054651731-11438-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:48:54 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B7EEC277C89; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:48:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #16] bind 8.2.5 dislikes install db 3.3.11 package on building From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651733-11438-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #16": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:48:53 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651733-11438-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 16 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/16 Ticket: [OpenPKG #16] Subject: bind 8.2.5 dislikes install db 3.3.11 package on building Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:48:52 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054651733-11438-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:50:21 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D3D39277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:50:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #17] binary pakets install into wrong directory [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651820-11446-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #17": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:50:20 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651820-11446-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 17 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/17 Ticket: [OpenPKG #17] Subject: binary pakets install into wrong directory Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:50:19 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This certainly was a user error: our binary RPM contents is auto-generated and install correctly by design ;-) The only reason why it was installed to somewhere else than expected has to be that the package was build with a different/wrong OpenPKG instance before. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054651820-11446-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:50:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 853A2277C89; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:50:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #17] binary pakets install into wrong directory From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054651822-11446-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #17": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:50:22 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054651822-11446-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 17 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/17 Ticket: [OpenPKG #17] Subject: binary pakets install into wrong directory Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:50:21 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054651822-11446-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:54:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id A71F4277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #18] pdflib.jar is not beeing installed From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054652049-11437-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #18": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054652049-11437-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 18 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/18 Ticket: [OpenPKG #18] Subject: pdflib.jar is not beeing installed Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:54:08 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > Version: pdflib-4.0.1-20020108 > OS: Solaris 8/Sparc > After building and installing the package pdflib.jar remains in > /cw/RPM/TMP/pdflib-4.0.1/bind/java/ Yes, /cw/RPM/TMP/ is a temporary location only. And the package does not contain any Java parts, hence it doesn't install them. To remove the temporary files a "rpm --clean" has to be performed. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054652049-11437-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:54:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BAB9E277C84; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:54:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #18] pdflib.jar is not beeing installed From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054652051-11437-14" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #18": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:54:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054652051-11437-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 18 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/18 Ticket: [OpenPKG #18] Subject: pdflib.jar is not beeing installed Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:54:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054652051-11437-14-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:55:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 118CE277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #19] Proftpd From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054652144-11438-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #19": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054652144-11438-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 19 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/19 Ticket: [OpenPKG #19] Subject: Proftpd Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:55:43 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > Version: proftpd-1.2.4-20011222 > OS: Solaris 8 > Proftpd shows always "You are number 1 of maximal xx users." no > matter how many users are logged in. At least with the current OpenPKG-CURRENT "proftpd" under FreeBSD I cannot reproduce this any longer. Certainly this was already fixed by the upstream vendor some time ago. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054652144-11438-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:55:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E853F277C84; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:55:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #19] Proftpd From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054652146-11438-14" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #19": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:55:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054652146-11438-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 19 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/19 Ticket: [OpenPKG #19] Subject: Proftpd Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:55:46 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054652146-11438-14-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:57:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C4F0E277A18; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:57:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #20] Problems with IMAPD-Package [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054652256-11437-16" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #20": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:57:36 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054652256-11437-16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 20 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/20 Ticket: [OpenPKG #20] Subject: Problems with IMAPD-Package Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:57:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > When I try to make the binary-package for IMAP, my compiler doesn't > find > the file com_err.h - I had the same problems, when I copy the file in > the > directory. This was fixed some time ago. I no longer know how, but this problem was reported to be gone. Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054652256-11437-16-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 16:57:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6B342277C84; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:57:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #20] Problems with IMAPD-Package From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054652258-11437-19" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #20": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:57:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054652258-11437-19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 20 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/20 Ticket: [OpenPKG #20] Subject: Problems with IMAPD-Package Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 16:57:37 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054652258-11437-19-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 20:57:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5CB9D277A13; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:57:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #23] mozilla-0.9.9 build failure on Solaris 8 [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054666634-83293-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #23": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:57:14 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054666634-83293-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 23 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/23 Ticket: [OpenPKG #23] Subject: mozilla-0.9.9 build failure on Solaris 8 Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 20:57:12 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ We're already at Mozilla 1.3.1 and so I think those old build problems are gone since a longer time. If there is still a problem, we can reinvestigate. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054666634-83293-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 20:57:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 57282277B2C; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:57:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #23] mozilla-0.9.9 build failure on Solaris 8 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054666636-83293-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #23": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:57:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054666636-83293-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 23 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/23 Ticket: [OpenPKG #23] Subject: mozilla-0.9.9 build failure on Solaris 8 Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 20:57:15 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054666636-83293-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 20:59:57 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C73AE277A13; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #24] OpenPKG bind package on Solaris 8 SPARC From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054666796-82822-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #24": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054666796-82822-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 24 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/24 Ticket: [OpenPKG #24] Subject: OpenPKG bind package on Solaris 8 SPARC Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 20:59:54 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > Bind needs user intervention when installing. There might not be a > good > workaround for this, unless ANDIrand has an easy script fix to create > entropy > and ANDIrand is listed as a build and runtime requirement. Yes, this is a general issue with the PRNG in OpenSSL. We cannot do anything here from the OpenPKG perspective. It has to be solved on the OS layer. So, remember this issue but do not try to solve it from within OpenPKG. Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054666796-82822-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 3 20:59:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 09376277B2C; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #24] OpenPKG bind package on Solaris 8 SPARC From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054666798-82822-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #24": ; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054666798-82822-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 24 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/24 Ticket: [OpenPKG #24] Subject: OpenPKG bind package on Solaris 8 SPARC Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jun 03 20:59:58 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054666798-82822-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 09:57:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id CC3F4277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:57:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #25] (S)RPMs signed with wrong key ? [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054713458-82823-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #25": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:57:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054713458-82823-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 25 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/25 Ticket: [OpenPKG #25] Subject: (S)RPMs signed with wrong key ? Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 09:57:36 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The OpenPGP key was officially changed between OpenPKG 1.0 and 1.1. So, it is clear that the old 1.0 RPMs cannot be verified correctly with the new key. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054713458-82823-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 09:57:41 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 002B3277C84; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #25] (S)RPMs signed with wrong key ? From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054713460-82823-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #25": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054713460-82823-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 25 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/25 Ticket: [OpenPKG #25] Subject: (S)RPMs signed with wrong key ? Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 09:57:39 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054713460-82823-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 10:02:21 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7E262277CF4; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:02:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #149] SuSE SLES: ncurses not building because of uudecode From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054713738-83293-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #149": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:02:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054713738-83293-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 149 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/149 Ticket: [OpenPKG #149] Subject: SuSE SLES: ncurses not building because of uudecode Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 10:02:16 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ From Christian Reiber : | pkgdev@lms:~/tmp $ rpm -bp ../src/ncurses/ncurses.spec | Executing(%prep): env -i /zsw/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e | /home/pkgdev/tmp/rpm-tmp.49367 | + cd /home/pkgdev/tmp | + cd /home/pkgdev/tmp | + rm -rf ncurses-5.3 | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc /home/pkgdev/src/ncurses/ncurses-5.3.tar.gz | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/tar -xf - | + STATUS=0 | + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' | + cd ncurses-5.3 | ++ id -u | + '[' 60002 = 0 ']' | ++ id -u | + '[' 60002 = 0 ']' | + chmod -Rf a+rX,g-w,o-w . | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/gzip -d -c | /home/pkgdev/src/ncurses/patch-5.3-20021231.sh.gz | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/shtool subst -e 's;gzip -dc;/zsw/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc;' -e | 's;patch -p1;/zsw/lib/openpkg/patch -p1;' patchbase.sh | + sh patchbase.sh | patching... | patchbase.sh: uudecode: command not found | gzip: ncurses-5.3-20021231.patch.gz: No such file or directory | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/gzip -d -c /home/pkgdev/src/ncurses/ncurses-5.3- | 20030105.patch.gz | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/patch -p1 | This file doesn't appear to be the 1.726 version -- patch anyway? [n] | | Although: | | pkgdev@lms:~/tmp $ type uudecode | uudecode is hashed (/home/pkgdev/bin/uudecode) Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1054713738-83293-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 10:07:19 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9780F277C7F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #149] SuSE SLES: ncurses not building because of uudecode From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054714038-82826-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #149": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054714038-82826-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 149 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/149 Ticket: [OpenPKG #149] Subject: SuSE SLES: ncurses not building because of uudecode Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 10:07:16 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ In article you wrote: > From Christian Reiber : > > | pkgdev@lms:~/tmp $ rpm -bp ../src/ncurses/ncurses.spec > | Executing(%prep): env -i /zsw/lib/openpkg/bash --norc --noprofile --posix -e > | /home/pkgdev/tmp/rpm-tmp.49367 > | + cd /home/pkgdev/tmp > | + cd /home/pkgdev/tmp > | + rm -rf ncurses-5.3 > | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc /home/pkgdev/src/ncurses/ncurses-5.3.tar.gz > | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/tar -xf - > | + STATUS=0 > | + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' > | + cd ncurses-5.3 > | ++ id -u > | + '[' 60002 = 0 ']' > | ++ id -u > | + '[' 60002 = 0 ']' > | + chmod -Rf a+rX,g-w,o-w . > | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/gzip -d -c > | /home/pkgdev/src/ncurses/patch-5.3-20021231.sh.gz > | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/shtool subst -e 's;gzip -dc;/zsw/lib/openpkg/gzip -dc;' -e > | 's;patch -p1;/zsw/lib/openpkg/patch -p1;' patchbase.sh > | + sh patchbase.sh > | patching... > | patchbase.sh: uudecode: command not found > | gzip: ncurses-5.3-20021231.patch.gz: No such file or directory > | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/gzip -d -c /home/pkgdev/src/ncurses/ncurses-5.3- > | 20030105.patch.gz > | + /zsw/lib/openpkg/patch -p1 > | This file doesn't appear to be the 1.726 version -- patch anyway? [n] > | > | Although: > | > | pkgdev@lms:~/tmp $ type uudecode > | uudecode is hashed (/home/pkgdev/bin/uudecode) The problem is that /home/pkgdev/bin/uudecode is not a system path which is known for SuSE and hence OpenPKG's "sane build environment" do not use it. uudecode really has to be in a default system path like /bin, /usr/bin, etc. So you have to install the SuSE "sharutils" package, I think. dv14:~ # uname -a Linux dv14 2.4.20-4GB #1 Mon Mar 17 17:54:44 UTC 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux dv14:~ # cat /etc/SuSE-release SuSE Linux 8.2 (i586) VERSION = 8.2 dv14:~ # which uudecode /usr/bin/uudecode dv14:~ # rpm -qf /usr/bin/uudecode sharutils-4.2c-492 dv14:~ # Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1054714038-82826-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 11:47:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B9399277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:47:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #26] new PAM support in some packages still missing [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054720022-82825-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #26": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:47:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054720022-82825-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 26 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/26 Ticket: [OpenPKG #26] Subject: new PAM support in some packages still missing Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 11:47:00 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ PAM support was already made fully optional and should be complete, although it is less tested because of the default = disabled. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054720022-82825-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 11:47:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DC0AF277C84; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:47:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #26] new PAM support in some packages still missing From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054720025-82825-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #26": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:47:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054720025-82825-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 26 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/26 Ticket: [OpenPKG #26] Subject: new PAM support in some packages still missing Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 11:47:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054720025-82825-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 11:48:57 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C5046277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:48:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #27] Build error in gtk-1.2.10-20020206.src.rpm From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054720136-82826-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #27": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:48:56 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054720136-82826-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 27 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/27 Ticket: [OpenPKG #27] Subject: Build error in gtk-1.2.10-20020206.src.rpm Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 11:48:55 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Close this ticket, because the issue is already very old, currently no problems known and we would need more details anyway to fix this in case the problem still exists. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054720136-82826-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 11:48:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E6C78277C84; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:48:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #27] Build error in gtk-1.2.10-20020206.src.rpm From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054720138-82826-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #27": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:48:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054720138-82826-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 27 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/27 Ticket: [OpenPKG #27] Subject: Build error in gtk-1.2.10-20020206.src.rpm Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 11:48:58 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054720138-82826-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:02:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E8D68277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:02:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #29] Automatic Build of new version on all OS required From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054720957-82826-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #29": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:02:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054720957-82826-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 29 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/29 Ticket: [OpenPKG #29] Subject: Automatic Build of new version on all OS required Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:02:34 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > We require an automatic (daily) build of new program version on the > different > operational system. The success of the build should be returned as > information > for the developers. We now have this since a longer time for the release engineering process. Unfortunately this is only run by the release engineers manually before a release. The reason mainly is that not all parts of this cannot be run in batch and unattended. We're working on this soon. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054720957-82826-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:03:33 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id AA801277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:03:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #30] sudo upgrade overwrote sudoers file From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054721012-82823-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #30": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:03:32 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054721012-82823-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 30 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/30 Ticket: [OpenPKG #30] Subject: sudo upgrade overwrote sudoers file Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:03:31 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054721012-82823-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:05:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 17B14277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:05:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #31] openssl: Problematic argument to gcc in config script [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054721102-82826-14" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #31": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:05:03 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054721102-82826-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 31 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/31 Ticket: [OpenPKG #31] Subject: openssl: Problematic argument to gcc in config script Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:05:01 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ AFAIK this was solved at the OpenSSL vendor side. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054721102-82826-14-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:05:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 05D19277C7F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #31] openssl: Problematic argument to gcc in config script From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054721104-82826-17" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #31": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054721104-82826-17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 31 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/31 Ticket: [OpenPKG #31] Subject: openssl: Problematic argument to gcc in config script Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:05:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054721104-82826-17-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:06:44 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B6936277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:06:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #32] Fwd: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/bind8 bind8.spec From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054721203-83293-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #32": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:06:43 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054721203-83293-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 32 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/32 Ticket: [OpenPKG #32] Subject: Fwd: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/bind8 bind8.spec Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:06:42 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > [thl - Fri May 30 16:48:16 2003]: > > >>> Christoph Schug 03.07.02 20:12:44 >>> > [...] > Index: openpkg-src/bind8/bind8.spec > [...] > +## FIXME: surely we need the patch for Linux only but those do not work > +## as documented in RPM-HOWTO. Any hints how to work around the > +## situation without requireing external patch program? > +%ifarch linux2.2 > %patch0 -p0 > +%endif This construct is no longer part of bind8.spec, so this can be closed. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054721203-83293-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:06:46 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C7491277C7F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:06:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #32] Fwd: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/bind8 bind8.spec From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054721205-83293-11" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #32": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:06:45 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054721205-83293-11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 32 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/32 Ticket: [OpenPKG #32] Subject: Fwd: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/bind8 bind8.spec Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:06:45 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054721205-83293-11-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:08:30 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E0654277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #33] [FWD] RE: OpenPKG-CURRENT "apache" und suEXEC Feature [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054721309-82826-19" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #33": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054721309-82826-19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 33 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/33 Ticket: [OpenPKG #33] Subject: [FWD] RE: OpenPKG-CURRENT "apache" und suEXEC Feature Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:08:28 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > die current version von apache kann auch keine user via php an mysql > verifizieren. scheinbar hat sich da was geandert. man sieht zwar via php die > header einer datenbank, aber nicht deren inhalt. Does anybody know more details or can try this out? I've no clue what exactly has to be done for repeating this. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054721309-82826-19-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:21:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E9010277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:21:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #34] Re: problem bootstrapping openpkg on Solaris From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722072-82822-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #34": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:21:12 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722072-82822-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 34 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/34 Ticket: [OpenPKG #34] Subject: Re: problem bootstrapping openpkg on Solaris Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:21:10 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > > First, this is a tremendously useful project. I've been looking for > a > > straightforward way to install opensource software in a NFS- > shareable > > location that would properly enforce library dependencies. The > openpkg > > tools work very well for this. > > > > I bootstrapped openpkg but had considerable problems building source > > packages until I discovered that on my system, BUFSIZ is defined to > be 1024 > > in /usr/include/iso/stdio_iso.h, included from /usr/include/stdio.h. > This > > is much smaller than the 8192 that (seems to be) the value that RPM > expects > > (noted in the comments /Volumes/app/appman/RPM/SRC/rpm-4.0.2). > > > > The effect was that the long installation path name (not my choice), > > /net/gsun492/Volumes/app/appman/, was causing the __build_pre macro > to > > overflow its buffer and get truncated, resulting in general havoc. > (It > > seems likely that short paths (/cm/) would not cause the problem to > occur.) > > I've looked into the RPM sources and it seems that RPM uses the POSIX > BUFSIZ (usually historically intended for maximum pathname length and > in > POSIX for the setvbuf stuff) for really any type of buffers, including > macro expansion buffers. This certainly is a bad coding style and > predestined to fail - as you discovered here. > > Just replacing all BUFSIZ occurences with an own (and numerically > larger) definition is not recommended, because it would not just > change > the buffer sizes in the macro parts (where it is needed), but also in > the I/O parts (where it is correct). A possible side-effect could be > that an I/O buffer could be larger than usually expected and lead to > I/O > latency problems, whatever. > > So, IMHO the correct fix is to change only the RPM macro code to use > a larger buffer. Can you try the following patch (against the latest > OpenPKG-CURRENT "openpkg" package) and give feedback whether it also > fixes your problems: We've not received any feedback from the user. So, we would have to check our patch again ourself. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054722072-82822-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:22:02 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 1717A277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #35] Re: problem compiling gcc3.1 on Solaris From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722121-82824-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #35": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722121-82824-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 35 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/35 Ticket: [OpenPKG #35] Subject: Re: problem compiling gcc3.1 on Solaris Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:22:00 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054722121-82824-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:23:01 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 099CA277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:23:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #36] mysql build fails on freebsd From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722180-82825-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #36": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:23:01 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722180-82825-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 36 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/36 Ticket: [OpenPKG #36] Subject: mysql build fails on freebsd Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:22:59 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT > OpenPKG_Package: mysql-3.23.51-20020628 > Operating_System: FreeBSD 4.5 > Submission from: (NULL) (217.17.34.18) > [...] The "mysql" package was completely worked off some months ago and now correctly builds under FreeBSD. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054722180-82825-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:23:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D8A92277C7F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:23:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #36] mysql build fails on freebsd From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722182-82825-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #36": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:23:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722182-82825-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 36 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/36 Ticket: [OpenPKG #36] Subject: mysql build fails on freebsd Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:23:02 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054722182-82825-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:26:22 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F0A07277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #39] openpkg-20020718-20020718 fails to find tar while bootstrapping From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722381-82824-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #39": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722381-82824-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 39 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/39 Ticket: [OpenPKG #39] Subject: openpkg-20020718-20020718 fails to find tar while bootstrapping Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:26:20 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT 20020718 > OpenPKG_Package: openpkg-20020718-20020718 > Operating_System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE > Submission from: (NULL) (62.208.225.82) > Submitted by: admin > [...] > dv1 $ pwd > dv1 $ /u/ms/work/openpkg/pkg/src > dv1 $ /re/bin/rpm --rebuild openpkg-20020718-20020718.src.rpm > Installing openpkg-20020718-20020718.src.rpm > [...] > ++ echo /tmp/openpkg/SRC/openpkg/openpkg.pgp > + cp /tmp/openpkg/SRC/openpkg/openpkg.pgp/ > tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718-root/re/etc/openpkg/openpkg.pgp > + exit 0 > Processing files: openpkg-20020718-20020718 > error: File not found: > /tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718-root/re/lib/openpkg/tar > Provides: OpenPKG > RPM build errors: > File not found: /tmp/openpkg/TMP/openpkg-20020718- > root/re/lib/openpkg/tar > *** Error code 1 Does this issue still exists in OpenPKG-CURRENT or can we close this ticket. If it doesn't exists, close this, please. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054722381-82824-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:28:43 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8B5CE277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:28:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #42] bootstrap problem on HP-UX 11.00 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722522-82825-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #42": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:28:42 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722522-82825-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 42 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/42 Ticket: [OpenPKG #42] Subject: bootstrap problem on HP-UX 11.00 Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:28:41 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > OpenPKG_Release: CURRENT > OpenPKG_Package: openpkg-20020909-20020909.src.sh > Operating_System: HP-UX 11.00 > Submission from: (NULL) (141.6.7.28) > [...] We've currently no longer any HP-UX boxes available for testing. But we could try to blindly fix this. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054722522-82825-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:29:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B13C3277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:29:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #43] Re: fsl related bug reports From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722575-82822-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #43": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:29:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722575-82822-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 43 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/43 Ticket: [OpenPKG #43] Subject: Re: fsl related bug reports Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:29:34 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054722575-82822-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:30:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 98759277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:30:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #44] bind-8.2.6-1.0.2.src.rpm From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722611-82824-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #44": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:30:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722611-82824-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 44 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/44 Ticket: [OpenPKG #44] Subject: bind-8.2.6-1.0.2.src.rpm Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:30:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054722611-82824-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 12:31:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E126F277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #46] Relocating openpkg from /cw to /opt/cw From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054722704-42209-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #46": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054722704-42209-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 46 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/46 Ticket: [OpenPKG #46] Subject: Relocating openpkg from /cw to /opt/cw Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 12:31:42 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054722704-42209-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:38:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BA770277AFF; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:38:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #48] cfengine: does not build by default From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054726738-82824-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #48": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:38:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054726738-82824-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 48 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/48 Ticket: [OpenPKG #48] Subject: cfengine: does not build by default Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:38:57 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054726738-82824-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:42:00 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BC24A277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:41:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #49] Perl: possible build problem - copying into /usr/local/scripts From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054726919-42209-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #49": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:41:59 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054726919-42209-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 49 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/49 Ticket: [OpenPKG #49] Subject: Perl: possible build problem - copying into /usr/local/scripts Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:41:58 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054726919-42209-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:43:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B2816277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #50] apache2: installs libexpat, conflicts with expat-1.95 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054726982-82823-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #50": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054726982-82823-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 50 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/50 Ticket: [OpenPKG #50] Subject: apache2: installs libexpat, conflicts with expat-1.95 Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:43:01 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054726982-82823-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:43:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 41205277C7F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:43:27 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #53] openpkg-tool doesn't pick up gcc dependency on binutils From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727007-82824-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #53": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:43:27 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727007-82824-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 53 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/53 Ticket: [OpenPKG #53] Subject: openpkg-tool doesn't pick up gcc dependency on binutils Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:43:26 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054727007-82824-15-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:44:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DDC6A277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:44:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #51] netpbm: symbol ref errors From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727049-82823-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #51": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:44:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727049-82823-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 51 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/51 Ticket: [OpenPKG #51] Subject: netpbm: symbol ref errors Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:44:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054727049-82823-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:46:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DC28A277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:46:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #54] openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727162-83293-14" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #54": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:46:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727162-83293-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 54 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/54 Ticket: [OpenPKG #54] Subject: openpkg-tool: ambiguous sources for KSH Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:46:01 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054727162-83293-14-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:50:02 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BBA09277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #55] gdbm 1.8.3 build error From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727401-82824-17" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #55": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727401-82824-17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 55 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/55 Ticket: [OpenPKG #55] Subject: gdbm 1.8.3 build error Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:50:00 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > OS: Debian 3.0r0 > > Building gdbm 1.8.3 with "rpm --bb gdbm.spec" fails as follows: > > > mkdir /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/include > mkdir /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/man > mkdir /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/man/man3 > mkdir /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/info > /bin/sh ./libtool /usr/bin/install -c -c libgdbm.la > /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.la > /usr/bin/install -c -c .libs/libgdbm.lai > /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.la > /usr/bin/install -c -c .libs/libgdbm.a > /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.a > ranlib /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.a > chmod 644 /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3-root/marvin/lib/libgdbm.a > libtool: install: warning: remember to run /marvin/RPM/TMP/gdbm-1.8.3- > root/marvin/include/gdbm.h': Operation not > permitted > make: *** [install] Error 1 > error: Bad exit status from /marvin/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.69053 (%install) > > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /marvin/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.69053 (%install) > I've retried this on Debian 3.0 now and cannot reproduce the problem. So close this ticket. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054727401-82824-17-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:50:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id ED6F4277C7F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:50:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #55] gdbm 1.8.3 build error From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727403-82824-21" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #55": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:50:03 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727403-82824-21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 55 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/55 Ticket: [OpenPKG #55] Subject: gdbm 1.8.3 build error Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:50:03 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054727403-82824-21-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:53:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2F48A277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:53:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #57] typo in squid %post scriplet From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727604-42209-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #57": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:53:24 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727604-42209-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 57 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/57 Ticket: [OpenPKG #57] Subject: typo in squid %post scriplet Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:53:22 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > error: execution of %post scriptlet from squid-2.5.1-1.2.0 failed, > exit status > 1 > > the reason is squid.spec %post > > /bin/squid -z >/dev/null > > should be > > /sbin/squid -z >/dev/null This was fixed some time ago in revision 1.34 of squid.spec. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054727604-42209-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:53:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4677A277C7F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:53:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #57] typo in squid %post scriplet From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727606-42209-11" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #57": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:53:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727606-42209-11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 57 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/57 Ticket: [OpenPKG #57] Subject: typo in squid %post scriplet Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:53:25 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054727606-42209-11-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:57:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 36B69277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:57:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #60] Config file location wrong in libxml From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727855-82824-23" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #60": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:57:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727855-82824-23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 60 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/60 Ticket: [OpenPKG #60] Subject: Config file location wrong in libxml Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:57:34 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > > The libxml package seems to be compiled with the expectation that > config file > > are found under /etc/sgml (rather than the correct > %{l_prefix}/etc/sgml). > > > > This seems to be a bug in the upstream libxml2 package; the autoconf > > infrastructure for this package doesn't properly relocate the > binaries' > > expectations of where the config file should reside. > > > > This was easily remedied with a small patch to the upstream source, > plus a small > > diff against the provided .spec file. Was already fixed some time ago: http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=8288 -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054727855-82824-23-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:57:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 66FCF277C7F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:57:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #60] Config file location wrong in libxml From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727857-82824-27" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #60": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:57:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727857-82824-27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 60 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/60 Ticket: [OpenPKG #60] Subject: Config file location wrong in libxml Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:57:36 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054727857-82824-27-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 13:58:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id CE78F277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:58:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #61] coreutils su not setuid root From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054727913-82826-24" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #61": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:58:33 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054727913-82826-24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 61 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/61 Ticket: [OpenPKG #61] Subject: coreutils su not setuid root Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 13:58:32 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054727913-82826-24-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:00:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4A54B277AFF; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:00:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #150] openpkg-dev build From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054728014-42209-14" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #150": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:00:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054728014-42209-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 150 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/150 Ticket: [OpenPKG #150] Subject: openpkg-dev build Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Wed Jun 04 14:00:12 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ feature request: when spec has later date than binary, build should implicitly enable force mode and build the binary again. ------------=_1054728014-42209-14-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:08:21 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 23864277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #62] mozilla 1.3's nspr doesn't build on Solaris From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054728500-82824-29" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #62": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054728500-82824-29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 62 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/62 Ticket: [OpenPKG #62] Subject: mozilla 1.3's nspr doesn't build on Solaris Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:08:19 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196004 > > Here are two patches: > > * one against the mozilla source to adjust some Makefiles, and > * one against mozilla.spec to apply the above patch when building on > Solaris > > These patches are styled after the recommendations from Mozilla > developers on Bugzilla. They allowed me to build mozilla with the > OpenPKG binutils installed. I think this was already addressed now by the Mozilla vendor. At least it is a general GNU binutils issue they are dealing with. So I close this until I get report again that this problem still exists in Mozilla 1.3.1. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054728500-82824-29-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:08:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 57D8E277CF5; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:08:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #62] mozilla 1.3's nspr doesn't build on Solaris From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054728503-82824-33" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #62": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:08:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054728503-82824-33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 62 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/62 Ticket: [OpenPKG #62] Subject: mozilla 1.3's nspr doesn't build on Solaris Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:08:22 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054728503-82824-33-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:09:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5B829277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:09:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #63] [sendmail] dev files not included From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054728550-82825-17" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #63": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:09:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054728550-82825-17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 63 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/63 Ticket: [OpenPKG #63] Subject: [sendmail] dev files not included Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:09:09 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054728550-82825-17-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:10:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id AA9E5277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #64] [glib2] libiconv inconsistency during compilation From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054728617-82822-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #64": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:17 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054728617-82822-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 64 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/64 Ticket: [OpenPKG #64] Subject: [glib2] libiconv inconsistency during compilation Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:10:15 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > During compilation on at least Solaris, that AutoConf gets confused > about the > status of libiconv (required by the prerequisite package gettext). > > "Configure" determines that libiconv isn't present (when it actually > is), and > sets Makefiles accordingly. At compile-time, though, the system > headers for > libiconv are found. This causes compilation to crash. > > I have included a patch below that fixes this by explicitly selecting > a > configure-time option to specify the GNU libiconv is installed on the > system. > This should be OK since the glib2 package is transitively Build- > dependent on > libiconv anyway. Patch was already applied some time ago. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054728617-82822-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:10:20 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D9703277CF4; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #64] [glib2] libiconv inconsistency during compilation From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054728619-82822-16" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #64": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054728619-82822-16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 64 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/64 Ticket: [OpenPKG #64] Subject: [glib2] libiconv inconsistency during compilation Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:10:19 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054728619-82822-16-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:17:42 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 743B2277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:17:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #72] Bug submissions From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054729061-82826-27" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #72": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:17:41 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054729061-82826-27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 72 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/72 Ticket: [OpenPKG #72] Subject: Bug submissions Requestors: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:17:39 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Sorry for the delay in replying, but we migrated from Jitterbug to Request Tracker and are not fully finished. > - is the openpkg-dev list the standard place for replies > from the openpkg team to submitted bugs? Bugs should be sent to openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org. This way they are filed to RT and automatically forwarded to all subscribers of openpkg-bugdb and openpkg-dev. If you _reply_ to a posting on openpkg-bugdb or openpkg-dev with subject containing "[OpenPKG #xxx]" it is automatically appended to the ticket in RT, too. > - is there a way to get cc'd on the initial submission > (for my records) and/or subsequent followups? In the new RT, the requestor of a ticket (you) is automatically Cc'ed on ticket modifications. > - how do I update a bug report (e.g. more diagnostic output, > etc.)? Is it simply by using the correct string in the Subject? > per this text from an automated reply I recently received: > > If you want to submit for information for this particular > bug report, please include the string "PR#139" in your > the mail "Subject" header. As a requestor you just reply to the initial "thanks, received" mail from RT. As someone else you just can reply on the message on openpkg-dev or openpkg-bugdb. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1054729061-82826-27-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:17:44 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 33B0D277CF6; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:17:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #72] Bug submissions From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054729064-82826-31" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #72": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:17:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054729064-82826-31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 72 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/72 Ticket: [OpenPKG #72] Subject: Bug submissions Requestors: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:17:43 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054729064-82826-31-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:21:08 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 15EDC277C84; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #124] glib2 libiconv inconsistency during compilation From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054729267-82823-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #124": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054729267-82823-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 124 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/124 Ticket: [OpenPKG #124] Subject: glib2 libiconv inconsistency during compilation Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:21:06 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054729267-82823-15-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:24:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5D163277CF4; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:24:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #147] openpkg-dev v0.9.7 broken under solaris From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054729455-82824-36" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #147": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:24:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054729455-82824-36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 147 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/147 Ticket: [OpenPKG #147] Subject: openpkg-dev v0.9.7 broken under solaris Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jun 04 14:24:14 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054729455-82824-36-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:58:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2F8D3277CF8; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:58:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #151] SuSE openpkg-20030603 installs garbage /etc/passwd entries From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054731490-82823-18" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #151": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:58:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054731490-82823-18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 151 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/151 Ticket: [OpenPKG #151] Subject: SuSE openpkg-20030603 installs garbage /etc/passwd entries Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Wed Jun 04 14:58:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ 1.2.0 = ok CURRENT = garbage # /cw/bin/rpm -q openpkg openpkg-20030603-20030603 # /usr/opkg/bin/rpm -q openpkg openpkg-1.2.0-1.2.0 # grep OpenPKG /etc/passwd cw:*:%{?l_muid}:%{?l_mgid}:/cw OpenPKG (management):/cw:/cw/lib/openpkg/bash cw-r:*:%{?l_ruid}:%{?l_rgid}:/cw OpenPKG (restricted):/cw:/cw/lib/openpkg/bash cw-n:*:%{?l_nuid}:%{?l_ngid}:/cw OpenPKG (non-privileged):/cw:/cw/lib/openpkg/bash opkg:x:1001:1001:/usr/opkg OpenPKG (management):/usr/opkg:/usr/opkg/lib/openpkg/bash opkg-r:x:1002:1002:/usr/opkg OpenPKG (restricted):/usr/opkg:/usr/opkg/lib/openpkg/bash opkg-n:x:1003:1003:/usr/opkg OpenPKG (non-priviledged):/usr/opkg:/usr/opkg/lib/openpkg/bash as a consequence, 'rpm -Uvh ...' reports warning: user cw does not exist - using root warning: group cw does not exist - using root -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1054731490-82823-18-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 14:58:33 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id CBDF9277CF7; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:58:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #152] SuSE binutils-2.13.2.1-20030321 do not install From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054731512-82826-35" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #152": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:58:32 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054731512-82826-35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 152 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/152 Ticket: [OpenPKG #152] Subject: SuSE binutils-2.13.2.1-20030321 do not install Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Wed Jun 04 14:58:31 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ binutils-2.13.2.1-20030321 build without problems but the rpm archive is broken. Even rpm2cpio does not work. However, other packages work including binutils-2.13.2.1-1.2.0 $ /cw/bin/rpm -qa make-3.80-20030109 openpkg-20030603-20030603 binutils-2.13.2.1-1.2.0 -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1054731512-82826-35-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 17:28:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9E2F5277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:28:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #151] SuSE openpkg-20030603 installs garbage /etc/passwd entries From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054740495-82823-19" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #151": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:28:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054740495-82823-19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 151 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/151 Ticket: [OpenPKG #151] Subject: SuSE openpkg-20030603 installs garbage /etc/passwd entries Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Wed Jun 04 17:28:14 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ fixed in openpkg-20030604 see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9637 ------------=_1054740495-82823-19-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 17:28:19 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id EEDD4277CF7; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:28:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #151] SuSE openpkg-20030603 installs garbage /etc/passwd entries From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054740497-82823-23" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #151": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:28:17 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054740497-82823-23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 151 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/151 Ticket: [OpenPKG #151] Subject: SuSE openpkg-20030603 installs garbage /etc/passwd entries Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by thl Time: Wed Jun 04 17:28:17 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054740497-82823-23-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 17:31:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E9FD5277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:31:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #152] SuSE binutils-2.13.2.1-20030321 do not install From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054740662-82826-36" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #152": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:31:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054740662-82826-36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 152 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/152 Ticket: [OpenPKG #152] Subject: SuSE binutils-2.13.2.1-20030321 do not install Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Wed Jun 04 17:31:01 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ inherited error from and solved along with http://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=151 ------------=_1054740662-82826-36-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 17:31:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 137C3277CF7; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #152] SuSE binutils-2.13.2.1-20030321 do not install From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054740664-82826-40" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #152": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054740664-82826-40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 152 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/152 Ticket: [OpenPKG #152] Subject: SuSE binutils-2.13.2.1-20030321 do not install Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by thl Time: Wed Jun 04 17:31:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054740664-82826-40-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 4 17:34:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9C4AA277A13; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #147] openpkg-dev broken under solaris [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054740878-82823-25" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #147": ; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054740878-82823-25 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 147 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/147 Ticket: [OpenPKG #147] Subject: openpkg-dev broken under solaris Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Wed Jun 04 17:34:37 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ openpkg-dev v0.9.7 ------------=_1054740878-82823-25-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jun 5 09:23:50 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8402F277CF7; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:23:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #150] openpkg-dev build with more intelligent enforcment From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054797829-82822-18" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #150": ; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:23:49 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054797829-82822-18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 150 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/150 Ticket: [OpenPKG #150] Subject: openpkg-dev build with more intelligent enforcment Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Thu Jun 05 09:23:48 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ openpkg-dev should enforce rebuild when an existing RPM was build on another host. **** DETAILS **** Please be aware that the identifier ".ix86-linux2.4-" in names for binary RPMs does not allow you to guess which Linux that RPM was built on. It could be dv4 RedHat 9 dv6 Debian 3 dv14 SuSE 8.2 Use rpm query to find out the "Build Host" $ $E/bin/rpm -qp --qf "%{BUILDHOST}\n" *.ix86-linux2.4-*.rpm This is also available in the more human memorizable generic query for information. $ $E/bin/rpm -qpi *.ix86-linux2.4-*.rpm ------------=_1054797829-82822-18-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jun 5 13:09:00 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9029D277CF7; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:08:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #153] openpkg-dev should check release early From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054811339-12897-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #153": ; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:08:59 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054811339-12897-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 153 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/153 Ticket: [OpenPKG #153] Subject: openpkg-dev should check release early Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jun 05 13:08:57 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ check "Release:" in spec file early on "vim", "build" ... to avoid late failure on final "release". Also do warn on "release" if FIXMEs found in spec file for CURRENT and STABLE branches and even fail if FIXMEs found on SOLID branches. ------------=_1054811339-12897-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jun 6 00:27:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 07859277CF6; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 00:27:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Doug_Walter@emailsdelivery.org To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Hi there (PR#181) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 00:27:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20030605222705.07859277CF6@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ------=_NextPart_30932_9832_5CCD.6FC9780215A5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Untitled Document

Copy DVD Software for only $19.95 See here for more information

It can also CONVERT VHS INTO DVD!

See here for more information

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you don't want more emails from us please e-mail :

nomore@emailsdelivery.org

 

11314 Ventura Blvd Suite #141

Studio City, CA 91604

Phone (213) 216 8305

 

------=_NextPart_30932_9832_5CCD.6FC9780215A5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jun 6 19:32:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8848E277AFB; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 19:32:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #88] openpkg-20030114-20030114.src.sh From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054920778-12897-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #88": ; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 19:32:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054920778-12897-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 88 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/88 Ticket: [OpenPKG #88] Subject: openpkg-20030114-20030114.src.sh Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Fri Jun 06 19:32:57 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1054920778-12897-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jun 6 19:37:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4F4EF277A13; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 19:37:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #95] enhance RT: marks URLs in messages with hyperlinks & fix reformatting/reordering From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1054921027-14209-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #95": ; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 19:37:07 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1054921027-14209-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 95 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/95 Ticket: [OpenPKG #95] Subject: enhance RT: marks URLs in messages with hyperlinks & fix reformatting/reordering Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Fri Jun 06 19:37:05 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Additionally, RT tries to reformat the message body for syntax highlighting and whatever else reasons. Unfortunately, this often results in totally garbled message bodies on display. Especially it reorders the quoting blocks. So I recommend to completely remove the reformatting. ------------=_1054921027-14209-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 9 16:48:20 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 92AEB277A13; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #112] finish packaging of Nessus From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055170099-65836-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #112": ; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055170099-65836-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 112 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/112 Ticket: [OpenPKG #112] Subject: finish packaging of Nessus Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Mon Jun 09 16:48:17 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > Currently we have just nessus-libs, but libnasl, nessus-core and > nessus-plugins are missing. The question just is whether we really want > four packages for just a single application? Or wouldn't it be better > to put libnasl into nessus-libs and nessus-core/nessus-plugins into a > single "nessus-tool" package? Or even all four into a single "nessus" > package!? Issue resolved by adding libnasl to nessus-libs package and by creating additional nessus-tool package containing nessus-core and nessus-plugins. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1055170099-65836-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 9 16:48:22 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id A67B6277AFF; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:48:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #112] finish packaging of Nessus From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055170101-65836-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #112": ; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:48:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055170101-65836-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 112 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/112 Ticket: [OpenPKG #112] Subject: finish packaging of Nessus Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jun 09 16:48:20 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1055170101-65836-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 9 18:25:46 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0BDDA277AFB; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 18:25:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #154] OpenPKG 1.3 Release Engineering From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055175945-65835-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #154": ; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 18:25:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055175945-65835-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 154 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/154 Ticket: [OpenPKG #154] Subject: OpenPKG 1.3 Release Engineering Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Mon Jun 09 18:25:44 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This is a meta-ticket for the Release Engineering task of OpenPKG 1.3. It is assigned to the package pumpkin currently responsible for pushing (or doing himself ;-) the daily release enginneering tasks until OpenPKG 1.3 is out of the door. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1055175945-65835-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 9 20:18:56 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id A019B277AFF; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:18:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #155] [python] core library imports fail on Solaris From: "matt@cis.ksu.edu via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055182735-65833-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #155": ; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:18:55 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055182735-65833-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 155 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/155 Ticket: [OpenPKG #155] Subject: [python] core library imports fail on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by matt@cis.ksu.edu Time: Mon Jun 09 20:18:53 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ I attempted to submit a ticket in RT about this, but the application crashed with an internal server error. Please accept my apology if anybody receives this twice as a result. On the present CURRENT python package, the import of libraries fails at runtime. Both the implicitly included libraries ('site') and the explicitly included libraries (e.g., 'string') fail to cleanly import: import-test.py -------------- import string print "Stuff" > bash$ python import-test.py > > Could not find platform independent libraries > Could not find platform dependent libraries > Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to [:] > 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "import_test.py", line 3, in ? > import string > ImportError: No module named string Now defining the PYTHONHOME and PYTHONPATH environment variables does help. The program will succeed, but this manual intervention seems a little clunky. > bash$ PYTHONHOME=/cw PYTHONPATH=/cw/lib/python python import-test.py > > Stuff -- Matt Hoosier CIS Accounts Manager Kansas State University ------------=_1055182735-65833-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcg djEuMi4yIChHTlUvTGludXgpCgppRDhEQlFBKzVNK0FvN2JWb2hCN2IrOFJB dVF6QUo5QTFJc1YzTDk0aHhFTWpRYXphVm1xTVhmdmxBQ2drNlhMCkEvNys5 bWp4K2c5THdEVTN0Q1JyK0RnPQo9cWxPZQotLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgU0lHTkFU VVJFLS0tLS0K ------------=_1055182735-65833-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 11 12:06:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6D7E7277AFB; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:06:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #156] Correct package dependencies according to a single library policy From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055325983-2317-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #156": ; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:06:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055325983-2317-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 156 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/156 Ticket: [OpenPKG #156] Subject: Correct package dependencies according to a single library policy Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket ajouté par ms Time: Mer. Jun. 11 12:06:21 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ >>> In all of our applications, we never have a run-time dependency >>> to libraries which were needed under build-time. >> >> I beg to differ, we have many such dependencies. Dependencies to >> libraries are very often copied in BuildPreReq and PreReq. > >Then those packages are incorrect IMHO. > We definitely have two policies at OpenPKG. 1 Library dependencies are listed only as BuildPreReq 2 Library dependencies are listed as both BuildPreReq and PreReq Only one should be chosen, and all package dependencies accordingly adjusted. -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1055325983-2317-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 11 13:21:30 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6999A277AFF; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #156] Correct package dependencies according to a single library policy From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055330490-2318-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #156": ; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055330490-2318-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 156 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/156 Ticket: [OpenPKG #156] Subject: Correct package dependencies according to a single library policy Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jun 11 13:21:28 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Wed, Jun 11, 2003, Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT wrote: > [...] > >>> In all of our applications, we never have a run-time dependency > >>> to libraries which were needed under build-time. > >> > >> I beg to differ, we have many such dependencies. Dependencies to > >> libraries are very often copied in BuildPreReq and PreReq. > > > >Then those packages are incorrect IMHO. > > > We definitely have two policies at OpenPKG. > > 1 Library dependencies are listed only as BuildPreReq > 2 Library dependencies are listed as both BuildPreReq and PreReq > > Only one should be chosen, and all package dependencies accordingly adjusted. I don't think we really had two _policies_, we just had different ways of packaging ;-) And because of some prominent (and correct) exceptions ("ncurses", etc), people got confused and over time uses (2) from above for all types of libraries. I vote for: 1. plain library packages are technically just plain BuildPreReq deps. 2. exceptions are shared libraries (still not an issue) and library packages which provide more than C headers and libs files and where this additional stuff is needed by the linking application under run-time. Those are both BuildPreReq (for the .h and .a files) and PreReq (for the remaining stuff). Examples are "ncurses", etc. 3. we remove the currently existing (if any) PreReq deps to library packages who are not of class in (2.). 4. we add a "enforce rebuild paranoia" ;-) option to openpkg-tool to allow it to go from PreReq to BuildPreReq via Index in order to also trigger an application rebuild if a library package is rebuild. I perhaps also could accept (because of future shared library support): 1. all(!) library package deps become PreReq and BuildPreReq 2. we add the currently missing PreReq deps to library packages. 3. we leave openpkg-tool as is and let Michael v.E. be happy that he not again has to tweak his little swiss-army-knife of OpenPKG packaging ;-) Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1055330490-2318-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 11 13:43:55 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 34025277AFF; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:43:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #156] Correct package dependencies according to a single library policy From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055331835-2316-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #156": ; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:43:55 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055331835-2316-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 156 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/156 Ticket: [OpenPKG #156] Subject: Correct package dependencies according to a single library policy Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Wed Jun 11 13:43:54 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Wed, Jun 11, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall via RT wrote: > 3. we leave openpkg-tool as is and let Michael v.E. be happy that he not > again has to tweak his little swiss-army-knife of OpenPKG packaging ;-) I don't mind tweaking. I mind adding heuristic guesswork. There is already too much of this in autoconf et al that we have to defeat when it guesses wrong. If you find a formalized way to make rpm aware of rebuild dependencies that are independent of runtime dependencies... go ahead :) -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS ------------=_1055331835-2316-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jun 12 19:14:45 2003 Received: from visp.engelschall.com (master.openpkg.org [195.27.176.150]) by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC46E277AFA for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by visp.engelschall.com (Postfix, from userid 1005) id C24694CE55B; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by en1.engelschall.com (Postfix, from userid 10000) id 7CD8A2877B; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:14:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Matt Hoosier Message-Id: <1055353826.30285.9.camel@shaula.cis.ksu.edu> Date: 11 Jun 2003 12:50:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zygq0oCsrcwCU+a5hFYF" Subject: lprng / ifhp packaged To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --=-zygq0oCsrcwCU+a5hFYF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-DcUAm5SyNwDhQWojx99b" --=-DcUAm5SyNwDhQWojx99b Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've packaged LPRng and the corresponding print filter, ifhp. Is there any interesting in integrating these into the main distribution? --=20 Matt Hoosier CIS Accounts Manager Kansas State University --=-DcUAm5SyNwDhQWojx99b Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ifhp.spec Content-Type: text/plain; name=ifhp.spec; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # package information Name: ifhp=09 Summary: Printer filter for HP LaserJet printers URL: http://www.astart.com/lprng/LPRng.html Vendor: Patrick Howell Packager: CIS Distribution: OpenPKG [PLUS] Group: Services License: Artistic Version: 3.5.10 Release: cis1 # list of sources Source0: ftp://ftp.lprng.com/pub/LPRng/ifhp/ifhp-%{version}.tgz # build information Prefix: %{l_prefix} BuildRoot: %{l_buildroot} BuildPreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg, gcc, make, file, a2ps, ghostscript PreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg, file, a2ps, ghostscript AutoReq: no AutoReqProv: no %description The ifhp filter is a general purpose print filter that can handle a wid= e variety of text, PostScript, PCL, and PJL printers. These include all known HP printers, PostScript supporting printers, as well as a wide variety of Tektronix, QMS, Epson, etc.=20 The filter provides support for error message reporting, diagnostics, and format conversions, as well as a vast variety of options that can b= e used to deal with difficult or vintage printers. %prep %setup -q %build CFLAGS=3D"-I%{l_prefix}/include" CPPFLAGS=3D"-I%{l_prefix}/include" LDFLAGS=3D"-L%{l_prefix}/lib" export CFLAGS CPPFLAGS LDFLAGS ./configure \ --prefix=3D%{l_prefix} \ --sysconfdir=3D%{l_prefix}/etc/ifhp \ --disable-gscheck %{l_make} %{l_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_make} %{l_mflags} install DESTDIR=3D$RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_rpmtool} files -v -ofiles -r$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ %{l_files_std} \ '%config %{l_prefix}/etc/ifhp*' %files -f files %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT --=-DcUAm5SyNwDhQWojx99b Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=lprng.spec Content-Type: text/plain; name=lprng.spec; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # package information Name: lprng Summary: Next-generation LPR software URL: http://www.lprng.com/ Vendor: Patrick Powell Packager: CIS Distribution: PLUS Group: Servers License: Artistic Version: 3.8.10 Release: cis4 # package options %option with_user %{l_musr} %option with_group %{l_mgrp} # list of sources Source0: ftp://ftp.lprng.com/pub/LPRng/LPRng/LPRng-%{version}.tgz # build information Prefix: %{l_prefix} BuildRoot: %{l_buildroot} BuildPreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg, gcc, make PreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg AutoReq: no AutoReqProv: no %description LPRng is the Next Generation in LPR software. It supports the standard BSD lpr commands and also supports a System V interface. Other features include lightweight lpr, lpc, and lprm commands,=20 dynamic redirection of print queues, automatic job holding, highly verbose diagnostics, multiple printers serving a single queue, client programs do not need to run SUID root, greatly enhanced security checks and a greatly improved permission and authorization mechanism. The default configuration provides a simple BSD LPR interface, but ther= e are options to modify a wide variety of operational facilities. The companion IFHP print filter can interface to a wide variety of printers, from the latest netowrk based high speed to vintage legacy printers. %prep %if "%{with_user}" =3D=3D "root" printf "Please think twice about making LPRng run as %s:%s\n" \ "%{with_user}:%{with_group}" | %{l_rpmtool} msg -b %endif %if "%{with_group}" =3D=3D "root" printf "Please think twice about making LPRng run as %s:%s\n" \ "%{with_user}:%{with_group}" | %{l_rpmtool} msg -b %endif %setup -q -n LPRng-%{version} %build CC=3D"%{l_cc}" CFLAGS=3D"%{l_cflags -O}" CPPFLAGS=3D"-I%{l_prefix}/include" LDFLAGS=3D"-L%{l_prefix}/lib" export CC CFLAGS CPPFLAGS LDFLAGS ./configure \ --prefix=3D%{l_prefix} \ --localstatedir=3D%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/run \ --sysconfdir=3D%{l_prefix}/etc/lprng \ --disable-shared \ --enable-static \ --disable-nls \ --with-unix_socket_path=3D%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/run/lprng.socket \ --with-lockfile=3D%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/run/lprng.lock \ --with-userid=3D%{with_user} \ --with-groupid=3D%{with_group} \ --with-included-gettext %{l_make} %{l_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT # fix up installation so that chown() isn't attempted %{l_shtool} subst \ -e 's;$(SUID_ROOT_PERMS);$(NORM_PERMS);g' src/Makefile # standard installation, sans invasive procedures %{l_make} %{l_mflags} install \ DESTDIR=3D$RPM_BUILD_ROOT POSTINSTALL=3DNO # install config _etcdir=3D${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/etc/lprng %{l_shtool} install -m 644 lpd.perms ${_etcdir}/ %{l_shtool} install -m 644 lpd.conf ${_etcdir}/ %{l_shtool} install -c -m 644 \ -e 's;/var/spool/lpd;%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/spool;g' \ printcap ${_etcdir}/ # make runtime dir %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/r= un # OpenPKG metadata %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d %{l_shtool} install -c -m 755 \ -e 's;@l_prefix@;%{l_prefix};g' \ -e 's;@lprng_user@;%{with_user};g' \ -e 's;@lprng_group@;%{with_group};g' \ %{SOURCE rc.lprng} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/ # Snarf files list %{l_rpmtool} files -v -ofiles -r$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ %{l_files_std} \ '%config %{l_prefix}/etc/lprng/*' %files -f files %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT --=-DcUAm5SyNwDhQWojx99b Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=rc.lprng Content-Type: text/plain; name=rc.lprng; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable #!@l_prefix@/lib/openpkg/bash @l_prefix@/etc/rc ## ## rc.lprng -- Run-Commands for LPRng daemon ## %config lprng_enable=3D"yes" lprng_rotatelogs_enable=3D"yes" lprng_user=3D"@lprng_user@" lprng_group=3D"@lprng_group@" lprng_rotate_numfiles=3D"10" lprng_rotate_minsize=3D"1M" lprng_rotate_complevel=3D"9" lprng_logfile_name=3D"log" %common PID_FILES=3D"`echo @l_prefix@/var/lprng/run/lprng.lock*`" lock_files_exist() { if [ "${PID_FILES}" =3D "@l_prefix@/var/lprng/run/lprng.lock*" ] ; = then return 1 else return 0 fi } start() { if lock_files_exist ; then echo "PID files found. Is LPRng already running?" return 1 fi @l_prefix@/sbin/lpd } stop() { if lock_files_exist ; then : else echo "No PID files found" return 1 fi kill -TERM `cat ${PID_FILES}` rm -f ${PID_FILES} || true } restart() { stop sleep 2 start } rotate_logs() { # rotate log files for log_file in @l_prefix@/var/lprng/spool/*/${lprng_logfile_name} = ; do # bail out if wildcard didn't expand [ ".${log_file}" =3D \ ".@l_prefix@/var/lprng/spool/*/${lprng_logfile_name}" ] && = \ continue shtool rotate \ --force \ --num-files ${lprng_rotate_numfiles} \ --size ${lprng_rotate_minsize} \ --delay \ --compress ${lprng_rotate_complevel} \ --owner ${lprng_user} \ --group ${lprng_group} \ --mode 644 \ "${log_file}" done } %start -p 200 -u root opServiceEnabled lprng || exit 0 start %stop -p 200 -u root opServiceEnabled lprng || exit 0 stop %restart -u root opServiceEnabled lprng || exit 0 restart %daily -u root opServiceEnabled lprng || exit 0 opServiceEnabled lprng_rotatelogs && ( rotate_logs ; restart ) --=-DcUAm5SyNwDhQWojx99b-- --=-zygq0oCsrcwCU+a5hFYF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+52vio7bVohB7b+8RAg5CAJ4p+vktjr0xtpJ/PXyqUZHkhBpmuACgilPU 7IXmaEnA7d7kggUZV6WFYto= =4HNd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zygq0oCsrcwCU+a5hFYF-- ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jun 12 19:16:54 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7E004277B26; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:16:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #157] lprng/ifhp packaged, needs review From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055438214-2315-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #157": ; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:16:54 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055438214-2315-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 157 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/157 Ticket: [OpenPKG #157] Subject: lprng/ifhp packaged, needs review Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Thu Jun 12 19:16:52 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ ----- Forwarded message from Matt Hoosier ----- Delivered-To: rse+openpkg-dev@en1.engelschall.com Delivered-To: rse+openpkg-dev@engelschall.com Subject: lprng / ifhp packaged From: Matt Hoosier To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Date: 11 Jun 2003 12:50:26 -0500 Reply-To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Precedence: list I've packaged LPRng and the corresponding print filter, ifhp. Is there any interesting in integrating these into the main distribution? -- Matt Hoosier CIS Accounts Manager Kansas State University # package information Name: ifhp Summary: Printer filter for HP LaserJet printers URL: http://www.astart.com/lprng/LPRng.html Vendor: Patrick Howell Packager: CIS Distribution: OpenPKG [PLUS] Group: Services License: Artistic Version: 3.5.10 Release: cis1 # list of sources Source0: ftp://ftp.lprng.com/pub/LPRng/ifhp/ifhp-%{version}.tgz # build information Prefix: %{l_prefix} BuildRoot: %{l_buildroot} BuildPreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg, gcc, make, file, a2ps, ghostscript PreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg, file, a2ps, ghostscript AutoReq: no AutoReqProv: no %description The ifhp filter is a general purpose print filter that can handle a wide variety of text, PostScript, PCL, and PJL printers. These include all known HP printers, PostScript supporting printers, as well as a wide variety of Tektronix, QMS, Epson, etc. The filter provides support for error message reporting, diagnostics, and format conversions, as well as a vast variety of options that can be used to deal with difficult or vintage printers. %prep %setup -q %build CFLAGS="-I%{l_prefix}/include" CPPFLAGS="-I%{l_prefix}/include" LDFLAGS="-L%{l_prefix}/lib" export CFLAGS CPPFLAGS LDFLAGS ./configure \ --prefix=%{l_prefix} \ --sysconfdir=%{l_prefix}/etc/ifhp \ --disable-gscheck %{l_make} %{l_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_make} %{l_mflags} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_rpmtool} files -v -ofiles -r$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ %{l_files_std} \ '%config %{l_prefix}/etc/ifhp*' %files -f files %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT # package information Name: lprng Summary: Next-generation LPR software URL: http://www.lprng.com/ Vendor: Patrick Powell Packager: CIS Distribution: PLUS Group: Servers License: Artistic Version: 3.8.10 Release: cis4 # package options %option with_user %{l_musr} %option with_group %{l_mgrp} # list of sources Source0: ftp://ftp.lprng.com/pub/LPRng/LPRng/LPRng-%{version}.tgz # build information Prefix: %{l_prefix} BuildRoot: %{l_buildroot} BuildPreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg, gcc, make PreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg AutoReq: no AutoReqProv: no %description LPRng is the Next Generation in LPR software. It supports the standard BSD lpr commands and also supports a System V interface. Other features include lightweight lpr, lpc, and lprm commands, dynamic redirection of print queues, automatic job holding, highly verbose diagnostics, multiple printers serving a single queue, client programs do not need to run SUID root, greatly enhanced security checks and a greatly improved permission and authorization mechanism. The default configuration provides a simple BSD LPR interface, but there are options to modify a wide variety of operational facilities. The companion IFHP print filter can interface to a wide variety of printers, from the latest netowrk based high speed to vintage legacy printers. %prep %if "%{with_user}" == "root" printf "Please think twice about making LPRng run as %s:%s\n" \ "%{with_user}:%{with_group}" | %{l_rpmtool} msg -b %endif %if "%{with_group}" == "root" printf "Please think twice about making LPRng run as %s:%s\n" \ "%{with_user}:%{with_group}" | %{l_rpmtool} msg -b %endif %setup -q -n LPRng-%{version} %build CC="%{l_cc}" CFLAGS="%{l_cflags -O}" CPPFLAGS="-I%{l_prefix}/include" LDFLAGS="-L%{l_prefix}/lib" export CC CFLAGS CPPFLAGS LDFLAGS ./configure \ --prefix=%{l_prefix} \ --localstatedir=%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/run \ --sysconfdir=%{l_prefix}/etc/lprng \ --disable-shared \ --enable-static \ --disable-nls \ --with-unix_socket_path=%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/run/lprng.socket \ --with-lockfile=%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/run/lprng.lock \ --with-userid=%{with_user} \ --with-groupid=%{with_group} \ --with-included-gettext %{l_make} %{l_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT # fix up installation so that chown() isn't attempted %{l_shtool} subst \ -e 's;$(SUID_ROOT_PERMS);$(NORM_PERMS);g' src/Makefile # standard installation, sans invasive procedures %{l_make} %{l_mflags} install \ DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT POSTINSTALL=NO # install config _etcdir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/etc/lprng %{l_shtool} install -m 644 lpd.perms ${_etcdir}/ %{l_shtool} install -m 644 lpd.conf ${_etcdir}/ %{l_shtool} install -c -m 644 \ -e 's;/var/spool/lpd;%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/spool;g' \ printcap ${_etcdir}/ # make runtime dir %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/var/lprng/run # OpenPKG metadata %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d %{l_shtool} install -c -m 755 \ -e 's;@l_prefix@;%{l_prefix};g' \ -e 's;@lprng_user@;%{with_user};g' \ -e 's;@lprng_group@;%{with_group};g' \ %{SOURCE rc.lprng} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/ # Snarf files list %{l_rpmtool} files -v -ofiles -r$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ %{l_files_std} \ '%config %{l_prefix}/etc/lprng/*' %files -f files %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT #!@l_prefix@/lib/openpkg/bash @l_prefix@/etc/rc ## ## rc.lprng -- Run-Commands for LPRng daemon ## %config lprng_enable="yes" lprng_rotatelogs_enable="yes" lprng_user="@lprng_user@" lprng_group="@lprng_group@" lprng_rotate_numfiles="10" lprng_rotate_minsize="1M" lprng_rotate_complevel="9" lprng_logfile_name="log" %common PID_FILES="`echo @l_prefix@/var/lprng/run/lprng.lock*`" lock_files_exist() { if [ "${PID_FILES}" = "@l_prefix@/var/lprng/run/lprng.lock*" ] ; then return 1 else return 0 fi } start() { if lock_files_exist ; then echo "PID files found. Is LPRng already running?" return 1 fi @l_prefix@/sbin/lpd } stop() { if lock_files_exist ; then : else echo "No PID files found" return 1 fi kill -TERM `cat ${PID_FILES}` rm -f ${PID_FILES} || true } restart() { stop sleep 2 start } rotate_logs() { # rotate log files for log_file in @l_prefix@/var/lprng/spool/*/${lprng_logfile_name} ; do # bail out if wildcard didn't expand [ ".${log_file}" = \ ".@l_prefix@/var/lprng/spool/*/${lprng_logfile_name}" ] && \ continue shtool rotate \ --force \ --num-files ${lprng_rotate_numfiles} \ --size ${lprng_rotate_minsize} \ --delay \ --compress ${lprng_rotate_complevel} \ --owner ${lprng_user} \ --group ${lprng_group} \ --mode 644 \ "${log_file}" done } %start -p 200 -u root opServiceEnabled lprng || exit 0 start %stop -p 200 -u root opServiceEnabled lprng || exit 0 stop %restart -u root opServiceEnabled lprng || exit 0 restart %daily -u root opServiceEnabled lprng || exit 0 opServiceEnabled lprng_rotatelogs && ( rotate_logs ; restart ) ----- End forwarded message ----- Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1055438214-2315-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jun 13 03:32:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9F3C6277B26; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 03:32:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #158] NTP static linking From: "bill@celestial.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055467924-88262-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #158": ; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 03:32:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055467924-88262-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 158 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/158 Ticket: [OpenPKG #158] Subject: NTP static linking Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by bill@celestial.com Time: Fri Jun 13 03:32:02 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ I ran into a problem today after installing ntp on a SuSE 8.2 personal system. The personal version doesn't have libelf which is necessary for this, so it won't build on the host system without rebuilding the SuSE SRPMS from their professional system (this is fairly common with SuSE where the professional system has full developer's libraries where the personal doesn't which is why we typically do binary installs on the personal boxes from builds under professional). The attached patch against the current ntp.spec file fixes this by forcing static linking. It also has one fix to allow this to build on SCO OpenServer, and adds a %config(noreplace) to the ntp.conf file which probably shouldn't be changed after it's configured for local servers. The OpenServer patch requires sed'' since the subst uses an escaped newline, but then the OpenServer sed'' is pretty broken so this is one of the first things we install. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the government's ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees.'' -President Bill Clinton, August 12, 1993 ------------=_1055467924-88262-1 Content-Type: application/x-patch; name="ntp.spec.patch" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="ntp.spec.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tIC4uLy4uL1BLRy9udHAuc3BlYwkyMDAzLTA2LTEyIDE4OjExOjEwLjAw MDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMAorKysgbnRwLnNwZWMJMjAwMy0wNi0xMiAxNzo1ODoz NS4wMDAwMDAwMDAgLTA3MDAKQEAgLTMzLDcgKzMzLDcgQEAKIEdyb3VwOiAg ICAgICAgTmV0d29yawogTGljZW5zZTogICAgICBCU0Qtc3R5bGUKIFZlcnNp b246ICAgICAgNC4xLjFiCi1SZWxlYXNlOiAgICAgIDIwMDMwMzI4CitSZWxl YXNlOiAgICAgIDIwMDMwNjEyCiAKICMgICBsaXN0IG9mIHNvdXJjZXMKIFNv dXJjZTA6ICAgICAgZnRwOi8vZnRwLnVkZWwuZWR1L3B1Yi9udHAvbnRwNC9u dHAtJXt2ZXJzaW9ufS50YXIuZ3oKQEAgLTcxLDggKzcxLDEzIEBACiAKICVi dWlsZAogICAgICggY2QgbnRwLSV7dmVyc2lvbn0KKyVpZiAiJXtfb3N9IiA9 PSAic2NvX3N2IgorICAgICAgJXtsX3NodG9vbH0gc3Vic3QgKwkJLWUgJy9z eXNcL3Npby5oL3MhXiEjICBpbmNsdWRlIDxzdHJvcHRzLmg+XG4hJyArCQlu dHBkL250cF9yZWZjbG9jay5jCislZW5kaWYKICAgICAgIENDPSIle2xfY2N9 IiAtICAgICAgQ0ZMQUdTPSIle2xfY2ZsYWdzIC1PfSIgKyAgICAgIENGTEFH Uz0iJXtsX2NmbGFncyAtT30gLXN0YXRpYyAiICAgICAgICAuL2NvbmZpZ3Vy ZSAgICAgICAgICAgIC0tcHJlZml4PSV7bF9wcmVmaXh9CiAgICAgICAle2xf c2h0b29sfSBzdWJzdCBAQCAtMTAzLDcgKzEwOCw3IEBACiAgICAgJXtsX3No dG9vbH0gbWtkaXIgLWYgLXAgLW0gNzU1ICV7bF9wcmVmaXh9L3Zhci9udHAv bnRwZC5zdGF0CiAgICAgc3RyaXAgJXtsX3ByZWZpeH0vYmluLyogPi9kZXYv bnVsbCAyPiYxIHx8IHRydWUKICAgICAle2xfcnBtdG9vbH0gZmlsZXMgLXYg LW9maWxlcyAtciAle2xfZmlsZXNfc3RkfSAtICAgICAgICAgJyVjb25maWcg JXtsX3ByZWZpeH0vZXRjL250cC9udHAuY29uZicKKyAgICAgICAgICclY29u ZmlnKG5vcmVwbGFjZSkgJXtsX3ByZWZpeH0vZXRjL250cC9udHAuY29uZicK IAogJWZpbGVzIC1mIGZpbGVzCiAK ------------=_1055467924-88262-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 16 12:43:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2EEB5277BFC; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:43:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #159] apache/mod_fastcgi: Default dir for Unix/Domain sockets hardcoded From: "p234@gmx.de via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055760204-735-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #159": ; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:43:24 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055760204-735-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 159 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/159 Ticket: [OpenPKG #159] Subject: apache/mod_fastcgi: Default dir for Unix/Domain sockets hardcoded Requestors: p234@gmx.de Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by p234@gmx.de Time: Mon Jun 16 12:43:22 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This is what the apache error log says (/opt/sw is l_prefix): [Sun Jun 15 16:42:30 2003] [error] (2)No such file or directory: FastCGI: can't create dynamic directory "/opt/sw/logs/fastcgi/dynamic": doesn't exist and can't be created: No such file or directory It seems to be hardcoded in mod_fastcgi.h: #define DEFAULT_SOCK_DIR "\\\\.\\pipe\\FastCGI\\" #elif defined(APACHE2) /* Default dir for Unix/Domain sockets */ #define DEFAULT_SOCK_DIR DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR "/fastcgi" #else /* !WIN32 && !APACHE2 */ /* Default dir for Unix/Domain sockets */ #define DEFAULT_SOCK_DIR "logs/fastcgi" Replacing "logs/fastcgi" by "var/apache/fastcgi" and creating the directory on install resolved the problem. Maybe its also an issue with apache2? regards Peter Duschau ------------=_1055760204-735-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 16 14:48:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 99DDB277A13; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:48:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #159] apache/mod_fastcgi: Default dir for Unix/Domain sockets hardcoded [comment] From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055767726-735-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #159": ; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:48:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055767726-735-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 159 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/159 Ticket: [OpenPKG #159] Subject: apache/mod_fastcgi: Default dir for Unix/Domain sockets hardcoded Requestors: p234@gmx.de Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: new Transaction: Comments added by mlelstv Time: Mon Jun 16 14:48:45 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > /* Default dir for Unix/Domain sockets */ > #define DEFAULT_SOCK_DIR "logs/fastcgi" This is ServerRoot-relativ. ad1) should be something like run/fastcgi ad2) the directory needs to be created, what about ownership, permissions ? ad3) The ServerRoot should be %{l_prefix}/var/apache and not %{l_prefix}. -- Michael van Elst OpenPKG Developer mlelstv@openpkg.org ------------=_1055767726-735-2-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jun 19 06:41:25 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BF411277A13; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 06:41:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 From: "Guest User via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1055997684-738-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 06:41:24 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1055997684-738-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by guest Time: Thu Jun 19 06:41:22 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > [Nobody - Wed Apr 02 17:00:02 2003]: > > For OpenPKG 2.0 (CURRENT branch) the bootstrap has > to be upgraded to RPM 4.2. > > > This may fix a problem seen with relocating packages, e.g.: OpenPKG installed under /home/conrad/openpkg Installing package 'apt' originally compiled for an installation at /data/clarens/opkg, results in: rpm --install --prefix /home/conrad//openpkg/ apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1.ix86-linux2.4-dco.rpm warning: /home/conrad/openpkg created as /home/conrad/openpkg.rpmnew warning: /home/conrad/openpkg saved as /home/conrad/openpkg.rpmorig warning: /home/conrad/openpkg created as /home/conrad/openpkg.rpmnew warning: /home/conrad/openpkg created as /home/conrad/openpkg.rpmnew error: can't unlink /home/conrad/openpkg-RPMDELETE: Is a directory error: can't unlink /home/conrad/openpkg-RPMDELETE: Is a directory error: can't rename /home/conrad/openpkg to /home/conrad/openpkg-RPMDELETE: Is a directory error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/conrad/openpkg: cpio: unlink failed - Is a directory [ The // is needed for a well known bug fixed in rpm-4.0.3 ] ------------=_1055997684-738-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jun 19 19:32:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4835A277C1B; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #160] OpenSSH/PAM From: "matt@cis.ksu.edu via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056043932-737-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #160": ; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056043932-737-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 160 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/160 Ticket: [OpenPKG #160] Subject: OpenSSH/PAM Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by matt@cis.ksu.edu Time: Thu Jun 19 19:32:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Hi, It looks like there is a mismatch between the compiled-in PAM service name for OpenSSH ("sshd") and the name configured in /etc/pam.conf and /etc/pam.d/ ("openssh"). Is it preferred to fix this by replacing the argument given to pamtool (e.g., substitute "--name=sshd" for "--name=openssh") or to patch the sources so that the service name matches the package name? Thanks, -- Matt Hoosier CIS Accounts Manager Kansas State University ------------=_1056043932-737-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcg djEuMi4yIChHTlUvTGludXgpCgppRDhEQlFBKzhmT0VvN2JWb2hCN2IrOFJB dCtuQUpvQ3JtYlVOaE8zZUpkQWpCMGQzVXdwbDhBUS9RQ2ZmNW1LCnFpRStC aDR2UXY3NUhoS0NFZDRjTVFNPQo9UkNBMAotLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgU0lHTkFU VVJFLS0tLS0K ------------=_1056043932-737-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 24 15:47:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7D8F0277A13; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #77] Re: FSL not optimal? [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056462431-735-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #77": ; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056462431-735-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 77 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/77 Ticket: [OpenPKG #77] Subject: Re: FSL not optimal? Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jun 24 15:47:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ On Wed, Mar 05, 2003, Thomas Lotterer wrote: > [...] We understand that some people prefer to have a global system level > logging and want to stick with the native syslog(3) facility. > > So we decided to make fsl optional in the future > with default to use fsl. > > The packages will only be modified to omit fsl build and run-time > requirements and remove fsl from the linker stage. > fsl is now optional with default yes, as promised [1] > The predefined fsl > configuration files and rc scripts will still be installed and cron will > run the scripts to trim log files which stay empty forever. Some logfile > analysis tools inside OpenPKG may fail with empty or not existent logs. > The global syslog(3) must be configured separately and system logs will > require manual trimming ... > keep this is mind! The rc files, especially the (somtimes previously missing) parts regarding log file trimming, were unified, too [2] [1] http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9922 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9923 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9924 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9925 [2] http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9934 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9935 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9937 ------------=_1056462431-735-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 24 15:47:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6505B277A13; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:47:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #77] Re: FSL not optimal? From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056462478-738-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #77": ; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:47:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056462478-738-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 77 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/77 Ticket: [OpenPKG #77] Subject: Re: FSL not optimal? Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Tue Jun 24 15:47:57 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1056462478-738-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 24 15:56:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DD13C277A13; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:56:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056462970-736-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:56:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056462970-736-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: new Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jun 24 15:56:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ as of 2003-06-24, the following packages have been fsl enabled, fsl has been made optional [1] and log file rotation has been added/ was unified [2]. arpd honeyd imapd inn monit nsd openssh petidomo pks portfwd postfix pound powerdns qpopper sasl sendmail smtpfeed teapop vrrpd whoson [1] http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9922 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9923 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9924 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9925 [2] http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9934 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9935 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9937 see also https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=77 ------------=_1056462970-736-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jun 24 18:36:09 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8A7C7277B26; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:36:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #161] Conflict, php-4.3.2-20030603 and apache-1.3.27-20030611 From: "bill@celestial.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056472569-4990-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #161": ; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:36:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056472569-4990-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 161 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/161 Ticket: [OpenPKG #161] Subject: Conflict, php-4.3.2-20030603 and apache-1.3.27-20030611 Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by bill@celestial.com Time: Tue Jun 24 18:36:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ There are a couple of conflicts between php-4.3.2-20030603 and apache-1.3.27-20030611: %{l_prefix}/include/php/main/build-defs.h %{l_prefix}/include/php/main/php_config.h Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``I don't care how little your country is, you got a right to run it like you want to. When the big nations quit meddling, then the world will have peace.'' Will Rogers ------------=_1056472569-4990-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 25 15:38:54 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 20B73277ACC; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:38:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056548334-736-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:38:54 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056548334-736-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Wed Jun 25 15:38:53 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9972 nagios ------------=_1056548334-736-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jun 25 15:50:33 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2F41E277ACC; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:50:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056549033-60325-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:50:33 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056549033-60325-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Wed Jun 25 15:50:31 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ CORE cvs ntp BASE amd coreutils delegate ircd kermit nntpcache openldap portsentry postgresql prngd procmail pureftpd ssmtp stunnel sudo PLUS aide cvsd kerberos msntp radius samhain scponly snmp sysmon tftp EVAL cfengine dhcp-agent exim gated openvpn spamassassin tripwire JUNK powerdns rdist ------------=_1056549033-60325-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jun 26 08:39:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0779D277C7F; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:39:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #162] Non-OpenPKG users and groups are incorrectly deleted From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056609575-739-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #162": ; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:39:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056609575-739-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 162 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/162 Ticket: [OpenPKG #162] Subject: Non-OpenPKG users and groups are incorrectly deleted Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jun 26 08:39:34 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ [manually moved from rt-dev#160 by thl on 2003-06-26 original created by ms on 2003-05-15] # /cw/bin/rpm -e openpkg If a preexisting user or group name is used to bootstrap OpenPKG, then when the instance is later removed via 'rpm -e' the preexisting user or group is removed as well. We need something like openpkg:WARNING: skipping deletion of OpenPKG super-user user root openpkg:WARNING: (would remove system standard user) openpkg:WARNING: skipping deletion of OpenPKG super-user group wheel openpkg:WARNING: (would remove system standard group) root@dv1:/tmp ...but for regular user and group names. We might consider not removing the preexisting objects, or just printing a warning. ------------=_1056609575-739-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jun 26 09:51:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id E65CC277B4F; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:51:12 +0200 (CEST) From: LISA To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] |Keep it up all night!| (PR#182) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:51:12 +0200 Message-Id: <20030626075112.E65CC277B4F@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Buy Generic Sildenafil Citrate Online (the active ingredient in V
3bAP6p CU5
Generic V i a g r a
.

Generic Sildenafil Citrate 100mg tablets (GSC-100) and V i a g r a® 100mg both
contain 100mg of Sildenafil Citrate. The only difference is that the generic is half the price.

Product:
Generic Sildenafil Citrate
 (GSC-100)

100mg Sildenafil Citrate
V i a g r a®


100mg Sildenafil Citrate
Cost: As low as H5.00 US per 100mg tablet p12.25 US per 100mg tablet
Physician Consultation: u0.00 J75.00 - O100.00 doctors visit
Convenience: 10 minute online consultation Dr. appointment - 1 to 2 hours
Pharmacy Visit - 30 min. to 1 hour
100% Money Back G u a r a n t e e: Yes, the first pharmaceutical ever G u a r a n t e ed NO
Delivery: Fast, F R E E shipping When can your doctor see you?

Visit Our Web Site for More Details

Why pay twice as much when GSC-100 is
the same thing and is only a c l i c k away?


100% Money Back G u a r a n t e e - The First Pharmaceutical to ever be G u a r a n t e ed

You are recieving this email because you or someone has subscribed to this opt in/out user list. Please click here to be removed, thank you!
6nZfYTh OR4
Z,¦ú>ÍGW,¦ú>âG From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jun 27 11:26:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F0FA6277AD1; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #163] 3rd party installed system library replacements foul package builds From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056705995-4990-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #163": ; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056705995-4990-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 163 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/163 Ticket: [OpenPKG #163] Subject: 3rd party installed system library replacements foul package builds Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: am Ticket angelegt von ms Time: Fr 27. Jun 2003, 11:26:34 _________________________________________________________________________ In some cases when 3rd party replacement software exists (pth or ncurses for example), an OpenPKG package fails to build for mismatching include and lib symbols. A general or at least consistent solution to the problem is needed. To reproduce this, install pth::with_pthread = yes. Then try to build openldap on the same machine. The openldap package relies on posix thread functions in libpthread or lib_c, and will fail when compiled with GNU pth include files. -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1056705995-4990-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jun 28 14:45:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 82B6E277B08; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:45:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #164] replace RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX?! From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056804336-737-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #164": ; Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:45:36 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056804336-737-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 164 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/164 Ticket: [OpenPKG #164] Subject: replace RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX?! Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Sat Jun 28 14:45:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ $RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX exists in %post and %pre, pointing to %{l_prefix} or if --prefix/--relocate is given on the command line (think "relocated packages") to the given path. But OpenPKG packages not intended to be relocatable. They are sometimes technically, but often they cannot be relocated because of hard-coded paths in binaries. And OpenPKG philosophie is to build from scratch and from source for each location -- meaning package relocation is not required. So, perhaps we should replace all occurences of $RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX with %{l_prefix}?! Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1056804336-737-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 30 05:38:26 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 28CE4277AF3; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:38:26 +0200 (CEST) From: sue To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] |Generic*Viagra*Cheap| (PR#183) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:38:26 +0200 Message-Id: <20030630033826.28CE4277AF3@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Buy Generic Sildenafil Citrate Online (the active ingredient in V
Yx5TpY tJX
Generic V i a g r a
.

Generic Sildenafil Citrate 100mg tablets (GSC-100) and V i a g r a® 100mg both
contain 100mg of Sildenafil Citrate. The only difference is that the generic is half the price.

Product:
Generic Sildenafil Citrate
 (GSC-100)

100mg Sildenafil Citrate
V i a g r a®


100mg Sildenafil Citrate
Cost: As low as c5.00 US per 100mg tablet q12.25 US per 100mg tablet
Physician Consultation: S0.00 V75.00 - G100.00 doctors visit
Convenience: 10 minute online consultation Dr. appointment - 1 to 2 hours
Pharmacy Visit - 30 min. to 1 hour
100% Money Back G u a r a n t e e: Yes, the first pharmaceutical ever G u a r a n t e ed NO
Delivery: Fast, F R E E shipping When can your doctor see you?

Visit Our Web Site for More Details

Why pay twice as much when GSC-100 is
the same thing and is only a c l i c k away?


100% Money Back G u a r a n t e e - The First Pharmaceutical to ever be G u a r a n t e ed

You are recieving this email because you or someone has subscribed to this opt in/out user list. Please click here to be removed, thank you!
Tf7ALVu tVb
From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 30 07:17:22 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 84959277A18; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:17:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #164] replace RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX?! From: "Guest User via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056950241-60325-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #164": ; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:17:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056950241-60325-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 164 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/164 Ticket: [OpenPKG #164] Subject: replace RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX?! Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by guest Time: Mon Jun 30 07:17:20 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Hi It would have a devastating effect on packages that I build (that are relocatable by design) to remove this. I know you say that OpenPKG is not intended to be relocatable, but as long as the functionality is in there, please don't take it out... Cheers Conrad > [rse - Sat Jun 28 14:45:35 2003]: > > $RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX exists in %post and %pre, pointing to %{l_prefix} or > if --prefix/--relocate is given on the command line (think "relocated > packages") to the given path. But OpenPKG packages not intended to be > relocatable. They are sometimes technically, but often they cannot > be relocated because of hard-coded paths in binaries. And OpenPKG > philosophie is to build from scratch and from source for each location > -- meaning package relocation is not required. So, perhaps we should > replace all occurences of $RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX with %{l_prefix}?! > > Ralf S. Engelschall > rse@engelschall.com > www.engelschall.com > > > ------------=_1056950241-60325-2-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 30 11:58:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 97E0A277B2C; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #165] Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056967084-735-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #165": ; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056967084-735-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 165 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/165 Ticket: [OpenPKG #165] Subject: Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: am Ticket angelegt von ms Time: Mo 30. Jun 2003, 11:58:03 _________________________________________________________________________ There are probably some inconsistencies between where and how (what owner and permissions) rcfile-based logging operates and what the specfile writer expects. For example, assume a package foo has rc.foo and foo.spec. If there is a %daily section in rc.foo, it will likely rotate a logfile, writing to some log directory. This directory is created in a foo.spec by shtool mkdir, and possibly altered by rpmtool %attr. The directory mode must allow writing by any log commands (like shtool rotate) launched by rc. -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1056967084-735-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 30 11:58:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 59CBF277BFB; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:58:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #166] Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056967115-737-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #166": ; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:58:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056967115-737-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 166 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/166 Ticket: [OpenPKG #166] Subject: Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: am Ticket angelegt von ms Time: Mo 30. Jun 2003, 11:58:34 _________________________________________________________________________ There are probably some inconsistencies between where and how (what owner and permissions) rcfile-based logging operates and what the specfile writer expects. For example, assume a package foo has rc.foo and foo.spec. If there is a %daily section in rc.foo, it will likely rotate a logfile, writing to some log directory. This directory is created in a foo.spec by shtool mkdir, and possibly altered by rpmtool %attr. The directory mode must allow writing by any log commands (like shtool rotate) launched by rc. -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1056967115-737-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jun 30 12:04:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9988B277A18; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:04:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #166] Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files [comment] From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1056967457-4990-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #166": ; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:04:17 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1056967457-4990-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 166 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/166 Ticket: [OpenPKG #166] Subject: Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: am Kommentar hinzugefügt von ms Time: Mo 30. Jun 2003, 12:04:16 _________________________________________________________________________ Ticket 166 'Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files' is a copy of ticket 165, and is therefore deleted. -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1056967457-4990-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 02:24:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C2ACC277B48; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 02:24:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #167] perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch From: "bill@celestial.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057019049-739-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #167": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 02:24:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057019049-739-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 167 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/167 Ticket: [OpenPKG #167] Subject: perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by bill@celestial.com Time: Tue Jul 01 02:24:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ When I tried to build the current perl-dbi today with postgresql support the compile failed because it couldn't find the postgresql include files. The attached patch fixes this, at least to the extent that it now compiles cleanly. It remains to be seen whether the module actually works (make test in the built directory fails, but that may well be an artifact of the openpkg-perl script). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ It is necessary for the welfare of society that genius should be privileged to utter sedition, to blaspheme, to outrage good taste, to corrupt the youthful mind, and generally to scandalize one's uncles. -- George Bernard Shaw ------------=_1057019049-739-3 Content-Type: application/x-patch; name="perl-dbi.spec.patch" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="perl-dbi.spec.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tIHBlcmwtZGJpLnNwZWMub3JpZwkyMDAzLTA2LTMwIDE2OjIxOjA5LjAw MDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMAorKysgcGVybC1kYmkuc3BlYwkyMDAzLTA2LTMwIDE2 OjQ1OjAxLjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMApAQCAtNDQsNyArNDQsNyBAQAogR3Jv dXA6ICAgICAgICBMYW5ndWFnZQogTGljZW5zZTogICAgICBHUEwvQXJ0aXN0 aWMKIFZlcnNpb246ICAgICAgMjAwMzA2MjkKLVJlbGVhc2U6ICAgICAgMjAw MzA2MjkKK1JlbGVhc2U6ICAgICAgMjAwMzA2MzAKIAogIyAgIHBhY2thZ2Ug b3B0aW9ucwogJW9wdGlvbiAgICAgICB3aXRoX2RiZF9teXNxbCAgIG5vCkBA IC0xMzgsNyArMTM4LDExIEBACiAgICAgKCBjZCBEQkQtUGctJXtWX2RiZF9w Z30KICAgICAgICV7bF9zaHRvb2x9IHN1YnN0IC1lICdzOy1scHE7LWxwcSAt bHNzbCAtbGNyeXB0byAtbGNyeXB0OycgTWFrZWZpbGUuUEwKICAgICAgIFBP U1RHUkVTX0hPTUU9JXtsX3ByZWZpeH0KLSAgICAgIGV4cG9ydCBQT1NUR1JF U19IT01FCisJICAjIE5PVEU6IHRoZSBzZWNvbmQgLUkgaGFzIHRvIGJlIGhl cmUgc2luY2UgdGhlIGZpcnN0IGlzCisJICAjIHN1cHBsaWVkIGluIHRoZSBN YWtlZmlsZS5QTCBzY3JpcHQKKwkgIFBPU1RHUkVTX0lOQ0xVREU9IiV7bF9w cmVmaXh9L2luY2x1ZGUvcG9zdGdyZXNxbCAtSSV7bF9wcmVmaXh9L2luY2x1 ZGUiCisJICBQT1NUR1JFU19MSUI9JXtsX3ByZWZpeH0vbGliCisgICAgICBl eHBvcnQgUE9TVEdSRVNfTElCIFBPU1RHUkVTX0lOQ0xVREUKICAgICAgICV7 bF9wcmVmaXh9L2Jpbi9wZXJsLW9wZW5wa2cgaW5zdGFsbAogICAgICkKICVl bmRpZgo= ------------=_1057019049-739-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 08:45:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B00A7277B48; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:45:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #167] perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057041946-739-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #167": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:45:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057041946-739-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 167 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/167 Ticket: [OpenPKG #167] Subject: perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Tue Jul 01 08:45:45 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Tue, Jul 01, 2003, bill@celestial.com via RT wrote: > When I tried to build the current perl-dbi today with postgresql support > the compile failed because it couldn't find the postgresql include files. > The attached patch fixes this, at least to the extent that it now compiles > cleanly. Thanks for noticing. Here I can simply live with POSTGRES_INCLUDE being set to %{l_prefix}/include/postgresql, did you check that you need both include paths ? -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS ------------=_1057041946-739-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 09:05:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 791CB277B46; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:05:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #167] perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch From: "bill@celestial.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057043147-739-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #167": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:05:47 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057043147-739-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 167 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/167 Ticket: [OpenPKG #167] Subject: perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by bill@celestial.com Time: Tue Jul 01 09:05:46 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:45:46AM +0200, Michael van Elst via RT wrote: >Request 167 was acted upon. >_________________________________________________________________________ > > URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/167 > Ticket: [OpenPKG #167] > Subject: perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch > Requestors: bill@celestial.com > Queue: openpkg > Owner: Nobody > Status: open > Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv > Time: Tue Jul 01 08:45:45 2003 >________________________________________________________________________ > >On Tue, Jul 01, 2003, bill@celestial.com via RT wrote: > >> When I tried to build the current perl-dbi today with postgresql support >> the compile failed because it couldn't find the postgresql include files. >> The attached patch fixes this, at least to the extent that it now compiles >> cleanly. > >Thanks for noticing. Here I can simply live with POSTGRES_INCLUDE >being set to %{l_prefix}/include/postgresql, did you check that >you need both include paths ? No I didn't, but given that the %{l_prefix}/include seemed to be required in the generated Makefile, I figured that was the safest way to do it. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 http://www.celestial.com/ You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard ------------=_1057043147-739-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 11:08:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9CC49277A13; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:08:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057050496-60325-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:08:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057050496-60325-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 01 11:08:15 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > [thl - Wed Jun 25 15:50:31 2003]: > > CORE cvs ntp > done cvs http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10094 ntp http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10105 ------------=_1057050496-60325-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 13:09:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 139D6277A13; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057057752-60325-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057057752-60325-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 01 13:09:12 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE amd > use of syslog is a run-time option by setting the "log_file" parameter in %{l_prefix}/var/amd/amd.log to "syslog". No action required. ------------=_1057057752-60325-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 13:12:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 05489277A13; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:12:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057057958-736-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:12:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057057958-736-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 01 13:12:38 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE coreutils > no trace of syslog found, false alarm. No action required. ------------=_1057057958-736-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 13:14:19 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 564BD277A13; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:14:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057058059-739-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:14:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057058059-739-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 01 13:14:18 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE delegate > use of syslog is a run-time option using a URL prefixed "syslog://". No action required. ------------=_1057058059-739-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 14:24:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 82A69277C28; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:24:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #168] openssl CA.pl missing From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057062277-735-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #168": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:24:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057062277-735-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 168 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/168 Ticket: [OpenPKG #168] Subject: openssl CA.pl missing Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 01 14:24:36 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ this script is frequently referenced in HOWTOs etc. ------------=_1057062277-735-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 14:48:33 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C1FA7277A13; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:48:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057063712-735-11" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:48:32 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057063712-735-11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 01 14:48:31 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE ircd > done ircd http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10112 ------------=_1057063712-735-11-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 16:42:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 97C81277A13; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 16:42:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057070546-60325-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 16:42:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057070546-60325-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 01 16:42:25 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE kermit nntpcache > done kermit http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10117 nntpcache http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10117 ------------=_1057070546-60325-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 17:42:29 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8F0BD277C84; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:42:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #168] openssl CA.pl missing From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057074148-738-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #168": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:42:28 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057074148-738-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 168 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/168 Ticket: [OpenPKG #168] Subject: openssl CA.pl missing Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jul 01 17:42:27 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Tue, Jul 01, 2003, Thomas Lotterer via RT wrote: > this script is frequently referenced in HOWTOs etc. And is a Perl script (means run-time dep to "perl"), and a very bad script, too. I personally dislike this stuff, but ok, if people want it then install it ("perl" is a build-time dep already). But please not install it as "CA.pl" in /bin/. Use just "CA" or even better (perhaps my vote), install it into /share/openssl/ and do not add a run-time dep to Perl.. I don't know. I just know I personally dislike it, so feel free to make your own decision and action ;-) Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1057074148-738-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 1 17:46:14 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 49688277A13; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057074374-739-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057074374-739-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 01 17:46:11 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE openldap portsentry > done openldap http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10122 portsentry http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10121 ------------=_1057074374-739-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 2 10:14:46 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id CA67E277CF4; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:14:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057133685-735-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:14:45 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057133685-735-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Wed Jul 02 10:14:44 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE postgresql > use of syslog, if detected by configure, is a run-time option using parameters in the config file as documented in %{l_prefix}/share/postgresql/postgresql.conf.sample syslog = 0 # range 0-2 syslog_facility = 'LOCAL0' syslog_ident = 'postgres' where, according to ./src/backend/utils/error/elog.c, the number after "syslog" means 0 = only stdout/stderr 1 = stdout+stderr and syslog 2 = syslog only and, according to ./src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c, the defaults are syslog 0 syslog_facility "LOCAL0" syslog_ident "postgres" No action required. ------------=_1057133685-735-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 2 14:42:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id EDBAB277A13; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:42:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057149729-737-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:42:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057149729-737-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Wed Jul 02 14:42:09 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE prngd > this package had no install section and resulted in an empty binary RPM in OpenPKG v1.1 and v1.2. Fixed that first, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10146 prngd http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10149 ------------=_1057149729-737-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 10:37:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F3223277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 10:37:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057221425-739-14" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 10:37:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057221425-739-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 10:37:05 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE procmail > done. Note the interesting LOG_MAIL issue! procmail http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10179 ------------=_1057221425-739-14-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 11:05:40 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DD1EE277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:05:39 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057223139-736-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:05:39 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057223139-736-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 11:05:38 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE pureftpd > done pureftpd http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10180 ------------=_1057223139-736-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 11:25:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id EF3CB277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:25:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057224310-60325-11" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:25:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057224310-60325-11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 11:25:09 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE ssmtp > done. Note that LOG_MAIL is not an issue because ssmtp conflicts with other MTAs. ssmtp http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10181 ------------=_1057224310-60325-11-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 11:47:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7C7A9277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057225631-735-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057225631-735-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 11:47:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE stunnel > done stunnel http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10182 ------------=_1057225631-735-15-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 12:18:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 43DB2277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:18:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057227484-739-16" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:18:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057227484-739-16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 12:18:03 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > BASE sudo > done. This package did not absolutely require fsl but it is a candidate where fsl/l2 can become a real advantage. Consider real time notification by logging sudo events to an IRC channel or send a message via SMTP. sudo http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10183 ------------=_1057227484-739-16-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 13:03:57 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2852D277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057230237-737-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057230237-737-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 13:03:56 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS aide > fsl ends up in the binary, however run-time test failed because due to missing default config aide bails out immediately. aide http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10184 ------------=_1057230237-737-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 13:14:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 1019F277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:14:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057230875-735-17" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:14:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057230875-735-17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 13:14:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS cvsd > done. cvsd http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10186 ------------=_1057230875-735-17-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 14:21:31 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 67519277CFB; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #169] file conflicts between kerberos and j2se14 From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057234890-738-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #169": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057234890-738-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 169 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/169 Ticket: [OpenPKG #169] Subject: file conflicts between kerberos and j2se14 Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 14:21:29 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ kerberos-1.2.8-20030627 vs. j2se14-1.4.2-20030612 /cw/man/man1/kinit.1 /cw/man/man1/klist.1 ------------=_1057234890-738-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 14:30:48 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5E6EC277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:30:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057235448-4990-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:30:48 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057235448-4990-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 14:30:47 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS kerberos > fsl ends up in the binaries /cw/bin/kftp /cw/bin/krcp /cw/bin/krlogin /cw/bin/krsh /cw/bin/ktelnet and no other binaries use syslog(3) according to objdump(1), however run-time test failed because not a single executable could be tweaked to log anything. This is especially annoying because the fsl regex in ident is rather complex but i'm only guessing http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile?v=1.1&f=openpkg-src/kerberos/fsl.kerberos kerberos http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10188 ------------=_1057235448-4990-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 14:35:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0F15B277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:35:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057235733-738-11" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:35:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057235733-738-11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 14:35:33 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS msntp > removed syslog(3) usage because it's only used for one single issue which is more or less debugging and not knowing about the event does not hurt the user, see the README file in the vendor source. msntp http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10189 ------------=_1057235733-738-11-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 15:01:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9DDB7277CFB; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:01:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057237281-60325-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:01:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057237281-60325-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 15:01:17 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS radius > use of syslog is a run-time option in the config file. No action required. logging { # This defines output channel that sends it info to syslog whith # facility `auth' and priority `notice' channel notice { syslog auth.notice; }; }; ------------=_1057237281-60325-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 15:18:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 734DE277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:18:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057238285-736-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:18:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057238285-736-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 15:18:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS samhain > done. samhain http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10190 ------------=_1057238285-736-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 15:57:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E90AD277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:57:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057240642-739-18" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:57:22 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057240642-739-18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 15:57:21 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS scponly > done. Needed some extra tweaking, LDFLAGS and LIBS were missing in Makefile and openlog ident is derived from PACKAGE_NAME which can be set as a parameter to configure (not as a predeclared variable) scponly http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10192 ------------=_1057240642-739-18-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 16:32:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8E0F9277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:32:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057242758-60325-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:32:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057242758-60325-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 16:32:37 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS snmp > done. snmp http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10194 ------------=_1057242758-60325-15-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 16:45:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5EAA5277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:45:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057243505-60325-17" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:45:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057243505-60325-17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 16:45:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS sysmon > done. sysmon http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10195 ------------=_1057243505-60325-17-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 17:01:50 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0E653277A18; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057244509-736-11" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057244509-736-11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 03 17:01:47 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS tftp > done. tftp http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10196 ------------=_1057244509-736-11-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 3 19:23:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DACA6277D01; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 19:23:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #170] Consistently use %{name} instead of hard-coded package name From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057253026-4990-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #170": ; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 19:23:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057253026-4990-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 170 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/170 Ticket: [OpenPKG #170] Subject: Consistently use %{name} instead of hard-coded package name Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Thu Jul 03 19:23:45 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The standard approach until recently (when Michael van Elst started to introduce more %{name} occurrences) was to use hard-coded package names in .spec files. I'm fine with using %{name} everywhere, but we have to do it consistently! The current mixture is a little bit unclean and should be solved. I think I'll do a mass-adjustment soon myself, but let us remember this issue. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1057253026-4990-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jul 4 20:52:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 80522277B08; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 20:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #171] python package fully broken: linkchecker shows problems From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057344753-739-21" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #171": ; Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 20:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057344753-739-21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 171 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/171 Ticket: [OpenPKG #171] Subject: python package fully broken: linkchecker shows problems Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Fri Jul 04 20:52:32 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The python package in OpenPKG-CURRENT seems to be fully broken when it comes to installation of Python based programs like "linkchecker". The problem looks like (plus more): running install Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 187, in ? data_files = [ File "/tmp/rse/openpkg/python-2.2.3-root/cw/lib/python/distutils/core.py", line 138, in setup File "setup.py", line 114, in run_commands Distribution.run_commands(self) File "/tmp/rse/openpkg/python-2.2.3-root/cw/lib/python/distutils/dist.py", line 902, in run_commands File "/tmp/rse/openpkg/python-2.2.3-root/cw/lib/python/distutils/dist.py", line 921, in run_command File "/cw/lib/python/cmd.py", line 112, in ensure_finalized except EOFError: File "/tmp/rse/openpkg/python-2.2.3-root/cw/lib/python/distutils/command/install.py", line 267, in finalize_options File "/tmp/rse/openpkg/python-2.2.3-root/cw/lib/python/distutils/sysconfig.py", line 417, in get_config_vars File "/tmp/rse/openpkg/python-2.2.3-root/cw/lib/python/distutils/sysconfig.py", line 322, in _init_posix distutils.errors.DistutilsPlatformError: invalid Python installation: unable to open /cw/lib/python2.2/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) This has to be fixed before release of OpenPKG 1.3, of course. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1057344753-739-21-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 15:51:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8AF78277AF2; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:51:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #172] openpkg-dev nosrc support From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057585876-2330-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #172": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:51:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057585876-2330-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 172 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/172 Ticket: [OpenPKG #172] Subject: openpkg-dev nosrc support Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 15:51:14 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ for nosrc packages, "rpm --norestriction" should be executed, too ------------=_1057585876-2330-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 15:52:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id AFD0D277B46; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:52:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #173] speclint should check for trailing newlines From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057585927-2334-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #173": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:52:07 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057585927-2334-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 173 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/173 Ticket: [OpenPKG #173] Subject: speclint should check for trailing newlines Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 15:52:06 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ ------------=_1057585927-2334-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 15:57:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C32F6277B07; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #174] rc script enhancement for opServiceEnabled From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057586230-54370-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #174": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057586230-54370-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 174 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/174 Ticket: [OpenPKG #174] Subject: rc script enhancement for opServiceEnabled Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 15:57:09 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ the rc script must create a construct like rc=0 ( first %section ) || rc=1 ... ( last %section ) || rc=1 exit $rc This allows every %section to use the following construct without having the first failing section exiting the entire concatenated script and omitting all following sections entirely. %section opServiceEnabled ... || exit 0 ------------=_1057586230-54370-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 15:58:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 41738277B26; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:58:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #175] modify rc script to use From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057586296-2332-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #175": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:58:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057586296-2332-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 175 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/175 Ticket: [OpenPKG #175] Subject: modify rc script to use Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 15:58:15 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ use the following short construct and not the obsolete if ... fi %section opServiceEnabled ... || exit 0 ------------=_1057586296-2332-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 16:00:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9FA74277A18; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:00:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #173] speclint should check for trailing newlines [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057586410-2333-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #173": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:00:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057586410-2333-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 173 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/173 Ticket: [OpenPKG #173] Subject: speclint should check for trailing newlines Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 07 16:00:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Done. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1057586410-2333-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 16:00:14 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7C295277B3A; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #173] speclint should check for trailing newlines From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057586413-2333-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #173": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057586413-2333-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 173 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/173 Ticket: [OpenPKG #173] Subject: speclint should check for trailing newlines Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 07 16:00:12 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1057586413-2333-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 16:00:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 73E8F277BFF; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:00:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #176] daemon bind/listen address From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057586423-54370-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #176": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:00:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057586423-54370-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 176 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/176 Ticket: [OpenPKG #176] Subject: daemon bind/listen address Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 16:00:22 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Verify that the default config for every daemon uses 127.0.0.1 for the bind/listen address with one exception: openssh should do a wildcard bind, otherwise it is too likely that users will lock themselfs out. ------------=_1057586423-54370-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 16:42:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id A6525277ACD; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:42:36 +0200 (CEST) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] fsl and LOG_MAIL facility issue in MTAs and procmail (PR#184) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 16:42:36 +0200 Message-Id: <20030707144236.A6525277ACD@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 09:36:00 +0200 From: Thomas Lotterer To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/ssmtp/ fsl.ssmtp rc.ssmtp ssmtp.spec openpk... Reply-To: thl@dev.de.cw.com In-Reply-To: <20030703172539.GB48024@engelschall.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany. On Thu, Jul 03, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003, Thomas Lotterer wrote: > > > [...] > > +ident (.+)/mail q{ > > [...] > > Isn't this too generic? This way perhaps also procmail's or whatever > messages are written to ssmtp.log if they are of facility "mail", aren't > they? Doesn't ssmtpd use a reasonable openlog(3) with its name? > I knew what i did when i decided to commit this. The issue is documented in OpenPKG ticket #117, search for LOG_MAIL and currently find that topic for procmail and ssmtp, also see checkin 10179. Excerpt/ summary here: https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=117 [...] Note the interesting LOG_MAIL issue! procmail http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10179 [...] Note that LOG_MAIL is not an issue because ssmtp conflicts with other MTAs. ssmtp http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10181 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10179 [procmail] [...] avoid log duplication by sendmail (and probably any MTA) whose fsl is catching all logs being tagged with LOG_MAIL facility The problem is that sendmail has no single ident and the fsl.sendmail catches (.+)/mail. So i decided to let all MTAs, including ssmtp, to use exacly this regex. The drawback is that third party applications like procmail need to be patched to never use the LOG_MAIL facility. If you don't like this, let me say i don't like this either. But the alternatives are likekly to open a can of worms. We could try to patch sendmail, but it uses variables for creating the ident and it has a dozend or so calls to openlog(3). An other alternative would be to act more like the orginal syslog and create logfiles not for a single application but for a facility. This would intermix sendmail and procmail log information into a LOG_MAIL file. Both approaches were too heavy for me to be introduced on the fly so i patched procmail. Having fsl'ized all CORE, BASE and PLUS packages now, it is the only application that used the LOG_MAIL facility so far. A politician in our beginning 21st century would describe this incident as "collateral damage". In public words it means "we targeted sendmail but accidentally hit procmail". -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 16:50:21 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 99309277ACD; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:50:21 +0200 (CEST) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] could we use rc in log rotation epilog? (PR#185) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 16:50:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20030707145021.99309277ACD@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: at least proftpd and teapop currently do. -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 16:53:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id E76A5277B08; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:53:33 +0200 (CEST) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] create fsllint (PR#186) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 16:53:33 +0200 Message-Id: <20030707145333.E76A5277B08@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 16:54:08 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id C30E7277B4E; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:54:08 +0200 (CEST) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] create rclint (PR#187) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 16:54:08 +0200 Message-Id: <20030707145408.C30E7277B4E@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 17:06:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B5E20277B3A; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:06:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #177] fsl and LOG_MAIL facility issue in MTAs and procmail From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057590383-2330-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #177": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:06:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057590383-2330-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 177 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/177 Ticket: [OpenPKG #177] Subject: fsl and LOG_MAIL facility issue in MTAs and procmail Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 17:06:22 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 09:36:00 +0200 From: Thomas Lotterer To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/ssmtp/ fsl.ssmtp rc.ssmtp ssmtp.spec openpk... Reply-To: thl@dev.de.cw.com In-Reply-To: <20030703172539.GB48024@engelschall.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany. On Thu, Jul 03, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003, Thomas Lotterer wrote: > > > [...] > > +ident (.+)/mail q{ > > [...] > > Isn't this too generic? This way perhaps also procmail's or whatever > messages are written to ssmtp.log if they are of facility "mail", aren't > they? Doesn't ssmtpd use a reasonable openlog(3) with its name? > I knew what i did when i decided to commit this. The issue is documented in OpenPKG ticket #117, search for LOG_MAIL and currently find that topic for procmail and ssmtp, also see checkin 10179. Excerpt/ summary here: https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=117 [...] Note the interesting LOG_MAIL issue! procmail http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10179 [...] Note that LOG_MAIL is not an issue because ssmtp conflicts with other MTAs. ssmtp http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10181 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10179 [procmail] [...] avoid log duplication by sendmail (and probably any MTA) whose fsl is catching all logs being tagged with LOG_MAIL facility The problem is that sendmail has no single ident and the fsl.sendmail catches (.+)/mail. So i decided to let all MTAs, including ssmtp, to use exacly this regex. The drawback is that third party applications like procmail need to be patched to never use the LOG_MAIL facility. If you don't like this, let me say i don't like this either. But the alternatives are likekly to open a can of worms. We could try to patch sendmail, but it uses variables for creating the ident and it has a dozend or so calls to openlog(3). An other alternative would be to act more like the orginal syslog and create logfiles not for a single application but for a facility. This would intermix sendmail and procmail log information into a LOG_MAIL file. Both approaches were too heavy for me to be introduced on the fly so i patched procmail. Having fsl'ized all CORE, BASE and PLUS packages now, it is the only application that used the LOG_MAIL facility so far. A politician in our beginning 21st century would describe this incident as "collateral damage". In public words it means "we targeted sendmail but accidentally hit procmail". -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1057590383-2330-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 17:06:41 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C1060277B3A; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:06:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #178] could we use rc in log rotation epilog? From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057590400-2330-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #178": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:06:40 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057590400-2330-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 178 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/178 Ticket: [OpenPKG #178] Subject: could we use rc in log rotation epilog? Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 17:06:39 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ at least proftpd and teapop currently do. -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1057590400-2330-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 17:07:09 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 842AA277B08; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:07:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #179] create fsllint From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057590429-2331-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #179": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:07:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057590429-2331-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 179 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/179 Ticket: [OpenPKG #179] Subject: create fsllint Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 17:07:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1057590429-2331-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 17:07:26 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 61D22277C00; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:07:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #180] create rclint From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057590446-2330-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #180": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:07:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057590446-2330-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 180 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/180 Ticket: [OpenPKG #180] Subject: create rclint Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 17:07:25 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1057590446-2330-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 17:11:08 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0945D277B08; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #181] rotating INN logs From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057590667-2334-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #181": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057590667-2334-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 181 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/181 Ticket: [OpenPKG #181] Subject: rotating INN logs Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 17:11:07 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Should we use the vendor log rotation or disable it and use our own? ------------=_1057590667-2334-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 17:21:29 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 2A3B7277ACD; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:21:29 +0200 (CEST) From: thl@dev.de.cw.com To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] log file rotation (PR#188) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:21:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20030707152129.2A3B7277ACD@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: - resolve https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=117 "FSL push down list" first - resolve https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=178 "could we use rc in log rotation epilog?" first - resolve https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=181 "rotating INN logs" first Then make sure the application opens a new log file at or immediately after log rotation. Use the application's favourite method, i.e. send some signal, restart, reload, stop/start it or use the new "jitter" option of fsl 1.2 (make sure to update PreReqs for fsl version in the latter case). -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 17:21:38 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C0E13277BFC; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:21:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #182] "append" in fsl.* files From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057591297-2330-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #182": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:21:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057591297-2330-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 182 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/182 Ticket: [OpenPKG #182] Subject: "append" in fsl.* files Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 17:21:36 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Remove "append" from fsl.* files, as it is the default for fsl v1.2 when "trunc" was introduced. This requires us to update PreReqs. Should we do this along with or after OpenPKG v1.3? The next release of fsl might drop support for the obsolete "append" option ... -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1057591297-2330-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 21:37:25 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 421C5277B4E; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 21:37:25 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #183] Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057606645-54370-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #183": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 21:37:25 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057606645-54370-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 183 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/183 Ticket: [OpenPKG #183] Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 21:37:24 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ On Tue, Jul 01, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2003, Thomas Lotterer wrote: > > > > Log: > > > rename and add log file rotation for fsl default log > > > > > > [...] > > > %{l_shtool} install -c -m 644 \ > > > -e 's;@l_prefix@;%{l_prefix};g' \ > > > - %{SOURCE fsl.default} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/fsl/ > > > + %{SOURCE fsl.default} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/fsl/fsl.fsl > > > > > If everyone follows my rigid file naming "fsl.fsl" then i'll eventually > > will rename the "fsl.default" in the CVS. Currently, it could be backed > > out without leaving any fragments in the repository ... > > No, it's ok. Just keep it as is... > Just to be absolutely sure, you mean: - keep fsl.default in CVS *and* - keep fsl.fsl in %{l_prefix}/etc/fsl/ This is ok for me, but the name change is worth being mentioned in the OpenPKG v1.3 "news" file. -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1057606645-54370-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 21:41:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 94218277B08; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 21:41:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #183] Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057606867-2331-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #183": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 21:41:07 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057606867-2331-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 183 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/183 Ticket: [OpenPKG #183] Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Mon Jul 07 21:41:06 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Mon, Jul 07, 2003, Thomas Lotterer via RT wrote: > > > > Log: > > > > rename and add log file rotation for fsl default log > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > %{l_shtool} install -c -m 644 \ > > > > -e 's;@l_prefix@;%{l_prefix};g' \ > > > > - %{SOURCE fsl.default} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/fsl/ > > > > + %{SOURCE fsl.default} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/fsl/fsl.fsl > > > > > > > If everyone follows my rigid file naming "fsl.fsl" then i'll eventually > > > will rename the "fsl.default" in the CVS. Currently, it could be backed > > > out without leaving any fragments in the repository ... > > > > No, it's ok. Just keep it as is... > > > Just to be absolutely sure, you mean: > > - keep fsl.default in CVS *and* > - keep fsl.fsl in %{l_prefix}/etc/fsl/ Yes, this little "line noise" in CVS is ok. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1057606867-2331-2-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 7 22:16:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 64752277B46; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:16:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #184] disable service when .*\.rpm(save|orig|new) is found From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057609019-2333-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #184": ; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:16:59 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057609019-2333-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 184 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/184 Ticket: [OpenPKG #184] Subject: disable service when .*\.rpm(save|orig|new) is found Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 07 22:16:58 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ under %{l_prefix}/etc/%{name} -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1057609019-2333-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 00:14:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9844D277A18; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 00:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #180] create rclint From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057616084-2334-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #180": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 00:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057616084-2334-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 180 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/180 Ticket: [OpenPKG #180] Subject: create rclint Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: am Status von neu auf erledigt geändert von thl Time: Di 08. Jul 2003, 00:14:43 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1057616084-2334-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 00:14:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C82E1277B08; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 00:14:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #180] create rclint [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057616086-2334-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #180": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 00:14:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057616086-2334-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 180 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/180 Ticket: [OpenPKG #180] Subject: create rclint Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: am Kommentar hinzugefügt von thl Time: Di 08. Jul 2003, 00:14:46 _________________________________________________________________________ http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10431 ------------=_1057616086-2334-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 05:47:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id B4C7D277AF3; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 05:47:05 +0200 (CEST) From: ethel To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Generic Viagra is cheaper! (PR#189) Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 05:47:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20030708034705.B4C7D277AF3@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Buy Generic Sildenafil Citrate Online (the active ingredient in V
PE6szr tWG
Generic V i a g r a
.

Generic Sildenafil Citrate 100mg tablets (GSC-100) and V i a g r a® 100mg both
contain 100mg of Sildenafil Citrate. The only difference is that the generic is half the price.

Product:
Generic Sildenafil Citrate
 (GSC-100)

100mg Sildenafil Citrate
V i a g r a®


100mg Sildenafil Citrate
Cost: As low as E5.00 US per 100mg tablet h12.25 US per 100mg tablet
Physician Consultation: z0.00 H75.00 - A100.00 doctors visit
Convenience: 10 minute online consultation Dr. appointment - 1 to 2 hours
Pharmacy Visit - 30 min. to 1 hour
100% Money Back G u a r a n t e e: Yes, the first pharmaceutical ever G u a r a n t e ed NO
Delivery: Fast, F R E E shipping When can your doctor see you?

Visit Our Web Site for More Details

Why pay twice as much when GSC-100 is
the same thing and is only a c l i c k away?


100% Money Back G u a r a n t e e - The First Pharmaceutical to ever be G u a r a n t e ed

You are recieving this email because you or someone has subscribed to this opt in/out user list. Please click here to be removed, thank you!
CdQIKXw o2D
tÅ? ?œM From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 08:39:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 60168277B4F; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:39:27 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #170] Consistently use %{name} instead of hard-coded package name [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057646367-43745-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #170": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:39:27 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057646367-43745-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 170 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/170 Ticket: [OpenPKG #170] Subject: Consistently use %{name} instead of hard-coded package name Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: deleted Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 08:39:26 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ done by rse, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10416 ------------=_1057646367-43745-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 08:39:53 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4CB38277A18; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:39:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #170] Consistently use %{name} instead of hard-coded package name From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057646393-2332-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #170": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:39:53 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057646393-2332-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 170 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/170 Ticket: [OpenPKG #170] Subject: Consistently use %{name} instead of hard-coded package name Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from deleted to resolved by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 08:39:52 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1057646393-2332-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 09:45:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BF56C277A18; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:45:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #179] create fsllint From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057650309-43745-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #179": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:45:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057650309-43745-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 179 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/179 Ticket: [OpenPKG #179] Subject: create fsllint Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 09:45:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1057650309-43745-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 09:45:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2F3D2277B4F; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:45:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #179] create fsllint [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057650311-43745-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #179": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:45:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057650311-43745-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 179 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/179 Ticket: [OpenPKG #179] Subject: create fsllint Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 09:45:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10434 ------------=_1057650311-43745-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 09:50:54 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B6881277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:50:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #185] openpkg-dev support for opd alias From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057650653-54370-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #185": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:50:53 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057650653-54370-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 185 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/185 Ticket: [OpenPKG #185] Subject: openpkg-dev support for opd alias Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 09:50:52 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ currenly, some operations, i.e."branch" (i assume those requiring changes to the local environment which are implemented by a wrapper function) behave differently between being called "openpkg-dev branch" and being called "opd branch". It also seems to have influence whether "opd" is an alias to "openpkg-dev" vs. absolute path like "/u/FOO/bin/openpkg-dev". ------------=_1057650653-54370-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 09:53:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 50EAD277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:53:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #186] openpkg-dev improve mass release performance From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057650829-2333-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #186": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:53:49 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057650829-2333-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 186 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/186 Ticket: [OpenPKG #186] Subject: openpkg-dev improve mass release performance Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 09:53:48 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Using release for mass commits is slow and performance needs to be improved. Suggestion from rse: - bundle scp, check, commit, *lint into separate loops - use multiple arguments for commands support them - disable scp compression Suggestion from cs: - set scp encryption to blowfish Suggestion from thl: - put scp (and possibly others) in the background ------------=_1057650829-2333-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 10:08:28 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id A1912277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:08:27 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #187] package erase /var pruning From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057651707-2331-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #187": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:08:27 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057651707-2331-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 187 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/187 Ticket: [OpenPKG #187] Subject: package erase /var pruning Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 10:08:26 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Currently (as of OpenPKG v1.2 just before v1.3) when a package is erased from an OpenPKG instance files created by the application, usually under %{l_prefix}/var/%{name}, remain on the system. This includes databases, spool areas and log files. The user should be able to specify if those files remain or should be pruned. ------------=_1057651707-2331-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 10:10:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2C3CD277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #188] rc %status From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057651805-54370-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #188": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057651805-54370-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 188 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/188 Ticket: [OpenPKG #188] Subject: rc %status Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 10:10:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The %{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/rc.%{name} scripts for daemons should provide a %status section which returns information about the daemon being up and running or not. ------------=_1057651805-54370-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 10:27:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5AB3E277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:27:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #189] rc %restart From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057652824-2332-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #189": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:27:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057652824-2332-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 189 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/189 Ticket: [OpenPKG #189] Subject: rc %restart Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 10:27:03 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The %{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/rc.%{name} scripts for daemons should provide a proper %restart section which checks if the daemon is up and running (using %status, see https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=188) and only in the case it is running it should be shut down (probably using %stop) and started up again (probably using %start). ------------=_1057652824-2332-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 10:29:33 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 74943277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:29:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #190] spec %preun daemon shut down From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057652973-54370-11" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #190": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:29:33 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057652973-54370-11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 190 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/190 Ticket: [OpenPKG #190] Subject: spec %preun daemon shut down Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 10:29:32 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The %preun sections for daemons should properly check if the daemon is up and running (using %status, see https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=188) and only in the case it is running the daemon should be shut down (probably using %stop from the %{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/rc.%{name} script) before the package is erased (uninstalled). ------------=_1057652973-54370-11-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 10:29:54 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 84D6F277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:29:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #191] spec %post restart From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057652994-2331-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #191": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:29:54 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057652994-2331-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 191 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/191 Ticket: [OpenPKG #191] Subject: spec %post restart Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 10:29:53 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The %post sections for daemons should do a proper restart (probably using %restart from the %{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/rc.%{name} script, see https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=189). ------------=_1057652994-2331-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 10:31:42 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4D7BA277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #192] spec %preun user hook From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057653102-2331-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #192": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057653102-2331-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 192 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/192 Ticket: [OpenPKG #192] Subject: spec %preun user hook Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 10:31:41 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The %preun sections for any package should provide hooks for the end user to allow him additional activities, i.e. saving the current configuration, do logging etc. ------------=_1057653102-2331-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 10:32:09 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F3DCE277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:32:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #193] spec %post user hook From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057653128-2333-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #193": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:32:08 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057653128-2333-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 193 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/193 Ticket: [OpenPKG #193] Subject: spec %post user hook Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 10:32:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The %post sections for any package should also provide hooks for the end user to allow him additional activities, i.e. restoring a previously saved configuration (see https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=192), apply an automated configuration etc. ------------=_1057653128-2333-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 11:02:57 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0A952277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:02:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #194] rc.%{name} config files From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057654976-2334-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #194": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:02:57 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057654976-2334-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 194 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/194 Ticket: [OpenPKG #194] Subject: rc.%{name} config files Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 11:02:55 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The %{l_prefix}/rc.d/rc.%{name} files are no config files, are not tagged as such and are therefor overwritten without notice and backup. 1.) rpmlint should ensure they are not tagged as %config 2.) a "DO NOT EDIT" comment should be placed in the rc files and rclint should check for it. ------------=_1057654976-2334-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 11:09:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0F47F277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:09:39 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #195] (spec|rpm|rc|fsl)lint branch support From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057655378-54370-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #195": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:09:39 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057655378-54370-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 195 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/195 Ticket: [OpenPKG #195] Subject: (spec|rpm|rc|fsl)lint branch support Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 11:09:38 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ How do we handle CVS branch support to the linters? Currently, only one valid instance of each exists and openpkg-dev only executes them for HEAD. But with the introduction of OpenPKG v1.3 we'll have to check OPENPKG_1_STABLE, OPENPKG_1_3_SOLID and HEAD *and* it is very likely that we have to used different (versions of) linters for every branch. Maybe we should place them into a "openpkg-lint" package and install/update this package along with each branch, creating a openpkg-lint.1.20031234.src.rpm for STABLE, openpkg-lint.1.3.0.src.rpm for CURRENT and openpkg-lint.20031234.src.rpm for HEAD etc. and install the latest incarnation for each branch into our /cw, /cw1 and /cw13 directories!? ------------=_1057655378-54370-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 11:11:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0837E277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:11:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #196] using files and accidentally omit SOURCEs From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057655518-2333-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #196": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:11:59 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057655518-2333-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 196 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/196 Ticket: [OpenPKG #196] Subject: using files and accidentally omit SOURCEs Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 11:11:58 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Sometimes a spec references files but does not list them as SOURCEs. Who should check for it and how: speclint, openpkg-dev, helping each other ... ------------=_1057655518-2333-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 11:14:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C4CB8277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:14:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #197] fsl template From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057655678-2333-14" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #197": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:14:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057655678-2333-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 197 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/197 Ticket: [OpenPKG #197] Subject: fsl template Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 11:14:37 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Where should i put the template and documentation for integration of fsl into a package to? ------------=_1057655678-2333-14-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 11:19:01 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 08A66277B48; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:19:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #198] shtool subst %{l_susr} etc. From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057655940-2334-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #198": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:19:01 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057655940-2334-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 198 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/198 Ticket: [OpenPKG #198] Subject: shtool subst %{l_susr} etc. Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 11:18:59 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ We wanted to create a macro to ease substitution of @l_[smrn]usr@ with %{l_[smrn]usr} when using "shtool subst ...". Currently, every user must be substituted seperately which is error prone when an existing (i.e. rc.* or fsl.*) file is edited to use a previously unused user but the substitution in the spec file is not updated. ------------=_1057655940-2334-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 12:09:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 36E11277BFF; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:09:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #199] gnutls: add back OpenCDK support to GNUTLS package From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057658955-54370-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #199": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:09:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057658955-54370-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 199 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/199 Ticket: [OpenPKG #199] Subject: gnutls: add back OpenCDK support to GNUTLS package Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 12:09:13 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Once GNU-TLS was updated to correctly work again with the OpenCDK API, support for it should be added back, of course. ----- Forwarded message from Michael van Elst ----- Delivered-To: rse+openpkg-cvs@en1.engelschall.com Delivered-To: rse+openpkg-cvs@engelschall.com From: "Michael van Elst" To: openpkg-cvs@openpkg.org Subject: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/gnutls/ gnutls.spec openpkg-web/ news.txt Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:22:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Precedence: list OpenPKG CVS Repository http://cvs.openpkg.org/ ____________________________________________________________________________ Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael van Elst Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: mlelstv@openpkg.org Module: openpkg-src openpkg-web Date: 08-Jul-2003 11:22:21 Branch: HEAD Handle: 2003070810221901 Modified files: openpkg-src/gnutls gnutls.spec openpkg-web news.txt Log: remove opencdk support, incompatible API changes Summary: Revision Changes Path 1.24 +6 -5 openpkg-src/gnutls/gnutls.spec 1.5433 +1 -0 openpkg-web/news.txt ____________________________________________________________________________ patch -p0 <<'@@ .' Index: openpkg-src/gnutls/gnutls.spec ============================================================================ $ cvs diff -u -r1.23 -r1.24 gnutls.spec --- openpkg-src/gnutls/gnutls.spec 29 Jun 2003 18:28:01 -0000 1.23 +++ openpkg-src/gnutls/gnutls.spec 8 Jul 2003 09:22:20 -0000 1.24 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Group: Cryptography License: GPL Version: 0.8.9 -Release: 20030629 +Release: 20030708 # list of sources Source0: ftp://gnutls.hellug.gr/pub/gnutls/gnutls-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -41,8 +41,10 @@ # build information Prefix: %{l_prefix} BuildRoot: %{l_buildroot} -BuildPreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg >= 20020206, gcrypt, libtasn1, opencdk, lzo, getopt -PreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg >= 20020206, gcrypt, libtasn1, opencdk, lzo, getopt +BuildPreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg >= 20020206 +PreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg >= 20020206 +BuildPreReq: gcrypt, libtasn1, lzo, getopt +PreReq: gcrypt, libtasn1, lzo, getopt AutoReq: no AutoReqProv: no @@ -61,11 +63,10 @@ CPPFLAGS="%{l_cppflags} %{l_cppflags lzo}" \ LDFLAGS="%{l_ldflags}" \ LIBS="-lgetopt" \ + LIBOPENCDK_CONFIG=no \ ./configure \ --prefix=%{l_prefix} \ --with-libgcrypt-prefix=%{l_prefix} \ - --with-libopencdk-prefix=%{l_prefix} \ - --disable-libopencdktest \ --disable-shared %{l_make} %{l_mflags -O} @@ . patch -p0 <<'@@ .' Index: openpkg-web/news.txt ============================================================================ $ cvs diff -u -r1.5432 -r1.5433 news.txt --- openpkg-web/news.txt 8 Jul 2003 09:20:31 -0000 1.5432 +++ openpkg-web/news.txt 8 Jul 2003 09:22:19 -0000 1.5433 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +08-Jul-2003: Upgraded package: P 08-Jul-2003: Upgraded package: P 08-Jul-2003: Upgraded package: P 08-Jul-2003: Upgraded package: P @@ . ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org CVS Repository Commit List openpkg-cvs@openpkg.org ----- End forwarded message ----- Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1057658955-54370-15-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 14:02:38 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BD154277A1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:02:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057665757-2332-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:02:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057665757-2332-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 14:02:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS (was EVAL initially) cfengine > done. cfengine http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10447 ------------=_1057665757-2332-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 14:55:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D2B97277A1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057668944-54370-16" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057668944-54370-16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 14:55:43 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > EVAL dhcp-agent > done, with checking for fsl in binaries only, no more run-time tests. dhcp-agent http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10450 ------------=_1057668944-54370-16-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 15:05:43 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 66F6A277A1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:05:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057669543-2333-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:05:43 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057669543-2333-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 15:05:42 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > EVAL gated > done. No run-time testing. gated http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10453 ------------=_1057669543-2333-15-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 15:06:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DF4E9277C7F; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:06:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057669570-2331-11" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:06:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057669570-2331-11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 15:06:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > EVAL exim > done. No run-time testing. exim http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10454 ------------=_1057669570-2331-11-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 15:20:08 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 1F014277A1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057670408-2334-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057670408-2334-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 15:20:07 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > EVAL openvpn > done. openvpn http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10455 ------------=_1057670408-2334-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 15:50:29 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id EF3E1277A1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:50:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057672228-54370-18" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:50:28 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057672228-54370-18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 15:50:27 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > PLUS (was EVAL initially) spamassassin > done. Note the interesting LOG_MAIL issue! spamassassin http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10459 ------------=_1057672228-54370-18-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 16:29:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4574B277A1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:29:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057674550-43745-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:29:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057674550-43745-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 16:29:09 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > EVAL tripwire > done. No run-time testing. tripwire http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10463 ------------=_1057674550-43745-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 16:29:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C1130277C7F; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:29:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057674566-2332-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:29:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057674566-2332-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 16:29:26 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > JUNK powerdns rdist > done. No run-time testing. rdist http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10464 ------------=_1057674566-2332-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 16:40:43 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 830E2277BFD; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:40:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #117] FSL push down list [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057675242-2333-17" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #117": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:40:42 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057675242-2333-17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 117 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/117 Ticket: [OpenPKG #117] Subject: FSL push down list Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 08 16:40:41 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > # -: missing, FSL support required > # +: already existing but need FSL support optionally > done > # X: syslog not reasonable, patch out syslog calls > # !: intentionally no FSL support but could be done if time permits > # ?: unknown what to do > suspendend for post-OpenPKG v1.3 > # U: syslog in unused code fragments, ignore this > nothing to do. ------------=_1057675242-2333-17-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 16:48:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 38408277A1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:48:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #197] fsl template From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057675698-2330-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #197": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:48:18 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057675698-2330-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 197 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/197 Ticket: [OpenPKG #197] Subject: fsl template Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 16:48:16 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > Where should i put the template and documentation for integration of > fsl into a package to? In CVS there doesn't seem to be a reasonable place. OTOH the RT is not unreasonable. So, just add all this template stuff to this ticket, please. ------------=_1057675698-2330-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 17:02:42 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BA9D6277A1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #186] openpkg-dev improve mass release performance From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057676561-2330-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #186": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057676561-2330-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 186 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/186 Ticket: [OpenPKG #186] Subject: openpkg-dev improve mass release performance Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 17:02:39 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > - bundle scp, check, commit, *lint into separate loops scp and commit is now bundled. linting is still not bundled (TODO). > - use multiple arguments for commands support them linting is of this type, yes. > - disable scp compression done. > Suggestion from cs: > - set scp encryption to blowfish done. > Suggestion from thl: > - put scp (and possibly others) in the background Is overkill, I think. Not done. ------------=_1057676561-2330-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 17:10:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7CDB9277B2C; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:10:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #196] using files and accidentally omit SOURCEs [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057677035-2333-21" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #196": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:10:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057677035-2333-21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 196 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/196 Ticket: [OpenPKG #196] Subject: using files and accidentally omit SOURCEs Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 17:10:34 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ There are actually 3 cases which have to be checked: 1. %{SOURCE} references file, corresponding Source: section missing -> speclint 2. Source: section exists, file in .src.rpm, but not in CVS -> openpkg-dev 3. Source: section exists, file not references via %setup, %patch or %SOURCE -> speclint 4. ?? ------------=_1057677035-2333-21-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 17:12:26 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 91D7A277B2C; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #195] (spec|rpm|rc|fsl)lint branch support [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057677146-2330-17" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #195": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057677146-2330-17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 195 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/195 Ticket: [OpenPKG #195] Subject: (spec|rpm|rc|fsl)lint branch support Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 17:12:25 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The branches should not receive many changes and life short, hence we for the next future can ignore this issue IMHO. We should first focus on really checking mostly all possible things in OpenPKG-CURRENT. ------------=_1057677146-2330-17-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 17:14:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B2EF2277B2C; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:14:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #194] rc.%{name} config files [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057677266-54370-21" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #194": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:14:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057677266-54370-21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 194 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/194 Ticket: [OpenPKG #194] Subject: rc.%{name} config files Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 17:14:26 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Point 1 has to be implemented. Point 2 IMHO should be not done, because else we would have to do the same for mostly all packages. "rpm -V" is the friend of the admin to see whether he accidently changed something he was not intended to change. ------------=_1057677266-54370-21-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 17:18:57 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id CA277277B2C; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:18:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #185] openpkg-dev support for opd alias [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057677536-2333-24" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #185": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:18:56 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057677536-2333-24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 185 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/185 Ticket: [OpenPKG #185] Subject: openpkg-dev support for opd alias Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 17:18:56 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ At least the "opd" alias was added now to the generated .bashrc. Why it still doesn't work for Christoph under Linux is not known to us until now. ------------=_1057677536-2333-24-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 17:21:42 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 74574277B2C; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:21:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #181] rotating INN logs From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057677702-2330-21" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #181": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:21:42 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057677702-2330-21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 181 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/181 Ticket: [OpenPKG #181] Subject: rotating INN logs Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 17:21:41 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1057677702-2330-21-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 8 17:21:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F32F2277C00; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:21:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #181] rotating INN logs From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057677704-2330-23" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #181": ; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:21:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057677704-2330-23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 181 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/181 Ticket: [OpenPKG #181] Subject: rotating INN logs Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Tue Jul 08 17:21:44 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ The own rotation was already removed again. And it is ok that INN performs its own rotation. ------------=_1057677704-2330-23-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 10 03:45:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id CB4F0277C7F; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 03:45:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #200] Libtool, dependency on automake From: "bill@celestial.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057801503-2331-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #200": ; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 03:45:03 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057801503-2331-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 200 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/200 Ticket: [OpenPKG #200] Subject: Libtool, dependency on automake Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by bill@celestial.com Time: Thu Jul 10 03:45:01 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ I've been working on a local project here using automake, autoconf, and libtool, and have run into a bunch of warning messages from acinclude.m4 from libtool-1.5-20030416 running with automake-1.7.5-20030518. I made a couple of minor tweaks to the libtool.spec file to (a) add a dependency on automake, and (b) rebuild all aclocal.m4 and Makefile.in files with ``aclocal'' and ``automake'' so they're in agreement with the installed automake. Updating the *demo databases is probably redundant, but it seems to me that consistency is probably a Good Thing(tm). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ When only cops have guns, it's called a ``police state''. -- Claire Wolfe, "101 Things To Do Until The Revolution" ------------=_1057801503-2331-15 Content-Type: application/x-patch; name="libtool.spec.patch" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="libtool.spec.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tIGxpYnRvb2wuc3BlYy5vcmlnCVdlZCBKdWwgIDkgMTg6MDE6NDkgMjAw MworKysgbGlidG9vbC5zcGVjCVdlZCBKdWwgIDkgMTg6MjQ6MjUgMjAwMwpA QCAtMzMsNyArMzMsNyBAQAogR3JvdXA6ICAgICAgICBEZXZlbG9wbWVudAog TGljZW5zZTogICAgICBHUEwKIFZlcnNpb246ICAgICAgMS41Ci1SZWxlYXNl OiAgICAgIDIwMDMwNDE2CitSZWxlYXNlOiAgICAgIDIwMDMwNzA5CiAKICMg ICBsaXN0IG9mIHNvdXJjZXMKIFNvdXJjZTA6ICAgICAgZnRwOi8vZnRwLmdu dS5vcmcvZ251L2xpYnRvb2wvbGlidG9vbC0le3ZlcnNpb259LnRhci5negpA QCAtNDEsOCArNDEsOCBAQAogIyAgIGJ1aWxkIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uCiBQcmVm aXg6ICAgICAgICV7bF9wcmVmaXh9CiBCdWlsZFJvb3Q6ICAgICV7bF9idWls ZHJvb3R9Ci1CdWlsZFByZVJlcTogIE9wZW5QS0csIG9wZW5wa2cgPj0gMjAw MjAyMDYsIG1ha2UKLVByZVJlcTogICAgICAgT3BlblBLRywgb3BlbnBrZyA+ PSAyMDAyMDIwNgorQnVpbGRQcmVSZXE6ICBPcGVuUEtHLCBvcGVucGtnID49 IDIwMDIwMjA2LCBtYWtlLCBhdXRvbWFrZQorUHJlUmVxOiAgICAgICBPcGVu UEtHLCBvcGVucGtnID49IDIwMDIwMjA2LCBhdXRvbWFrZQogQXV0b1JlcTog ICAgICBubwogQXV0b1JlcVByb3Y6ICBubwogCkBAIC01NSw2ICs1NSwxOSBA QAogICAgICVzZXR1cCAtcQogCiAlYnVpbGQKKwkjIEF1dG9tYWtlIGlzIHRp ZWQgdmVyeSB0aWdodGx5IHRvIGF1dG9tYWtlIHNvIG5lZWRzIHRvIGhhdmUK KwkjIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IHZlcnNpb25zIG9mIGFjbG9jYWwubTQgYW5kIGZy aWVuZHMKKwlmb3IgYWNsb2NhbCBpbiBgZmluZCAuIC1uYW1lIGFjbG9jYWwu bTQgLXByaW50YCA7IGRvCisJCWRpcj1gZGlybmFtZSAkYWNsb2NhbGAKKwkJ KAljZCAkZGlyCisJCQlhY2xvY2FsCisJCQljYXNlICIkZGlyIiBpbiAjeygK KwkJCQkqZGVtbykJYXV0b21ha2U7OworCQkJZXNhYyAjfQorCQkpOworCWRv bmUKKwlhdXRvbWFrZQorCWF1dG9jb25mCiAgICAgQ0M9IiV7bF9jY30iIFwK ICAgICBDRkxBR1M9IiV7bF9jZmxhZ3MgLU99IiBcCiAgICAgLi9jb25maWd1 cmUgXAo= ------------=_1057801503-2331-15-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jul 11 09:43:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0C705277D02; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:43:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057909396-2331-16" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:43:17 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057909396-2331-16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Fri Jul 11 09:43:15 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Remember this for OpenPKG 2.0 development which starts soon once we've kicked out OpenPKG 1.3. ----- Forwarded message from Conrad Steenberg ----- Delivered-To: rse+openpkg-dev@en1.engelschall.com Delivered-To: rse+openpkg-dev@engelschall.com Subject: Bootstrap port to rpm-4.2.1 From: Conrad Steenberg To: OpenPKG Developer Mailing list Date: 10 Jul 2003 16:59:13 -0700 Reply-To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Precedence: list Hi I made a port of the bootstrap package to rpm-4.2.1, available at http://heppc22.hep.caltech.edu/openpkg/ This addresses RT ticket #68 at https://rt.openpkg.org/SelfService/Display.html?id=68 Since the downloads are rather large, the .boot and .spec files and changed/added patch files are also available. The README is below. Hopefully this would be a useful start to the 4.2 port :-) Cheers! Conrad -- Conrad Steenberg README file --------------------------------------------------- OpenPKG port to rpm-4.2.1 based on openpkg-20030710 --------------------------------------------------- In this directory: 1. Prebuilt source RPM/shell scripts openpkg-20030710_4.2.1-20030710_4.2.1.src.rpm openpkg-20030710_4.2.1-20030710_4.2.1.src.sh 2. Boot script and spec file openpkg.spec openpkg.boot 3. Patches modified to work with rpm-4.2.1 rpm.patch.bugfix rpm.patch.feature rpm.patch.fts rpm.patch.makefile rpm.patch.porting You also need: rpm-4.2.1.tar.gz from http://www.rpm.org beecrypt-3.0.0.tar.gz from http://sourceforge.net/projects/beecrypt/ Make diffs as appropriate Caveats ------- 1. rpm.patch.regen is not applied, since it is specific to rpm-4.0.2 2. rpm --install --justdb in the build process fails for some reason, so the rpm package is _really_ installed to prepare the rpm database. 3. This part of rpm.patch.porting was not applied out of sheer laziness: +--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Avoid non-portable construct: a self-referencing structure | declaration cannot be combined with the corresponding typedef. | Although GCC supports this (and does the correct thing), most | other stricter compilers complain and fail. +--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Index: rpmio/rpmmacro.h --- rpmio/rpmmacro.h 2000/12/11 18:41:27 1.1.1.2 +++ rpmio/rpmmacro.h 2001/06/25 19:26:59 1.2 @@ -6,14 +6,15 @@ */ /*! The structure used to store a macro. */ -typedef /*@abstract@*/ struct MacroEntry { +struct MacroEntry { struct MacroEntry *prev;/*!< Macro entry stack. */ const char *name; /*!< Macro name. */ const char *opts; /*!< Macro parameters (a la getopt) */ const char *body; /*!< Macro body. */ int used; /*!< No. of expansions. */ int level; /*!< Scoping level. */ -} MacroEntry; +}; +typedef /*@abstract@*/ struct MacroEntry MacroEntry; /*! The structure used to store the set of macros in a context. */ typedef /*@abstract@*/ struct MacroContext { 4. This version of rpm uses the 'rpmbuild' command to build packages. it is included in the path of the installation. It actually calls the 'rpmb' command, but Redhat-9 also does it this way, so there. 5. I'm new to OpenPKG so touching any of this may format your root partition, misalign important astronomical objects, or cause some other really serious mischief to happen. You've been warned ;-) Cheers Conrad Steenberg ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org ----- End forwarded message ----- Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1057909396-2331-16-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jul 11 09:47:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E80A8277D06; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:47:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #201] Quickref - modifications From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1057909630-43339-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #201": ; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:47:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1057909630-43339-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 201 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/201 Ticket: [OpenPKG #201] Subject: Quickref - modifications Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Fri Jul 11 09:47:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Good suggestions which should be merged into the QuickRef once time permits. ----- Forwarded message from Matthias Kurz ----- Delivered-To: rse+openpkg-users@en1.engelschall.com Delivered-To: rse+openpkg-users@engelschall.com Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:03:43 +0200 From: Matthias Kurz To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org Subject: Quickref - modifications Reply-To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org Precedence: list Hi. Before i forget: I suggest to add the points 24 and 23 (in this order) from the FAQ to the QuickRef. As a third bullet, before "o Updating OpenPKG to the latest version:" and after "o Boostrapping OpenPKG from scratch:" Also it would be nice, when there would be the keyword "debugging" under "o Fetch and build a binary package from source:", e.g. by changing Alternatively, to perform the 'steps behind' option, --rebuild manually by entering the following commands: to Alternatively, to perform the 'steps behind' option, --rebuild manually by entering the following commands (good for debugging - see also BUILD OPTIONS under "man rpm"). Hmmm, i would probably write it as Alternatively, to perform the steps behind the option --rebuild one can manually enter the following commands (good for debugging - see also BUILD OPTIONS under "man rpm"). (mk) -- Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47 >> Im prämotorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw) << ----- End forwarded message ----- Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1057909630-43339-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 10:29:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7AFC5277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:29:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #2] openpkg: rc: suggestions for enhancement From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058171386-2330-26" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #2": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:29:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058171386-2330-26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 2 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/2 Ticket: [OpenPKG #2] Subject: openpkg: rc: suggestions for enhancement Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 10:29:45 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > - rename rc.xxxx to just xxxxx? No, we keep the syntax "rc.xxxx", because it is like the standard Unix "rc.local" etc. files and allows easy grepping for developers, etc. pp. > - provide %status in all packages Not done, new ticket will be created. > - "rc -v" should output "OpenPKG: apache bind foo" Done, but without "-v". Instead "-s" silent disabled this default output and output syntax is "OpenPKG: : , , . > - rc.func additions: signal (via rpmtool signal) > rotate (via shtool rotate), checkpid Does not provide a lot of improvement, because rpmtool is already in $PATH for run-command scripts and hence can easily be used without wrappers. > - run-command scripts should support > %restart > %stop; sleep1; %start Done, but differently: "rc" is now in $PATH for run-command scripts, so the syntax for the above is "rc myself stop; sleep 1; rc myself start" -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058171386-2330-26-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 10:29:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 49DE2277BFB; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:29:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #2] openpkg: rc: suggestions for enhancement From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058171389-2330-30" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #2": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:29:49 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058171389-2330-30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 2 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/2 Ticket: [OpenPKG #2] Subject: openpkg: rc: suggestions for enhancement Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 10:29:48 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058171389-2330-30-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 11:46:22 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9FAF5277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:46:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #188] rc %status From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058175981-43339-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #188": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:46:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058175981-43339-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 188 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/188 Ticket: [OpenPKG #188] Subject: rc %status Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 11:46:19 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > The %{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/rc.%{name} scripts for daemons should provide > a %status section which returns information about the daemon being up > and running or not. The section always has to exit with return code 0 (i.e. there is always a status) and the status information has to be a valid /bin/sh script containing only variable defintions with variable names prefixed with "_". At least two variables have to exist always: _usable="yes|no" # meaning: config, license, etc. (in)valid, etc. _active="yes|no" # meaning: daemon is running/stopped, etc Supported usage has to be: # rc.myself: %restart eval `rc myself status` if [ ".$myself_active`" = .yes ]; then rc myself stop start fi # myself.spec: %pre eval `rc myself status | tee ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/myself.status` if [ ".$myself_active`" = .yes ]; then %{l_rc} myself stop fi %post eval `cat ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/myself.status` if [ ".$myself_active`" = .yes ]; then %{l_rc} myself start fi rm -f ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/myself.status $ rc myself status myself_usable="yes" myself_active="no" > eval `rc all status` > if [ ".$foo_active" = .yes ]; then > fi -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058175981-43339-2-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 11:50:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E797B277B3A; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:50:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #9] sudo: log file handling not implemented From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058176206-43339-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #9": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:50:06 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058176206-43339-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 9 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/9 Ticket: [OpenPKG #9] Subject: sudo: log file handling not implemented Requestors: chris@schug.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 11:50:05 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058176206-43339-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 11:51:26 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B0427277B3A; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:51:25 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #14] apache: invalid rc script arguments are ignored From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058176285-43745-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #14": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:51:25 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058176285-43745-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 14 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/14 Ticket: [OpenPKG #14] Subject: apache: invalid rc script arguments are ignored Requestors: markus.sander@de.cw.com Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 11:51:24 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058176285-43745-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 11:58:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C61B3277B3A; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:58:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #56] /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058176703-2330-33" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #56": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:58:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058176703-2330-33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 56 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/56 Ticket: [OpenPKG #56] Subject: /etc/rc: ERROR: require root priviledges ... Requestors: vinod+openpkg@kutty.cc Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 11:58:22 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058176703-2330-33-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 12:06:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E5CAF277B48; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:06:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #87] Java CLASSPATH standards From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058177172-2332-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #87": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:06:12 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058177172-2332-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 87 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/87 Ticket: [OpenPKG #87] Subject: Java CLASSPATH standards Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 12:06:11 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058177172-2332-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 12:07:54 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 58B54277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #91] perl .packlist files [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058177274-54370-25" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #91": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058177274-54370-25 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 91 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/91 Ticket: [OpenPKG #91] Subject: perl .packlist files Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 12:07:53 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ AFAIK those files are not essential and I also know no application for it and we also never had those files, so let's don't do it for now. ------------=_1058177274-54370-25-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 12:11:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E2E1C277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:11:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #103] samba-2.2.5-1.1.2 no longer compiles under Solaris 8/9 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058177506-2333-30" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #103": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:11:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058177506-2333-30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 103 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/103 Ticket: [OpenPKG #103] Subject: samba-2.2.5-1.1.2 no longer compiles under Solaris 8/9 Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 12:11:46 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058177506-2333-30-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 12:12:48 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7966D277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:12:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #106] ocaml package hangs under build-time From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058177568-2333-33" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #106": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:12:48 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058177568-2333-33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 106 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/106 Ticket: [OpenPKG #106] Subject: ocaml package hangs under build-time Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 12:12:47 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058177568-2333-33-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 12:16:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id AD5EB277B4F; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #116] mutt-1.4i-1.2.2 does not install on dv4 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058177786-2330-40" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #116": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058177786-2330-40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 116 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/116 Ticket: [OpenPKG #116] Subject: mutt-1.4i-1.2.2 does not install on dv4 Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 12:16:24 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058177786-2330-40-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 12:17:50 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2A9E5277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:17:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #119] RedHat 8/9 and statically linked executables (like RPM itself) From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058177870-2330-43" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #119": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:17:50 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058177870-2330-43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 119 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/119 Ticket: [OpenPKG #119] Subject: RedHat 8/9 and statically linked executables (like RPM itself) Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 12:17:49 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058177870-2330-43-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 12:22:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0A929277B4F; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:22:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #133] TODO: rc From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058178134-43339-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #133": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:22:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058178134-43339-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 133 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/133 Ticket: [OpenPKG #133] Subject: TODO: rc Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 12:22:14 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058178134-43339-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:18:02 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 83869277B3A; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:18:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #161] Conflict, php-4.3.2-20030603 and apache-1.3.27-20030611 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058181481-2330-50" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #161": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:18:01 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058181481-2330-50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 161 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/161 Ticket: [OpenPKG #161] Subject: Conflict, php-4.3.2-20030603 and apache-1.3.27-20030611 Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:18:00 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058181481-2330-50-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:22:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C9CBC277BFF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:22:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #169] file conflicts between kerberos and j2se14 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058181736-2333-39" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #169": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:22:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058181736-2333-39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 169 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/169 Ticket: [OpenPKG #169] Subject: file conflicts between kerberos and j2se14 Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:22:15 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > kerberos-1.2.8-20030627 vs. j2se14-1.4.2-20030612 > /cw/man/man1/kinit.1 > /cw/man/man1/klist.1 Should be deleted from j2se14. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058181736-2333-39-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:23:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 3F95B277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:23:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #174] rc script enhancement for opServiceEnabled From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058181817-43745-26" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #174": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:23:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058181817-43745-26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 174 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/174 Ticket: [OpenPKG #174] Subject: rc script enhancement for opServiceEnabled Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:23:36 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058181817-43745-26-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:25:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E5DA9277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #178] could we use rc in log rotation epilog? From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058181915-2332-18" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #178": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058181915-2332-18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 178 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/178 Ticket: [OpenPKG #178] Subject: could we use rc in log rotation epilog? Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:25:14 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > at least proftpd and teapop currently do. Yes, use "rc " und openpkg >= 20030714. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058181915-2332-18-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:37:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id CB586277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:37:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #175] modify rc scripts to use opServiceEnabled From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058182626-2334-20" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #175": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:37:06 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058182626-2334-20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 175 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/175 Ticket: [OpenPKG #175] Subject: modify rc scripts to use opServiceEnabled Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:37:05 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058182626-2334-20-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id EF154277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #8] zebra: log file handling not yet implemented [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183123-2333-43" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #8": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183123-2333-43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 8 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/8 Ticket: [OpenPKG #8] Subject: zebra: log file handling not yet implemented Requestors: chris@schug.net Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:22 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183123-2333-43-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:26 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 13F0E277BFF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #125] openpkg-dev contributor uploading files other than *.spec [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183125-2333-45" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #125": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183125-2333-45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 125 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/125 Ticket: [OpenPKG #125] Subject: openpkg-dev contributor uploading files other than *.spec Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:25 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183125-2333-45-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:28 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 07F3D277D2B; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:27 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #147] openpkg-dev broken under solaris [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183127-2333-47" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #147": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:27 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183127-2333-47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 147 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/147 Ticket: [OpenPKG #147] Subject: openpkg-dev broken under solaris Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:27 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183127-2333-47-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:30 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 85607277D34; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #150] openpkg-dev build with more intelligent enforcment [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183130-2333-49" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #150": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:30 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183130-2333-49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 150 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/150 Ticket: [OpenPKG #150] Subject: openpkg-dev build with more intelligent enforcment Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:29 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183130-2333-49-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:32 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 84806277DCF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #153] openpkg-dev should check release early [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183132-2333-51" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #153": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:32 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183132-2333-51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 153 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/153 Ticket: [OpenPKG #153] Subject: openpkg-dev should check release early Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:31 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183132-2333-51-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B04F4277DFE; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #165] Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183134-2333-53" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #165": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183134-2333-53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 165 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/165 Ticket: [OpenPKG #165] Subject: Compare rcfile log ops with corresponding mkfile /cw/var/*/log in spec files Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:33 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183134-2333-53-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:38 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 650E1277E0A; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #168] openssl CA.pl missing [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183138-2333-55" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #168": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183138-2333-55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 168 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/168 Ticket: [OpenPKG #168] Subject: openssl CA.pl missing Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:36 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183138-2333-55-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:40 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0535A277E0D; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:39 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #172] openpkg-dev nosrc support [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183139-2333-57" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #172": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:39 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183139-2333-57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 172 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/172 Ticket: [OpenPKG #172] Subject: openpkg-dev nosrc support Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:38 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183139-2333-57-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:43 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C6A0C277E10; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #176] daemon bind/listen address [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183142-2333-59" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #176": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:42 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183142-2333-59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 176 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/176 Ticket: [OpenPKG #176] Subject: daemon bind/listen address Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:41 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183142-2333-59-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:44 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6AA53277E11; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #178] could we use rc in log rotation epilog? [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183144-2333-61" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #178": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183144-2333-61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 178 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/178 Ticket: [OpenPKG #178] Subject: could we use rc in log rotation epilog? Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:43 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183144-2333-61-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BE117277B3A; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #181] rotating INN logs [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183146-2333-63" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #181": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183146-2333-63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 181 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/181 Ticket: [OpenPKG #181] Subject: rotating INN logs Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:45 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183146-2333-63-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 3A3D6277BFF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #182] "append" in fsl.* files [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183149-2333-65" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #182": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183149-2333-65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 182 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/182 Ticket: [OpenPKG #182] Subject: "append" in fsl.* files Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:48 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183149-2333-65-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:52 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E6739277D2C; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #183] Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183151-2333-67" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #183": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:51 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183151-2333-67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 183 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/183 Ticket: [OpenPKG #183] Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:51 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183151-2333-67-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:56 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 14370277DCF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #184] disable service when .*\.rpm(save|orig|new) is found [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183155-2333-69" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #184": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:56 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183155-2333-69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 184 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/184 Ticket: [OpenPKG #184] Subject: disable service when .*\.rpm(save|orig|new) is found Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:54 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183155-2333-69-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:45:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 69986277E0A; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #185] openpkg-dev support for opd alias [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183158-2333-71" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #185": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:45:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183158-2333-71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 185 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/185 Ticket: [OpenPKG #185] Subject: openpkg-dev support for opd alias Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:56 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183158-2333-71-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:00 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5EB86277E11; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:00 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #186] openpkg-dev improve mass release performance [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183160-2333-73" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #186": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:00 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183160-2333-73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 186 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/186 Ticket: [OpenPKG #186] Subject: openpkg-dev improve mass release performance Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:45:59 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183160-2333-73-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E9BE3277E15; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #188] rc %status [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183164-2333-75" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #188": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183164-2333-75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 188 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/188 Ticket: [OpenPKG #188] Subject: rc %status Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:46:03 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183164-2333-75-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:08 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E3941277E19; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #189] rc %restart [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183167-2333-77" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #189": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:07 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183167-2333-77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 189 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/189 Ticket: [OpenPKG #189] Subject: rc %restart Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:46:07 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183167-2333-77-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 3EAB7277E15; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #190] spec %preun daemon shut down [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183170-2333-79" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #190": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183170-2333-79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 190 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/190 Ticket: [OpenPKG #190] Subject: spec %preun daemon shut down Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:46:09 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183170-2333-79-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:14 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7BBBB277E11; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #191] spec %post restart [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183174-2333-81" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #191": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183174-2333-81 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 191 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/191 Ticket: [OpenPKG #191] Subject: spec %post restart Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:46:13 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183174-2333-81-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id A0A93277E03; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #192] spec %preun user hook [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183177-2333-83" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #192": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:17 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183177-2333-83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 192 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/192 Ticket: [OpenPKG #192] Subject: spec %preun user hook Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:46:16 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183177-2333-83-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:21 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6345F277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #193] spec %post user hook [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183181-2333-85" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #193": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183181-2333-85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 193 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/193 Ticket: [OpenPKG #193] Subject: spec %post user hook Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:46:20 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183181-2333-85-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:25 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 89191277BFF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #194] rc.%{name} config files [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183184-2333-87" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #194": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:24 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183184-2333-87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 194 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/194 Ticket: [OpenPKG #194] Subject: rc.%{name} config files Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:46:23 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183184-2333-87-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:46:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 17216277D2B; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #197] fsl template [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183186-2333-89" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #197": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183186-2333-89 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 197 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/197 Ticket: [OpenPKG #197] Subject: fsl template Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:46:26 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058183186-2333-89-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:54:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 14D22277BFB; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:54:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #156] Correct package dependencies according to a single library policy From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183656-2331-28" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #156": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:54:17 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183656-2331-28 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 156 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/156 Ticket: [OpenPKG #156] Subject: Correct package dependencies according to a single library policy Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:54:15 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058183656-2331-28-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 13:55:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 71531277B3A; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:55:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #167] perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058183705-43745-29" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #167": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:55:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058183705-43745-29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 167 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/167 Ticket: [OpenPKG #167] Subject: perl-dbi with_dbd_pg patch Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 13:55:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058183705-43745-29-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 14:16:56 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 24050277C00; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:16:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #202] daemon packages have to be run-time checked From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058185015-43339-21" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #202": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:16:56 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058185015-43339-21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 202 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/202 Ticket: [OpenPKG #202] Subject: daemon packages have to be run-time checked Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 14:16:54 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The following packages are "daemon" packages ("?" indicated I'm not sure) which need in-depth run-time testing after the recent major rc/fsl/uid changes: aegis? aica? amavisd amd apache apache2 arpd bind bind8 clamav cups cvs cvsd dcron delegate dhcp-agent? dhcpd djbdns dss easysoap? emacs? exim fetchmail gated honeyd imapd inn ircd jabberd kerberos lmtp2nntp msntp mysql mysql3 nagios? nessus-tool? nntpcache nsd ntp openldap openssh openvpn orbit? orbit2? pb4sd pks portfwd portsentry postfix postgresql pound powerdns prngd proftpd pureftpd qpopper radius rdist rsync samba samhain? sendmail smtpfeed? spread squid tftp tomcat tomcat4 tsmc unixodbc? uucp vrrpd zebra Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1058185015-43339-21-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 14:17:56 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 89652277BFF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:17:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #169] file conflicts between kerberos and j2se14 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058185076-2334-23" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #169": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:17:56 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058185076-2334-23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 169 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/169 Ticket: [OpenPKG #169] Subject: file conflicts between kerberos and j2se14 Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 14:17:55 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058185076-2334-23-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 14:23:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C2347277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:23:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #184] disable service when .*\.rpm(save|orig|new) is found From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058185437-2334-27" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #184": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:23:57 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058185437-2334-27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 184 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/184 Ticket: [OpenPKG #184] Subject: disable service when .*\.rpm(save|orig|new) is found Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 14:23:56 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058185437-2334-27-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 14:24:00 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E8590277C00; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:23:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #184] disable service when .*\.rpm(save|orig|new) is found [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058185439-2334-29" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #184": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:23:59 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058185439-2334-29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 184 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/184 Ticket: [OpenPKG #184] Subject: disable service when .*\.rpm(save|orig|new) is found Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 14:23:59 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Done in OpenPKG 20030711 -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058185439-2334-29-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 14:53:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0AAA4277BFB; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:53:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #147] openpkg-dev broken under solaris From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058187228-2331-30" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #147": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:53:48 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058187228-2331-30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 147 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/147 Ticket: [OpenPKG #147] Subject: openpkg-dev broken under solaris Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Mon Jul 14 14:53:47 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Done, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10635 Requiring bash is not (only :-) because i'm lazy, but because - openpkg-dev will benefit from other bash features (like local variables) and so i decided to go the bash way anyway before this ticket was even created. - it doesn't hurt because even the bootstrap comes with a bash ------------=_1058187228-2331-30-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 14:53:51 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 82FDB277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:53:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #147] openpkg-dev broken under solaris From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058187231-2331-34" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #147": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:53:51 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058187231-2331-34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 147 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/147 Ticket: [OpenPKG #147] Subject: openpkg-dev broken under solaris Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Mon Jul 14 14:53:50 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058187231-2331-34-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 15:01:33 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 83FFB277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:01:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #145] rc issues From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058187692-2332-22" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #145": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:01:32 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058187692-2332-22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 145 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/145 Ticket: [OpenPKG #145] Subject: rc issues Requestors: dwd@drdykstra.us Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 15:01:30 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > [...] > The recommended way to set up the environment is with > eval `$opkg_root/etc/rc --eval all env` > and I've got some issues with that: > > 1. I noticed a whole lot of extra lower case variables are being > set, > being pulled in from the %config sections of al the rc.d scripts, > even those that don't have a %env section. They're not being > exported, but I really don't like them being left set in the > user's environment. I'm not sure what to do about all of them, > but I do have a partial solution (below). > > 2. The eval statement takes a noticeably long amount of time, and > I'm > not too happy about that either. > > 3. The %config sections of all the rc.d scripts are being read in > for every file. If they were only read in once, especially only > those that have %env sections, that could help with reducing > the time. > > What do you think of the following patch (against the current CVS rc > version 1.24)? In our case, it cuts the total time down by about 25% > and the size of the tmpfile down by about 80%. It reduces but does > not > eliminate the extra unexported variables left set in the user's shell. > [...] Thanks for your patch and sorry for the delay in responding. I've now reviewed it and also took it over in a slightly adjusted way. 1. To move out the %config generation out of the loop is a great idea. I've done it now exactly as in your patch. 2. To look at only those files with %env sections is not possible, because all sections in all scripts by definition should be able to see all config variables of all other scripts. An example are packages which use the %config variables from the "MTA" packages. So, this extra optimization with your "grep" approach is not possible. Nevertheless the moving out of the %config parsing already dramatically speeds up processing, so I think we should be already happy about this. 3. The lowercase _xxx variables are nasty, yes. But I don't know how one could solve this. Because the stuff is "eval"ed in the caller's shell, we cannot use sub-shells inside the scripts. With a subshell we could get rid of the %config variables being passed to the caller, but at the same time the resulting variables (for which we're evaluating!) would be lost, too. > Also, what do you think about having a way for having the "tmpfile" > pre-generated each time any package is installed or upgraded, and > having the users invoke that each time rather than running rc > directly? > That would eliminate the speed problem. I'm thinking of having them > invoke > $opkg_root/etc/init.sh or $opkg_root/etc/setup.sh or something like > that. Yes, that's an idea we already had in another OpenPKG ticket. This definetely could dramatically speed up processing again. I'll perhaps try to pick up this idea later for OpenPKG 2.0. Thanks for your contribution. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058187692-2332-22-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 15:02:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4FD06277BFB; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:02:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #145] rc issues From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058187726-43745-32" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #145": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:02:06 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058187726-43745-32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 145 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/145 Ticket: [OpenPKG #145] Subject: rc issues Requestors: dwd@drdykstra.us Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 14 15:02:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058187726-43745-32-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 15:31:31 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 428E2277BFF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:31:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #197] fsl template From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058189491-43745-34" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #197": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:31:31 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058189491-43745-34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 197 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/197 Ticket: [OpenPKG #197] Subject: fsl template Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Mon Jul 14 15:31:29 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ How to integrate the "fake syslog library" (fsl) into an existing OpenPKG package named FIXME. o in the .spec file - between "Release" and the list of sources, place the fsl %option. We default to "yes". Align the "yes" with other options, if there are any. The "with_fsl" should always be the first option. - add rc.FIXME and fsl.FIXME to the list of sources. It is very likely that rc.FIXME already exists. The order must be rc before fsl. - make sure that "PreReq" requires at least OpenPKG version 20030415, as it introduced the %{l_fsl...} macros. - immediately after "PreReq" and before other "if ... with..." constructs or, if none exist, before "AutoReq", place the "if ... with_fsl ..." construct for conditional "(Build)PreReq". - %build section, try if LDFLAGS and LIBS can be used to inject %{l_fsl_ldflags} and %{l_fsl_libs} as shown in the template %right after CFLAGS. If this doesn't work, i.e. because %configure desperatly searches for a library with empty name %when build with "with_fsl no", try to wrap the LDFLAGS/LIBS %section with a "if ... with_fsl ..." construct, too. - %install section, make sure the "shtool mkdir" exists, creates a .../var/FIXME directory and is placed immediately after the initial "rm". - %install section, make sure the rc.FIXME file is installed and the @@ variables are substituted, see "install run-command script". - %install section, make sure the fsl.FIXME file is installed and the @@ variables are substituted, see "install OSSP fsl configuration". - %install section, make sure the fsl directory is listed as "%not %dir" and the fsl.FIXME receives a "%config" tag. o in the rc.FIXME file - make sure a %config section exists which creates at least the _enable and _log_ variables. - make sure a %daily section exists which does log file rotation, see "rotate logfile". The job must be run as @l_susr@. o create a fsl.FIXME file - and make sure the proper regex is used for "ident". This requires source code examination (sometimes patching) and often run-time testing. - the epilog of the log file rotation is fully package dependent. It is valid to run a "rc FIXME restart" (using no path to rc). An alternative is to use the "jitter=1" option in the l2 file channel, which was introduced with fsl-1.2.0 (note the fsl "(Build)PreReq" in the .spec) - the use of "append=1" in the l2 file channel is deprecated, as "replace=0" was introduced with fsl-1.2.0 and became the default (note the fsl "(Build)PreReq" in the .spec) ## ## FIXME.spec -- OpenPKG RPM Specification ... Release: ... # package options %option with_fsl yes # list of sources ... Source...: rc.FIXME Source...: fsl.FIXME ... PreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg >= 20030415 ... %if "%{with_fsl}" == "yes" BuildPreReq: fsl >= 1.2.0 PreReq: fsl >= 1.2.0 %endif AutoReq: no ... %build ... CFLAGS=... \ LDFLAGS="%{l_fsl_ldflags}" \ LIBS="%{l_fsl_libs}" \ ./configure \ ... %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/var/FIXME \ ... # install run-command script %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d %{l_shtool} install -c -m 755 \ -e 's;@l_prefix@;%{l_prefix};g' \ -e 's;@l_susr@;%{l_susr};g' \ -e 's;@l_rusr@;%{l_rusr};g' \ -e 's;@l_rgrp@;%{l_rgrp};g' \ %{SOURCE rc.FIXME} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/ # install OSSP fsl configuration %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/fsl %{l_shtool} install -c -m 644 \ -e 's;@l_prefix@;%{l_prefix};g' \ %{SOURCE fsl.FIXME} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/fsl/ # determine installation files %{l_rpmtool} files -v -ofiles -r$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ %{l_files_std} \ '%not %dir %{l_prefix}/etc/fsl' \ '%config %{l_prefix}/etc/fsl/fsl.FIXME' \ #!@l_prefix@/lib/openpkg/bash @l_prefix@/etc/rc ## ## rc.FIXME -- Run-Commands ## %config FIXME_enable="yes" ... FIXME_log_prolog="true" FIXME_log_epilog="true" FIXME_log_numfiles="10" FIXME_log_minsize="1M" FIXME_log_complevel="9" ... %daily -u @l_susr@ opServiceEnabled FIXME || exit 0 # rotate logfile shtool rotate -f \ -n${FIXME_log_numfiles} -s${FIXME_log_minsize} -d \ -z${FIXME_log_complevel} -o@l_rusr@ -g@l_rgrp@ -m644 \ -P "${FIXME_log_prolog}" \ -E "${FIXME_log_epilog} && rc FIXME restart" \ @l_prefix@/var/FIXME/FIXME.log ## ## fsl.FIXME -- OSSP fsl configuration ## ident (FIXME.*)/.+ q{ prefix( prefix="%b %d %H:%M:%S %N <%L> $1[%P]: " ) -> { debug: file( path="@l_prefix@/var/FIXME/FIXME.log", perm=0644 ) } }; -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1058189491-43745-34-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 15:32:14 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B7088277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #197] fsl template From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058189533-2333-92" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #197": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058189533-2333-92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 197 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/197 Ticket: [OpenPKG #197] Subject: fsl template Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Mon Jul 14 15:32:12 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058189533-2333-92-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 15:39:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B28C9277BFF; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:39:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #183] Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058189976-54370-35" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #183": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:39:36 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058189976-54370-35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 183 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/183 Ticket: [OpenPKG #183] Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Mon Jul 14 15:39:35 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Done in fsl-1.2.0-20030714, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10637 ------------=_1058189976-54370-35-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 15:39:53 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id A4C45277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:39:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #183] Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058189993-2334-32" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #183": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:39:53 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058189993-2334-32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 183 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/183 Ticket: [OpenPKG #183] Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/fsl/ fsl.default fsl.spec rc.fsl openpkg-we... Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Mon Jul 14 15:39:52 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058189993-2334-32-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 16:19:44 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4E30D277ACC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:19:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #155] [python] core library imports fail on Solaris From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058192383-2331-36" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #155": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:19:43 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058192383-2331-36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 155 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/155 Ticket: [OpenPKG #155] Subject: [python] core library imports fail on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Mon Jul 14 16:19:41 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Fixed in python-20030609 and later. -- Michael van Elst OpenPKG Developer mlelstv@openpkg.org ------------=_1058192383-2331-36-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 16:20:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 02666277D2B; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:20:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #155] [python] core library imports fail on Solaris From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058192422-54370-39" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #155": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:20:22 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058192422-54370-39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 155 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/155 Ticket: [OpenPKG #155] Subject: [python] core library imports fail on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by mlelstv Time: Mon Jul 14 16:20:21 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058192422-54370-39-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 16:27:09 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D0817277D34; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:27:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #182] "append" in fsl.* files From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058192828-2333-94" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #182": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:27:08 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058192828-2333-94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 182 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/182 Ticket: [OpenPKG #182] Subject: "append" in fsl.* files Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Mon Jul 14 16:27:07 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Done, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10639 ------------=_1058192828-2333-94-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 16:27:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id A5EAC277D35; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #182] "append" in fsl.* files From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058192831-2333-98" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #182": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058192831-2333-98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 182 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/182 Ticket: [OpenPKG #182] Subject: "append" in fsl.* files Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Mon Jul 14 16:27:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058192831-2333-98-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 17:44:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5E48E277A22; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:44:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #171] python package fully broken: linkchecker shows problems From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058197489-43745-37" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #171": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:44:49 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058197489-43745-37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 171 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/171 Ticket: [OpenPKG #171] Subject: python package fully broken: linkchecker shows problems Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Mon Jul 14 17:44:48 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Fixed more references to versioned paths in python scripts. linkchecker-20030714 now builds and installs. -- Michael van Elst OpenPKG Developer mlelstv@openpkg.org ------------=_1058197489-43745-37-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 14 17:44:52 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 80FDB277D2E; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #171] python package fully broken: linkchecker shows problems From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058197492-43745-41" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #171": ; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058197492-43745-41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 171 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/171 Ticket: [OpenPKG #171] Subject: python package fully broken: linkchecker shows problems Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by mlelstv Time: Mon Jul 14 17:44:51 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058197492-43745-41-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 15 12:06:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id ED491277AFB; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:06:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #194] rc.%{name} config files [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058263594-2330-53" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #194": ; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:06:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058263594-2330-53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 194 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/194 Ticket: [OpenPKG #194] Subject: rc.%{name} config files Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 15 12:06:33 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Ralf "rpmlint" Engelschall ------------=_1058263594-2330-53-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 15 12:17:55 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 43DBE277AFB; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:17:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #192] spec %preun user hook [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058264275-2333-100" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #192": ; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:17:55 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058264275-2333-100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 192 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/192 Ticket: [OpenPKG #192] Subject: spec %preun user hook Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 15 12:17:53 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Research has shown that rpm calls %pre nad %preun scripts really at the very beginning of it's activity. The archive is not even unpacked at this point. Only little information is passed to the scripts. A single tells whether the action is an install or upgrade (see http://www.fedora.us/docs/spec.html). Compared to a wrapper around rpm the enhancement functionality of the hook would be negliable if not null, so there is no reason to implement it. ------------=_1058264275-2333-100-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 15 12:18:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 3231E277C7D; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:18:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #193] spec %post user hook [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058264283-43745-43" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #193": ; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:18:03 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058264283-43745-43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 193 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/193 Ticket: [OpenPKG #193] Subject: spec %post user hook Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 15 12:18:02 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Research has shown that rpm calls %post and %postun scripts really at the end of it's activity. Only little information is passed to the scripts. A single tells whether the action is an erase or upgrade (see http://www.fedora.us/docs/spec.html). Compared to a wrapper around rpm the enhancement functionality of the hook would be negliable if not null, so there is no reason to implement it. ------------=_1058264283-43745-43-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 15 12:30:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D70C9277AFB; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:30:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #202] daemon packages have to be run-time checked [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058265036-43339-22" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #202": ; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:30:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058265036-43339-22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 202 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/202 Ticket: [OpenPKG #202] Subject: daemon packages have to be run-time checked Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 15 12:30:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ [CORE] cvs ntp openssh rsync [BASE] amd apache bind delegate dhcpd emacs fetchmail inn ircd lmtp2nntp mysql nntpcache openldap portsentry postfix postgresql prngd proftpd pureftpd qpopper samba smtpfeed squid unixodbc uucp zebra [PLUS] aegis bind8 clamav cvsd imapd kerberos msntp mysql3 orbit pb4sd pks portfwd radius samhain sendmail spread tftp [EVAL] aica apache2 arpd cups dcron dhcp-agent djbdns dss easysoap exim gated nagios nessus-tool nsd openvpn orbit2 pound tomcat tomcat4 tsmc [JUNK] amavisd honeyd jabberd powerdns rdist vrrpd ------------=_1058265036-43339-22-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 15 14:40:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4B969277A1D; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:40:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #200] Libtool, dependency on automake From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058272810-2330-55" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #200": ; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:40:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058272810-2330-55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 200 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/200 Ticket: [OpenPKG #200] Subject: Libtool, dependency on automake Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Tue Jul 15 14:40:09 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Running automake in the demo subdirectories fails with: Makefile.am: object `hello.lo' created both with libtool and without Makefile.am: object `foo.lo' created both with libtool and without I don't understand enough about automake to see where the error is. -- Michael van Elst OpenPKG Developer mlelstv@openpkg.org ------------=_1058272810-2330-55-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 15 16:51:38 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E6965277AEE; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:51:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #203] icewm package From: "martin@slackers.net via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058280697-2330-59" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #203": ; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:51:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058280697-2330-59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 203 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/203 Ticket: [OpenPKG #203] Subject: icewm package Requestors: martin@slackers.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by martin@slackers.net Time: Tue Jul 15 16:51:36 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Not sure if this is the place to post new packages but thought I would start here. Attachd is a first stab at a package for the ICE window manager. It works for me with redhat 7.3 and solaris 9. I find it a nice light self contained desktop when I need to run GUI apps on my servers via VNC (for example when you have an awful Java server program that requires you to run a GUI to install - java gui apps with X over a WAN are terrible!) Martin Andrews ------------=_1058280697-2330-59 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="icewm.spec" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="icewm.spec" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 IyMKIyMgIGV0aGVyZWFsLnNwZWMgLS0gT3BlblBLRyBSUE0gU3BlY2lmaWNh dGlvbgojIyAgQ29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAyMDAwLTIwMDMgVGhlIE9wZW5QS0cg UHJvamVjdCA8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5vcGVucGtnLm9yZy8+CiMjICBDb3B5cmln aHQgKGMpIDIwMDAtMjAwMyBSYWxmIFMuIEVuZ2Vsc2NoYWxsIDxyc2VAZW5n ZWxzY2hhbGwuY29tPgojIyAgQ29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAyMDAwLTIwMDMgQ2Fi bGUgJiBXaXJlbGVzcyA8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jdy5jb20vPgojIwojIyAgUGVy bWlzc2lvbiB0byB1c2UsIGNvcHksIG1vZGlmeSwgYW5kIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGUg dGhpcyBzb2Z0d2FyZSBmb3IKIyMgIGFueSBwdXJwb3NlIHdpdGggb3Igd2l0 aG91dCBmZWUgaXMgaGVyZWJ5IGdyYW50ZWQsIHByb3ZpZGVkIHRoYXQKIyMg IHRoZSBhYm92ZSBjb3B5cmlnaHQgbm90aWNlIGFuZCB0aGlzIHBlcm1pc3Np b24gbm90aWNlIGFwcGVhciBpbiBhbGwKIyMgIGNvcGllcy4KIyMKIyMgIFRI SVMgU09GVFdBUkUgSVMgUFJPVklERUQgYGBBUyBJUycnIEFORCBBTlkgRVhQ UkVTU0VEIE9SIElNUExJRUQKIyMgIFdBUlJBTlRJRVMsIElOQ0xVRElORywg QlVUIE5PVCBMSU1JVEVEIFRPLCBUSEUgSU1QTElFRCBXQVJSQU5USUVTIE9G CiMjICBNRVJDSEFOVEFCSUxJVFkgQU5EIEZJVE5FU1MgRk9SIEEgUEFSVElD VUxBUiBQVVJQT1NFIEFSRSBESVNDTEFJTUVELgojIyAgSU4gTk8gRVZFTlQg U0hBTEwgVEhFIEFVVEhPUlMgQU5EIENPUFlSSUdIVCBIT0xERVJTIEFORCBU SEVJUgojIyAgQ09OVFJJQlVUT1JTIEJFIExJQUJMRSBGT1IgQU5ZIERJUkVD VCwgSU5ESVJFQ1QsIElOQ0lERU5UQUwsCiMjICBTUEVDSUFMLCBFWEVNUExB UlksIE9SIENPTlNFUVVFTlRJQUwgREFNQUdFUyAoSU5DTFVESU5HLCBCVVQg Tk9UCiMjICBMSU1JVEVEIFRPLCBQUk9DVVJFTUVOVCBPRiBTVUJTVElUVVRF IEdPT0RTIE9SIFNFUlZJQ0VTOyBMT1NTIE9GCiMjICBVU0UsIERBVEEsIE9S IFBST0ZJVFM7IE9SIEJVU0lORVNTIElOVEVSUlVQVElPTikgSE9XRVZFUiBD QVVTRUQgQU5ECiMjICBPTiBBTlkgVEhFT1JZIE9GIExJQUJJTElUWSwgV0hF VEhFUiBJTiBDT05UUkFDVCwgU1RSSUNUIExJQUJJTElUWSwKIyMgIE9SIFRP UlQgKElOQ0xVRElORyBORUdMSUdFTkNFIE9SIE9USEVSV0lTRSkgQVJJU0lO RyBJTiBBTlkgV0FZIE9VVAojIyAgT0YgVEhFIFVTRSBPRiBUSElTIFNPRlRX QVJFLCBFVkVOIElGIEFEVklTRUQgT0YgVEhFIFBPU1NJQklMSVRZIE9GCiMj ICBTVUNIIERBTUFHRS4KIyMKCiMgICBwYWNrYWdlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uCk5h bWU6ICAgICAgICAgaWNld20KU3VtbWFyeTogICAgICBJQ0UgV2luZG93IE1h bmFnZXIKVVJMOiAgICAgICAgICBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmljZXdtLm9yZy8KVmVu ZG9yOiAgICAgICA/ClBhY2thZ2VyOiAgICAgTElPTiBiaW9zY2llbmNlCkRp c3RyaWJ1dGlvbjogbGlvbgpHcm91cDogICAgICAgIFgxMQpMaWNlbnNlOiAg ICAgIEdQTApWZXJzaW9uOiAgICAgIDEuMi45ClJlbGVhc2U6ICAgICAgbGlv bi4yCgojICAgcGFja2FnZSBvcHRpb25zCgojICAgbGlzdCBvZiBzb3VyY2Vz ClNvdXJjZTA6ICAgICAgaHR0cDovL2Z0cDEuc291cmNlZm9yZ2UubmV0L2lj ZXdtL2ljZXdtLSV7dmVyc2lvbn0udGFyLmd6CgojICAgYnVpbGQgaW5mb3Jt YXRpb24KUHJlZml4OiAgICAgICAle2xfcHJlZml4fQpCdWlsZFJvb3Q6ICAg ICV7bF9idWlsZHJvb3R9CkJ1aWxkUHJlUmVxOiAgT3BlblBLRywgb3BlbnBr ZywgaW1saWIsIGxpYmljb252LCB4MTEKUHJlUmVxOiAgICAgICBPcGVuUEtH LCBvcGVucGtnLCBpbWxpYiwgbGliaWNvbnYKQXV0b1JlcTogICAgICBubwpB dXRvUmVxUHJvdjogIG5vCgolZGVzY3JpcHRpb24KICAgIEljZVdNIGlzIGEg d2luZG93IG1hbmFnZXIgZm9yIHRoZSBYMTEgV2luZG93IFN5c3RlbS4gVGhl IGdvYWwgb2YgSWNlV00KICAgIGlzIHNwZWVkLCBzaW1wbGljaXR5LCBhbmQg bm90IGdldHRpbmcgaW4gdGhlIHVzZXIncyB3YXkuCgolcHJlcAogICAgJXNl dHVwIC1xCgolYnVpbGQKICAgIENDPSIle2xfY2N9IiBcCiAgICBDRkxBR1M9 IiV7bF9jZmxhZ3MgLU99IiBcCiAgICBDUFBGTEFHUz0iJXtsX2NwcGZsYWdz fSIgXAogICAgTERGTEFHUz0iJXtsX2xkZmxhZ3N9IiBcCiAgICAuL2NvbmZp Z3VyZSBcCiAgICAgICAgLS1wcmVmaXg9JXtsX3ByZWZpeH0gXAogICAgICAg IC0td2l0aC1pbWxpYj0le2xfcHJlZml4fS9iaW4gXAogICAgICAgIC0tZGlz YWJsZS14ZnJlZXR5cGUgXAogICAgICAgIC0tZGlzYWJsZS14aW5lcmFtYQog ICAgJXtsX21ha2V9ICV7bF9tZmxhZ3MgLU99CgolaW5zdGFsbAogICAgcm0g LXJmICRSUE1fQlVJTERfUk9PVAogICAgJXtsX21ha2V9ICV7bF9tZmxhZ3N9 IGluc3RhbGwgREVTVERJUj0kUlBNX0JVSUxEX1JPT1QKICAgIHN0cmlwICRS UE1fQlVJTERfUk9PVCV7bF9wcmVmaXh9L2Jpbi8qID4vZGV2L251bGwgMj4m MSB8fCB0cnVlCiAgICAle2xfcnBtdG9vbH0gZmlsZXMgLXYgLW9maWxlcyAt ciRSUE1fQlVJTERfUk9PVCAle2xfZmlsZXNfc3RkfQoKJWZpbGVzIC1mIGZp bGVzCgolY2xlYW4KICAgIHJtIC1yZiAkUlBNX0JVSUxEX1JPT1QKCg== ------------=_1058280697-2330-59-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 15 18:42:30 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 980AC277AD1; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:42:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #200] Libtool, dependency on automake From: "bill@celestial.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058287349-2334-34" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #200": ; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:42:29 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058287349-2334-34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 200 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/200 Ticket: [OpenPKG #200] Subject: Libtool, dependency on automake Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by bill@celestial.com Time: Tue Jul 15 18:42:28 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 02:40:10PM +0200, Michael van Elst via RT wrote: >Request 200 was acted upon. >_________________________________________________________________________ > > URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/200 > Ticket: [OpenPKG #200] > Subject: Libtool, dependency on automake > Requestors: bill@celestial.com > Queue: openpkg > Owner: mlelstv > Status: open > Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv > Time: Tue Jul 15 14:40:09 2003 >________________________________________________________________________ > > >Running automake in the demo subdirectories fails with: > >Makefile.am: object `hello.lo' created both with libtool and without >Makefile.am: object `foo.lo' created both with libtool and without I didn't see this building on FreeBSD 4.8 STABLE, but haven't tried on other platforms yet. >I don't understand enough about automake to see where the error is. I'm glad I'm not alone in that :-). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.'' ------------=_1058287349-2334-34-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 15 20:47:56 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6049E277A18; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:47:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #203] icewm package From: "martin@slackers.net via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058294875-2332-25" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #203": ; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:47:55 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058294875-2332-25 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 203 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/203 Ticket: [OpenPKG #203] Subject: icewm package Requestors: martin@slackers.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Correspondence added by martin@slackers.net Time: Tue Jul 15 20:47:53 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ And now an updated spec adding the with_libiconv option so I can use icewm on machines with only the posix-C locale. Martin > > ------------=_1058294875-2332-25 Content-Type: text/plain; name="icewm.spec" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="icewm.spec" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary ## ## ethereal.spec -- OpenPKG RPM Specification ## Copyright (c) 2000-2003 The OpenPKG Project ## Copyright (c) 2000-2003 Ralf S. Engelschall ## Copyright (c) 2000-2003 Cable & Wireless ## ## Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for ## any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that ## the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all ## copies. ## ## THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED ## WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ## MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. ## IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND THEIR ## CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, ## SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT ## LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF ## USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ## ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, ## OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT ## OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF ## SUCH DAMAGE. ## # package information Name: icewm Summary: ICE Window Manager URL: http://www.icewm.org/ Vendor: ? Packager: LION bioscience Distribution: lion Group: X11 License: GPL Version: 1.2.9 Release: lion.3 # package options %option with_libiconv yes # list of sources Source0: http://ftp1.sourceforge.net/icewm/icewm-%{version}.tar.gz # build information Prefix: %{l_prefix} BuildRoot: %{l_buildroot} BuildPreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg, imlib, x11 PreReq: OpenPKG, openpkg, imlib %if "%{with_libiconv}" == "yes" BuildPreReq: libiconv PreReq: libiconv %endif AutoReq: no AutoReqProv: no %description IceWM is a window manager for the X11 Window System. The goal of IceWM is speed, simplicity, and not getting in the user's way. %prep %setup -q %build CC="%{l_cc}" \ CFLAGS="%{l_cflags -O}" \ CPPFLAGS="%{l_cppflags}" \ LDFLAGS="%{l_ldflags}" \ ./configure \ --prefix=%{l_prefix} \ --with-imlib=%{l_prefix}/bin \ %if "%{with_libiconv}" == "no" --disable-i18n \ %endif --disable-xfreetype \ --disable-xinerama %{l_make} %{l_mflags -O} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_make} %{l_mflags} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT strip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/bin/* >/dev/null 2>&1 || true %{l_rpmtool} files -v -ofiles -r$RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{l_files_std} %files -f files %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ------------=_1058294875-2332-25-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 16 05:42:54 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7005) id 8508F277AD1; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 05:42:54 +0200 (CEST) From: trent_doud@emailswitch.net To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org, openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: [BugDB] Who is spying on you? (PR#190) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 05:42:54 +0200 Message-Id: <20030716034254.8508F277AD1@mail.openpkg.org> Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ------=_NextPart_15658_26926_F06.7A1B780215A5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Untitled Document Find out if your boss, spouse or a criminal is spying on you

Also if you have downloaded any music, movie clips, or games then your computer may be infected with SpyWares and AdWares!

Advertisers use downloadable music as a vehicle to "legally" add

SpyWares and AdWares to consumer PCs. If you're suspicious that

Your system is infected then here's your chance to scan your computer free of charge.

Just click below:

http://www.spydetector.net

This is the only spy detection software that protect you against 99.9% of all Spywares

"Spyware" is a common term for files that are installed on your system without your knowledge that allow the user to monitor your PCs activities surreptitiously, Silently your PCs Data and your habits are being documented for review and potential use against you.  .
Spyware devices take many forms: keysroke loggers, web activity recorders, program access monitoring devices, password grabbers, and recovery programs, instant message recorders, email monitors and redirectors, and many more. 

WARNING: Virus softwares such as Mcafee and Norton Anti-Virus protect you against viruses not Spywares.

 

 

If you don't want more emails from us please e-mail: nomore@emailswitch.net

This email was sent using an evaluation version of ESMTP @Engine http://www.esmtp.net

The world fastest email delivery software

@Engine is not spamming software and ESMTP does not send or encourage the sending of unsolicited email. 

yYZqyxBhCmhNZrBFZ ------=_NextPart_15658_26926_F06.7A1B780215A5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 09:28:03 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DEF75277A13; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:28:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #198] shtool subst %{l_susr} etc. From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058426881-2333-103" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #198": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:28:01 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058426881-2333-103 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 198 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/198 Ticket: [OpenPKG #198] Subject: shtool subst %{l_susr} etc. Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 09:28:00 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > [thl - Tue Jul 08 11:18:59 2003]: > > We wanted to create a macro to ease substitution of @l_[smrn]usr@ with > %{l_[smrn]usr} when using "shtool subst ...". Currently, every user > must be substituted seperately which is error prone when an > existing (i.e. rc.* or fsl.*) file is edited to use a previously > unused user but the substitution in the spec file is not updated. > done with openpkg-20030716; implemented as %{l_value} macro. ------------=_1058426881-2333-103-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 09:28:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9A151277CF8; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:28:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #198] shtool subst %{l_susr} etc. From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058426885-2333-107" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #198": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:28:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058426885-2333-107 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 198 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/198 Ticket: [OpenPKG #198] Subject: shtool subst %{l_susr} etc. Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 09:28:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058426885-2333-107-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 09:29:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 800CE277A13; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:29:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #200] Libtool, dependency on automake From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058426964-43745-46" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #200": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:29:24 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058426964-43745-46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 200 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/200 Ticket: [OpenPKG #200] Subject: Libtool, dependency on automake Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 09:29:23 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > [bill@celestial.com - Tue Jul 15 18:42:28 2003]: > > >Running automake in the demo subdirectories fails with: > > done. ------------=_1058426964-43745-46-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 09:29:28 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 83234277CFB; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:29:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #200] Libtool, dependency on automake From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058426968-43745-50" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #200": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:29:28 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058426968-43745-50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 200 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/200 Ticket: [OpenPKG #200] Subject: Libtool, dependency on automake Requestors: bill@celestial.com Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 09:29:27 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058426968-43745-50-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 09:51:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 01ACB277CF6; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:51:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #204] replace shtool subst -e @l_...@ with %{l_value -s ...} From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058428294-54370-43" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #204": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:51:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058428294-54370-43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 204 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/204 Ticket: [OpenPKG #204] Subject: replace shtool subst -e @l_...@ with %{l_value -s ...} Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 09:51:32 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Search for "shtool subst @l_...@" usage and replace with new "shtool %{l_value -s ...}" construct. (Pre)Req openpkg-20030717 Sample @@ -273,13 +266,7 @@ # install run-command script %{l_shtool} mkdir -f -p -m 755 \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d - %{l_shtool} install -c -m 755 \ - -e 's;@l_prefix@;%{l_prefix};g' \ - -e 's;@l_susr@;%{l_susr};g' \ - -e 's;@l_musr@;%{l_musr};g' \ - -e 's;@l_mgrp@;%{l_mgrp};g' \ - -e 's;@l_rusr@;%{l_rusr};g' \ - -e 's;@l_rgrp@;%{l_rgrp};g' \ + %{l_shtool} install -c -m 755 %{l_value -s -a} \ %{SOURCE rc.postfix} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/etc/rc.d/ -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1058428294-54370-43-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 10:13:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id EE76E277CF4; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:13:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #205] ASCII-tar From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058429589-2332-29" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #205": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:13:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058429589-2332-29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 205 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/205 Ticket: [OpenPKG #205] Subject: ASCII-tar Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 10:13:07 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ OpenPKG sometimes uses tar to minimize the number of files in CVS. The drawback is that tar does not allow for useful diffs and useful version tracking. We need a ASCII based archiving solution. Suggestion: "shtool ara". -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1058429589-2332-29-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 12:30:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 3BA3C277A13; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #203] icewm package From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058437804-54370-44" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #203": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058437804-54370-44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 203 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/203 Ticket: [OpenPKG #203] Subject: icewm package Requestors: martin@slackers.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Thu Jul 17 12:30:02 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > Not sure if this is the place to post new packages but thought I would > start here. Attachd is a first stab at a package for the ICE window > manager. It works for me with redhat 7.3 and solaris 9. I find it a > nice light self contained desktop when I need to run GUI apps on my > servers via VNC (for example when you have an awful Java server > program that requires you to run a GUI to install - java gui apps > with X over a WAN are terrible!) Thanks for your contribution. I've now taken over your icewm.spec, extended it somewhat more and comitted it to CVS for OpenPKG-CURRENT. The commit you can find here: http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10710 The result you can find here: ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/icewm-1.2.9-20030717.src.rpm -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058437804-54370-44-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 12:30:08 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 529D2277CF9; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #203] icewm package From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058437808-54370-48" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #203": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058437808-54370-48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 203 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/203 Ticket: [OpenPKG #203] Subject: icewm package Requestors: martin@slackers.net Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Thu Jul 17 12:30:07 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058437808-54370-48-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 15:31:09 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C2764277A13; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:31:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #160] OpenSSH/PAM From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058448667-2333-110" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #160": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:31:07 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058448667-2333-110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 160 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/160 Ticket: [OpenPKG #160] Subject: OpenSSH/PAM Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Thu Jul 17 15:31:06 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > It looks like there is a mismatch between the compiled-in PAM service > name for OpenSSH ("sshd") and the name configured in /etc/pam.conf and > /etc/pam.d/ ("openssh"). > > Is it preferred to fix this by replacing the argument given to pamtool > (e.g., substitute "--name=sshd" for "--name=openssh") or to patch the > sources so that the service name matches the package name? OpenSSH knows about a define SSHD_PAM_SERVICE which we now set to "openssh". This name is used in pam_start(3) within auth-pam.c and so the PAM configuration is now in sync with the program identification starting with "openssh-3.6.p2-20030717". Details you can find here: http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10718 Thanks for your feedback and support. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058448667-2333-110-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 15:31:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2EE24277CF8; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #160] OpenSSH/PAM From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058448671-2333-114" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #160": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058448671-2333-114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 160 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/160 Ticket: [OpenPKG #160] Subject: OpenSSH/PAM Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Thu Jul 17 15:31:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058448671-2333-114-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 15:31:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4E6A9277CFE; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:31:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #206] replace root with %{l_susr} in filelist %attr From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058448678-2331-40" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #206": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:31:18 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058448678-2331-40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 206 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/206 Ticket: [OpenPKG #206] Subject: replace root with %{l_susr} in filelist %attr Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 15:31:17 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ replace constant with variable for consistency. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1058448678-2331-40-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 17:45:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E6012277A13; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:45:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #204] replace shtool subst -e @l_...@ with %{l_value -s ...} From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058456726-43745-53" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #204": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:45:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058456726-43745-53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 204 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/204 Ticket: [OpenPKG #204] Subject: replace shtool subst -e @l_...@ with %{l_value -s ...} Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 17:45:24 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058456726-43745-53-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 17:45:31 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 18E41277A13; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:45:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #204] replace shtool subst -e @l_...@ with %{l_value -s ...} From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058456730-43745-55" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #204": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:45:31 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058456730-43745-55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 204 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/204 Ticket: [OpenPKG #204] Subject: replace shtool subst -e @l_...@ with %{l_value -s ...} Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 17:45:28 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ done, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10720 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10721 speclint.pl -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1058456730-43745-55-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 20:28:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BEBB4277AFF; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:28:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #204] replace shtool subst -e @l_...@ with %{l_value -s ...} From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058466514-54370-51" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #204": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:28:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058466514-54370-51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 204 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/204 Ticket: [OpenPKG #204] Subject: replace shtool subst -e @l_...@ with %{l_value -s ...} Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 20:28:33 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058466514-54370-51-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 20:45:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id AB7C1277AFF; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:45:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #206] replace root with %{l_susr} in filelist %attr From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058467548-2334-38" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #206": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:45:48 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058467548-2334-38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 206 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/206 Ticket: [OpenPKG #206] Subject: replace root with %{l_susr} in filelist %attr Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 20:45:46 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058467548-2334-38-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 20:45:51 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 04216277CF4; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #206] replace root with %{l_susr} in filelist %attr [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058467550-2334-40" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #206": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058467550-2334-40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 206 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/206 Ticket: [OpenPKG #206] Subject: replace root with %{l_susr} in filelist %attr Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 20:45:50 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ done, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10723 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10724 speclint.pl -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1058467550-2334-40-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 17 20:47:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 381CD277AFF; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:47:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #185] openpkg-dev support for opd alias From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058467635-2331-42" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #185": ; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:47:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058467635-2331-42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 185 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/185 Ticket: [OpenPKG #185] Subject: openpkg-dev support for opd alias Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Thu Jul 17 20:47:13 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058467635-2331-42-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Jul 18 22:41:41 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F3993277AEC; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 22:41:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #207] replace opXXX function calls with rcXXX ones From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058560900-2332-32" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #207": ; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 22:41:40 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058560900-2332-32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 207 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/207 Ticket: [OpenPKG #207] Subject: replace opXXX function calls with rcXXX ones Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Fri Jul 18 22:41:39 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ As of openpkg-20030718-20030718 the new world order dictates that all rc.* files use rcXXX functions and no longer the old (still provided for compatibility but deprecated) opXXX functions. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058560900-2332-32-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 12:21:32 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D549B277B0C; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:21:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #8] zebra: log file handling not yet implemented From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058610091-43745-59" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #8": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:21:31 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058610091-43745-59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 8 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/8 Ticket: [OpenPKG #8] Subject: zebra: log file handling not yet implemented Requestors: chris@schug.net Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 12:21:30 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058610091-43745-59-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 12:21:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2F458277CF4; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:21:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #8] zebra: log file handling not yet implemented From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058610094-43745-61" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #8": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:21:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058610094-43745-61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 8 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/8 Ticket: [OpenPKG #8] Subject: zebra: log file handling not yet implemented Requestors: chris@schug.net Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 12:21:32 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Now fixed with zebra-0.93b-20030719. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058610094-43745-61-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 12:26:35 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0EDC2277AFB; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #8] zebra: log file handling not yet implemented From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058610394-2333-117" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #8": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058610394-2333-117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 8 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/8 Ticket: [OpenPKG #8] Subject: zebra: log file handling not yet implemented Requestors: chris@schug.net Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 12:26:33 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058610394-2333-117-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 12:43:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C430C277ACF; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #10] openpkg: install into a directory which includes a dash From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058611383-2333-119" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #10": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058611383-2333-119 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 10 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/10 Ticket: [OpenPKG #10] Subject: openpkg: install into a directory which includes a dash Requestors: maier@de.cw.com Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 12:43:02 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ No longer can be reproduced with openpkg-20030718-20030718, so I guess this old issue has already solved itself over time. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058611383-2333-119-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 12:43:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 80E67277BFF; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:43:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #10] openpkg: install into a directory which includes a dash From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058611386-2333-123" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #10": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:43:06 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058611386-2333-123 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 10 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/10 Ticket: [OpenPKG #10] Subject: openpkg: install into a directory which includes a dash Requestors: maier@de.cw.com Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 12:43:05 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058611386-2333-123-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 12:45:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4B23E277B08; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:45:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #109] sane build environment not sane enough on RedHato From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058611546-43745-64" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #109": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:45:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058611546-43745-64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 109 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/109 Ticket: [OpenPKG #109] Subject: sane build environment not sane enough on RedHato Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 12:45:42 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Should be now solved with openpkg-20030719-20030719 because we explicitly "unset" the aliases for "rm", "mv", "cp", etc. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058611546-43745-64-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 12:45:49 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BEA5D277BFF; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:45:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #109] sane build environment not sane enough on RedHato From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058611548-43745-68" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #109": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:45:48 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058611548-43745-68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 109 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/109 Ticket: [OpenPKG #109] Subject: sane build environment not sane enough on RedHato Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 12:45:47 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058611548-43745-68-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 20:08:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D1089277A13; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 20:08:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #207] replace opXXX function calls with rcXXX ones From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058638137-43745-70" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #207": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 20:08:57 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058638137-43745-70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 207 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/207 Ticket: [OpenPKG #207] Subject: replace opXXX function calls with rcXXX ones Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 20:08:56 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Now done. All references to opXXX were replaced with rcXXX, but for upgrade and backward compatibility reasons the bootstrap still defines backward mappings from opXXX to rcXXX. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058638137-43745-70-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Jul 19 20:09:01 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BBFE7277B0C; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 20:09:00 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #207] replace opXXX function calls with rcXXX ones From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058638140-43745-74" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #207": ; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 20:09:00 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058638140-43745-74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 207 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/207 Ticket: [OpenPKG #207] Subject: replace opXXX function calls with rcXXX ones Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Sat Jul 19 20:08:59 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058638140-43745-74-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jul 20 01:07:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id AEC2B277B0C; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 01:07:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #208] test ticket From: "email@email.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058656078-2333-126" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #208": ; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 01:07:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058656078-2333-126 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 208 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/208 Ticket: [OpenPKG #208] Subject: test ticket Requestors: email@email.com Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by email@email.com Time: Sun Jul 20 01:07:56 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ test ticket ------------=_1058656078-2333-126-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jul 20 20:21:45 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B7FA9277CFB; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:21:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #209] Petidomo: APPROVE openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org: Your posting to list "openpkg-bugdb" From: "(Petidomo Mailing List Server) via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058725304-43745-77" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #209": ; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:21:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058725304-43745-77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 209 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/209 Ticket: [OpenPKG #209] Subject: Petidomo: APPROVE openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org: Your posting to list "openpkg-bugdb" Requestors: petidomo-approve@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by petidomo-approve@openpkg.org Time: Sun Jul 20 20:21:42 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Your posting needs to be approved. Do this by replying to this mail and citing the string 2CBC2316576F802E53F7A52904676131 in your reply. You won't have to do that again. ------------=_1058725304-43745-77-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 09:18:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9C2CF277B07; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:18:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #210] shtool options space before argument From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058771884-54370-55" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #210": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:18:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058771884-54370-55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 210 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/210 Ticket: [OpenPKG #210] Subject: shtool options space before argument Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Jul 21 09:18:02 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ enforce shtool options to use a space (not more, not less) before their argument. This is a cosmetic issue only but currently totatlly random in spec and rc files. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1058771884-54370-55-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 10:05:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 262B0277A13; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #208] test ticket [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058774703-2331-45" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #208": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058774703-2331-45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 208 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/208 Ticket: [OpenPKG #208] Subject: test ticket Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: deleted Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 21 10:05:03 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ spamcop. probing detected. ------------=_1058774703-2331-45-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 10:06:19 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 356F0277A13; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #209] Petidomo: APPROVE openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org: Your posting to list "openpkg-bugdb" [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058774779-2333-128" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #209": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058774779-2333-128 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 209 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/209 Ticket: [OpenPKG #209] Subject: Petidomo: APPROVE openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org: Your posting to list "openpkg-bugdb" Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: deleted Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 21 10:06:18 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ spamcop. probing detected. ------------=_1058774779-2333-128-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 10:50:57 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 179E3277A13; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:50:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #210] shtool options space before argument From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058777456-2334-43" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #210": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:50:57 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058777456-2334-43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 210 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/210 Ticket: [OpenPKG #210] Subject: shtool options space before argument Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by thl Time: Mon Jul 21 10:50:55 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058777456-2334-43-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 10:50:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 03BAC277B0C; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:50:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #210] shtool options space before argument [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058777458-2334-45" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #210": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:50:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058777458-2334-45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 210 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/210 Ticket: [OpenPKG #210] Subject: shtool options space before argument Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 21 10:50:57 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ done http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10800 http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10801 (previous incomplete, filesystem full) http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=10802 linting ------------=_1058777458-2334-45-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 14:17:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6903B277ACF; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:17:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #164] replace RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX?! From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058789837-2330-61" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #164": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:17:17 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058789837-2330-61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 164 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/164 Ticket: [OpenPKG #164] Subject: replace RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX?! Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Mon Jul 21 14:17:14 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Ok, we decided to do it vice versa: we now replaced all remaining occurrences of hard-coded %{l_prefix} in %{pre,post,preun,postun} sections with intended \$RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX to be consistent over all packages and to allow relocation (at least in theory). -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058789837-2330-61-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 14:17:20 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 52EA2277B00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #164] replace RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX?! From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058789840-2330-65" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #164": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058789840-2330-65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 164 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/164 Ticket: [OpenPKG #164] Subject: replace RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX?! Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 21 14:17:19 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058789840-2330-65-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 16:47:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5E1A1277ACF; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #196] speclint: using files and accidentally omit SOURCEs [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058798829-2331-47" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #196": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058798829-2331-47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 196 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/196 Ticket: [OpenPKG #196] Subject: speclint: using files and accidentally omit SOURCEs Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Jul 21 16:47:07 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ speclint now checks whether the Source/Patch headers and the references via %SOURCE/%PATCH and %setup/%patch are consistent. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058798829-2331-47-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 21 16:47:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6E37E277B08; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #196] speclint: using files and accidentally omit SOURCEs From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058798832-2331-50" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #196": ; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:12 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058798832-2331-50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 196 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/196 Ticket: [OpenPKG #196] Subject: speclint: using files and accidentally omit SOURCEs Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Jul 21 16:47:11 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058798832-2331-50-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 22 22:30:42 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 62340277ACC; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:30:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #181] rotating INN logs From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058905841-35433-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #181": ; Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:30:41 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058905841-35433-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 181 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/181 Ticket: [OpenPKG #181] Subject: rotating INN logs Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Tue Jul 22 22:30:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058905841-35433-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 23 16:03:08 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BB548277ACC; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:03:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #113] rc script for custom packages installed under %{l_prefix}/local/ From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058968983-2334-47" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #113": ; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:03:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058968983-2334-47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 113 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/113 Ticket: [OpenPKG #113] Subject: rc script for custom packages installed under %{l_prefix}/local/ Requestors: cs@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Wed Jul 23 16:03:00 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > Startup prio should be intermixable with the one of traditional rc > script's prios. With the current internal logic of "rc", this is nearly impossible without again very large code refactoring. So we'll suspend this issue until OSSP rc is available. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058968983-2334-47-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 23 16:19:20 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 99B3A277AFE; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:19:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #211] openssl: add openpkg-snakeoil utility From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058969959-2330-69" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #211": ; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:19:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058969959-2330-69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 211 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/211 Ticket: [OpenPKG #211] Subject: openssl: add openpkg-snakeoil utility Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: stalled Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Wed Jul 23 16:19:16 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ A "openpkg-snakeoil" utility (derived from mod_ssl's stuff or from RSE's cca.sh stuff) should be added to the "openssl" package. This then can be used by all SSL-enabled daemon packages to create on-the-fly an own Snake Oil certificate to allow the user to at least immediately use the package. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058969959-2330-69-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 23 16:20:19 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 82ADA277ACC; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:20:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #139] TODO: More package issues [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058970019-2332-33" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #139": ; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:20:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058970019-2332-33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 139 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/139 Ticket: [OpenPKG #139] Subject: TODO: More package issues Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: open Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Wed Jul 23 16:20:17 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ All of those issues were now already solved. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1058970019-2332-33-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 23 16:20:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id ED90C277B46; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:20:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #139] TODO: More package issues From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058970021-2332-36" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #139": ; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:20:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058970021-2332-36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 139 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/139 Ticket: [OpenPKG #139] Subject: TODO: More package issues Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jul 23 16:20:21 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058970021-2332-36-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 23 17:25:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BBA4A277A1D; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:25:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #194] rpmlint: rc.%{name} config files From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1058973914-2330-71" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #194": ; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:25:14 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1058973914-2330-71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 194 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/194 Ticket: [OpenPKG #194] Subject: rpmlint: rc.%{name} config files Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Wed Jul 23 17:25:13 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1058973914-2330-71-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 24 08:37:46 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id ABE2B277AFA; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:37:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #212] POP virtual target for imapd From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059028665-2333-133" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #212": ; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:37:45 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059028665-2333-133 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 212 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/212 Ticket: [OpenPKG #212] Subject: POP virtual target for imapd Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jul 24 08:37:43 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Christoph Schug noted that imapd also supports POP3, so the POP virtual target should be added. This requires that we check if the log file position and format is compatible to the pb4sd package which is the only consumer of the POP virtual target. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059028665-2333-133-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 24 08:39:29 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 62F49277AFA; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #213] portfwd binaries w/o fsl code included From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059028769-43745-80" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #213": ; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059028769-43745-80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 213 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/213 Ticket: [OpenPKG #213] Subject: portfwd binaries w/o fsl code included Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jul 24 08:39:27 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Michael van Elst noted that the binaries in portfwd do not have fsl code included when built with_fsl=yes. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059028769-43745-80-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 24 08:42:19 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F2764277AFA; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:42:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #214] openpkg-dev install option enhancement From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059028938-2330-74" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #214": ; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:42:18 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059028938-2330-74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 214 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/214 Ticket: [OpenPKG #214] Subject: openpkg-dev install option enhancement Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: stalled Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Thu Jul 24 08:42:17 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Michael van Elst requested that "opd in -f" should not automatically or unconditionally add --nodeps to rpm execution. Think about changing "opd -f" to "rpm --force" and "opd -n" to "rpm --nodeps". Of course, it should be possible to combine both. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059028938-2330-74-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 24 10:40:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 42473277B26; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:40:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #213] portfwd binaries w/o fsl code included From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059036023-43339-26" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #213": ; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:40:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059036023-43339-26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 213 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/213 Ticket: [OpenPKG #213] Subject: portfwd binaries w/o fsl code included Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Thu Jul 24 10:40:21 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Now fixed with portfwd-0.26rc6-20030724 and higher. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1059036023-43339-26-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 24 10:40:26 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 54B31277B4E; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:40:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #213] portfwd binaries w/o fsl code included From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059036026-43339-30" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #213": ; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:40:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059036026-43339-30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 213 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/213 Ticket: [OpenPKG #213] Subject: portfwd binaries w/o fsl code included Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Thu Jul 24 10:40:25 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1059036026-43339-30-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 24 10:53:48 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 44F28277A1D; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:53:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #120] missing manpage for rc From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059036828-35433-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #120": ; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:53:48 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059036828-35433-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 120 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/120 Ticket: [OpenPKG #120] Subject: missing manpage for rc Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by rse Time: Thu Jul 24 10:53:46 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ An rc(8) manpage was written recently for OpenPKG-CURRENT. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1059036828-35433-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 24 10:53:50 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 71BE7277B2C; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:53:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #120] missing manpage for rc From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059036830-35433-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #120": ; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:53:50 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059036830-35433-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 120 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/120 Ticket: [OpenPKG #120] Subject: missing manpage for rc Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Thu Jul 24 10:53:49 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1059036830-35433-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sun Jul 27 16:25:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 90974277AEC; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:25:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #215] openpkg.src.sh should check for dependencies or at least fail if dependencies are not met. From: "martin.konold@erfrakon.de via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059315923-2330-76" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #215": ; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:25:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059315923-2330-76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 215 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/215 Ticket: [OpenPKG #215] Subject: openpkg.src.sh should check for dependencies or at least fail if dependencies are not met. Requestors: martin.konold@erfrakon.de Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by martin.konold@erfrakon.de Time: Sun Jul 27 16:25:21 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ From: Bernhard Erdmann To: Kolab Server and KDE Client development issues Hi, openpkg-20030606-20030606.src.sh tries to execute uudecode without testing its existance or checking its return code: # extract the tarball echo "$me: extracting to $dir..." uudecode $me rm -rf $dir >/dev/null 2>&1 mkdir $dir || exit 1 As uudecode (part of sharutils) is not installed on each and every system, this line should read at least: uudecode $me || exit 1 ------------=_1059315923-2330-76-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:33:08 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 1099F277ACC; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:33:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #165] log file rotation [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424386-2333-135" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #165": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:33:06 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424386-2333-135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 165 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/165 Ticket: [OpenPKG #165] Subject: log file rotation Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:33:05 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This ticket became a subset of "PR#202 run-time check and related issues". Now, shortly before the OpenPKG v1.3 release, it is resolved for CORE and BASE packages. For an overview, see PR#202. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059424386-2333-135-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:34:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 09106277ACC; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:34:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #176] daemon bind/listen address [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424449-35433-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #176": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:34:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424449-35433-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 176 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/176 Ticket: [OpenPKG #176] Subject: daemon bind/listen address Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:34:09 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This ticket became a subset of "PR#202 run-time check and related issues". Now, shortly before the OpenPKG v1.3 release, it is resolved for CORE and BASE packages. For an overview, see PR#202. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059424449-35433-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:35:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C86CE277ACC; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:35:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #178] could we use rc in log rotation epilog? From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424536-2330-78" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #178": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:35:36 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424536-2330-78 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 178 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/178 Ticket: [OpenPKG #178] Subject: could we use rc in log rotation epilog? Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:35:35 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1059424536-2330-78-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:35:39 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 93C3D277B07; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:35:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #178] could we use rc in log rotation epilog? [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424538-2330-80" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #178": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:35:38 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424538-2330-80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 178 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/178 Ticket: [OpenPKG #178] Subject: could we use rc in log rotation epilog? Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:35:37 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This ticket became a subset of "PR#202 run-time check and related issues". Now, shortly before the OpenPKG v1.3 release, it is resolved for CORE and BASE packages. For an overview, see PR#202. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059424538-2330-80-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:36:36 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id C11A6277AFE; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #188] rc %status From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424595-2332-39" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #188": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424595-2332-39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 188 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/188 Ticket: [OpenPKG #188] Subject: rc %status Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:36:32 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1059424595-2332-39-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:36:37 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 5F2AA277ACC; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:36:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #188] rc %status [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424597-2332-41" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #188": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:36:37 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424597-2332-41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 188 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/188 Ticket: [OpenPKG #188] Subject: rc %status Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:36:36 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This ticket became a subset of "PR#202 run-time check and related issues". Now, shortly before the OpenPKG v1.3 release, it is resolved for CORE and BASE packages. For an overview, see PR#202. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059424597-2332-41-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:37:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 59FDF277ACC; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:37:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #189] rc %restart [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424654-54370-57" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #189": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:37:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424654-54370-57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 189 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/189 Ticket: [OpenPKG #189] Subject: rc %restart Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:37:33 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This ticket became a subset of "PR#202 run-time check and related issues". Now, shortly before the OpenPKG v1.3 release, it is resolved for CORE and BASE packages. For an overview, see PR#202. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059424654-54370-57-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:38:30 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 54556277AFE; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:38:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #190] spec %preun daemon shut down [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424710-43339-33" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #190": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:38:30 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424710-43339-33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 190 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/190 Ticket: [OpenPKG #190] Subject: spec %preun daemon shut down Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:38:29 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This ticket became a subset of "PR#202 run-time check and related issues". Now, shortly before the OpenPKG v1.3 release, it is resolved for CORE and BASE packages. For an overview, see PR#202. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059424710-43339-33-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:39:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DCFAD277ACC; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #191] spec %post restart [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424757-2330-83" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #191": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424757-2330-83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 191 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/191 Ticket: [OpenPKG #191] Subject: spec %post restart Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:39:16 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This ticket became a subset of "PR#202 run-time check and related issues". Now, shortly before the OpenPKG v1.3 release, it is resolved for CORE and BASE packages. For an overview, see PR#202. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059424757-2330-83-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:41:44 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9F7B3277ACC; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:41:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #202] daemon packages have to be run-time checked [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059424904-2331-53" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #202": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:41:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059424904-2331-53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 202 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/202 Ticket: [OpenPKG #202] Subject: daemon packages have to be run-time checked Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:41:42 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This ticket became a superset of other related issues. Now, shortly before the OpenPKG v1.3 release, it is resolved for CORE and BASE packages. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059424904-2331-53-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Jul 28 22:46:51 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2DD33277ACC; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #202] daemon packages have to be run-time checked From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059425209-35433-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #202": ; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059425209-35433-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 202 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/202 Ticket: [OpenPKG #202] Subject: daemon packages have to be run-time checked Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Mon Jul 28 22:46:48 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ test: # P=FIMXE # ps -ax | fgrep $P # /cw/bin/rpm -e $P # rm -rf /cw/etc/$P/ /cw/var/$P/; rm /cw/etc/rc.d/rc.$P # /cw/bin/rpm -Uvh /e/openpkg/PKG/bin/$P* # ll /cw/var/$P/ - daemon must not run # /cw/etc/rc $P status restart status - status must show active=no both times - daemon must not run # /cw/etc/rc $P status start status - status must show active=no first then - daemon must be running and - daemon must be bound to/listen to 127.0.0.1, then - status must show active=yes # /cw/etc/rc $P status restart status - memorize current pid - status must show active=yes both times - daemon must be running, but use different pid #FIXME enforce logging and verify; enforce small size rotation # /cw/etc/rc $P status daily status - status must show active=yes both times - log file rotation must have been done - both log files must have same owner/perm # /cw/bin/rpm -Uvh --force $P # /cw/etc/rc $P status - daemon must run # /cw/etc/rc $P status stop status - status must show active=yes first then - daemon must not be running, then - status must show active=no # /cw/etc/rc $P status start status # /cw/bin/rpm -e --force $P - daemon must not run https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id= 165 rc %daily log file rotation 176 daemon bind/listen address 178 could we use rc in log rotation epilog? 188 rc %status 189 rc %start, %stop, %restart 190 spec %preun daemon shut down 191 spec %post restart 202 daemon packages have to be run-time checked [CORE] 165 176 178 188 189 190 191 202 cvs x x x x x x x x ntp x 1 x x x x x x openssh x 2 x x x x x x rsync x x x x x x x x [BASE] 165 176 178 188 189 190 191 202 amd x 1 x x x x x x apache x x x x x x x x bind x x x x x x x x delegate x x x x x x x x dhcpd x x x x x x x x inn x x x x x x x x ircd x x x x x x x x lmtp2nntp x x x x x x x x mysql x x x x x x x x nntpcache x x x x x x x x openldap x x x x x x x x portsentry x 3 x x x x x x postfix x x x x x x x x postgresql x x x x x x x x prngd x x x x x x x x proftpd x x x x x x x x pureftpd x x x x x x x x qpopper x x x x x x x x samba x x x x x x x x smtpfeed x x x x x x x x squid x x x x x x x x uucp x x x x x x x x zebra x x x x x x x x Notes: 1) wildcard bind because single instance per machine only 2) wildcard bind to avoid user locking himself out 3) wildcard bind by design [PLUS] 165 176 178 188 189 190 191 202 aegis - - - % - - - - bind8 - - - x - - - - clamav - - - x - - - - cvsd - - - x - - - - imapd - - - x - - - - kerberos - - - - - - - - msntp - - - - - - - - mysql3 - - - x - - - - pb4sd - - - x - - - - pks - - - x - - - - portfwd - - - x - - - - radius - - - x - - - - samhain - - - x - - - - sasl - - - x - - - - sendmail - - - x - - - - spread - - - % - - - - FIXME no rc file at all tftp - - - x - - - - [EVAL] 165 176 178 188 189 190 191 202 aegis - - - - - - - - aica - - - % - - - - apache2 - - - x - - - - arpd - - - x - - - - cups - - - x - - - - dcron - - - x - - - - dhcp-agent - - - x - - - - djbdns - - - x - - - - dss - - - x - - - - easysoap - - - % - - - - exim - - - x - - - - gated - - - - - - - - nagios - - - - - - - - nessus-tool - - - % - - - - nsd - - - x - - - - openvpn - - - - - - - - orbit2 - - - % - - - - pound - - - - - - - - tomcat - - - - - - - - tomcat4 - - - - - - - - tsmc - - - - - - - - [JUNK] 165 176 178 188 189 190 191 202 amavisd - - - x - - - - honeyd - - - - - - - - jabberd - - - - - - - - powerdns - - - - - - - - rdist - - - - - - - - vrrpd - - - - - - - - -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059425209-35433-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 29 11:33:02 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 33C0D277ACC; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:33:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #176] daemon bind/listen address [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059471180-54370-59" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #176": ; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:33:01 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059471180-54370-59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 176 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/176 Ticket: [OpenPKG #176] Subject: daemon bind/listen address Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Tue Jul 29 11:32:59 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > [thl - Mon Jul 07 16:00:22 2003]: > > Verify that the default config for every daemon uses 127.0.0.1 for the > bind/listen address with one exception: openssh should do a wildcard > bind, otherwise it is too likely that users will lock themselfs out. > In a meeting today, we decided openssh should not be an exception. We prefer security over comfort. Done with http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=11172 Please note that the sshd_config default changed between OpenPKG v1.2 and OpenPKG v1.3 because of an application version update. So a .rpmsave file will be created anyway and extra work needs to be done. So this decision does not make upgrade experience worse. Also note that in order to prevent gross damage, the rc mechanism was modified to treat existence of .rpm(new|orig|save) as bad enough to inhibit %start and %restart from being run. See http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=11141 Because the %post section of a openssh upgrade will execute a %restart, modified configuration that was saved by RPM into .rpmsave causes this %restart to be omitted. The old sshd will continue to run and allows the administrator to clean out the configuration and do the %restart manually. We understand that automated upgrade procedures need to be enhanced to do this extra work. We also know that rebooting the machine before the configuration was fixed creates a machine which cannot be managed remotely. As said in the first paragraph, we decided to prefer security over comfort. -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059471180-54370-59-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 29 12:17:13 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 418DC277ACC; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:17:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #215] openpkg.src.sh should check for dependencies or at least fail if dependencies are not met. [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059473833-54370-61" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #215": ; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:17:13 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059473833-54370-61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 215 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/215 Ticket: [OpenPKG #215] Subject: openpkg.src.sh should check for dependencies or at least fail if dependencies are not met. Requestors: martin.konold@erfrakon.de Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Tue Jul 29 12:17:11 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ The bootstrap starting with openpkg-20030729-20030729 exits immediately if uudecode cannot be found. -- Ralf S. Engelschall OpenPKG Project Leader rse@openpkg.org ------------=_1059473833-54370-61-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Jul 29 12:17:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BF352277BFA; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:17:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #215] openpkg.src.sh should check for dependencies or at least fail if dependencies are not met. From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059473835-54370-64" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #215": ; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:17:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059473835-54370-64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 215 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/215 Ticket: [OpenPKG #215] Subject: openpkg.src.sh should check for dependencies or at least fail if dependencies are not met. Requestors: martin.konold@erfrakon.de Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from new to resolved by rse Time: Tue Jul 29 12:17:14 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1059473835-54370-64-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 30 08:56:20 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D8015277B0C; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:56:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #216] Test as guest from web interface From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059548179-35433-18" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #216": ; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:56:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059548179-35433-18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 216 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/216 Ticket: [OpenPKG #216] Subject: Test as guest from web interface Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Wed Jul 30 08:56:18 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ User reported it is not possible to submit issues from web interface. ------------=_1059548179-35433-18-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 30 09:08:44 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 45D7B277B0C; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:08:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #217] openpkg-dev .cvspass handling From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059548923-54370-67" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #217": ; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:08:43 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059548923-54370-67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 217 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/217 Ticket: [OpenPKG #217] Subject: openpkg-dev .cvspass handling Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Wed Jul 30 09:08:40 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ ----- Forwarded message from "Ralf S. Engelschall" ----- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:05:56 +0200 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-re/ openpkg-dev On Tue, Apr 29, 2003, Thomas Lotterer wrote: > support anonymous cvs by creating .cvspass > [...] > + # create a .cvspass > + echo "++ creating CVS password file (${OPENPKG_WORK}/.cvspass)" > + sed -e 's;^ *;;' <"${OPENPKG_WORK}/.cvspass" > + /1 ${OPENPKG_REPO} A > +EOF Be careful, you _overwrite_ an existing .cvspass here. Better to _append_ to the file in case the guy has other entries there... Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1059548923-54370-67-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 30 09:37:51 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F11AE277ACD; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:37:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #216] Test as guest from web interface [comment] From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059550670-2331-55" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #216": ; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:37:50 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059550670-2331-55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 216 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/216 Ticket: [OpenPKG #216] Subject: Test as guest from web interface Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: new Transaction: Comments added by thl Time: Wed Jul 30 09:37:49 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ > [thl - Wed Jul 30 08:56:18 2003]: > > User reported it is not possible to submit issues from web interface. > Interesting. The ticket was created and appeared on the mailing list. But after clicking SUBMIT rt reported "ERROR". Very confusing. Needs to be fixed (if not changed completely). -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1059550670-2331-55-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 30 09:51:42 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6D813277B0C; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:51:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #216] Test as guest from web interface From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059551501-2334-51" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #216": ; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:51:41 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059551501-2334-51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 216 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/216 Ticket: [OpenPKG #216] Subject: Test as guest from web interface Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Wed Jul 30 09:51:39 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Sun, Jul 27, 2003, Martin Konold wrote: > Hi, > > when people are entering the rt web interface they are offered to login as > guest user. > > Later they are offered to enter a new ticket only to be confronted with an > error after making the bug report. > > IMHO if anonymous users shall not be able to enter bug reports then guest > users shall not get the "new ticket" menu entry. > > Regards, > -- martin > This is under investigation, PR#216. Currently, rt errornously reports an error :-) The ticket is created. However, we have to think about the problems anonymous users can cause and either get them under control or discontinue the web option. -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1059551501-2334-51-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Jul 30 15:11:23 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id DE85D277B3A; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:11:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #218] mod_jk cannot be loaded into apache From: "martin.perina@ataco.cz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059570681-35433-20" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #218": ; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:11:21 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059570681-35433-20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 218 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/218 Ticket: [OpenPKG #218] Subject: mod_jk cannot be loaded into apache Requestors: martin.perina@ataco.cz Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by martin.perina@ataco.cz Time: Wed Jul 30 15:11:19 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Hello, i've upgraded some packages to current version of OpenPKG on Sparc Solaris 9: apache-1.3.28-20030723 apr-0.9.3-20030707 autoconf-2.57-20030723 automake-1.7.6-20030711 binutils-2.13.2.1-1.2.0 cvs-1.11.5-1.2.2 db-4.1.25.0-1.2.0 expat-1.95.6-20030130 fsl-1.0.6-1.2.0 gcc-3.2.1-1.2.0 j2se14-1.4.2-20030723 libtool-1.5-20030723 links-2.0-1.2.0 m4-1.4o-20030723 make-3.80-1.2.0 ncftp-3.1.5-1.2.0 ntp-4.1.1b-1.2.0 openpkg-20030723-20030723 openpkg-tool-20030723-20030723 patch-2.5.8-1.2.0 pcre-3.9-1.2.0 perl-5.8.0-1.2.0 perl-ds-1.2.0-1.2.0 perl-time-1.2.0-1.2.0 postfix-2.0.2-1.2.1 procmail-3.22-1.2.0 tomcat-adapter-3.2.4-20030717 vim-6.1.290-1.2.0 zlib-1.1.4-20030227 But there is problem with loading mod_jk module from tomcat-adapter package, it cannot be loaded into apache. Apache starting error is: OpenPKG: start: apache:FAILED openpkg:rc:WARNING: /cw:apache:%start: failed with return code 3 +----Log:-------------------------------------------------------------- | /cw/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started | Syntax error on line 6 of /cw/etc/tomcat-adapter/tomcat-adapter.conf: | Cannot load /cw/libexec/tomcat-adapter/mod_jk.so into server: ld.so.1: /cw/sbin/apache: fatal: relocation error: file /cw/libexec/tomcat-adapter/mod_jk.so: symbol ap_table_get: referenced symbol not found +---------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is my tomcat-adapter.conf: ## ## tomcat-adapter.conf -- Apache Configuration Snippet for Tomcat Adapter ## # load DSO LoadModule jk_module /cw/libexec/tomcat-adapter/mod_jk.so # workers configuration JkWorkersFile /cw/etc/tomcat-adapter/workers.properties # logging JkLogFile /cw/var/tomcat-adapter/tomcat-adapter.log JkLogLevel warn # assigning URLs to Tomcat #JkMount /*.jsp ajp12 #JkMount /servlet/* ajp12 #JkMount /examples/* ajp12 Here is my workers.properties: # Seznam AJP spojeni worker.list=jboss # AJP spojeni pro JBoss worker.jboss.type=ajp13 worker.jboss.host=locahost worker.jboss.port=8009 worker.jboss.lbfactor=50 worker.jboss.cachesize=10 worker.jboss.cache_timeout=600 worker.jboss.socket_keepalive=1 worker.jboss.socket_timeout=300 Here is my apache.conf: ## ## apache.conf -- Apache Custom Configuration ## ______________________________________________________ ## ## PLEASE EDIT THIS FILE!! ADJUST YOUR CONFIGURATION BY ## OVERRIDING DIRECTIVES FROM "apache.base" HERE, PLEASE! ## ______________________________________________________ ## # include Apache default/base configuration Include "/cw/etc/apache/apache.base" # Include mod_jk configuration Include "/cw/etc/tomcat-adapter/tomcat-adapter.conf" # override/extend with local configuration #Include "/cw/etc/apache/apache.vhost" #Listen 127.0.0.1:80 NameVirtualHost * ServerName sunik.ataco.cz JkMount / jboss ErrorLog /cw/var/apache/log/sunik.ataco.cz-error.log TransferLog /cw/var/apache/log/sunik.ataco.cz-access.log Thanks for help ------------=_1059570681-35433-20-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 31 18:17:16 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 100CA277AF4; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #219] Implement qt-config From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059668235-35433-22" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #219": ; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059668235-35433-22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 219 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/219 Ticket: [OpenPKG #219] Subject: Implement qt-config Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: open Transaction: Ticket creado por ms Time: Jue. Jul. 31 18:17:14 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Because qt is a library and unfortunately has a nonstandard configation script, dependent packages correctly build only when they painstakingly do the right thing. Other packages which make assumptions about the qt installation (does it use GL, theads, ICE...) often break. scribus (hard coded hack works only sometimes) lyx (not sure) mysqlcc (not sure) as-gui (already correct) mico (already correct) We can correct this inconsistent behaviour by packaging qt with a qt-config program. The qt-config program should pay attention to what qt picks up from the underlying operating system and X11 installation. -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1059668235-35433-22-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 31 19:45:22 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 2E115277AF4; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:45:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #220] Group names are incorrect From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059673521-35433-24" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #220": ; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:45:22 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059673521-35433-24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 220 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/220 Ticket: [OpenPKG #220] Subject: Group names are incorrect Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: open Transaction: Ticket creado por ms Time: Jue. Jul. 31 19:45:20 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Many package group names are incorrect. Debugger valgrind Converter lzo Converter lzop Converter x11-ssh-askpass Converter pccts Disk cdrecord Library getopt Language gcc Language gcc2 Language gcc32 Language gcc34 Language honeyd Language indent Misc awk Misc dia Misc scribus Network mico Networtk tftp Text latex2html Text txt2html Video dss X11 dxpc X11 fontconfig X11 icewm Others I'm not sure about (what the hell is mhonarc? ...) -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1059673521-35433-24-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Thu Jul 31 19:51:27 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B4E8C277ACD; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:51:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #220] Group names are incorrect From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059673886-43339-37" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #220": ; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:51:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059673886-43339-37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 220 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/220 Ticket: [OpenPKG #220] Subject: Group names are incorrect Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: open Transaction: Correspondencia agregada por ms Time: Jue. Jul. 31 19:51:25 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Finished reclassifying: Debugger valgrind -> Development Converter lzo -> Compression Converter lzop -> Compression Converter x11-ssh-askpass -> Security Converter pccts -> Language Disk cdrecord -> Filesystem Library getopt -> System Language gcc -> Compiler Language gcc2 -> Compiler Language gcc32 -> Compiler Language gcc34 -> Compiler Language honeyd -> Security Language indent -> Converter Misc awk -> Language Misc dia -> Graphics Misc scribus -> Editor Network mico -> System Networtk tftp -> Network Text latex2html -> Converter Text txt2html -> Converter Video dss -> Network X11 dxpc -> XWindow X11 fontconfig -> XWindow X11 icewm -> XWindow -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1059673886-43339-37-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Fri Aug 1 18:34:33 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 00EE9277AFA; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 18:34:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #221] gv build fails on Solaris From: "matt@cis.ksu.edu via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059755664-68760-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #221": ; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 18:34:24 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059755664-68760-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 221 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/221 Ticket: [OpenPKG #221] Subject: gv build fails on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by matt@cis.ksu.edu Time: Fri Aug 01 18:34:22 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Sun's "xmkmf" tool assumes that the proprietary Sun linker is being used, so it generates Makefile's with many proprietary switches (in particular, it liberally uses the "-Xc" option, which GNU binutils don't understand). Unfortunately, the Sun "xmkmf" also ignores environment variables like "HasGcc" that other platforms use to tune link flags. There are a couple of ways around this that come to mind: (1) manually editing the generated Makefiles to get rid of the offending linker switches. e.g., ... # generate Makefiles and build gv xmkmf -a case "%{l_target}" in *solaris* ) for mkfile in `find . -name Makefile` ; do %{l_shtool} subst \ -e "s;-Xc;;g" -e "s;-xF;;g" -e "s-xarch=v8;;g" \ $mkfile done ;; * ) true ;; esac %{l_make} ... (2) rather than calling "xmkmf", manually perform the same work as "xmkmf", setting appropriate environment variables to use GNU binutils. The "xpm" package does this. ---- Matt Hoosier CIS Unix/Accounts Administrator Kansas State University ------------=_1059755664-68760-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Sat Aug 2 11:08:59 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9EF68277AFA; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 11:08:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #222] bootstrap should require itself!? From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059815338-68762-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #222": ; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 11:08:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059815338-68762-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 222 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/222 Ticket: [OpenPKG #222] Subject: bootstrap should require itself!? Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by rse Time: Sat Aug 02 11:08:56 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ It is currently too easy to stumble over ones feets by just trying to compile the openpkg*.src.rpm with a plain RedHat/SuSE/whatever vendor RPM as seen on http://studio.imagemagick.org/pipermail/magick-developers/2002-May/000533.html All OpenPKG packages require "OpenPKG, openpkg >= YYYYMMDD", so they are safe in this situation. But the bootstrap contains obviously no depdendencies at all. Perhaps it should depend on itself. On bootstrapping via .src.sh, it should not matter, because the .spec's headers are ignored. And once it is installed, there is an "openpkg" package. Voila! Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ------------=_1059815338-68762-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 10:13:25 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 6410C277AFF; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:13:25 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #223] Build a more complete X11 package From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059984805-68762-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #223": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:13:25 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059984805-68762-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 223 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/223 Ticket: [OpenPKG #223] Subject: Build a more complete X11 package Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket creado por ms Time: Lun. Ago. 04 10:13:24 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ X11 based programs do not consistently build for a variety of reasons. Fix this by building a better X11 package, and providing hooks to the real X11 subsystem. o gv/xmkmf picks up shinola from macros not under OpenPKG control o qt picks up strange XFree86 stuff (GL), but not with other X11 servers o xaw3d, xfig, and xpm also have xmkmf/Imake troubles -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1059984805-68762-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 10:19:24 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B8C3A277AFF; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:19:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #221] gv build fails on Solaris From: "michael.schloh@cw.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059985163-45570-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #221": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:19:23 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059985163-45570-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 221 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/221 Ticket: [OpenPKG #221] Subject: gv build fails on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by michael.schloh@cw.com Time: Mon Aug 04 10:19:21 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Fri, Aug 01, 2003, matt@cis.ksu.edu via RT wrote: > Sun's "xmkmf" tool assumes that the proprietary Sun linker is being used, so > it generates Makefile's with many proprietary switches (in particular, it > liberally uses the "-Xc" option, which GNU binutils don't understand). > Hello Matt, First, you are right about the inconsistencies and there is a ticket that describes the considerations https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=104 Do the problems you noticed with gv actually cause the build to break, or just spew warning or '-Xc not understood' messages? Last time I built gv on Solaris it worked, but I'm not sure if I had binutils installed. -- michael.schloh@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe Cable & Wireless Telecommunications Services GmbH ------------=_1059985163-45570-0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogMi42LjNp YSs0SwoKaVFFVkFnVUJQeTRYQjF1WXY4MFVvVlRkQVFFRURnZi9jeXhRdHFM dVBMQnpVN1RCRy9aa2EwY3dxeTVvVlZiUgoreUVZclNHakkrc1lLSzU5VUVK YVgybVRyWC9SS1MwOGRqOUtEM0ovS1hOYStWdHVrdkFFSEo5a2hjQ1VnOXcz CjNPN0lzUVFBMDhaK1hsYXNmTHRrMHdaTXV0MnovRHRGV3JVbUY3QU1YR0Z6 K3piSjI0SS8xVVFIa1hOc3RhRjkKcXcwaVFSV3dyS2d0VHM0RnNvcy9YY3oz R3VvU2VIZEdhRTdENUZjOGdqL0pYOUR1SHlwSDRkTXA0c2FNanN5UAp5cTN3 U3h2WUZVdjlSdGpoNHVHMjN1cG9nQldoajBqaWtHVG1ydldZNnNzeGkzMVBW bWJkRHZlNFpYQ0VIUTExCmkxbUhLbFdJeUFES0RkQ2RKaVE5VE9PWk83QnBP aWQzeWwxWkxpS2YzazNGOUpXM0p3TzVKUT09Cj1IbjBWCi0tLS0tRU5EIFBH UCBTSUdOQVRVUkUtLS0tLQo= ------------=_1059985163-45570-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 10:22:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id F1A01277A00; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:22:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #223] Build a more complete X11 package [comment] From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059985334-68761-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #223": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:22:14 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059985334-68761-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 223 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/223 Ticket: [OpenPKG #223] Subject: Build a more complete X11 package Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: am Kommentar hinzugefügt von ms Time: Mo 04. Aug 2003, 10:22:12 _________________________________________________________________________ Whoops, this ticket is a copy of #104, so close it. https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=104 -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1059985334-68761-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 13:46:11 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 9C873277C7D; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:46:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #224] [FWD] tcl/expect dependency problem. From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059997570-69073-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #224": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:46:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059997570-69073-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 224 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/224 Ticket: [OpenPKG #224] Subject: [FWD] tcl/expect dependency problem. Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Aug 04 13:46:08 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This is an old issue and was deferred until the latest release was sent out. We should try to circumvent this nasty tcl/expect issue in the future. ----- Forwarded message from Bill Campbell ----- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:31:45 -0800 From: Bill Campbell Subject: tcl/expect dependency problem. To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org There appears to be a dependency loop between expect and tcl. Building the changes from yesterday, the tcl install failed saying: tcl = 8.4.1 is needed by expect-5.38-20021023 Attempting a ``openpkg build expect'' returns: tcl = 8.4.2 is needed by expect-5.38-20030304 Bill ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1059997570-69073-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 13:47:47 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id E060F277BFF; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:47:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #224] [FWD] tcl/expect dependency problem. From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059997666-45570-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #224": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:47:46 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059997666-45570-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 224 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/224 Ticket: [OpenPKG #224] Subject: [FWD] tcl/expect dependency problem. Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Mon Aug 04 13:47:46 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ ----- Forwarded message from Michael van Elst ----- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:20:19 +0200 From: Michael van Elst Subject: Re: tcl/expect dependency problem. To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org Not exactly a loop. expect _embeds_ tcl because it requires part of the tcl build environment that is not available even when you have installed the tcl package. However, it must embed exactly the same tcl version that you have installed to prevent run-time conflicts. You are not allowed to upgrade tcl because this would break the dependency of an already existing expect package. You are not allowed to upgrade expect because this requires the new tcl already installed. The ugly truth is that you have to _delete_ the expect package and then install expect again (which then updates tcl first). The "correct" solution is to add the missing parts to the tcl package that allows expect to build without embedding tcl. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1059997666-45570-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 13:55:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 350BF277C1B; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:55:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #225] Simplification of rc scripts From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059998104-68758-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #225": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:55:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059998104-68758-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 225 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/225 Ticket: [OpenPKG #225] Subject: Simplification of rc scripts Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Mon Aug 04 13:55:03 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ This is an old issue and was deferred until the latest release was sent out. It seems we missed it when migrating from the previous ticket system. ----- Forwarded message from "REIBER, CHRISTIAN via RT" ----- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:23:56 +0200 (CEST) From: "REIBER, CHRISTIAN via RT" Subject: [CW-IS #102] Simplification of rc scripts To: "AdminCc of CW-IS Ticket #102": ; In rc-scripts it is possible to test a variable via opServiceEnabled in order to avoid running a section when the service is actually not enabled. A closer look reveals that in almost all cases this mechanism is needed in most sections. Therefore I suggest to make it the default behaviour giving the opportunity to remove that code from the sections (making them easier to read and to maintain). A option in the section name (e.g. -a for "always") allows to switch off that behaviour, i.e. the sections's script than has complete control and is run whenever the section is requested, irrespective whether the service is enabled or not. Idea: This mechanism prevents a manually executed "rc start" to work. But it would make sense to allow the system administrator to explicitely override the "enable=no" without being forced to change the setting of the rc variable (which could lead to unwanted results if he/she forgets to reset it again). -- Christian Reiber, Zeppelin Baumaschinen GmbH, IT/System Engineering eMail: Christian.Reiber@zeppelin.com ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1059998104-68758-1-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 13:59:15 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 70873277A00; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:59:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #154] OpenPKG 1.3 Release Engineering From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1059998355-69073-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #154": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:59:15 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1059998355-69073-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 154 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/154 Ticket: [OpenPKG #154] Subject: OpenPKG 1.3 Release Engineering Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by rse Time: Mon Aug 04 13:59:14 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1059998355-69073-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 14:58:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 4BFC7277B00; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:58:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #221] gv build fails on Solaris From: "matt@cis.ksu.edu via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060001938-68761-3" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #221": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:58:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060001938-68761-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 221 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/221 Ticket: [OpenPKG #221] Subject: gv build fails on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by matt@cis.ksu.edu Time: Mon Aug 04 14:58:57 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ This build fails. Thanks, Matt > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003, matt@cis.ksu.edu via RT wrote: > > Sun's "xmkmf" tool assumes that the proprietary Sun linker is being used, so > > it generates Makefile's with many proprietary switches (in particular, it > > liberally uses the "-Xc" option, which GNU binutils don't understand). > > > Hello Matt, > > First, you are right about the inconsistencies and there is a ticket that > describes the considerations > > https://rt.openpkg.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=104 > > Do the problems you noticed with gv actually cause the build to break, or just > spew warning or '-Xc not understood' messages? Last time I built gv on > Solaris it worked, but I'm not sure if I had binutils installed. > > -- > michael.schloh@cw.com > Development Team, Operations Northern Europe > Cable & Wireless Telecommunications Services GmbH > -- Matt Hoosier CIS Accounts Manager Kansas State University ------------=_1060001938-68761-3-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 15:17:58 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 513D3277A00; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 [comment] From: "Ralf S. Engelschall via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060003078-45570-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060003078-45570-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: rse Status: stalled Transaction: Comments added by rse Time: Mon Aug 04 15:17:57 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Additionally, we need the following features to be patched in: - possibility to add custom headers or at least add hard-coded a "Class" header. - possibility to add custom sections or at least add hard-coded "%test", "%vcheck" sections. - dependency enhancement: alternative dependencies (OR instead of AND logic). - dependency enhancement: library type dependencies??? (needs more thinking ;-) ------------=_1060003078-45570-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 15:44:48 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 1A22B277B26; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #221] gv build fails on Solaris From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060004687-68758-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #221": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060004687-68758-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 221 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/221 Ticket: [OpenPKG #221] Subject: gv build fails on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Mon Aug 04 15:44:47 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Matt, > This build fails. can you please try gv-3.5.8-20030804 and report ? Greetings, -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS ------------=_1060004687-68758-2-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 16:31:44 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 915AB277B0C; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #221] gv build fails on Solaris From: "matt@cis.ksu.edu via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060007504-68759-0" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #221": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060007504-68759-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 221 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/221 Ticket: [OpenPKG #221] Subject: gv build fails on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by matt@cis.ksu.edu Time: Mon Aug 04 16:31:42 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ 3.5.8-20030804 works. Thanks. On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 08:44, Michael van Elst via RT wrote: > Request 221 was acted upon. > _________________________________________________________________________ > > URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/221 > Ticket: [OpenPKG #221] > Subject: gv build fails on Solaris > Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu > Queue: openpkg > Owner: Nobody > Status: open > Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv > Time: Mon Aug 04 15:44:47 2003 > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Matt, > > > This build fails. > > can you please try gv-3.5.8-20030804 and report ? > > Greetings, -- Matt Hoosier CIS Unix/Accounts Administrator ------------=_1060007504-68759-0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcg djEuMi4yIChHTlUvTGludXgpCgppRDhEQlFBL0xtNUhvN2JWb2hCN2IrOFJB b1hLQUo5YzF6UjFGVkw4d3R2TnNsRU4wVlZwWXR4OVBnQ2dpd1BaCnJQQjBX SUc2UG1tSStpdW5pZHZYM21RPQo9dnlIagotLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgU0lHTkFU VVJFLS0tLS0K ------------=_1060007504-68759-0-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 17:25:06 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B659D277A00; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:25:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 From: "Guest User via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060010705-69073-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:25:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060010705-69073-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by guest Time: Mon Aug 04 17:25:04 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ > [rse - Fri Jul 11 09:43:15 2003]: > > Remember this for OpenPKG 2.0 development which starts soon once we've > kicked out OpenPKG 1.3. Hi I've placed updated versions (rpm and .sh) of the openpkg base using rpm-4.2.1 at http://hepgrid1.caltech.edu/clarens/source/ Congratulations on releasing 1.3! Cheers Conrad ------------=_1060010705-69073-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 17:28:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0BC64277A00; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:28:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #221] gv build fails on Solaris [comment] From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060010884-68760-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #221": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:28:04 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060010884-68760-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 221 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/221 Ticket: [OpenPKG #221] Subject: gv build fails on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Comments added by mlelstv Time: Mon Aug 04 17:28:03 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ Using our manual xmkmf-workaround helps for Solaris. -- Michael van Elst OpenPKG Developer mlelstv@openpkg.org ------------=_1060010884-68760-2-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 17:28:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id B2DDC277B26; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #221] gv build fails on Solaris From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060010886-68760-5" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #221": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060010886-68760-5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 221 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/221 Ticket: [OpenPKG #221] Subject: gv build fails on Solaris Requestors: matt@cis.ksu.edu Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by mlelstv Time: Mon Aug 04 17:28:05 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1060010886-68760-5-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 18:12:34 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 3858A277B23; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060013554-68761-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060013554-68761-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Mon Aug 04 18:12:33 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Conrad, > I've placed updated versions (rpm and .sh) of the openpkg base using rpm-4.2.1 at http://hepgrid1.caltech.edu/clarens/source/ Just in time :-) I will have a close look. On what systems do you use rpm-4.2.1 ? Greetings, -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS ------------=_1060013554-68761-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 18:40:54 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id AF06B277B26; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:40:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 From: "Conrad Steenberg via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060015253-68762-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:40:53 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060015253-68762-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by conrad@hep.caltech.edu Time: Mon Aug 04 18:40:52 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Hi I only used it on Redhat 7/8/9 so far. It is known not to compile on Redhat 6. Since you will have to look this gift horse in the mouth anyway, here is a rundown of the crooked teeth I know about: - Needs to be upgraded to the newer shell functions for rc scripts - popt options doesn't work in rpm - rpm wants to use its own version of libdb, this was worked around by renaming the rpm-specific libdb source dir (db3->db3.tmp). This way it picks up db-4.1.x from the main openpkg distribution, but it may not be the most elegant way of doing it. - hardcoded a few defines to make rpm/4.2.1/rpmio compile since the configure script that ships with rpm-4.2.1 didn't seem to get it right. On the positive side, I've worked with this version on about 6 different machines for a bout 2 weeks without any crashes, corrupt databases etc. Cheers Conrad On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 09:12, Michael van Elst via RT wrote: > Request 68 was acted upon. > _________________________________________________________________________ > > URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 > Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] > Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 > Requestors: rse@openpkg.org > Queue: openpkg > Owner: mlelstv > Status: open > Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv > Time: Mon Aug 04 18:12:33 2003 > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Conrad, > > > I've placed updated versions (rpm and .sh) of the openpkg base using rpm-4.2.1 at http://hepgrid1.caltech.edu/clarens/source/ > > Just in time :-) I will have a close look. > > On what systems do you use rpm-4.2.1 ? > > > Greetings, -- Conrad Steenberg ------------=_1060015253-68762-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Mon Aug 4 19:37:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7A430277B3A; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 19:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #224] tcl/expect dependency problem. From: "bill@celestial.com via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060018632-68761-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #224": ; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 19:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060018632-68761-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 224 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/224 Ticket: [OpenPKG #224] Subject: tcl/expect dependency problem. Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by bill@celestial.com Time: Mon Aug 04 19:37:11 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:47:46PM +0200, Thomas Lotterer via RT wrote: >Request 224 was acted upon. >_________________________________________________________________________ > > URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/224 > Ticket: [OpenPKG #224] > Subject: [FWD] tcl/expect dependency problem. > Requestors: thl@openpkg.org > Queue: openpkg > Owner: Nobody > Status: new > Transaction: Correspondence added by thl > Time: Mon Aug 04 13:47:46 2003 >________________________________________________________________________ > >----- Forwarded message from Michael van Elst ----- > >Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:20:19 +0200 >From: Michael van Elst >Subject: Re: tcl/expect dependency problem. >To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org > >Not exactly a loop. > ... >The "correct" solution is to add the missing parts to the tcl >package that allows expect to build without embedding tcl. It might be useful to add package specific options to the ~/.openpkg/build file to add ``--nodeps'' to the installation call. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. ------------=_1060018632-68761-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 09:01:51 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 97B4D277BFB; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #226] OpenPKG 1.3 environment bug in rc script From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060066910-45570-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #226": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060066910-45570-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 226 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/226 Ticket: [OpenPKG #226] Subject: OpenPKG 1.3 environment bug in rc script Requestors: thl@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: Nobody Status: new Transaction: Ticket created by thl Time: Tue Aug 05 09:01:48 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ ----- Forwarded message from Bill Campbell ----- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 23:48:27 -0700 From: Bill Campbell Subject: OpenPKG 1.3 environment bug in rc script To: openpkg-dev@openpkg.org I found what seems to be a bug in the %{l_prefix}/etc/rc script in openpkg-1.3.0-1.3.0 that silently ignores any environment variables set in packages %env sections that contain anything but upper case [A-Z] (e.g. minor things like LD_LIBRARY_PATH :-). The attached patch to the rc file accepts anything starting with [A-Z] followed by anything. Bill ----- End forwarded message ----- Thanks a lot, Bill, good catch. We wanted to filter variables with upper case characters only and get rid of (usually temporary) variables with lower case characters but we forgot the underscore. The official fix is http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=11479 and we consider merging this into an updated openpkg-1.3.1 later. -- Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless ------------=_1060066910-45570-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 09:39:05 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 17696277AF2; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:39:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #216] Test as guest from web interface From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060069145-68758-6" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #216": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:39:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060069145-68758-6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 216 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/216 Ticket: [OpenPKG #216] Subject: Test as guest from web interface Requestors: martin.konold@erfrakon.de Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Tue Aug 05 09:39:04 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1060069145-68758-6-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 09:39:07 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 28A88277BFD; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:39:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #216] Test as guest from web interface From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060069147-68758-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #216": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:39:07 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060069147-68758-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 216 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/216 Ticket: [OpenPKG #216] Subject: Test as guest from web interface Requestors: martin.konold@erfrakon.de Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by thl Time: Tue Aug 05 09:39:05 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Removed "New Ticket" option from RT guest menu. Updated http://www.openpkg.org/support.html -- Thomas Lotterer OpenPKG Developer thl@openpkg.org ------------=_1060069147-68758-8-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 09:41:04 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id ABC1F277A00; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:41:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #216] Test as guest from web interface From: "Thomas Lotterer via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060069263-68759-4" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #216": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:41:03 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060069263-68759-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 216 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/216 Ticket: [OpenPKG #216] Subject: Test as guest from web interface Requestors: Queue: openpkg Owner: thl Status: resolved Transaction: Status changed from open to resolved by thl Time: Tue Aug 05 09:41:03 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1060069263-68759-4-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 14:38:32 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 7765E277BFA; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:38:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060087111-68760-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:38:31 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060087111-68760-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Tue Aug 05 14:38:30 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ Conrad, I managed to adapt rpm-4.2.1 to run under FreeBSD4 after ironing out some heavy Linuxisms in the code. I don't see any major obstacle to get it running on all our supported platforms. > - Needs to be upgraded to the newer shell functions for rc scripts Sure, but that's just drag and drop or copy and paste :) > - popt options doesn't work in rpm Can you elaborate on that ? > - rpm wants to use its own version of libdb, this was worked around by > renaming the rpm-specific libdb source dir (db3->db3.tmp). This way it > picks up db-4.1.x from the main openpkg distribution, but it may not > be > the most elegant way of doing it. Probably not, but it is important for compatibility. BTW, we use the older db-3.2.9. > - hardcoded a few defines to make rpm/4.2.1/rpmio compile since the > configure script that ships with rpm-4.2.1 didn't seem to get it > right. Yes. There needs more to be done in this area for portability. I hope to get a working package out this week. Greetings, -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; mlelstv@dev.de.cw.net :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS ------------=_1060087111-68760-7-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 14:56:12 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8FCF4277BFD; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:56:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #227] Permission problem in rc.mico From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060088171-45570-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #227": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:56:11 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060088171-45570-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 227 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/227 Ticket: [OpenPKG #227] Subject: Permission problem in rc.mico Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: new Transaction: Ticket creado por ms Time: Mar. Ago. 05 14:56:10 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ # ./rc all start OpenPKG: start: ntp, mico:FAILED openpkg:rc:WARNING: /cw:mico:%start: failed with return code 1 +----Log:-------------------------------------------------------------- | /tmp/[...]/rc.tmp: line 185: /cw/var/mico/nsd.pid: Permission denied +---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1060088171-45570-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 17:47:48 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id D6252277C1B; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 17:47:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #228] Files .pc (pkg-config) files are installed even with no dependency to pkg-config From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060098467-68758-12" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #228": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 17:47:47 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060098467-68758-12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 228 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/228 Ticket: [OpenPKG #228] Subject: Files .pc (pkg-config) files are installed even with no dependency to pkg-config Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: new Transaction: Ticket creado por ms Time: Mar. Ago. 05 17:47:46 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ In some packages, .pc files are installed to %{l_prefix}/lib/pkgconfig. This can be considered correct if the package has a dependency to pkg-config. If not, then the dependency (both build and runtime) should be added, or the .pc files should be removed. openssl (implicitly installs openssl.pc) imagemagic (implicitly installs ImageMagick.pc) maybe more? Lastly, a check should be added to rpmlint. Any installed .pc files are suspect, and if they are installed to %{l_prefix}/lib/pkgconfig with no dependency then an error is raised. -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1060098467-68758-12-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 18:21:26 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id BF8E4277C7D; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:21:25 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 From: "Conrad Steenberg via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060100485-69073-9" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:21:25 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060100485-69073-9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by conrad@hep.caltech.edu Time: Tue Aug 05 18:21:24 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 05:38, Michael van Elst via RT wrote: > Request 68 was acted upon. > _________________________________________________________________________ > > URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 > Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] > Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 > Requestors: rse@openpkg.org > Queue: openpkg > Owner: mlelstv > Status: open > Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv > Time: Tue Aug 05 14:38:30 2003 > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Conrad, > > I managed to adapt rpm-4.2.1 to run under FreeBSD4 after ironing out > some heavy Linuxisms in the code. I don't see any major obstacle to > get it running on all our supported platforms. Glad to hear :-) > > > - Needs to be upgraded to the newer shell functions for rc scripts > > Sure, but that's just drag and drop or copy and paste :) > > > - popt options doesn't work in rpm > > Can you elaborate on that ? Typing rpm --help: ... [ a long list of options] Options implemented via popt alias/exec: Help options: -?, --help Show this help message --usage Display brief usage message [end] I.e. the list of 'options implemented via popt alias/exec' is empty. Testing with e.g. rpm -qip .rpm gives '-qip: unknown option' Cheers Conrad > > > - rpm wants to use its own version of libdb, this was worked around by > > renaming the rpm-specific libdb source dir (db3->db3.tmp). This way it > > picks up db-4.1.x from the main openpkg distribution, but it may not > > be > > the most elegant way of doing it. > > Probably not, but it is important for compatibility. BTW, we use the > older db-3.2.9. > > > - hardcoded a few defines to make rpm/4.2.1/rpmio compile since the > > configure script that ships with rpm-4.2.1 didn't seem to get it > > right. > > Yes. There needs more to be done in this area for portability. > > I hope to get a working package out this week. > > Greetings, -- Conrad Steenberg ------------=_1060100485-69073-9-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 18:24:17 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 0161D277A00; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:24:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #220] Group names are incorrect [comment] From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060100656-68760-10" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #220": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:24:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060100656-68760-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 220 was acted upon. This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/220 Ticket: [OpenPKG #220] Subject: Group names are incorrect Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: open Transaction: Comentarios añadidos por ms Time: Mar. Ago. 05 18:24:16 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ No more incorrect groups found. -- Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz OpenPKG Developer ms@openpkg.org ------------=_1060100656-68760-10-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Tue Aug 5 18:24:18 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id 8F844277C7F; Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:24:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #220] Group names are incorrect From: "Michael Schloh v. Bennewitz via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060100658-68760-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #220": ; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:24:18 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060100658-68760-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 220 was acted upon. This is an automatically generated message. ________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/220 Ticket: [OpenPKG #220] Subject: Group names are incorrect Requestors: ms@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: ms Status: resolved Transaction: Estado cambiado de abierto a resuelto por ms Time: Mar. Ago. 05 18:24:17 2003 _________________________________________________________________________ According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please just respond to this message. ------------=_1060100658-68760-13-- From openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Wed Aug 6 01:22:10 2003 Received: by mail.openpkg.org (Postfix, from userid 7004) id ACB3A277D01; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 01:22:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OpenPKG #68] upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 From: "Michael van Elst via RT" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1060125729-45570-13" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "AdminCc of OpenPKG Ticket #68": ; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 01:22:09 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: openpkg-bugdb@openpkg.org Sender: openpkg-bugdb-owner@openpkg.org Precedence: list List-Server: OSSP Petidomo/4.0 List-Owner: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1060125729-45570-13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Request 68 was acted upon. _________________________________________________________________________ URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/68 Ticket: [OpenPKG #68] Subject: upgrade bootstrap to RPM 4.2 Requestors: rse@openpkg.org Queue: openpkg Owner: mlelstv Status: open Transaction: Correspondence added by mlelstv Time: Wed Aug 06 01:22:08 2003 ________________________________________________________________________ On Tue, Aug 05, 2003, Conrad Steenberg via RT wrote: > I.e. the list of 'options implemented via popt alias/exec' is empty. > Testing with e.g. > rpm -qip .rpm > gives '-qip: unknown option' Not here, I still have to correct a fixed path somewhere, but otherwise I get: Options implemented via popt alias/exec: --scripts list install/erase scriptlets from package(s) --setperms set permissions of files in a package --setugids set user/group ownership of files in a package --conflicts list capabilities this package conflicts with --obsoletes list other packages removed by installing this package --provides list capabilities that this package provides --requires list capabilities required by package(s) --info list descriptive information from package(s) --changelog list change logs for this package --triggers list trigger scriptlets from package(s) --last list package(s) by install time, most recent first --filesbypkg list all files from each package --fileclass list file names with classes --filecolor list file names with colors --fileprovide list file names with provides --filerequire list file names with requires --redhatprovides find package name that contains a provided capability (needs rpmdb-redhat package installed) --redhatrequires find package name that contains a required capability (needs rpmdb-redhat package installed) --buildpolicy= set buildroot (e.g. compress man pages) --with=